Galois group of $(X^4 - 2)(X^2 + 2)$
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to compute the Galois group of the polynomial $P(X) = (X^4 - 2)(X^2 + 2)$, but I think that I made a mistake. This is what I thought:
$P(X)$ has roots $pm i sqrt{2}, pm i sqrt[4]{2}, pm sqrt[4]{2}$, then the splitting field of $P(X)$ is $K := mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt{2}]$, but $sqrt{2} = left( sqrt[4]{2} right)^2 in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt[4]{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$ and $i = (i sqrt[4]{2})^3 (sqrt[4]{2}) left( frac{-1}{2} right) in K$, then $K = mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$.
Observing that $X^4 - 2$ is monic, has $sqrt[4]{2}$ as a root and is irreducible on $mathbb{Q} [X]$ by Eisenstein's criterion applied for $p = 2$, we have that $X^4 - 2$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}$ which has a root $sqrt[4]{2}$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 4$. Furthermore, $X^2 + 1$ is monic, which has a root $i$ and is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$ since $X^2 + 1$ is a polynomial of degree $2$ and $i notin mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}]$, then $X^2 + 1$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] = 2$.
By the tower law,
$$left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right] = left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 2 cdot 4 = 8,$$
but there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i]$ which fixes $mathbb{Q}$ and this contradicts the fact that the cardinality of the Galois group of $K$ over $mathbb{Q})$ is equal to $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right]$
What am I doing wrong?
abstract-algebra galois-theory
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to compute the Galois group of the polynomial $P(X) = (X^4 - 2)(X^2 + 2)$, but I think that I made a mistake. This is what I thought:
$P(X)$ has roots $pm i sqrt{2}, pm i sqrt[4]{2}, pm sqrt[4]{2}$, then the splitting field of $P(X)$ is $K := mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt{2}]$, but $sqrt{2} = left( sqrt[4]{2} right)^2 in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt[4]{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$ and $i = (i sqrt[4]{2})^3 (sqrt[4]{2}) left( frac{-1}{2} right) in K$, then $K = mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$.
Observing that $X^4 - 2$ is monic, has $sqrt[4]{2}$ as a root and is irreducible on $mathbb{Q} [X]$ by Eisenstein's criterion applied for $p = 2$, we have that $X^4 - 2$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}$ which has a root $sqrt[4]{2}$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 4$. Furthermore, $X^2 + 1$ is monic, which has a root $i$ and is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$ since $X^2 + 1$ is a polynomial of degree $2$ and $i notin mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}]$, then $X^2 + 1$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] = 2$.
By the tower law,
$$left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right] = left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 2 cdot 4 = 8,$$
but there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i]$ which fixes $mathbb{Q}$ and this contradicts the fact that the cardinality of the Galois group of $K$ over $mathbb{Q})$ is equal to $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right]$
What am I doing wrong?
abstract-algebra galois-theory
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to compute the Galois group of the polynomial $P(X) = (X^4 - 2)(X^2 + 2)$, but I think that I made a mistake. This is what I thought:
$P(X)$ has roots $pm i sqrt{2}, pm i sqrt[4]{2}, pm sqrt[4]{2}$, then the splitting field of $P(X)$ is $K := mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt{2}]$, but $sqrt{2} = left( sqrt[4]{2} right)^2 in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt[4]{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$ and $i = (i sqrt[4]{2})^3 (sqrt[4]{2}) left( frac{-1}{2} right) in K$, then $K = mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$.
Observing that $X^4 - 2$ is monic, has $sqrt[4]{2}$ as a root and is irreducible on $mathbb{Q} [X]$ by Eisenstein's criterion applied for $p = 2$, we have that $X^4 - 2$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}$ which has a root $sqrt[4]{2}$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 4$. Furthermore, $X^2 + 1$ is monic, which has a root $i$ and is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$ since $X^2 + 1$ is a polynomial of degree $2$ and $i notin mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}]$, then $X^2 + 1$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] = 2$.
By the tower law,
$$left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right] = left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 2 cdot 4 = 8,$$
but there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i]$ which fixes $mathbb{Q}$ and this contradicts the fact that the cardinality of the Galois group of $K$ over $mathbb{Q})$ is equal to $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right]$
What am I doing wrong?
abstract-algebra galois-theory
I'm trying to compute the Galois group of the polynomial $P(X) = (X^4 - 2)(X^2 + 2)$, but I think that I made a mistake. This is what I thought:
$P(X)$ has roots $pm i sqrt{2}, pm i sqrt[4]{2}, pm sqrt[4]{2}$, then the splitting field of $P(X)$ is $K := mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt[4]{2}, i sqrt{2}]$, but $sqrt{2} = left( sqrt[4]{2} right)^2 in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$, $i sqrt[4]{2} in mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$ and $i = (i sqrt[4]{2})^3 (sqrt[4]{2}) left( frac{-1}{2} right) in K$, then $K = mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}, i]$.
Observing that $X^4 - 2$ is monic, has $sqrt[4]{2}$ as a root and is irreducible on $mathbb{Q} [X]$ by Eisenstein's criterion applied for $p = 2$, we have that $X^4 - 2$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}$ which has a root $sqrt[4]{2}$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 4$. Furthermore, $X^2 + 1$ is monic, which has a root $i$ and is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$ since $X^2 + 1$ is a polynomial of degree $2$ and $i notin mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}]$, then $X^2 + 1$ is a minimal polynomial over $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[4]{2}] [X]$, then $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] = 2$.
By the tower law,
$$left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right] = left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] right] left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2}] : mathbb{Q} right] = 2 cdot 4 = 8,$$
but there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i]$ which fixes $mathbb{Q}$ and this contradicts the fact that the cardinality of the Galois group of $K$ over $mathbb{Q})$ is equal to $left[ mathbb{Q} [sqrt[4]{2},i] : mathbb{Q} right]$
What am I doing wrong?
abstract-algebra galois-theory
abstract-algebra galois-theory
asked Nov 14 at 22:49
Math enthusiast
1176
1176
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You are wrong that there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{K}:=mathbb{Q}(sqrt[4]{2},text{i})$ that fix $mathbb{Q}$. The automorphism group $G:=text{Aut}_mathbb{Q}(mathbb{K})$ is isomorphic to the unique nonabelian semidirect product $C_4rtimes C_2cong D_4$, where $C_k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$ and $D_k$ is the dihedral group of order $2k$. The group $G$ is generated by $tau$ and $sigma$ where $$tau(sqrt[4]{2})=text{i}sqrt[4]{2},,,,tau(text{i})=text{i},,,,sigma(sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2},,text{ and }sigma(text{i})=-text{i},.$$
Note that $langle tauranglecaplangle sigmarangle=text{Id}$, with $langle tauranglecong C_4$ and $langle sigmaranglecong C_2$. In addition,
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(sqrt[4]{2})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=tau(-text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2}=sigma(sqrt[4]{2})$$
and
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(text{i})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i})=tau(-text{i})=-text{i}=sigma(text{i}),.$$
Hence, $taucircsigmacirctau=sigma$, or $taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}$. That is,
$$G=biglangle tau,sigma,big|,tau^{circ 4}=text{id},,,,sigma^{circ 2}=text{id},,text{ and }taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}ranglecong D_4,.$$
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
2
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
2
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
1
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You are wrong that there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{K}:=mathbb{Q}(sqrt[4]{2},text{i})$ that fix $mathbb{Q}$. The automorphism group $G:=text{Aut}_mathbb{Q}(mathbb{K})$ is isomorphic to the unique nonabelian semidirect product $C_4rtimes C_2cong D_4$, where $C_k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$ and $D_k$ is the dihedral group of order $2k$. The group $G$ is generated by $tau$ and $sigma$ where $$tau(sqrt[4]{2})=text{i}sqrt[4]{2},,,,tau(text{i})=text{i},,,,sigma(sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2},,text{ and }sigma(text{i})=-text{i},.$$
Note that $langle tauranglecaplangle sigmarangle=text{Id}$, with $langle tauranglecong C_4$ and $langle sigmaranglecong C_2$. In addition,
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(sqrt[4]{2})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=tau(-text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2}=sigma(sqrt[4]{2})$$
and
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(text{i})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i})=tau(-text{i})=-text{i}=sigma(text{i}),.$$
Hence, $taucircsigmacirctau=sigma$, or $taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}$. That is,
$$G=biglangle tau,sigma,big|,tau^{circ 4}=text{id},,,,sigma^{circ 2}=text{id},,text{ and }taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}ranglecong D_4,.$$
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
2
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
2
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
1
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You are wrong that there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{K}:=mathbb{Q}(sqrt[4]{2},text{i})$ that fix $mathbb{Q}$. The automorphism group $G:=text{Aut}_mathbb{Q}(mathbb{K})$ is isomorphic to the unique nonabelian semidirect product $C_4rtimes C_2cong D_4$, where $C_k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$ and $D_k$ is the dihedral group of order $2k$. The group $G$ is generated by $tau$ and $sigma$ where $$tau(sqrt[4]{2})=text{i}sqrt[4]{2},,,,tau(text{i})=text{i},,,,sigma(sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2},,text{ and }sigma(text{i})=-text{i},.$$
Note that $langle tauranglecaplangle sigmarangle=text{Id}$, with $langle tauranglecong C_4$ and $langle sigmaranglecong C_2$. In addition,
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(sqrt[4]{2})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=tau(-text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2}=sigma(sqrt[4]{2})$$
and
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(text{i})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i})=tau(-text{i})=-text{i}=sigma(text{i}),.$$
Hence, $taucircsigmacirctau=sigma$, or $taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}$. That is,
$$G=biglangle tau,sigma,big|,tau^{circ 4}=text{id},,,,sigma^{circ 2}=text{id},,text{ and }taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}ranglecong D_4,.$$
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
2
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
2
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
1
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You are wrong that there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{K}:=mathbb{Q}(sqrt[4]{2},text{i})$ that fix $mathbb{Q}$. The automorphism group $G:=text{Aut}_mathbb{Q}(mathbb{K})$ is isomorphic to the unique nonabelian semidirect product $C_4rtimes C_2cong D_4$, where $C_k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$ and $D_k$ is the dihedral group of order $2k$. The group $G$ is generated by $tau$ and $sigma$ where $$tau(sqrt[4]{2})=text{i}sqrt[4]{2},,,,tau(text{i})=text{i},,,,sigma(sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2},,text{ and }sigma(text{i})=-text{i},.$$
Note that $langle tauranglecaplangle sigmarangle=text{Id}$, with $langle tauranglecong C_4$ and $langle sigmaranglecong C_2$. In addition,
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(sqrt[4]{2})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=tau(-text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2}=sigma(sqrt[4]{2})$$
and
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(text{i})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i})=tau(-text{i})=-text{i}=sigma(text{i}),.$$
Hence, $taucircsigmacirctau=sigma$, or $taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}$. That is,
$$G=biglangle tau,sigma,big|,tau^{circ 4}=text{id},,,,sigma^{circ 2}=text{id},,text{ and }taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}ranglecong D_4,.$$
You are wrong that there are only $4$ automorphisms of $mathbb{K}:=mathbb{Q}(sqrt[4]{2},text{i})$ that fix $mathbb{Q}$. The automorphism group $G:=text{Aut}_mathbb{Q}(mathbb{K})$ is isomorphic to the unique nonabelian semidirect product $C_4rtimes C_2cong D_4$, where $C_k$ is the cyclic group of order $k$ and $D_k$ is the dihedral group of order $2k$. The group $G$ is generated by $tau$ and $sigma$ where $$tau(sqrt[4]{2})=text{i}sqrt[4]{2},,,,tau(text{i})=text{i},,,,sigma(sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2},,text{ and }sigma(text{i})=-text{i},.$$
Note that $langle tauranglecaplangle sigmarangle=text{Id}$, with $langle tauranglecong C_4$ and $langle sigmaranglecong C_2$. In addition,
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(sqrt[4]{2})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=tau(-text{i}sqrt[4]{2})=sqrt[4]{2}=sigma(sqrt[4]{2})$$
and
$$(taucircsigmacirctau)(text{i})=(taucirc sigma)(text{i})=tau(-text{i})=-text{i}=sigma(text{i}),.$$
Hence, $taucircsigmacirctau=sigma$, or $taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}$. That is,
$$G=biglangle tau,sigma,big|,tau^{circ 4}=text{id},,,,sigma^{circ 2}=text{id},,text{ and }taucircsigma=sigmacirctau^{-1}ranglecong D_4,.$$
edited Nov 15 at 6:44
answered Nov 14 at 22:58
Batominovski
31.6k23188
31.6k23188
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
2
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
2
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
1
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
2
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
2
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
1
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
Thanks, this helps me to realize where I was wrong, but I have a doubt now. I know that $G cong C_4 times C_2$ since $G$ is abelian and $o(tau) = 4$, but how do you observe that $G$ is abelian? Is there a quick way to observe this without resorting to brute force?
– Math enthusiast
Nov 15 at 0:12
2
2
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@Mathenthusiast I am not sure if there is any other quick way to see why $G$ is abelian. You can try to find all groups of order $8$ that act transitively on the roots of the minimal polynomial of $sqrt[4]{2}+text{i}$ over $mathbb{Q}$, but I think it leads to a long solution. On the other hand, you can observe that $tau$ generates a subgroup $N$ of $G$ (which is cyclic of order $4$), $sigma$ generates a subgroup $H$ of $G$ of order $2$. Since $N$ and $H$ intersects trivially, and $$|NH|=frac{|N|,|H|}{|Ncap H|}=8=|G|,,$$ we must have $Gcong Ntimes Hcong C_4times C_2$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 0:24
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
@JyrkiLahtonen I was too sleepy to check for whether $langle tau rangle$ or $langle sigmarangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ last night, and I assumed they were normal. Now that you mentioned it $langle sigmarangle$ is not normal in $G$. Thanks for the comments.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:41
2
2
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
@Mathenthusiast Please read Jyrki Lahtonen's comments, and note that I fixed the error. In my first comment, both $N$ and $H$ must be normal subgroups of $G$ for the conditions $NH=G$ and $Ncap H=G$ to imply $Gcong Ntimes H$.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:42
1
1
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
@JyrkiLahtonen No, it's ok. I think your comments are too good to be deleted.
– Batominovski
Nov 15 at 6:55
|
show 1 more comment
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998928%2fgalois-group-of-x4-2x2-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown