No. of ways for $(((n mod i) mod j) mod k) mod n$












1












$begingroup$


Consider $3$ integers, $i, j, k$ all between $1$ and $m$, both exclusive. Consider
$$(((n mod i)mod j)mod k)mod n$$
where $n$ is another positive integer. Suppose the maximum value of the above expression in $L$. Find the number of ways to choose the triple $(i,j,k)$ so as to get $L$.



My try:-



Since in the end we have $mod n$, $L$ can be $n-1$ at max. But, the thing is if it can even achieve that value! For instance, if we take both $n$, $m$ to be $4$, I checked by hit and trial that $L$ will be $1$. This got me thinking, is there a general representation for these "concatenated" mods? I've no more idea on how to proceed. Even if a hint will do. Thanks :)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do $i,j,k$ have to be different?
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Jan 8 at 23:39










  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK no, there's no such condition on them
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:41
















1












$begingroup$


Consider $3$ integers, $i, j, k$ all between $1$ and $m$, both exclusive. Consider
$$(((n mod i)mod j)mod k)mod n$$
where $n$ is another positive integer. Suppose the maximum value of the above expression in $L$. Find the number of ways to choose the triple $(i,j,k)$ so as to get $L$.



My try:-



Since in the end we have $mod n$, $L$ can be $n-1$ at max. But, the thing is if it can even achieve that value! For instance, if we take both $n$, $m$ to be $4$, I checked by hit and trial that $L$ will be $1$. This got me thinking, is there a general representation for these "concatenated" mods? I've no more idea on how to proceed. Even if a hint will do. Thanks :)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do $i,j,k$ have to be different?
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Jan 8 at 23:39










  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK no, there's no such condition on them
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:41














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


Consider $3$ integers, $i, j, k$ all between $1$ and $m$, both exclusive. Consider
$$(((n mod i)mod j)mod k)mod n$$
where $n$ is another positive integer. Suppose the maximum value of the above expression in $L$. Find the number of ways to choose the triple $(i,j,k)$ so as to get $L$.



My try:-



Since in the end we have $mod n$, $L$ can be $n-1$ at max. But, the thing is if it can even achieve that value! For instance, if we take both $n$, $m$ to be $4$, I checked by hit and trial that $L$ will be $1$. This got me thinking, is there a general representation for these "concatenated" mods? I've no more idea on how to proceed. Even if a hint will do. Thanks :)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider $3$ integers, $i, j, k$ all between $1$ and $m$, both exclusive. Consider
$$(((n mod i)mod j)mod k)mod n$$
where $n$ is another positive integer. Suppose the maximum value of the above expression in $L$. Find the number of ways to choose the triple $(i,j,k)$ so as to get $L$.



My try:-



Since in the end we have $mod n$, $L$ can be $n-1$ at max. But, the thing is if it can even achieve that value! For instance, if we take both $n$, $m$ to be $4$, I checked by hit and trial that $L$ will be $1$. This got me thinking, is there a general representation for these "concatenated" mods? I've no more idea on how to proceed. Even if a hint will do. Thanks :)







combinatorics number-theory elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 9 at 4:42







Ankita Gupta

















asked Jan 8 at 10:42









Ankita GuptaAnkita Gupta

213




213












  • $begingroup$
    Do $i,j,k$ have to be different?
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Jan 8 at 23:39










  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK no, there's no such condition on them
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:41


















  • $begingroup$
    Do $i,j,k$ have to be different?
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Jan 8 at 23:39










  • $begingroup$
    @TonyK no, there's no such condition on them
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:41
















$begingroup$
Do $i,j,k$ have to be different?
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 8 at 23:39




$begingroup$
Do $i,j,k$ have to be different?
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 8 at 23:39












$begingroup$
@TonyK no, there's no such condition on them
$endgroup$
– Ankita Gupta
Jan 9 at 4:41




$begingroup$
@TonyK no, there's no such condition on them
$endgroup$
– Ankita Gupta
Jan 9 at 4:41










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

A partial result in the case $n=m$.



Take $i=j=k=p$ where $p$ is the smallest integer greater than $n/2$. Then the result is $n-p$, the greatest integer lower than $n/2$.



Furthermore, if $i geq p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is less than $n-i leq n-p$ so the final result is kot greater than $n-p$.



If $i < p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is not greater than $p-1$ ($n$ odd) or $p-2$ ($p$ even) ie $n-p$.



A more careful study should yield the equality cases (I think it is $i=p,n-p$ and $j,k geq n-p$).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 8 at 11:54










  • $begingroup$
    When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 9 at 0:37










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:42










  • $begingroup$
    Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 9 at 9:01



















0












$begingroup$

In every case the maximum remainder is N mod ((N/2)+1).
This will be the maximum value L. Therefore L = N mod((N/2)+1)



Case 1: if N = M



Here i has to be (N/2)+1, because only that will yield remainder as L. If i has any other value, the remainder will always be less than L.
Now j,k should be 1 more than (N mod i) (so that the remainder remains L) till M.
Therefore j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
hence total number of ways = c^2



Case 2: if M > N



Subcase 1: i = (N/2)+1 will give remainder as L
j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
Total count = c^2



Subcase 2: j = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen we have to ensure that (N mod i) = N
Therefore to make N mod i = N , i = N+1 ...... M
k = (N mod j)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
Total count = (M-N)*c



Subcase 3: k = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen
((N mod i) mod j) = N, Therefore i,j = N+1 ...... M
Total count = (M-N)^2



Hence total number of ways if M>N : c^2 + (M-N)*c + (M-N)^2






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066023%2fno-of-ways-for-n-mod-i-mod-j-mod-k-mod-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    A partial result in the case $n=m$.



    Take $i=j=k=p$ where $p$ is the smallest integer greater than $n/2$. Then the result is $n-p$, the greatest integer lower than $n/2$.



    Furthermore, if $i geq p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is less than $n-i leq n-p$ so the final result is kot greater than $n-p$.



    If $i < p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is not greater than $p-1$ ($n$ odd) or $p-2$ ($p$ even) ie $n-p$.



    A more careful study should yield the equality cases (I think it is $i=p,n-p$ and $j,k geq n-p$).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 8 at 11:54










    • $begingroup$
      When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 0:37










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 9 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 9:01
















    1












    $begingroup$

    A partial result in the case $n=m$.



    Take $i=j=k=p$ where $p$ is the smallest integer greater than $n/2$. Then the result is $n-p$, the greatest integer lower than $n/2$.



    Furthermore, if $i geq p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is less than $n-i leq n-p$ so the final result is kot greater than $n-p$.



    If $i < p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is not greater than $p-1$ ($n$ odd) or $p-2$ ($p$ even) ie $n-p$.



    A more careful study should yield the equality cases (I think it is $i=p,n-p$ and $j,k geq n-p$).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 8 at 11:54










    • $begingroup$
      When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 0:37










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 9 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 9:01














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    A partial result in the case $n=m$.



    Take $i=j=k=p$ where $p$ is the smallest integer greater than $n/2$. Then the result is $n-p$, the greatest integer lower than $n/2$.



    Furthermore, if $i geq p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is less than $n-i leq n-p$ so the final result is kot greater than $n-p$.



    If $i < p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is not greater than $p-1$ ($n$ odd) or $p-2$ ($p$ even) ie $n-p$.



    A more careful study should yield the equality cases (I think it is $i=p,n-p$ and $j,k geq n-p$).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    A partial result in the case $n=m$.



    Take $i=j=k=p$ where $p$ is the smallest integer greater than $n/2$. Then the result is $n-p$, the greatest integer lower than $n/2$.



    Furthermore, if $i geq p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is less than $n-i leq n-p$ so the final result is kot greater than $n-p$.



    If $i < p$, then $n$ mod $i$ is not greater than $p-1$ ($n$ odd) or $p-2$ ($p$ even) ie $n-p$.



    A more careful study should yield the equality cases (I think it is $i=p,n-p$ and $j,k geq n-p$).







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 8 at 11:16









    MindlackMindlack

    4,910211




    4,910211












    • $begingroup$
      Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 8 at 11:54










    • $begingroup$
      When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 0:37










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 9 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 9:01


















    • $begingroup$
      Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 8 at 11:54










    • $begingroup$
      When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 0:37










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
      $endgroup$
      – Ankita Gupta
      Jan 9 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
      $endgroup$
      – Mindlack
      Jan 9 at 9:01
















    $begingroup$
    Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 8 at 11:54




    $begingroup$
    Okay! And how about when n and m are not equal?
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 8 at 11:54












    $begingroup$
    When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 9 at 0:37




    $begingroup$
    When $n < m$, we can choose $i=j=k=n$ and $L=n$. The rest is an exercise for you for now. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 9 at 0:37












    $begingroup$
    Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:42




    $begingroup$
    Yeah I'm trying. But just for the record, $L=n$ is not possible, as I said that there's mod n in the end
    $endgroup$
    – Ankita Gupta
    Jan 9 at 4:42












    $begingroup$
    Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 9 at 9:01




    $begingroup$
    Oh right, my mistake. Then I would say that when $m>n$ you cannot do better than when $m=n$ for pretty much the same reason. When $n > m$, I do not know yet.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 9 at 9:01











    0












    $begingroup$

    In every case the maximum remainder is N mod ((N/2)+1).
    This will be the maximum value L. Therefore L = N mod((N/2)+1)



    Case 1: if N = M



    Here i has to be (N/2)+1, because only that will yield remainder as L. If i has any other value, the remainder will always be less than L.
    Now j,k should be 1 more than (N mod i) (so that the remainder remains L) till M.
    Therefore j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
    hence total number of ways = c^2



    Case 2: if M > N



    Subcase 1: i = (N/2)+1 will give remainder as L
    j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
    Total count = c^2



    Subcase 2: j = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen we have to ensure that (N mod i) = N
    Therefore to make N mod i = N , i = N+1 ...... M
    k = (N mod j)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
    Total count = (M-N)*c



    Subcase 3: k = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen
    ((N mod i) mod j) = N, Therefore i,j = N+1 ...... M
    Total count = (M-N)^2



    Hence total number of ways if M>N : c^2 + (M-N)*c + (M-N)^2






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      In every case the maximum remainder is N mod ((N/2)+1).
      This will be the maximum value L. Therefore L = N mod((N/2)+1)



      Case 1: if N = M



      Here i has to be (N/2)+1, because only that will yield remainder as L. If i has any other value, the remainder will always be less than L.
      Now j,k should be 1 more than (N mod i) (so that the remainder remains L) till M.
      Therefore j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
      hence total number of ways = c^2



      Case 2: if M > N



      Subcase 1: i = (N/2)+1 will give remainder as L
      j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
      Total count = c^2



      Subcase 2: j = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen we have to ensure that (N mod i) = N
      Therefore to make N mod i = N , i = N+1 ...... M
      k = (N mod j)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
      Total count = (M-N)*c



      Subcase 3: k = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen
      ((N mod i) mod j) = N, Therefore i,j = N+1 ...... M
      Total count = (M-N)^2



      Hence total number of ways if M>N : c^2 + (M-N)*c + (M-N)^2






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        In every case the maximum remainder is N mod ((N/2)+1).
        This will be the maximum value L. Therefore L = N mod((N/2)+1)



        Case 1: if N = M



        Here i has to be (N/2)+1, because only that will yield remainder as L. If i has any other value, the remainder will always be less than L.
        Now j,k should be 1 more than (N mod i) (so that the remainder remains L) till M.
        Therefore j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
        hence total number of ways = c^2



        Case 2: if M > N



        Subcase 1: i = (N/2)+1 will give remainder as L
        j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
        Total count = c^2



        Subcase 2: j = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen we have to ensure that (N mod i) = N
        Therefore to make N mod i = N , i = N+1 ...... M
        k = (N mod j)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
        Total count = (M-N)*c



        Subcase 3: k = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen
        ((N mod i) mod j) = N, Therefore i,j = N+1 ...... M
        Total count = (M-N)^2



        Hence total number of ways if M>N : c^2 + (M-N)*c + (M-N)^2






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In every case the maximum remainder is N mod ((N/2)+1).
        This will be the maximum value L. Therefore L = N mod((N/2)+1)



        Case 1: if N = M



        Here i has to be (N/2)+1, because only that will yield remainder as L. If i has any other value, the remainder will always be less than L.
        Now j,k should be 1 more than (N mod i) (so that the remainder remains L) till M.
        Therefore j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
        hence total number of ways = c^2



        Case 2: if M > N



        Subcase 1: i = (N/2)+1 will give remainder as L
        j,k = (N mod i)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
        Total count = c^2



        Subcase 2: j = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen we have to ensure that (N mod i) = N
        Therefore to make N mod i = N , i = N+1 ...... M
        k = (N mod j)+1 ...... M (Let this count be c)
        Total count = (M-N)*c



        Subcase 3: k = (N/2)+1 but for this to happen
        ((N mod i) mod j) = N, Therefore i,j = N+1 ...... M
        Total count = (M-N)^2



        Hence total number of ways if M>N : c^2 + (M-N)*c + (M-N)^2







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 9 at 8:59









        AKSHAY KHANNAAKSHAY KHANNA

        11




        11






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066023%2fno-of-ways-for-n-mod-i-mod-j-mod-k-mod-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix