Find a linear map knowing its image and kernel












0












$begingroup$


So..I have to find any linear map $f: mathbb{R}^4 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ that has a kernel and and an image with the following basis:



$$ker(f)=operatorname{Span}{(-1,0,0,1),(1,3,2,0)}.$$



$$operatorname{Img}(f)=operatorname{Span}{(1,1,1),(0,-2,1)}.$$



I have been trying to find similar problems to this one, but all of them so far have been for linear maps on $mathbb{R}^3 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$, which are solved with Gauss. I have also seen that this can be solved by the extension of basis, but I can't wrap my mind around it as we have not touched that at all. What should be the method for solving this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean with find? I am currently tempted to solve it with universal properties (the solution can't be unique, hence I could at least try some canonicality). i.e. if you want a specific solution, you would have to trace that all back
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:38












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I edited it now, I meant find as in finding any linear map that meets those criteria, so a universal solution would work too, as would do any specific solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightsong
    Jan 8 at 10:51










  • $begingroup$
    ok, then I will write something down: however, be aware that i won't be a universal solution, but its construction will involve universal properties, which makes it in a way "canonical"
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:52
















0












$begingroup$


So..I have to find any linear map $f: mathbb{R}^4 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ that has a kernel and and an image with the following basis:



$$ker(f)=operatorname{Span}{(-1,0,0,1),(1,3,2,0)}.$$



$$operatorname{Img}(f)=operatorname{Span}{(1,1,1),(0,-2,1)}.$$



I have been trying to find similar problems to this one, but all of them so far have been for linear maps on $mathbb{R}^3 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$, which are solved with Gauss. I have also seen that this can be solved by the extension of basis, but I can't wrap my mind around it as we have not touched that at all. What should be the method for solving this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean with find? I am currently tempted to solve it with universal properties (the solution can't be unique, hence I could at least try some canonicality). i.e. if you want a specific solution, you would have to trace that all back
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:38












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I edited it now, I meant find as in finding any linear map that meets those criteria, so a universal solution would work too, as would do any specific solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightsong
    Jan 8 at 10:51










  • $begingroup$
    ok, then I will write something down: however, be aware that i won't be a universal solution, but its construction will involve universal properties, which makes it in a way "canonical"
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:52














0












0








0





$begingroup$


So..I have to find any linear map $f: mathbb{R}^4 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ that has a kernel and and an image with the following basis:



$$ker(f)=operatorname{Span}{(-1,0,0,1),(1,3,2,0)}.$$



$$operatorname{Img}(f)=operatorname{Span}{(1,1,1),(0,-2,1)}.$$



I have been trying to find similar problems to this one, but all of them so far have been for linear maps on $mathbb{R}^3 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$, which are solved with Gauss. I have also seen that this can be solved by the extension of basis, but I can't wrap my mind around it as we have not touched that at all. What should be the method for solving this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So..I have to find any linear map $f: mathbb{R}^4 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ that has a kernel and and an image with the following basis:



$$ker(f)=operatorname{Span}{(-1,0,0,1),(1,3,2,0)}.$$



$$operatorname{Img}(f)=operatorname{Span}{(1,1,1),(0,-2,1)}.$$



I have been trying to find similar problems to this one, but all of them so far have been for linear maps on $mathbb{R}^3 rightarrow mathbb{R}^3$, which are solved with Gauss. I have also seen that this can be solved by the extension of basis, but I can't wrap my mind around it as we have not touched that at all. What should be the method for solving this?







linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces linear-transformations hamel-basis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 12:49







user593746

















asked Jan 8 at 10:34









LightsongLightsong

247




247












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean with find? I am currently tempted to solve it with universal properties (the solution can't be unique, hence I could at least try some canonicality). i.e. if you want a specific solution, you would have to trace that all back
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:38












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I edited it now, I meant find as in finding any linear map that meets those criteria, so a universal solution would work too, as would do any specific solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightsong
    Jan 8 at 10:51










  • $begingroup$
    ok, then I will write something down: however, be aware that i won't be a universal solution, but its construction will involve universal properties, which makes it in a way "canonical"
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:52


















  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean with find? I am currently tempted to solve it with universal properties (the solution can't be unique, hence I could at least try some canonicality). i.e. if you want a specific solution, you would have to trace that all back
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:38












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I edited it now, I meant find as in finding any linear map that meets those criteria, so a universal solution would work too, as would do any specific solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightsong
    Jan 8 at 10:51










  • $begingroup$
    ok, then I will write something down: however, be aware that i won't be a universal solution, but its construction will involve universal properties, which makes it in a way "canonical"
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 10:52
















$begingroup$
what do you mean with find? I am currently tempted to solve it with universal properties (the solution can't be unique, hence I could at least try some canonicality). i.e. if you want a specific solution, you would have to trace that all back
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 8 at 10:38






$begingroup$
what do you mean with find? I am currently tempted to solve it with universal properties (the solution can't be unique, hence I could at least try some canonicality). i.e. if you want a specific solution, you would have to trace that all back
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 8 at 10:38














$begingroup$
Sorry, I edited it now, I meant find as in finding any linear map that meets those criteria, so a universal solution would work too, as would do any specific solution.
$endgroup$
– Lightsong
Jan 8 at 10:51




$begingroup$
Sorry, I edited it now, I meant find as in finding any linear map that meets those criteria, so a universal solution would work too, as would do any specific solution.
$endgroup$
– Lightsong
Jan 8 at 10:51












$begingroup$
ok, then I will write something down: however, be aware that i won't be a universal solution, but its construction will involve universal properties, which makes it in a way "canonical"
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 8 at 10:52




$begingroup$
ok, then I will write something down: however, be aware that i won't be a universal solution, but its construction will involve universal properties, which makes it in a way "canonical"
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 8 at 10:52










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Lets fix: $V:= mathbb{R}^4, K:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}-1 \ 0\0\1end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix}1 \ 3\2\0end{pmatrix} rightrangle , I:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1\1 end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix} 0\-2\1 end{pmatrix} rightrangle , W:= mathbb{R}^3$



Now clearly: $K subset V$ and $I subset W$, this means we have canonical maps: $pi:Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K$ and $iota:I hookrightarrow W$ (the projection onto the quotient and the inclusion). Now by the dimension formula we know $dim( V/_K)=2=dim(I)$, hence there exists an isomorphism $varphi:V/_K to I$ (pick your favourite one).



Consider the morphism: $$iota circ varphi circ pi: Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K xrightarrow{sim}I hookrightarrow W.$$



Now since both, $varphi$ and $iota$ are monics, the kernel of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the kernel of $pi$ which construction is $K$. Dually since $varphi$ and $iota$ are epics, the image of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the image of $iota$ which by construction is $I$.



So $iota circ varphi circ pi$ has the desired properties



Now a funfact at the end: by the homomorphism theorem any morphism with the desired properties factors in precisely that way and "only" depends on the choice of $varphi$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
    $endgroup$
    – user593746
    Jan 8 at 12:45








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Enkidu
    Jan 8 at 13:03










  • $begingroup$
    Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
    $endgroup$
    – Lightsong
    Jan 11 at 11:29



















1












$begingroup$

we need a $3times 4$ matrix.



The columns must be linear combinations of the vectors in the image.



let start with the first 2 columns, as the two given vectors.



$begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix}$



And our kernel maps to 0.



$begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix} begin {bmatrix} -1&1\0&3\0&2\1&0end{bmatrix} = begin {bmatrix} 0&0\0&0\0&0\0&0end{bmatrix}$



And that is enough to solve for the missing values.



$begin {bmatrix} 1&0&-frac 12&1\1&-2&frac 52&1\1&1&-2&1 end{bmatrix}$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    We find a $3$ by $4$ matrix $$A= [C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]$$ to represent our linear map.



    From the information about the Kernel, we know that $$-C_1+C_4=0$$ and $$C_1+3C_2+2C_3 =0$$



    And from the Image we know that the Column space needs to span $(1,1,1)^T$ and $(0,-2,1)^T$



    Now we form a matrix $A$ with the above conditions.



    $$ A = begin{bmatrix}-3&1&0&-3\1&1&-2&1\-5&1&1&-5end{bmatrix}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066016%2ffind-a-linear-map-knowing-its-image-and-kernel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Lets fix: $V:= mathbb{R}^4, K:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}-1 \ 0\0\1end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix}1 \ 3\2\0end{pmatrix} rightrangle , I:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1\1 end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix} 0\-2\1 end{pmatrix} rightrangle , W:= mathbb{R}^3$



      Now clearly: $K subset V$ and $I subset W$, this means we have canonical maps: $pi:Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K$ and $iota:I hookrightarrow W$ (the projection onto the quotient and the inclusion). Now by the dimension formula we know $dim( V/_K)=2=dim(I)$, hence there exists an isomorphism $varphi:V/_K to I$ (pick your favourite one).



      Consider the morphism: $$iota circ varphi circ pi: Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K xrightarrow{sim}I hookrightarrow W.$$



      Now since both, $varphi$ and $iota$ are monics, the kernel of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the kernel of $pi$ which construction is $K$. Dually since $varphi$ and $iota$ are epics, the image of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the image of $iota$ which by construction is $I$.



      So $iota circ varphi circ pi$ has the desired properties



      Now a funfact at the end: by the homomorphism theorem any morphism with the desired properties factors in precisely that way and "only" depends on the choice of $varphi$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 3




        $begingroup$
        In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
        $endgroup$
        – user593746
        Jan 8 at 12:45








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
        $endgroup$
        – Enkidu
        Jan 8 at 13:03










      • $begingroup$
        Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
        $endgroup$
        – Lightsong
        Jan 11 at 11:29
















      1












      $begingroup$

      Lets fix: $V:= mathbb{R}^4, K:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}-1 \ 0\0\1end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix}1 \ 3\2\0end{pmatrix} rightrangle , I:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1\1 end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix} 0\-2\1 end{pmatrix} rightrangle , W:= mathbb{R}^3$



      Now clearly: $K subset V$ and $I subset W$, this means we have canonical maps: $pi:Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K$ and $iota:I hookrightarrow W$ (the projection onto the quotient and the inclusion). Now by the dimension formula we know $dim( V/_K)=2=dim(I)$, hence there exists an isomorphism $varphi:V/_K to I$ (pick your favourite one).



      Consider the morphism: $$iota circ varphi circ pi: Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K xrightarrow{sim}I hookrightarrow W.$$



      Now since both, $varphi$ and $iota$ are monics, the kernel of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the kernel of $pi$ which construction is $K$. Dually since $varphi$ and $iota$ are epics, the image of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the image of $iota$ which by construction is $I$.



      So $iota circ varphi circ pi$ has the desired properties



      Now a funfact at the end: by the homomorphism theorem any morphism with the desired properties factors in precisely that way and "only" depends on the choice of $varphi$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 3




        $begingroup$
        In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
        $endgroup$
        – user593746
        Jan 8 at 12:45








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
        $endgroup$
        – Enkidu
        Jan 8 at 13:03










      • $begingroup$
        Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
        $endgroup$
        – Lightsong
        Jan 11 at 11:29














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$

      Lets fix: $V:= mathbb{R}^4, K:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}-1 \ 0\0\1end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix}1 \ 3\2\0end{pmatrix} rightrangle , I:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1\1 end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix} 0\-2\1 end{pmatrix} rightrangle , W:= mathbb{R}^3$



      Now clearly: $K subset V$ and $I subset W$, this means we have canonical maps: $pi:Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K$ and $iota:I hookrightarrow W$ (the projection onto the quotient and the inclusion). Now by the dimension formula we know $dim( V/_K)=2=dim(I)$, hence there exists an isomorphism $varphi:V/_K to I$ (pick your favourite one).



      Consider the morphism: $$iota circ varphi circ pi: Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K xrightarrow{sim}I hookrightarrow W.$$



      Now since both, $varphi$ and $iota$ are monics, the kernel of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the kernel of $pi$ which construction is $K$. Dually since $varphi$ and $iota$ are epics, the image of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the image of $iota$ which by construction is $I$.



      So $iota circ varphi circ pi$ has the desired properties



      Now a funfact at the end: by the homomorphism theorem any morphism with the desired properties factors in precisely that way and "only" depends on the choice of $varphi$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Lets fix: $V:= mathbb{R}^4, K:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}-1 \ 0\0\1end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix}1 \ 3\2\0end{pmatrix} rightrangle , I:= leftlangle begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1\1 end{pmatrix} ,begin{pmatrix} 0\-2\1 end{pmatrix} rightrangle , W:= mathbb{R}^3$



      Now clearly: $K subset V$ and $I subset W$, this means we have canonical maps: $pi:Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K$ and $iota:I hookrightarrow W$ (the projection onto the quotient and the inclusion). Now by the dimension formula we know $dim( V/_K)=2=dim(I)$, hence there exists an isomorphism $varphi:V/_K to I$ (pick your favourite one).



      Consider the morphism: $$iota circ varphi circ pi: Vtwoheadrightarrow V/_K xrightarrow{sim}I hookrightarrow W.$$



      Now since both, $varphi$ and $iota$ are monics, the kernel of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the kernel of $pi$ which construction is $K$. Dually since $varphi$ and $iota$ are epics, the image of $iota circ varphi circ pi$ is the same as the image of $iota$ which by construction is $I$.



      So $iota circ varphi circ pi$ has the desired properties



      Now a funfact at the end: by the homomorphism theorem any morphism with the desired properties factors in precisely that way and "only" depends on the choice of $varphi$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Jan 8 at 11:11

























      answered Jan 8 at 11:05









      EnkiduEnkidu

      1,44429




      1,44429








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
        $endgroup$
        – user593746
        Jan 8 at 12:45








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
        $endgroup$
        – Enkidu
        Jan 8 at 13:03










      • $begingroup$
        Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
        $endgroup$
        – Lightsong
        Jan 11 at 11:29














      • 3




        $begingroup$
        In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
        $endgroup$
        – user593746
        Jan 8 at 12:45








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
        $endgroup$
        – Enkidu
        Jan 8 at 13:03










      • $begingroup$
        Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
        $endgroup$
        – Lightsong
        Jan 11 at 11:29








      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
      $endgroup$
      – user593746
      Jan 8 at 12:45






      $begingroup$
      In other words, you showed that there exists a canonical bijective correspondence between the set $S(K,I)subseteq operatorname{Hom}(V,W)$ of all linear maps $T:Vto W$ such that $ker T=Ksubseteq V$ and $operatorname{im} T=Isubseteq W$ and the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ of isomorphisms from $V/K$ to $I$. In the case $V/Kcong I$, the set $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is (non-canonically) in bijective correspondence with $operatorname{GL}(V/K)$, or with $operatorname{GL}(I)$. Otherwise, $operatorname{Iso}(V/K,I)$ is empty. Great work!
      $endgroup$
      – user593746
      Jan 8 at 12:45






      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
      $endgroup$
      – Enkidu
      Jan 8 at 13:03




      $begingroup$
      actually not, that is the homomorphism theorem, I just did the other direction: sazing that a morphism that factors that way has the desired properties and stating that they exist by dimension.
      $endgroup$
      – Enkidu
      Jan 8 at 13:03












      $begingroup$
      Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
      $endgroup$
      – Lightsong
      Jan 11 at 11:29




      $begingroup$
      Wow...That is quite out of my league, but it's an amazing answer, I will be checking this one again once I finish this year with,hopefully, more knowledge of linear Algebra. Thank you for the answer and sorry for the delay in the response.
      $endgroup$
      – Lightsong
      Jan 11 at 11:29











      1












      $begingroup$

      we need a $3times 4$ matrix.



      The columns must be linear combinations of the vectors in the image.



      let start with the first 2 columns, as the two given vectors.



      $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix}$



      And our kernel maps to 0.



      $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix} begin {bmatrix} -1&1\0&3\0&2\1&0end{bmatrix} = begin {bmatrix} 0&0\0&0\0&0\0&0end{bmatrix}$



      And that is enough to solve for the missing values.



      $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&-frac 12&1\1&-2&frac 52&1\1&1&-2&1 end{bmatrix}$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        we need a $3times 4$ matrix.



        The columns must be linear combinations of the vectors in the image.



        let start with the first 2 columns, as the two given vectors.



        $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix}$



        And our kernel maps to 0.



        $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix} begin {bmatrix} -1&1\0&3\0&2\1&0end{bmatrix} = begin {bmatrix} 0&0\0&0\0&0\0&0end{bmatrix}$



        And that is enough to solve for the missing values.



        $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&-frac 12&1\1&-2&frac 52&1\1&1&-2&1 end{bmatrix}$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          we need a $3times 4$ matrix.



          The columns must be linear combinations of the vectors in the image.



          let start with the first 2 columns, as the two given vectors.



          $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix}$



          And our kernel maps to 0.



          $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix} begin {bmatrix} -1&1\0&3\0&2\1&0end{bmatrix} = begin {bmatrix} 0&0\0&0\0&0\0&0end{bmatrix}$



          And that is enough to solve for the missing values.



          $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&-frac 12&1\1&-2&frac 52&1\1&1&-2&1 end{bmatrix}$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          we need a $3times 4$ matrix.



          The columns must be linear combinations of the vectors in the image.



          let start with the first 2 columns, as the two given vectors.



          $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix}$



          And our kernel maps to 0.



          $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&a&b\1&-2&c&d\1&1&e&f end{bmatrix} begin {bmatrix} -1&1\0&3\0&2\1&0end{bmatrix} = begin {bmatrix} 0&0\0&0\0&0\0&0end{bmatrix}$



          And that is enough to solve for the missing values.



          $begin {bmatrix} 1&0&-frac 12&1\1&-2&frac 52&1\1&1&-2&1 end{bmatrix}$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 8 at 11:22









          Doug MDoug M

          45.4k31954




          45.4k31954























              1












              $begingroup$

              We find a $3$ by $4$ matrix $$A= [C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]$$ to represent our linear map.



              From the information about the Kernel, we know that $$-C_1+C_4=0$$ and $$C_1+3C_2+2C_3 =0$$



              And from the Image we know that the Column space needs to span $(1,1,1)^T$ and $(0,-2,1)^T$



              Now we form a matrix $A$ with the above conditions.



              $$ A = begin{bmatrix}-3&1&0&-3\1&1&-2&1\-5&1&1&-5end{bmatrix}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                We find a $3$ by $4$ matrix $$A= [C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]$$ to represent our linear map.



                From the information about the Kernel, we know that $$-C_1+C_4=0$$ and $$C_1+3C_2+2C_3 =0$$



                And from the Image we know that the Column space needs to span $(1,1,1)^T$ and $(0,-2,1)^T$



                Now we form a matrix $A$ with the above conditions.



                $$ A = begin{bmatrix}-3&1&0&-3\1&1&-2&1\-5&1&1&-5end{bmatrix}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  We find a $3$ by $4$ matrix $$A= [C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]$$ to represent our linear map.



                  From the information about the Kernel, we know that $$-C_1+C_4=0$$ and $$C_1+3C_2+2C_3 =0$$



                  And from the Image we know that the Column space needs to span $(1,1,1)^T$ and $(0,-2,1)^T$



                  Now we form a matrix $A$ with the above conditions.



                  $$ A = begin{bmatrix}-3&1&0&-3\1&1&-2&1\-5&1&1&-5end{bmatrix}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  We find a $3$ by $4$ matrix $$A= [C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]$$ to represent our linear map.



                  From the information about the Kernel, we know that $$-C_1+C_4=0$$ and $$C_1+3C_2+2C_3 =0$$



                  And from the Image we know that the Column space needs to span $(1,1,1)^T$ and $(0,-2,1)^T$



                  Now we form a matrix $A$ with the above conditions.



                  $$ A = begin{bmatrix}-3&1&0&-3\1&1&-2&1\-5&1&1&-5end{bmatrix}$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 8 at 11:24









                  Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

                  42k42061




                  42k42061






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066016%2ffind-a-linear-map-knowing-its-image-and-kernel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                      When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                      Grease: Live!