How to solve for $theta$ in terms of $a,b,c$ in this expression?
$begingroup$
I am trying to design a cam profile like in the above image. There are 2 equations I have come up with that define variable "c". The problem, however, is that variables a, b & c are known values and it is angle $theta$ that I need to know. The 2 arcs on either end of the straight line are equal. The radius of the arcs and the angle $theta$ change when any of the variables are changed.
The 2 equations I have so far:
$c = frac{2a}{sin theta}(1-cos theta)+frac{b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
$c = 2 left[ frac{a}{sin theta} - sqrt{ left( frac{a}{sin theta} right)^2 - a^2}, right] + frac {b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
I can't for the life of me manage to rearrange the equation to make $theta$ the subject!
If anyone is an algebra whiz, any help would be much appreciated!
Cheers.
EDIT
Ok, so after a bit of geometric shenanigans, I have come up with some different equations to help solve this but and still struggling to rearrange it. (However, I had to replace $theta$ with $x$ as I couldn't get $theta$ to work with the program I drew this with!)
By drawing a chord for the arc, we can show that the angle of the chord is half that of the slope. What I really need to find is the length of either $e$ or $d$, where $d + e = frac{c}{2}$
Using the half angle formula I get:
$tan x = frac{2 tan frac{x}{2} }{1 - tan^2 frac{x}{2}}$
Which can be written as:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{frac{2e}{a}}{1-frac{e^2}{a^2}} $
Simplifying to:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{2ae}{a^2-e^2}$
My problem now, is that I can't simplify it to get $e$ on its own!
If anyone has any ideas, that would be awesome!
algebra-precalculus trigonometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to design a cam profile like in the above image. There are 2 equations I have come up with that define variable "c". The problem, however, is that variables a, b & c are known values and it is angle $theta$ that I need to know. The 2 arcs on either end of the straight line are equal. The radius of the arcs and the angle $theta$ change when any of the variables are changed.
The 2 equations I have so far:
$c = frac{2a}{sin theta}(1-cos theta)+frac{b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
$c = 2 left[ frac{a}{sin theta} - sqrt{ left( frac{a}{sin theta} right)^2 - a^2}, right] + frac {b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
I can't for the life of me manage to rearrange the equation to make $theta$ the subject!
If anyone is an algebra whiz, any help would be much appreciated!
Cheers.
EDIT
Ok, so after a bit of geometric shenanigans, I have come up with some different equations to help solve this but and still struggling to rearrange it. (However, I had to replace $theta$ with $x$ as I couldn't get $theta$ to work with the program I drew this with!)
By drawing a chord for the arc, we can show that the angle of the chord is half that of the slope. What I really need to find is the length of either $e$ or $d$, where $d + e = frac{c}{2}$
Using the half angle formula I get:
$tan x = frac{2 tan frac{x}{2} }{1 - tan^2 frac{x}{2}}$
Which can be written as:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{frac{2e}{a}}{1-frac{e^2}{a^2}} $
Simplifying to:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{2ae}{a^2-e^2}$
My problem now, is that I can't simplify it to get $e$ on its own!
If anyone has any ideas, that would be awesome!
algebra-precalculus trigonometry
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Related (but not a duplicate): "Find the radius of two circular arcs in a reverse curve separated by a tangent line" and my solution. The curve in question is similar, although the parameters describing it differ; there should be a way to translate one to the other, but I don't have time at the moment.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 8 at 12:07
$begingroup$
Your last equation in $e$ write $a^2 c-2 e left(a^2+a bright)-c e^2+2 e^3=0$ Still the cubic to solve.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to design a cam profile like in the above image. There are 2 equations I have come up with that define variable "c". The problem, however, is that variables a, b & c are known values and it is angle $theta$ that I need to know. The 2 arcs on either end of the straight line are equal. The radius of the arcs and the angle $theta$ change when any of the variables are changed.
The 2 equations I have so far:
$c = frac{2a}{sin theta}(1-cos theta)+frac{b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
$c = 2 left[ frac{a}{sin theta} - sqrt{ left( frac{a}{sin theta} right)^2 - a^2}, right] + frac {b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
I can't for the life of me manage to rearrange the equation to make $theta$ the subject!
If anyone is an algebra whiz, any help would be much appreciated!
Cheers.
EDIT
Ok, so after a bit of geometric shenanigans, I have come up with some different equations to help solve this but and still struggling to rearrange it. (However, I had to replace $theta$ with $x$ as I couldn't get $theta$ to work with the program I drew this with!)
By drawing a chord for the arc, we can show that the angle of the chord is half that of the slope. What I really need to find is the length of either $e$ or $d$, where $d + e = frac{c}{2}$
Using the half angle formula I get:
$tan x = frac{2 tan frac{x}{2} }{1 - tan^2 frac{x}{2}}$
Which can be written as:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{frac{2e}{a}}{1-frac{e^2}{a^2}} $
Simplifying to:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{2ae}{a^2-e^2}$
My problem now, is that I can't simplify it to get $e$ on its own!
If anyone has any ideas, that would be awesome!
algebra-precalculus trigonometry
$endgroup$
I am trying to design a cam profile like in the above image. There are 2 equations I have come up with that define variable "c". The problem, however, is that variables a, b & c are known values and it is angle $theta$ that I need to know. The 2 arcs on either end of the straight line are equal. The radius of the arcs and the angle $theta$ change when any of the variables are changed.
The 2 equations I have so far:
$c = frac{2a}{sin theta}(1-cos theta)+frac{b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
$c = 2 left[ frac{a}{sin theta} - sqrt{ left( frac{a}{sin theta} right)^2 - a^2}, right] + frac {b.sin theta}{cos theta} $
I can't for the life of me manage to rearrange the equation to make $theta$ the subject!
If anyone is an algebra whiz, any help would be much appreciated!
Cheers.
EDIT
Ok, so after a bit of geometric shenanigans, I have come up with some different equations to help solve this but and still struggling to rearrange it. (However, I had to replace $theta$ with $x$ as I couldn't get $theta$ to work with the program I drew this with!)
By drawing a chord for the arc, we can show that the angle of the chord is half that of the slope. What I really need to find is the length of either $e$ or $d$, where $d + e = frac{c}{2}$
Using the half angle formula I get:
$tan x = frac{2 tan frac{x}{2} }{1 - tan^2 frac{x}{2}}$
Which can be written as:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{frac{2e}{a}}{1-frac{e^2}{a^2}} $
Simplifying to:
$frac{c-2e}{b} = frac{2ae}{a^2-e^2}$
My problem now, is that I can't simplify it to get $e$ on its own!
If anyone has any ideas, that would be awesome!
algebra-precalculus trigonometry
algebra-precalculus trigonometry
edited Jan 10 at 1:45
Trolley Trev
asked Jan 8 at 10:12
Trolley TrevTrolley Trev
234
234
1
$begingroup$
Related (but not a duplicate): "Find the radius of two circular arcs in a reverse curve separated by a tangent line" and my solution. The curve in question is similar, although the parameters describing it differ; there should be a way to translate one to the other, but I don't have time at the moment.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 8 at 12:07
$begingroup$
Your last equation in $e$ write $a^2 c-2 e left(a^2+a bright)-c e^2+2 e^3=0$ Still the cubic to solve.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Related (but not a duplicate): "Find the radius of two circular arcs in a reverse curve separated by a tangent line" and my solution. The curve in question is similar, although the parameters describing it differ; there should be a way to translate one to the other, but I don't have time at the moment.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 8 at 12:07
$begingroup$
Your last equation in $e$ write $a^2 c-2 e left(a^2+a bright)-c e^2+2 e^3=0$ Still the cubic to solve.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 10 at 3:30
1
1
$begingroup$
Related (but not a duplicate): "Find the radius of two circular arcs in a reverse curve separated by a tangent line" and my solution. The curve in question is similar, although the parameters describing it differ; there should be a way to translate one to the other, but I don't have time at the moment.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 8 at 12:07
$begingroup$
Related (but not a duplicate): "Find the radius of two circular arcs in a reverse curve separated by a tangent line" and my solution. The curve in question is similar, although the parameters describing it differ; there should be a way to translate one to the other, but I don't have time at the moment.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 8 at 12:07
$begingroup$
Your last equation in $e$ write $a^2 c-2 e left(a^2+a bright)-c e^2+2 e^3=0$ Still the cubic to solve.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 10 at 3:30
$begingroup$
Your last equation in $e$ write $a^2 c-2 e left(a^2+a bright)-c e^2+2 e^3=0$ Still the cubic to solve.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 10 at 3:30
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Considering the first equation
$$c = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}$$
using the tangent half-angle substitution, we end with
$$c=frac{2 t left(-a t^2+a+bright)}{1-t^2}$$ that is to say
$$2 a t^3-c t^2-2 t (a+b)+c=0$$ that you can solve using Cardano method.
Probably easier would be Newton method for solving the cubic equation. Starting using $t_0=0$, we should have $t_1=frac{c}{2 (a+b)}$ and
$$t_2=frac{c^3 (b-a)+4 c (a+b)^3}{8 (a+b)^4-2 c^2 (a-2 b) (a+b)}$$
$$t_{n+1}=frac{4 a t_n^3-c t_n^2-c}{2 left(3 a t_n^2-c t_n-(a+b)right)}$$
Similarly, if $theta$ is small, we could expand the first equation as Taylor series
$$c= (a+b)theta+frac{a+4 b}{12} theta ^3 +frac{a+16
b}{120} theta ^5 +frac{17 (a+64 b)}{20160}theta ^7+Oleft(theta ^9right)$$ and use series reversion to get
$$theta=frac{c}{a+b}-frac{ (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)^4}c^3+frac{ left(a^2+2 a b+16
b^2right)}{80 (a+b)^7}c^5+Oleft(c^7right)$$
Edit
Still assuming small values fo $theta$, we could build at $theta=0$ the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and get for the whole
$$f(theta) = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}-c$$ the approximation
$$f(theta)simeqfrac{-c+ (a+b)theta+frac{c (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)}theta ^2}{1-frac{(a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)} theta ^2 }$$ Solving the quadratic
$$thetasimeq frac{2 left(sqrt{3 c^2 (a+4 b) (a+b)+9 (a+b)^4}-3 (a+b)^2right)}{c (a+4 b)}tag 1$$ which seems interesting.
Let us try it for $a=1$ and $b=4$. Give $theta$ a value to compute $c$ and recompute the estimate $theta_*$ from $(1)$. The table below reproduces results (in degrees).
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
theta & c & theta_* \
5 & 0.43728 & 5.00001 \
10 & 0.88029 & 10.0003 \
15 & 1.33510 & 15.0020 \
20 & 1.80853 & 20.0082 \
25 & 2.30862 & 25.0249 \
30 & 2.84530 & 30.0617 \
35 & 3.43143 & 35.1324 \
40 & 4.08434 & 40.2567 \
45 & 4.82843 & 45.4605 \
50 & 5.69963 & 50.7782 \
55 & 6.75373 & 56.2542 \
60 & 8.08290 & 61.9466
end{array}
right)$$
Update
After comments, it is quite sure that we can make better knowing that the area of interest is around $theta=frac pi 4$. To stay "simple", writing the $[1,1]$ Padé approximant, we should get
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4+ frac{alpha +beta c}{gamma+delta c}$$ where
$$alpha=2 left(left(6 sqrt{2}-8right) a^2+sqrt{2} a b+b^2right)$$
$$beta=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a-2 b$$
$$gamma=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a^2+3 left(5 sqrt{2}-8right) a b-2 b^2$$
$$delta=left(4-3 sqrt{2}right) a-2 b$$ Applied to the case
$$a= pi 160frac{12}{360}=frac{16 pi }{3}qquad b= pi 160frac{50}{360}=frac{200 pi }{9}qquad c=80$$ this would give
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4 +frac{90 left(6 sqrt{2}-37right)+left(337+366 sqrt{2}right) pi }{left(1161
sqrt{2}-2497right) pi -90 left(13+9 sqrt{2}right)}approx 0.761710$$ which converted to degrees would give $43.6427$ while the exact solution would be $theta=0.7617146$ corresponding to $43.6430$. Not too bad.
Keeping $a=frac{16 pi }{3}$ and $b= frac{200 pi }{9}$ and varying $c$ over a quite large range, here are some results.
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.1540 & 35.2569 \
65 & 37.4779 & 37.5244 \
70 & 39.6591 & 39.6759 \
75 & 41.7103 & 41.7142 \
80 & 43.6427 & 43.6430 \
85 & 45.4666 & 45.4665 \
90 & 47.1906 & 47.1894 \
95 & 48.8228 & 48.8165 \
100 & 50.3704 & 50.3528
end{array}
right)$$
New update
We could still do much better at the price of a quadratic equation. Around a given angle $theta_0$, develop the rhs of the original equation as a $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and solve for $theta$. I shall not give here the formulae but just the results for the last worked case $(theta_0=frac pi 4, a=frac{16 pi }{3}, b= frac{200 pi }{9})$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.256535 & 35.256856 \
65 & 37.524331 & 37.524418 \
70 & 39.675901 & 39.675917 \
75 & 41.714232 & 41.714233 \
80 & 43.643029 & 43.643029 \
85 & 45.466540 & 45.466540 \
90 & 47.189400 & 47.189400 \
95 & 48.816481 & 48.816478 \
100 & 50.352781 & 50.352763
end{array}
right)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think one may simplify the problem a lot by realizing that due to symmetry the straight line segment is passing right through the center of your drawing, i.e. given the lower right corner corresponds to $(0,0)$, through $(a+tfrac{b}{2},tfrac{c}{2})$. Then it's easy to see that $tan(tfrac{pi}{2}-theta) = frac{a+tfrac{b}{2}}{tfrac{c}{2}}$. However, the values of $a$, $b$ and $c$ are not independent. Infact all you need is $c$ and $2a+b = 2(a+tfrac{b}{2})$, the latter of which is the width of the rectangle.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can set up $a^2+(c/2)^2=(d/2)^2$ and $tan theta =d/b$ where d is the other side of the center rectangle with one size is $b$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066000%2fhow-to-solve-for-theta-in-terms-of-a-b-c-in-this-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Considering the first equation
$$c = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}$$
using the tangent half-angle substitution, we end with
$$c=frac{2 t left(-a t^2+a+bright)}{1-t^2}$$ that is to say
$$2 a t^3-c t^2-2 t (a+b)+c=0$$ that you can solve using Cardano method.
Probably easier would be Newton method for solving the cubic equation. Starting using $t_0=0$, we should have $t_1=frac{c}{2 (a+b)}$ and
$$t_2=frac{c^3 (b-a)+4 c (a+b)^3}{8 (a+b)^4-2 c^2 (a-2 b) (a+b)}$$
$$t_{n+1}=frac{4 a t_n^3-c t_n^2-c}{2 left(3 a t_n^2-c t_n-(a+b)right)}$$
Similarly, if $theta$ is small, we could expand the first equation as Taylor series
$$c= (a+b)theta+frac{a+4 b}{12} theta ^3 +frac{a+16
b}{120} theta ^5 +frac{17 (a+64 b)}{20160}theta ^7+Oleft(theta ^9right)$$ and use series reversion to get
$$theta=frac{c}{a+b}-frac{ (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)^4}c^3+frac{ left(a^2+2 a b+16
b^2right)}{80 (a+b)^7}c^5+Oleft(c^7right)$$
Edit
Still assuming small values fo $theta$, we could build at $theta=0$ the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and get for the whole
$$f(theta) = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}-c$$ the approximation
$$f(theta)simeqfrac{-c+ (a+b)theta+frac{c (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)}theta ^2}{1-frac{(a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)} theta ^2 }$$ Solving the quadratic
$$thetasimeq frac{2 left(sqrt{3 c^2 (a+4 b) (a+b)+9 (a+b)^4}-3 (a+b)^2right)}{c (a+4 b)}tag 1$$ which seems interesting.
Let us try it for $a=1$ and $b=4$. Give $theta$ a value to compute $c$ and recompute the estimate $theta_*$ from $(1)$. The table below reproduces results (in degrees).
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
theta & c & theta_* \
5 & 0.43728 & 5.00001 \
10 & 0.88029 & 10.0003 \
15 & 1.33510 & 15.0020 \
20 & 1.80853 & 20.0082 \
25 & 2.30862 & 25.0249 \
30 & 2.84530 & 30.0617 \
35 & 3.43143 & 35.1324 \
40 & 4.08434 & 40.2567 \
45 & 4.82843 & 45.4605 \
50 & 5.69963 & 50.7782 \
55 & 6.75373 & 56.2542 \
60 & 8.08290 & 61.9466
end{array}
right)$$
Update
After comments, it is quite sure that we can make better knowing that the area of interest is around $theta=frac pi 4$. To stay "simple", writing the $[1,1]$ Padé approximant, we should get
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4+ frac{alpha +beta c}{gamma+delta c}$$ where
$$alpha=2 left(left(6 sqrt{2}-8right) a^2+sqrt{2} a b+b^2right)$$
$$beta=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a-2 b$$
$$gamma=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a^2+3 left(5 sqrt{2}-8right) a b-2 b^2$$
$$delta=left(4-3 sqrt{2}right) a-2 b$$ Applied to the case
$$a= pi 160frac{12}{360}=frac{16 pi }{3}qquad b= pi 160frac{50}{360}=frac{200 pi }{9}qquad c=80$$ this would give
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4 +frac{90 left(6 sqrt{2}-37right)+left(337+366 sqrt{2}right) pi }{left(1161
sqrt{2}-2497right) pi -90 left(13+9 sqrt{2}right)}approx 0.761710$$ which converted to degrees would give $43.6427$ while the exact solution would be $theta=0.7617146$ corresponding to $43.6430$. Not too bad.
Keeping $a=frac{16 pi }{3}$ and $b= frac{200 pi }{9}$ and varying $c$ over a quite large range, here are some results.
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.1540 & 35.2569 \
65 & 37.4779 & 37.5244 \
70 & 39.6591 & 39.6759 \
75 & 41.7103 & 41.7142 \
80 & 43.6427 & 43.6430 \
85 & 45.4666 & 45.4665 \
90 & 47.1906 & 47.1894 \
95 & 48.8228 & 48.8165 \
100 & 50.3704 & 50.3528
end{array}
right)$$
New update
We could still do much better at the price of a quadratic equation. Around a given angle $theta_0$, develop the rhs of the original equation as a $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and solve for $theta$. I shall not give here the formulae but just the results for the last worked case $(theta_0=frac pi 4, a=frac{16 pi }{3}, b= frac{200 pi }{9})$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.256535 & 35.256856 \
65 & 37.524331 & 37.524418 \
70 & 39.675901 & 39.675917 \
75 & 41.714232 & 41.714233 \
80 & 43.643029 & 43.643029 \
85 & 45.466540 & 45.466540 \
90 & 47.189400 & 47.189400 \
95 & 48.816481 & 48.816478 \
100 & 50.352781 & 50.352763
end{array}
right)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Considering the first equation
$$c = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}$$
using the tangent half-angle substitution, we end with
$$c=frac{2 t left(-a t^2+a+bright)}{1-t^2}$$ that is to say
$$2 a t^3-c t^2-2 t (a+b)+c=0$$ that you can solve using Cardano method.
Probably easier would be Newton method for solving the cubic equation. Starting using $t_0=0$, we should have $t_1=frac{c}{2 (a+b)}$ and
$$t_2=frac{c^3 (b-a)+4 c (a+b)^3}{8 (a+b)^4-2 c^2 (a-2 b) (a+b)}$$
$$t_{n+1}=frac{4 a t_n^3-c t_n^2-c}{2 left(3 a t_n^2-c t_n-(a+b)right)}$$
Similarly, if $theta$ is small, we could expand the first equation as Taylor series
$$c= (a+b)theta+frac{a+4 b}{12} theta ^3 +frac{a+16
b}{120} theta ^5 +frac{17 (a+64 b)}{20160}theta ^7+Oleft(theta ^9right)$$ and use series reversion to get
$$theta=frac{c}{a+b}-frac{ (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)^4}c^3+frac{ left(a^2+2 a b+16
b^2right)}{80 (a+b)^7}c^5+Oleft(c^7right)$$
Edit
Still assuming small values fo $theta$, we could build at $theta=0$ the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and get for the whole
$$f(theta) = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}-c$$ the approximation
$$f(theta)simeqfrac{-c+ (a+b)theta+frac{c (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)}theta ^2}{1-frac{(a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)} theta ^2 }$$ Solving the quadratic
$$thetasimeq frac{2 left(sqrt{3 c^2 (a+4 b) (a+b)+9 (a+b)^4}-3 (a+b)^2right)}{c (a+4 b)}tag 1$$ which seems interesting.
Let us try it for $a=1$ and $b=4$. Give $theta$ a value to compute $c$ and recompute the estimate $theta_*$ from $(1)$. The table below reproduces results (in degrees).
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
theta & c & theta_* \
5 & 0.43728 & 5.00001 \
10 & 0.88029 & 10.0003 \
15 & 1.33510 & 15.0020 \
20 & 1.80853 & 20.0082 \
25 & 2.30862 & 25.0249 \
30 & 2.84530 & 30.0617 \
35 & 3.43143 & 35.1324 \
40 & 4.08434 & 40.2567 \
45 & 4.82843 & 45.4605 \
50 & 5.69963 & 50.7782 \
55 & 6.75373 & 56.2542 \
60 & 8.08290 & 61.9466
end{array}
right)$$
Update
After comments, it is quite sure that we can make better knowing that the area of interest is around $theta=frac pi 4$. To stay "simple", writing the $[1,1]$ Padé approximant, we should get
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4+ frac{alpha +beta c}{gamma+delta c}$$ where
$$alpha=2 left(left(6 sqrt{2}-8right) a^2+sqrt{2} a b+b^2right)$$
$$beta=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a-2 b$$
$$gamma=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a^2+3 left(5 sqrt{2}-8right) a b-2 b^2$$
$$delta=left(4-3 sqrt{2}right) a-2 b$$ Applied to the case
$$a= pi 160frac{12}{360}=frac{16 pi }{3}qquad b= pi 160frac{50}{360}=frac{200 pi }{9}qquad c=80$$ this would give
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4 +frac{90 left(6 sqrt{2}-37right)+left(337+366 sqrt{2}right) pi }{left(1161
sqrt{2}-2497right) pi -90 left(13+9 sqrt{2}right)}approx 0.761710$$ which converted to degrees would give $43.6427$ while the exact solution would be $theta=0.7617146$ corresponding to $43.6430$. Not too bad.
Keeping $a=frac{16 pi }{3}$ and $b= frac{200 pi }{9}$ and varying $c$ over a quite large range, here are some results.
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.1540 & 35.2569 \
65 & 37.4779 & 37.5244 \
70 & 39.6591 & 39.6759 \
75 & 41.7103 & 41.7142 \
80 & 43.6427 & 43.6430 \
85 & 45.4666 & 45.4665 \
90 & 47.1906 & 47.1894 \
95 & 48.8228 & 48.8165 \
100 & 50.3704 & 50.3528
end{array}
right)$$
New update
We could still do much better at the price of a quadratic equation. Around a given angle $theta_0$, develop the rhs of the original equation as a $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and solve for $theta$. I shall not give here the formulae but just the results for the last worked case $(theta_0=frac pi 4, a=frac{16 pi }{3}, b= frac{200 pi }{9})$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.256535 & 35.256856 \
65 & 37.524331 & 37.524418 \
70 & 39.675901 & 39.675917 \
75 & 41.714232 & 41.714233 \
80 & 43.643029 & 43.643029 \
85 & 45.466540 & 45.466540 \
90 & 47.189400 & 47.189400 \
95 & 48.816481 & 48.816478 \
100 & 50.352781 & 50.352763
end{array}
right)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Considering the first equation
$$c = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}$$
using the tangent half-angle substitution, we end with
$$c=frac{2 t left(-a t^2+a+bright)}{1-t^2}$$ that is to say
$$2 a t^3-c t^2-2 t (a+b)+c=0$$ that you can solve using Cardano method.
Probably easier would be Newton method for solving the cubic equation. Starting using $t_0=0$, we should have $t_1=frac{c}{2 (a+b)}$ and
$$t_2=frac{c^3 (b-a)+4 c (a+b)^3}{8 (a+b)^4-2 c^2 (a-2 b) (a+b)}$$
$$t_{n+1}=frac{4 a t_n^3-c t_n^2-c}{2 left(3 a t_n^2-c t_n-(a+b)right)}$$
Similarly, if $theta$ is small, we could expand the first equation as Taylor series
$$c= (a+b)theta+frac{a+4 b}{12} theta ^3 +frac{a+16
b}{120} theta ^5 +frac{17 (a+64 b)}{20160}theta ^7+Oleft(theta ^9right)$$ and use series reversion to get
$$theta=frac{c}{a+b}-frac{ (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)^4}c^3+frac{ left(a^2+2 a b+16
b^2right)}{80 (a+b)^7}c^5+Oleft(c^7right)$$
Edit
Still assuming small values fo $theta$, we could build at $theta=0$ the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and get for the whole
$$f(theta) = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}-c$$ the approximation
$$f(theta)simeqfrac{-c+ (a+b)theta+frac{c (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)}theta ^2}{1-frac{(a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)} theta ^2 }$$ Solving the quadratic
$$thetasimeq frac{2 left(sqrt{3 c^2 (a+4 b) (a+b)+9 (a+b)^4}-3 (a+b)^2right)}{c (a+4 b)}tag 1$$ which seems interesting.
Let us try it for $a=1$ and $b=4$. Give $theta$ a value to compute $c$ and recompute the estimate $theta_*$ from $(1)$. The table below reproduces results (in degrees).
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
theta & c & theta_* \
5 & 0.43728 & 5.00001 \
10 & 0.88029 & 10.0003 \
15 & 1.33510 & 15.0020 \
20 & 1.80853 & 20.0082 \
25 & 2.30862 & 25.0249 \
30 & 2.84530 & 30.0617 \
35 & 3.43143 & 35.1324 \
40 & 4.08434 & 40.2567 \
45 & 4.82843 & 45.4605 \
50 & 5.69963 & 50.7782 \
55 & 6.75373 & 56.2542 \
60 & 8.08290 & 61.9466
end{array}
right)$$
Update
After comments, it is quite sure that we can make better knowing that the area of interest is around $theta=frac pi 4$. To stay "simple", writing the $[1,1]$ Padé approximant, we should get
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4+ frac{alpha +beta c}{gamma+delta c}$$ where
$$alpha=2 left(left(6 sqrt{2}-8right) a^2+sqrt{2} a b+b^2right)$$
$$beta=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a-2 b$$
$$gamma=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a^2+3 left(5 sqrt{2}-8right) a b-2 b^2$$
$$delta=left(4-3 sqrt{2}right) a-2 b$$ Applied to the case
$$a= pi 160frac{12}{360}=frac{16 pi }{3}qquad b= pi 160frac{50}{360}=frac{200 pi }{9}qquad c=80$$ this would give
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4 +frac{90 left(6 sqrt{2}-37right)+left(337+366 sqrt{2}right) pi }{left(1161
sqrt{2}-2497right) pi -90 left(13+9 sqrt{2}right)}approx 0.761710$$ which converted to degrees would give $43.6427$ while the exact solution would be $theta=0.7617146$ corresponding to $43.6430$. Not too bad.
Keeping $a=frac{16 pi }{3}$ and $b= frac{200 pi }{9}$ and varying $c$ over a quite large range, here are some results.
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.1540 & 35.2569 \
65 & 37.4779 & 37.5244 \
70 & 39.6591 & 39.6759 \
75 & 41.7103 & 41.7142 \
80 & 43.6427 & 43.6430 \
85 & 45.4666 & 45.4665 \
90 & 47.1906 & 47.1894 \
95 & 48.8228 & 48.8165 \
100 & 50.3704 & 50.3528
end{array}
right)$$
New update
We could still do much better at the price of a quadratic equation. Around a given angle $theta_0$, develop the rhs of the original equation as a $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and solve for $theta$. I shall not give here the formulae but just the results for the last worked case $(theta_0=frac pi 4, a=frac{16 pi }{3}, b= frac{200 pi }{9})$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.256535 & 35.256856 \
65 & 37.524331 & 37.524418 \
70 & 39.675901 & 39.675917 \
75 & 41.714232 & 41.714233 \
80 & 43.643029 & 43.643029 \
85 & 45.466540 & 45.466540 \
90 & 47.189400 & 47.189400 \
95 & 48.816481 & 48.816478 \
100 & 50.352781 & 50.352763
end{array}
right)$$
$endgroup$
Considering the first equation
$$c = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}$$
using the tangent half-angle substitution, we end with
$$c=frac{2 t left(-a t^2+a+bright)}{1-t^2}$$ that is to say
$$2 a t^3-c t^2-2 t (a+b)+c=0$$ that you can solve using Cardano method.
Probably easier would be Newton method for solving the cubic equation. Starting using $t_0=0$, we should have $t_1=frac{c}{2 (a+b)}$ and
$$t_2=frac{c^3 (b-a)+4 c (a+b)^3}{8 (a+b)^4-2 c^2 (a-2 b) (a+b)}$$
$$t_{n+1}=frac{4 a t_n^3-c t_n^2-c}{2 left(3 a t_n^2-c t_n-(a+b)right)}$$
Similarly, if $theta$ is small, we could expand the first equation as Taylor series
$$c= (a+b)theta+frac{a+4 b}{12} theta ^3 +frac{a+16
b}{120} theta ^5 +frac{17 (a+64 b)}{20160}theta ^7+Oleft(theta ^9right)$$ and use series reversion to get
$$theta=frac{c}{a+b}-frac{ (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)^4}c^3+frac{ left(a^2+2 a b+16
b^2right)}{80 (a+b)^7}c^5+Oleft(c^7right)$$
Edit
Still assuming small values fo $theta$, we could build at $theta=0$ the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and get for the whole
$$f(theta) = frac{2a}{sin (theta)}(1-cos (theta))+frac{b,sin (theta)}{cos (theta)}-c$$ the approximation
$$f(theta)simeqfrac{-c+ (a+b)theta+frac{c (a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)}theta ^2}{1-frac{(a+4 b)}{12 (a+b)} theta ^2 }$$ Solving the quadratic
$$thetasimeq frac{2 left(sqrt{3 c^2 (a+4 b) (a+b)+9 (a+b)^4}-3 (a+b)^2right)}{c (a+4 b)}tag 1$$ which seems interesting.
Let us try it for $a=1$ and $b=4$. Give $theta$ a value to compute $c$ and recompute the estimate $theta_*$ from $(1)$. The table below reproduces results (in degrees).
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
theta & c & theta_* \
5 & 0.43728 & 5.00001 \
10 & 0.88029 & 10.0003 \
15 & 1.33510 & 15.0020 \
20 & 1.80853 & 20.0082 \
25 & 2.30862 & 25.0249 \
30 & 2.84530 & 30.0617 \
35 & 3.43143 & 35.1324 \
40 & 4.08434 & 40.2567 \
45 & 4.82843 & 45.4605 \
50 & 5.69963 & 50.7782 \
55 & 6.75373 & 56.2542 \
60 & 8.08290 & 61.9466
end{array}
right)$$
Update
After comments, it is quite sure that we can make better knowing that the area of interest is around $theta=frac pi 4$. To stay "simple", writing the $[1,1]$ Padé approximant, we should get
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4+ frac{alpha +beta c}{gamma+delta c}$$ where
$$alpha=2 left(left(6 sqrt{2}-8right) a^2+sqrt{2} a b+b^2right)$$
$$beta=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a-2 b$$
$$gamma=2 left(sqrt{2}-2right) a^2+3 left(5 sqrt{2}-8right) a b-2 b^2$$
$$delta=left(4-3 sqrt{2}right) a-2 b$$ Applied to the case
$$a= pi 160frac{12}{360}=frac{16 pi }{3}qquad b= pi 160frac{50}{360}=frac{200 pi }{9}qquad c=80$$ this would give
$$thetasimeq frac pi 4 +frac{90 left(6 sqrt{2}-37right)+left(337+366 sqrt{2}right) pi }{left(1161
sqrt{2}-2497right) pi -90 left(13+9 sqrt{2}right)}approx 0.761710$$ which converted to degrees would give $43.6427$ while the exact solution would be $theta=0.7617146$ corresponding to $43.6430$. Not too bad.
Keeping $a=frac{16 pi }{3}$ and $b= frac{200 pi }{9}$ and varying $c$ over a quite large range, here are some results.
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.1540 & 35.2569 \
65 & 37.4779 & 37.5244 \
70 & 39.6591 & 39.6759 \
75 & 41.7103 & 41.7142 \
80 & 43.6427 & 43.6430 \
85 & 45.4666 & 45.4665 \
90 & 47.1906 & 47.1894 \
95 & 48.8228 & 48.8165 \
100 & 50.3704 & 50.3528
end{array}
right)$$
New update
We could still do much better at the price of a quadratic equation. Around a given angle $theta_0$, develop the rhs of the original equation as a $[2,2]$ Padé approximant and solve for $theta$. I shall not give here the formulae but just the results for the last worked case $(theta_0=frac pi 4, a=frac{16 pi }{3}, b= frac{200 pi }{9})$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
c & theta_{approx} & theta_{exact} \
60 & 35.256535 & 35.256856 \
65 & 37.524331 & 37.524418 \
70 & 39.675901 & 39.675917 \
75 & 41.714232 & 41.714233 \
80 & 43.643029 & 43.643029 \
85 & 45.466540 & 45.466540 \
90 & 47.189400 & 47.189400 \
95 & 48.816481 & 48.816478 \
100 & 50.352781 & 50.352763
end{array}
right)$$
edited Jan 15 at 4:26
answered Jan 8 at 11:22
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
125k1158135
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
That is helpful as I'm looking to have an angle between 40 and 50 degrees and the margin of error is small.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. I thought it could be useful. I could elaborate a much better approximation if you give me the range you really want to explore.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 11 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Ideally: $$a = pi160frac{12}{360}$$ $$b = pi160frac{50}{360}$$ $$c = 80$$ By trial and error, $theta$ is very close to 43.64303$^circ$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 11 at 22:23
1
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. You must keep in mind that we could do much better but at the price of much more nasty expressions.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 9:58
1
1
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@TrolleyTrev. For the specific values of $(a,b)$ you gave and $60 leq c leq 100$, a very good empirical model would be $$theta=-frac{18592}{2245}+frac{2153 sqrt{c}}{1567}+frac{862 c}{969}-frac{88 csqrt{c}}{1997}$$ leading to errors smaller than $0.002$ degrees.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 12 at 16:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think one may simplify the problem a lot by realizing that due to symmetry the straight line segment is passing right through the center of your drawing, i.e. given the lower right corner corresponds to $(0,0)$, through $(a+tfrac{b}{2},tfrac{c}{2})$. Then it's easy to see that $tan(tfrac{pi}{2}-theta) = frac{a+tfrac{b}{2}}{tfrac{c}{2}}$. However, the values of $a$, $b$ and $c$ are not independent. Infact all you need is $c$ and $2a+b = 2(a+tfrac{b}{2})$, the latter of which is the width of the rectangle.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think one may simplify the problem a lot by realizing that due to symmetry the straight line segment is passing right through the center of your drawing, i.e. given the lower right corner corresponds to $(0,0)$, through $(a+tfrac{b}{2},tfrac{c}{2})$. Then it's easy to see that $tan(tfrac{pi}{2}-theta) = frac{a+tfrac{b}{2}}{tfrac{c}{2}}$. However, the values of $a$, $b$ and $c$ are not independent. Infact all you need is $c$ and $2a+b = 2(a+tfrac{b}{2})$, the latter of which is the width of the rectangle.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think one may simplify the problem a lot by realizing that due to symmetry the straight line segment is passing right through the center of your drawing, i.e. given the lower right corner corresponds to $(0,0)$, through $(a+tfrac{b}{2},tfrac{c}{2})$. Then it's easy to see that $tan(tfrac{pi}{2}-theta) = frac{a+tfrac{b}{2}}{tfrac{c}{2}}$. However, the values of $a$, $b$ and $c$ are not independent. Infact all you need is $c$ and $2a+b = 2(a+tfrac{b}{2})$, the latter of which is the width of the rectangle.
$endgroup$
I think one may simplify the problem a lot by realizing that due to symmetry the straight line segment is passing right through the center of your drawing, i.e. given the lower right corner corresponds to $(0,0)$, through $(a+tfrac{b}{2},tfrac{c}{2})$. Then it's easy to see that $tan(tfrac{pi}{2}-theta) = frac{a+tfrac{b}{2}}{tfrac{c}{2}}$. However, the values of $a$, $b$ and $c$ are not independent. Infact all you need is $c$ and $2a+b = 2(a+tfrac{b}{2})$, the latter of which is the width of the rectangle.
answered Jan 8 at 10:29
denklodenklo
4457
4457
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
$begingroup$
That is somewhat helpful, but main problem I'm facing is that in order to figure out the height component of the arc segments, a trig function is required which means I end up with too many trig functions to simplify down to just one. Basically, c = 2 * height of arcs + height of slope.
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 8 at 10:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can set up $a^2+(c/2)^2=(d/2)^2$ and $tan theta =d/b$ where d is the other side of the center rectangle with one size is $b$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can set up $a^2+(c/2)^2=(d/2)^2$ and $tan theta =d/b$ where d is the other side of the center rectangle with one size is $b$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can set up $a^2+(c/2)^2=(d/2)^2$ and $tan theta =d/b$ where d is the other side of the center rectangle with one size is $b$
$endgroup$
We can set up $a^2+(c/2)^2=(d/2)^2$ and $tan theta =d/b$ where d is the other side of the center rectangle with one size is $b$
edited Jan 8 at 12:42
answered Jan 8 at 11:35
kelalakakelalaka
3291314
3291314
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Why -1? Could you explain?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
Jan 8 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
$begingroup$
Not sure who gave the -1 but presumably because $a^2 + left[ frac{c}{2} right]^2 neq left[frac{d}{2}right]^2$
$endgroup$
– Trolley Trev
Jan 10 at 4:01
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066000%2fhow-to-solve-for-theta-in-terms-of-a-b-c-in-this-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Related (but not a duplicate): "Find the radius of two circular arcs in a reverse curve separated by a tangent line" and my solution. The curve in question is similar, although the parameters describing it differ; there should be a way to translate one to the other, but I don't have time at the moment.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 8 at 12:07
$begingroup$
Your last equation in $e$ write $a^2 c-2 e left(a^2+a bright)-c e^2+2 e^3=0$ Still the cubic to solve.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 10 at 3:30