Is there a morphism from a locally free sheaf to the dual twisted by determinant bundle?












0












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over the field $mathbb{C}$. Let $E$ be a locally free sheaf of rank $r$ and $F=E^{vee}$, the dual locally free sheaf. If rank $E$=2, then we have the isomorphism $Esimeq Fotimes text{det }E$. Do we have an analogous relation in the higher ranks. For example, is there an inclusion $Esubset Fotimestext{det},E$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over the field $mathbb{C}$. Let $E$ be a locally free sheaf of rank $r$ and $F=E^{vee}$, the dual locally free sheaf. If rank $E$=2, then we have the isomorphism $Esimeq Fotimes text{det }E$. Do we have an analogous relation in the higher ranks. For example, is there an inclusion $Esubset Fotimestext{det},E$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over the field $mathbb{C}$. Let $E$ be a locally free sheaf of rank $r$ and $F=E^{vee}$, the dual locally free sheaf. If rank $E$=2, then we have the isomorphism $Esimeq Fotimes text{det }E$. Do we have an analogous relation in the higher ranks. For example, is there an inclusion $Esubset Fotimestext{det},E$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over the field $mathbb{C}$. Let $E$ be a locally free sheaf of rank $r$ and $F=E^{vee}$, the dual locally free sheaf. If rank $E$=2, then we have the isomorphism $Esimeq Fotimes text{det }E$. Do we have an analogous relation in the higher ranks. For example, is there an inclusion $Esubset Fotimestext{det},E$?







      algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 8 at 10:08









      user349424user349424

      34317




      34317






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          To give a morphism $E to E^vee otimes det(E)$ is the same as to give a bilinear form on $E$ with values in $det(E)$. This morphism is injective if the form is generically non-degenerate. It is an isomorphism when the form is everywhere non-degenerate. A necessary condition for this is that
          $$
          det(E^vee otimes det(E)) cong det(E^vee) otimes det(E)^r cong det(E)^{r-1}
          $$

          is isomorphic to $det(E)$. So, this can be true only if $det(E) = O_X$, or if $det(E)$ is a point of order $r-2$ on $Pic^0(X)$.



          Note also that there may be no nontrivial morphisms. For instance, take $X = mathbb{P}^1$ and $E = O(-1) oplus O(-1) oplus O(-1)$. Then $E^vee otimes det(E) cong O(-2) oplus O(-2) oplus O(-2)$ and $Hom(E,E^vee otimes det(E)) = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:57












          • $begingroup$
            In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:59










          • $begingroup$
            There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
            $endgroup$
            – Sasha
            Jan 8 at 13:18












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065998%2fis-there-a-morphism-from-a-locally-free-sheaf-to-the-dual-twisted-by-determinant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          To give a morphism $E to E^vee otimes det(E)$ is the same as to give a bilinear form on $E$ with values in $det(E)$. This morphism is injective if the form is generically non-degenerate. It is an isomorphism when the form is everywhere non-degenerate. A necessary condition for this is that
          $$
          det(E^vee otimes det(E)) cong det(E^vee) otimes det(E)^r cong det(E)^{r-1}
          $$

          is isomorphic to $det(E)$. So, this can be true only if $det(E) = O_X$, or if $det(E)$ is a point of order $r-2$ on $Pic^0(X)$.



          Note also that there may be no nontrivial morphisms. For instance, take $X = mathbb{P}^1$ and $E = O(-1) oplus O(-1) oplus O(-1)$. Then $E^vee otimes det(E) cong O(-2) oplus O(-2) oplus O(-2)$ and $Hom(E,E^vee otimes det(E)) = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:57












          • $begingroup$
            In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:59










          • $begingroup$
            There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
            $endgroup$
            – Sasha
            Jan 8 at 13:18
















          1












          $begingroup$

          To give a morphism $E to E^vee otimes det(E)$ is the same as to give a bilinear form on $E$ with values in $det(E)$. This morphism is injective if the form is generically non-degenerate. It is an isomorphism when the form is everywhere non-degenerate. A necessary condition for this is that
          $$
          det(E^vee otimes det(E)) cong det(E^vee) otimes det(E)^r cong det(E)^{r-1}
          $$

          is isomorphic to $det(E)$. So, this can be true only if $det(E) = O_X$, or if $det(E)$ is a point of order $r-2$ on $Pic^0(X)$.



          Note also that there may be no nontrivial morphisms. For instance, take $X = mathbb{P}^1$ and $E = O(-1) oplus O(-1) oplus O(-1)$. Then $E^vee otimes det(E) cong O(-2) oplus O(-2) oplus O(-2)$ and $Hom(E,E^vee otimes det(E)) = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:57












          • $begingroup$
            In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:59










          • $begingroup$
            There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
            $endgroup$
            – Sasha
            Jan 8 at 13:18














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          To give a morphism $E to E^vee otimes det(E)$ is the same as to give a bilinear form on $E$ with values in $det(E)$. This morphism is injective if the form is generically non-degenerate. It is an isomorphism when the form is everywhere non-degenerate. A necessary condition for this is that
          $$
          det(E^vee otimes det(E)) cong det(E^vee) otimes det(E)^r cong det(E)^{r-1}
          $$

          is isomorphic to $det(E)$. So, this can be true only if $det(E) = O_X$, or if $det(E)$ is a point of order $r-2$ on $Pic^0(X)$.



          Note also that there may be no nontrivial morphisms. For instance, take $X = mathbb{P}^1$ and $E = O(-1) oplus O(-1) oplus O(-1)$. Then $E^vee otimes det(E) cong O(-2) oplus O(-2) oplus O(-2)$ and $Hom(E,E^vee otimes det(E)) = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          To give a morphism $E to E^vee otimes det(E)$ is the same as to give a bilinear form on $E$ with values in $det(E)$. This morphism is injective if the form is generically non-degenerate. It is an isomorphism when the form is everywhere non-degenerate. A necessary condition for this is that
          $$
          det(E^vee otimes det(E)) cong det(E^vee) otimes det(E)^r cong det(E)^{r-1}
          $$

          is isomorphic to $det(E)$. So, this can be true only if $det(E) = O_X$, or if $det(E)$ is a point of order $r-2$ on $Pic^0(X)$.



          Note also that there may be no nontrivial morphisms. For instance, take $X = mathbb{P}^1$ and $E = O(-1) oplus O(-1) oplus O(-1)$. Then $E^vee otimes det(E) cong O(-2) oplus O(-2) oplus O(-2)$ and $Hom(E,E^vee otimes det(E)) = 0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 8 at 13:17

























          answered Jan 8 at 11:16









          SashaSasha

          5,208139




          5,208139












          • $begingroup$
            Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:57












          • $begingroup$
            In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:59










          • $begingroup$
            There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
            $endgroup$
            – Sasha
            Jan 8 at 13:18


















          • $begingroup$
            Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:57












          • $begingroup$
            In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
            $endgroup$
            – user349424
            Jan 8 at 12:59










          • $begingroup$
            There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
            $endgroup$
            – Sasha
            Jan 8 at 13:18
















          $begingroup$
          Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
          $endgroup$
          – user349424
          Jan 8 at 12:57






          $begingroup$
          Is the above condition for injectivity or to give a morphism?
          $endgroup$
          – user349424
          Jan 8 at 12:57














          $begingroup$
          In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
          $endgroup$
          – user349424
          Jan 8 at 12:59




          $begingroup$
          In other words, is there a morphism which is not injective?
          $endgroup$
          – user349424
          Jan 8 at 12:59












          $begingroup$
          There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
          $endgroup$
          – Sasha
          Jan 8 at 13:18




          $begingroup$
          There may be no nonzero morphisms, I edited the answer to include an example.
          $endgroup$
          – Sasha
          Jan 8 at 13:18


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065998%2fis-there-a-morphism-from-a-locally-free-sheaf-to-the-dual-twisted-by-determinant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

          When does type information flow backwards in C++?

          Grease: Live!