Is there a value of $t$ above which these inequalities aren't jointly satisfiable












1












$begingroup$


Let ${a_{1}, ...., a_{8}} in [0, 1]$ be such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$ and let $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$. Is there a value of $t$ above which the following inequalities aren't jointly satisfiable? I know that they are all satisfiable for any value of $t leq frac{2}{3}$.



(1) $frac{a_{1} + a_{2}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} geq t$



(2) $frac{a_{1} + a_{5}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{5} + a_{6}} geq t$



(3) $frac{a_{4} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} geq t$



(4) $frac{a_{7} + a_{8}}{a_{3} + a_{4} + a_{7} + a_{8}} geq t$



(5) $frac{a_{1} + a_{3}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} leq 1 - t$



(6) $frac{a_{6} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} leq 1 - t$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Does the summation of the $a_i$ start from $0$ or $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @EuxhenH, sorry it starts from 1, there is no $a_{0}$. I'll edit the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alex Ravsky, i'm looking for the smallest $t$ such that there exist no feasible $a_{1}, ...., a_{8}$ that satisfy all six inequalities.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 14 at 14:11
















1












$begingroup$


Let ${a_{1}, ...., a_{8}} in [0, 1]$ be such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$ and let $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$. Is there a value of $t$ above which the following inequalities aren't jointly satisfiable? I know that they are all satisfiable for any value of $t leq frac{2}{3}$.



(1) $frac{a_{1} + a_{2}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} geq t$



(2) $frac{a_{1} + a_{5}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{5} + a_{6}} geq t$



(3) $frac{a_{4} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} geq t$



(4) $frac{a_{7} + a_{8}}{a_{3} + a_{4} + a_{7} + a_{8}} geq t$



(5) $frac{a_{1} + a_{3}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} leq 1 - t$



(6) $frac{a_{6} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} leq 1 - t$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Does the summation of the $a_i$ start from $0$ or $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @EuxhenH, sorry it starts from 1, there is no $a_{0}$. I'll edit the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alex Ravsky, i'm looking for the smallest $t$ such that there exist no feasible $a_{1}, ...., a_{8}$ that satisfy all six inequalities.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 14 at 14:11














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


Let ${a_{1}, ...., a_{8}} in [0, 1]$ be such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$ and let $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$. Is there a value of $t$ above which the following inequalities aren't jointly satisfiable? I know that they are all satisfiable for any value of $t leq frac{2}{3}$.



(1) $frac{a_{1} + a_{2}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} geq t$



(2) $frac{a_{1} + a_{5}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{5} + a_{6}} geq t$



(3) $frac{a_{4} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} geq t$



(4) $frac{a_{7} + a_{8}}{a_{3} + a_{4} + a_{7} + a_{8}} geq t$



(5) $frac{a_{1} + a_{3}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} leq 1 - t$



(6) $frac{a_{6} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} leq 1 - t$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let ${a_{1}, ...., a_{8}} in [0, 1]$ be such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$ and let $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$. Is there a value of $t$ above which the following inequalities aren't jointly satisfiable? I know that they are all satisfiable for any value of $t leq frac{2}{3}$.



(1) $frac{a_{1} + a_{2}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} geq t$



(2) $frac{a_{1} + a_{5}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{5} + a_{6}} geq t$



(3) $frac{a_{4} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} geq t$



(4) $frac{a_{7} + a_{8}}{a_{3} + a_{4} + a_{7} + a_{8}} geq t$



(5) $frac{a_{1} + a_{3}}{a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{3} + a_{4}} leq 1 - t$



(6) $frac{a_{6} + a_{8}}{a_{2} + a_{4} + a_{6} + a_{8}} leq 1 - t$







linear-algebra probability inequality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 15 at 11:31









Alex Ravsky

43.2k32583




43.2k32583










asked Jan 8 at 12:14









King KongKing Kong

11010




11010












  • $begingroup$
    Does the summation of the $a_i$ start from $0$ or $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @EuxhenH, sorry it starts from 1, there is no $a_{0}$. I'll edit the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alex Ravsky, i'm looking for the smallest $t$ such that there exist no feasible $a_{1}, ...., a_{8}$ that satisfy all six inequalities.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 14 at 14:11


















  • $begingroup$
    Does the summation of the $a_i$ start from $0$ or $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 14:30










  • $begingroup$
    @EuxhenH, sorry it starts from 1, there is no $a_{0}$. I'll edit the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alex Ravsky, i'm looking for the smallest $t$ such that there exist no feasible $a_{1}, ...., a_{8}$ that satisfy all six inequalities.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 14 at 14:11
















$begingroup$
Does the summation of the $a_i$ start from $0$ or $1$?
$endgroup$
– EuxhenH
Jan 8 at 14:30




$begingroup$
Does the summation of the $a_i$ start from $0$ or $1$?
$endgroup$
– EuxhenH
Jan 8 at 14:30












$begingroup$
@EuxhenH, sorry it starts from 1, there is no $a_{0}$. I'll edit the question now.
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 8 at 15:27




$begingroup$
@EuxhenH, sorry it starts from 1, there is no $a_{0}$. I'll edit the question now.
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 8 at 15:27




1




1




$begingroup$
@Alex Ravsky, i'm looking for the smallest $t$ such that there exist no feasible $a_{1}, ...., a_{8}$ that satisfy all six inequalities.
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 14 at 14:11




$begingroup$
@Alex Ravsky, i'm looking for the smallest $t$ such that there exist no feasible $a_{1}, ...., a_{8}$ that satisfy all six inequalities.
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 14 at 14:11










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1





+50







$begingroup$

Let’s start a quest for a largest $t<1$ for which there exist feasible $a_1,dots, a_8$ that satisfy all six inequalities. In this quest we can drop the condition $sum a_i=1$, because if non-negative numbers $a_i$ satisfy the inequalities for some $t$ then numbers $a’_i=frac {a_i}{sum a_j}$ also satisfy the inequalities for the same $t$ and $sum a’_i=1$.



Now note that each of $a_5$ and $a_7$ occur in only one inequality, (2) and (4), respectively. Pick any of these $a_i$’s and fix all other $a_j$’s. Then when $a_i$ tends to infinity, the left hand side of the inequality, in which it occurs, tends to $1$. Since $t<1$, for all other $a_j$’s the inequality will be satisfied for sufficiently large $a_i$. Thus in our quest we can drop both $a_5$ and $a_7$ and the inequalities (2) and (4).



After routine transformations, we can simplify the remaining inequalities to the following



(1’) $a_1+a_2ge s(a_3+a_4)$



(3’) $a_4+a_8ge s(a_2+a_6)$



(5’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_1+a_3)$



(6’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_6+a_8)$.



Here $s=frac {t}{1-t}>0,$ because $t>frac 12$.



Since $a_3$ and $a_6$ occur only at the right hand sides of the inequalities, when we annulate them, the inequality still be satisfied.



Now the inequalities transform to



(1’’) $a_1+a_2ge sa_4$



(3’’) $a_4+a_8ge sa_2$



(5’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_1$



(6’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_8$.



Adding (1’’) and (3’’), we obtain $a_1+a_8ge (s-1)(a_2+a_4)$. Adding (5’’) and (6’’), we obtain $2(a_2+a_4)ge s(a_1+a_8)$. Since, by $1$, $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4>0$, and $a_3=0$, we have that both $A=a_1+a_8$ and $B=a_2+a_4$ are positive. Since $2Age 2(s-1)Bge s(s-1)A$, we have $s(s-1)le 2$. This implies $sle 2$ and $tlefrac 23$.



In order to satisfy inequalities (1’’)-(6’’) with $s=2$ we may try to put $a_1=a_8=a$ and $a_2=a_4=b$. Then the inequalities will be satisfied iff $a=b$. If we put $a>0$, $a_3=a_6=0$, $a_5=a_7=a$, the inequalities (2) and (4) also will be satisfied. At last, to achieve $sum a_i=1$, we put $a=frac 16$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 8:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Jan 16 at 9:47








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    cool, accepting the answer now
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 10:05



















2












$begingroup$

Let $a_1=a_4=frac{1}{2}$ and everything else equal $0$ (all fractions make sense for these choices since $a_1$ and $a_4$ appear in all denominators). Choose $t=1$. From $(1)$ we get $frac{1}{2}geq 1$ and from $(2)$ we get $1geq 1$, so they are not jointly satisfiable.



(Forgive me if I understood the problem wrong).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:56












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066099%2fis-there-a-value-of-t-above-which-these-inequalities-arent-jointly-satisfiabl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1





+50







$begingroup$

Let’s start a quest for a largest $t<1$ for which there exist feasible $a_1,dots, a_8$ that satisfy all six inequalities. In this quest we can drop the condition $sum a_i=1$, because if non-negative numbers $a_i$ satisfy the inequalities for some $t$ then numbers $a’_i=frac {a_i}{sum a_j}$ also satisfy the inequalities for the same $t$ and $sum a’_i=1$.



Now note that each of $a_5$ and $a_7$ occur in only one inequality, (2) and (4), respectively. Pick any of these $a_i$’s and fix all other $a_j$’s. Then when $a_i$ tends to infinity, the left hand side of the inequality, in which it occurs, tends to $1$. Since $t<1$, for all other $a_j$’s the inequality will be satisfied for sufficiently large $a_i$. Thus in our quest we can drop both $a_5$ and $a_7$ and the inequalities (2) and (4).



After routine transformations, we can simplify the remaining inequalities to the following



(1’) $a_1+a_2ge s(a_3+a_4)$



(3’) $a_4+a_8ge s(a_2+a_6)$



(5’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_1+a_3)$



(6’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_6+a_8)$.



Here $s=frac {t}{1-t}>0,$ because $t>frac 12$.



Since $a_3$ and $a_6$ occur only at the right hand sides of the inequalities, when we annulate them, the inequality still be satisfied.



Now the inequalities transform to



(1’’) $a_1+a_2ge sa_4$



(3’’) $a_4+a_8ge sa_2$



(5’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_1$



(6’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_8$.



Adding (1’’) and (3’’), we obtain $a_1+a_8ge (s-1)(a_2+a_4)$. Adding (5’’) and (6’’), we obtain $2(a_2+a_4)ge s(a_1+a_8)$. Since, by $1$, $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4>0$, and $a_3=0$, we have that both $A=a_1+a_8$ and $B=a_2+a_4$ are positive. Since $2Age 2(s-1)Bge s(s-1)A$, we have $s(s-1)le 2$. This implies $sle 2$ and $tlefrac 23$.



In order to satisfy inequalities (1’’)-(6’’) with $s=2$ we may try to put $a_1=a_8=a$ and $a_2=a_4=b$. Then the inequalities will be satisfied iff $a=b$. If we put $a>0$, $a_3=a_6=0$, $a_5=a_7=a$, the inequalities (2) and (4) also will be satisfied. At last, to achieve $sum a_i=1$, we put $a=frac 16$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 8:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Jan 16 at 9:47








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    cool, accepting the answer now
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 10:05
















1





+50







$begingroup$

Let’s start a quest for a largest $t<1$ for which there exist feasible $a_1,dots, a_8$ that satisfy all six inequalities. In this quest we can drop the condition $sum a_i=1$, because if non-negative numbers $a_i$ satisfy the inequalities for some $t$ then numbers $a’_i=frac {a_i}{sum a_j}$ also satisfy the inequalities for the same $t$ and $sum a’_i=1$.



Now note that each of $a_5$ and $a_7$ occur in only one inequality, (2) and (4), respectively. Pick any of these $a_i$’s and fix all other $a_j$’s. Then when $a_i$ tends to infinity, the left hand side of the inequality, in which it occurs, tends to $1$. Since $t<1$, for all other $a_j$’s the inequality will be satisfied for sufficiently large $a_i$. Thus in our quest we can drop both $a_5$ and $a_7$ and the inequalities (2) and (4).



After routine transformations, we can simplify the remaining inequalities to the following



(1’) $a_1+a_2ge s(a_3+a_4)$



(3’) $a_4+a_8ge s(a_2+a_6)$



(5’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_1+a_3)$



(6’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_6+a_8)$.



Here $s=frac {t}{1-t}>0,$ because $t>frac 12$.



Since $a_3$ and $a_6$ occur only at the right hand sides of the inequalities, when we annulate them, the inequality still be satisfied.



Now the inequalities transform to



(1’’) $a_1+a_2ge sa_4$



(3’’) $a_4+a_8ge sa_2$



(5’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_1$



(6’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_8$.



Adding (1’’) and (3’’), we obtain $a_1+a_8ge (s-1)(a_2+a_4)$. Adding (5’’) and (6’’), we obtain $2(a_2+a_4)ge s(a_1+a_8)$. Since, by $1$, $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4>0$, and $a_3=0$, we have that both $A=a_1+a_8$ and $B=a_2+a_4$ are positive. Since $2Age 2(s-1)Bge s(s-1)A$, we have $s(s-1)le 2$. This implies $sle 2$ and $tlefrac 23$.



In order to satisfy inequalities (1’’)-(6’’) with $s=2$ we may try to put $a_1=a_8=a$ and $a_2=a_4=b$. Then the inequalities will be satisfied iff $a=b$. If we put $a>0$, $a_3=a_6=0$, $a_5=a_7=a$, the inequalities (2) and (4) also will be satisfied. At last, to achieve $sum a_i=1$, we put $a=frac 16$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 8:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Jan 16 at 9:47








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    cool, accepting the answer now
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 10:05














1





+50







1





+50



1




+50



$begingroup$

Let’s start a quest for a largest $t<1$ for which there exist feasible $a_1,dots, a_8$ that satisfy all six inequalities. In this quest we can drop the condition $sum a_i=1$, because if non-negative numbers $a_i$ satisfy the inequalities for some $t$ then numbers $a’_i=frac {a_i}{sum a_j}$ also satisfy the inequalities for the same $t$ and $sum a’_i=1$.



Now note that each of $a_5$ and $a_7$ occur in only one inequality, (2) and (4), respectively. Pick any of these $a_i$’s and fix all other $a_j$’s. Then when $a_i$ tends to infinity, the left hand side of the inequality, in which it occurs, tends to $1$. Since $t<1$, for all other $a_j$’s the inequality will be satisfied for sufficiently large $a_i$. Thus in our quest we can drop both $a_5$ and $a_7$ and the inequalities (2) and (4).



After routine transformations, we can simplify the remaining inequalities to the following



(1’) $a_1+a_2ge s(a_3+a_4)$



(3’) $a_4+a_8ge s(a_2+a_6)$



(5’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_1+a_3)$



(6’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_6+a_8)$.



Here $s=frac {t}{1-t}>0,$ because $t>frac 12$.



Since $a_3$ and $a_6$ occur only at the right hand sides of the inequalities, when we annulate them, the inequality still be satisfied.



Now the inequalities transform to



(1’’) $a_1+a_2ge sa_4$



(3’’) $a_4+a_8ge sa_2$



(5’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_1$



(6’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_8$.



Adding (1’’) and (3’’), we obtain $a_1+a_8ge (s-1)(a_2+a_4)$. Adding (5’’) and (6’’), we obtain $2(a_2+a_4)ge s(a_1+a_8)$. Since, by $1$, $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4>0$, and $a_3=0$, we have that both $A=a_1+a_8$ and $B=a_2+a_4$ are positive. Since $2Age 2(s-1)Bge s(s-1)A$, we have $s(s-1)le 2$. This implies $sle 2$ and $tlefrac 23$.



In order to satisfy inequalities (1’’)-(6’’) with $s=2$ we may try to put $a_1=a_8=a$ and $a_2=a_4=b$. Then the inequalities will be satisfied iff $a=b$. If we put $a>0$, $a_3=a_6=0$, $a_5=a_7=a$, the inequalities (2) and (4) also will be satisfied. At last, to achieve $sum a_i=1$, we put $a=frac 16$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let’s start a quest for a largest $t<1$ for which there exist feasible $a_1,dots, a_8$ that satisfy all six inequalities. In this quest we can drop the condition $sum a_i=1$, because if non-negative numbers $a_i$ satisfy the inequalities for some $t$ then numbers $a’_i=frac {a_i}{sum a_j}$ also satisfy the inequalities for the same $t$ and $sum a’_i=1$.



Now note that each of $a_5$ and $a_7$ occur in only one inequality, (2) and (4), respectively. Pick any of these $a_i$’s and fix all other $a_j$’s. Then when $a_i$ tends to infinity, the left hand side of the inequality, in which it occurs, tends to $1$. Since $t<1$, for all other $a_j$’s the inequality will be satisfied for sufficiently large $a_i$. Thus in our quest we can drop both $a_5$ and $a_7$ and the inequalities (2) and (4).



After routine transformations, we can simplify the remaining inequalities to the following



(1’) $a_1+a_2ge s(a_3+a_4)$



(3’) $a_4+a_8ge s(a_2+a_6)$



(5’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_1+a_3)$



(6’) $a_2+a_4ge s(a_6+a_8)$.



Here $s=frac {t}{1-t}>0,$ because $t>frac 12$.



Since $a_3$ and $a_6$ occur only at the right hand sides of the inequalities, when we annulate them, the inequality still be satisfied.



Now the inequalities transform to



(1’’) $a_1+a_2ge sa_4$



(3’’) $a_4+a_8ge sa_2$



(5’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_1$



(6’’) $a_2+a_4ge sa_8$.



Adding (1’’) and (3’’), we obtain $a_1+a_8ge (s-1)(a_2+a_4)$. Adding (5’’) and (6’’), we obtain $2(a_2+a_4)ge s(a_1+a_8)$. Since, by $1$, $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4>0$, and $a_3=0$, we have that both $A=a_1+a_8$ and $B=a_2+a_4$ are positive. Since $2Age 2(s-1)Bge s(s-1)A$, we have $s(s-1)le 2$. This implies $sle 2$ and $tlefrac 23$.



In order to satisfy inequalities (1’’)-(6’’) with $s=2$ we may try to put $a_1=a_8=a$ and $a_2=a_4=b$. Then the inequalities will be satisfied iff $a=b$. If we put $a>0$, $a_3=a_6=0$, $a_5=a_7=a$, the inequalities (2) and (4) also will be satisfied. At last, to achieve $sum a_i=1$, we put $a=frac 16$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 15 at 11:30









Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky

43.2k32583




43.2k32583








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 8:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Jan 16 at 9:47








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    cool, accepting the answer now
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 10:05














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 8:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Jan 16 at 9:47








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    cool, accepting the answer now
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 16 at 10:05








1




1




$begingroup$
Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 16 at 8:31




$begingroup$
Fantastic, thanks! So $2/3$ is the greatest value of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable, right?
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 16 at 8:31




1




1




$begingroup$
Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Ravsky
Jan 16 at 9:47






$begingroup$
Right. According to your comment, $frac 23$ is the biggest value of $t in (frac{1}{2}, 1]$ for which there exist $a_{1},dots, a_{8} in [0, 1]$ satisfying all inequalities (1)-(6) such that $sum limits_{0 < i leq 8} a_{i} = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Ravsky
Jan 16 at 9:47






1




1




$begingroup$
cool, accepting the answer now
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 16 at 10:05




$begingroup$
cool, accepting the answer now
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 16 at 10:05











2












$begingroup$

Let $a_1=a_4=frac{1}{2}$ and everything else equal $0$ (all fractions make sense for these choices since $a_1$ and $a_4$ appear in all denominators). Choose $t=1$. From $(1)$ we get $frac{1}{2}geq 1$ and from $(2)$ we get $1geq 1$, so they are not jointly satisfiable.



(Forgive me if I understood the problem wrong).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:56
















2












$begingroup$

Let $a_1=a_4=frac{1}{2}$ and everything else equal $0$ (all fractions make sense for these choices since $a_1$ and $a_4$ appear in all denominators). Choose $t=1$. From $(1)$ we get $frac{1}{2}geq 1$ and from $(2)$ we get $1geq 1$, so they are not jointly satisfiable.



(Forgive me if I understood the problem wrong).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:56














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Let $a_1=a_4=frac{1}{2}$ and everything else equal $0$ (all fractions make sense for these choices since $a_1$ and $a_4$ appear in all denominators). Choose $t=1$. From $(1)$ we get $frac{1}{2}geq 1$ and from $(2)$ we get $1geq 1$, so they are not jointly satisfiable.



(Forgive me if I understood the problem wrong).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let $a_1=a_4=frac{1}{2}$ and everything else equal $0$ (all fractions make sense for these choices since $a_1$ and $a_4$ appear in all denominators). Choose $t=1$. From $(1)$ we get $frac{1}{2}geq 1$ and from $(2)$ we get $1geq 1$, so they are not jointly satisfiable.



(Forgive me if I understood the problem wrong).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 8 at 14:36









EuxhenHEuxhenH

546212




546212












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:56


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
    $endgroup$
    – King Kong
    Jan 8 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
    $endgroup$
    – EuxhenH
    Jan 8 at 15:56
















$begingroup$
Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 8 at 15:32




$begingroup$
Thanks, you've understood correctly and that looks right. But are there any values below 1 for which they aren't satisfiable, and if so, what is the lowest such value?
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 8 at 15:32












$begingroup$
Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
$endgroup$
– EuxhenH
Jan 8 at 15:41




$begingroup$
Let $a_7=a_8=0$ and the other $a_ineq 0$. Then from $(4)$ we get $0geq t$. So if they will be satisfied then $tleq 0$.
$endgroup$
– EuxhenH
Jan 8 at 15:41












$begingroup$
Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 8 at 15:50




$begingroup$
Yes, but this doesn't tell us anything about the range of values of $t$ for which the inequalities are jointly satisfiable.
$endgroup$
– King Kong
Jan 8 at 15:50












$begingroup$
It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
$endgroup$
– EuxhenH
Jan 8 at 15:56




$begingroup$
It doesn't. I am just giving an upper bound.
$endgroup$
– EuxhenH
Jan 8 at 15:56


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066099%2fis-there-a-value-of-t-above-which-these-inequalities-arent-jointly-satisfiabl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix