Identifying the space of geodesics on the hyperbolic plane as a topological space.












1












$begingroup$


On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."



One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."



The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?



Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."



    One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."



    The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?



    Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."



      One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."



      The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?



      Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."



      One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."



      The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?



      Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.







      hyperbolic-geometry continued-fractions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 22 '18 at 7:10









      caffeinemachinecaffeinemachine

      6,62721354




      6,62721354






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
          $$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
          $$

          which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.



          The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
          $${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
          $$

          where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.



          In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.



          So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049185%2fidentifying-the-space-of-geodesics-on-the-hyperbolic-plane-as-a-topological-spac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
            $$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
            $$

            which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.



            The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
            $${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
            $$

            where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.



            In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.



            So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
              $$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
              $$

              which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.



              The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
              $${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
              $$

              where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.



              In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.



              So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
                $$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
                $$

                which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.



                The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
                $${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
                $$

                where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.



                In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.



                So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
                $$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
                $$

                which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.



                The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
                $${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
                $$

                where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.



                In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.



                So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 26 '18 at 5:08









                Lee MosherLee Mosher

                50.1k33787




                50.1k33787






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049185%2fidentifying-the-space-of-geodesics-on-the-hyperbolic-plane-as-a-topological-spac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix