Identifying the space of geodesics on the hyperbolic plane as a topological space.
$begingroup$
On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."
One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."
The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?
Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.
hyperbolic-geometry continued-fractions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."
One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."
The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?
Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.
hyperbolic-geometry continued-fractions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."
One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."
The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?
Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.
hyperbolic-geometry continued-fractions
$endgroup$
On pg. 2 of this PDF, the author defines $mathcal G=(-infty, 0)times(0, 1)$ and mentions that $mathcal G$ can be thought of as "a space of geodesics on the hyperbolic $2$-space $mathbb H^2$."
One of the things that is confusing me is the use of the indefinite article "a" in the phrase "a space of geodesics..."
The other thing is that how are we thinking of the collection of geodesics as a topological space?
Can somebody please spell out the details here, and please feel free to offer an insights.
hyperbolic-geometry continued-fractions
hyperbolic-geometry continued-fractions
asked Dec 22 '18 at 7:10
caffeinemachinecaffeinemachine
6,62721354
6,62721354
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
$$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
$$
which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.
The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
$${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
$$
where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.
In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.
So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049185%2fidentifying-the-space-of-geodesics-on-the-hyperbolic-plane-as-a-topological-spac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
$$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
$$
which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.
The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
$${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
$$
where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.
In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.
So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
$$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
$$
which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.
The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
$${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
$$
where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.
In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.
So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
$$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
$$
which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.
The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
$${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
$$
where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.
In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.
So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.
$endgroup$
What this means, I believe, is that it is a subspace of the full space of geodesics. In the upper half plane model $mathbb H$, the boundary is
$$partial mathbb H = mathbb R cup {infty}
$$
which is topologized as the one point compactification of $mathbb R$, and is therefore homeomorphic to the circle $S^1$.
The full space of (oriented) geodesics can be identified with the set of ordered pairs
$${(x,y) in partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H mid x ne y }
$$
where $x$ is the initial ideal endpoint of the geodesic and $y$ is the terminal ideal endpoint. That space can be topologized as a subset of the torus $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H approx S^1 times S^1$ with the product topology.
In that passage, the author seems to be thinking of $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$ very literally as a subset of $partial mathbb H times partial mathbb H$, with the subspace topology --- which, of course, is also the ordinary product topology on $(-infty,0) times (0,1)$.
So, the reason that it is "a" space of geodesics is simply because it is "a" subset of the full space of geodesics.
answered Dec 26 '18 at 5:08
Lee MosherLee Mosher
50.1k33787
50.1k33787
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049185%2fidentifying-the-space-of-geodesics-on-the-hyperbolic-plane-as-a-topological-spac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown