Is it possible to find $x$ in a general form or forms for the equation $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ mod $x = 0$?
$begingroup$
Hello I was wondering is possible to find x in a general form or forms so that there are integer answers for something like the equation below? If so could you point me in the right direction?
$2n^2 + 2n + 1$ mod$ x = 0$
ie
$x = 1,5,13,17$... work and solve the condition.
elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hello I was wondering is possible to find x in a general form or forms so that there are integer answers for something like the equation below? If so could you point me in the right direction?
$2n^2 + 2n + 1$ mod$ x = 0$
ie
$x = 1,5,13,17$... work and solve the condition.
elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hello I was wondering is possible to find x in a general form or forms so that there are integer answers for something like the equation below? If so could you point me in the right direction?
$2n^2 + 2n + 1$ mod$ x = 0$
ie
$x = 1,5,13,17$... work and solve the condition.
elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
Hello I was wondering is possible to find x in a general form or forms so that there are integer answers for something like the equation below? If so could you point me in the right direction?
$2n^2 + 2n + 1$ mod$ x = 0$
ie
$x = 1,5,13,17$... work and solve the condition.
elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic
elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic
edited Dec 22 '18 at 5:58
AandJ4Ever
114
114
asked Dec 22 '18 at 5:30
Ryan ToppsRyan Topps
124
124
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you're asking for what $x$ the equation $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ has a root modulo $x$.
First, since $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ is odd, we can assume that $x$ is odd. Then we can write:
$$2n^2 + 2n + 1 = frac{1}{2}((2n+1)^2 + 1)$$
This allows us to see that the equation has a solution if and only if there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $x$.
By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, this holds exactly when there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $p^k$ for every prime power $p^k$ dividing $x$.
It's a standard result that this happens when $pequiv 1pmod{4}$. This can be seen by looking at the cyclic group of units $pmod{p^k}$ and seeing when it has order divisible by $4$.
In conclusion, your equation has a solution exactly when all of the prime factors of $x$ are $1pmod 4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes: $f(n)$ mod $x=0$ if and only if $xmid f(n)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
1
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049140%2fis-it-possible-to-find-x-in-a-general-form-or-forms-for-the-equation-2n2-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you're asking for what $x$ the equation $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ has a root modulo $x$.
First, since $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ is odd, we can assume that $x$ is odd. Then we can write:
$$2n^2 + 2n + 1 = frac{1}{2}((2n+1)^2 + 1)$$
This allows us to see that the equation has a solution if and only if there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $x$.
By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, this holds exactly when there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $p^k$ for every prime power $p^k$ dividing $x$.
It's a standard result that this happens when $pequiv 1pmod{4}$. This can be seen by looking at the cyclic group of units $pmod{p^k}$ and seeing when it has order divisible by $4$.
In conclusion, your equation has a solution exactly when all of the prime factors of $x$ are $1pmod 4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you're asking for what $x$ the equation $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ has a root modulo $x$.
First, since $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ is odd, we can assume that $x$ is odd. Then we can write:
$$2n^2 + 2n + 1 = frac{1}{2}((2n+1)^2 + 1)$$
This allows us to see that the equation has a solution if and only if there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $x$.
By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, this holds exactly when there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $p^k$ for every prime power $p^k$ dividing $x$.
It's a standard result that this happens when $pequiv 1pmod{4}$. This can be seen by looking at the cyclic group of units $pmod{p^k}$ and seeing when it has order divisible by $4$.
In conclusion, your equation has a solution exactly when all of the prime factors of $x$ are $1pmod 4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you're asking for what $x$ the equation $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ has a root modulo $x$.
First, since $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ is odd, we can assume that $x$ is odd. Then we can write:
$$2n^2 + 2n + 1 = frac{1}{2}((2n+1)^2 + 1)$$
This allows us to see that the equation has a solution if and only if there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $x$.
By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, this holds exactly when there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $p^k$ for every prime power $p^k$ dividing $x$.
It's a standard result that this happens when $pequiv 1pmod{4}$. This can be seen by looking at the cyclic group of units $pmod{p^k}$ and seeing when it has order divisible by $4$.
In conclusion, your equation has a solution exactly when all of the prime factors of $x$ are $1pmod 4$.
$endgroup$
I think you're asking for what $x$ the equation $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ has a root modulo $x$.
First, since $2n^2 + 2n + 1$ is odd, we can assume that $x$ is odd. Then we can write:
$$2n^2 + 2n + 1 = frac{1}{2}((2n+1)^2 + 1)$$
This allows us to see that the equation has a solution if and only if there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $x$.
By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, this holds exactly when there is a square root of $-1$ modulo $p^k$ for every prime power $p^k$ dividing $x$.
It's a standard result that this happens when $pequiv 1pmod{4}$. This can be seen by looking at the cyclic group of units $pmod{p^k}$ and seeing when it has order divisible by $4$.
In conclusion, your equation has a solution exactly when all of the prime factors of $x$ are $1pmod 4$.
edited Dec 22 '18 at 7:43
answered Dec 22 '18 at 7:07
SladeSlade
25.2k12665
25.2k12665
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
Thank you, you explained that well
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 7:36
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps I made a mistake; see the updated answer. The prime factors can never be $3pmod{4}$, I was misremembering something else.
$endgroup$
– Slade
Dec 22 '18 at 7:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes: $f(n)$ mod $x=0$ if and only if $xmid f(n)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
1
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes: $f(n)$ mod $x=0$ if and only if $xmid f(n)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
1
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes: $f(n)$ mod $x=0$ if and only if $xmid f(n)$.
$endgroup$
Yes: $f(n)$ mod $x=0$ if and only if $xmid f(n)$.
answered Dec 22 '18 at 5:54
AandJ4EverAandJ4Ever
114
114
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
1
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
1
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
$begingroup$
17 is not part of f(n) though
$endgroup$
– Ryan Topps
Dec 22 '18 at 5:57
1
1
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
$begingroup$
@RyanTopps We have $amid b$ iff there is some integer $k$ s.t. $b=ak$ iff $b=0$ mod $a$.
$endgroup$
– AandJ4Ever
Dec 22 '18 at 6:01
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049140%2fis-it-possible-to-find-x-in-a-general-form-or-forms-for-the-equation-2n2-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown