Drawing close together horizontal lines in Latex












3















How can I draw lines like in the picture in Latex? I tried using two consecutive rule but they are not as close together as I would like them to beenter image description here.
This is how I tried:



noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}
noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}









share|improve this question























  • Welcome to TeX-SE! According to tex.stackexchange.com/a/89424/121799 you could do documentclass[fleqn]{article} begin{document} noindent hrule width hsize kern 0.5mm hrule width hsize height 0.4pt end{document}

    – marmot
    Mar 11 at 4:29
















3















How can I draw lines like in the picture in Latex? I tried using two consecutive rule but they are not as close together as I would like them to beenter image description here.
This is how I tried:



noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}
noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}









share|improve this question























  • Welcome to TeX-SE! According to tex.stackexchange.com/a/89424/121799 you could do documentclass[fleqn]{article} begin{document} noindent hrule width hsize kern 0.5mm hrule width hsize height 0.4pt end{document}

    – marmot
    Mar 11 at 4:29














3












3








3








How can I draw lines like in the picture in Latex? I tried using two consecutive rule but they are not as close together as I would like them to beenter image description here.
This is how I tried:



noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}
noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}









share|improve this question














How can I draw lines like in the picture in Latex? I tried using two consecutive rule but they are not as close together as I would like them to beenter image description here.
This is how I tried:



noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}
noindentrule{15cm}{0.7pt}






rules






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 11 at 4:18









OscarOscar

182




182













  • Welcome to TeX-SE! According to tex.stackexchange.com/a/89424/121799 you could do documentclass[fleqn]{article} begin{document} noindent hrule width hsize kern 0.5mm hrule width hsize height 0.4pt end{document}

    – marmot
    Mar 11 at 4:29



















  • Welcome to TeX-SE! According to tex.stackexchange.com/a/89424/121799 you could do documentclass[fleqn]{article} begin{document} noindent hrule width hsize kern 0.5mm hrule width hsize height 0.4pt end{document}

    – marmot
    Mar 11 at 4:29

















Welcome to TeX-SE! According to tex.stackexchange.com/a/89424/121799 you could do documentclass[fleqn]{article} begin{document} noindent hrule width hsize kern 0.5mm hrule width hsize height 0.4pt end{document}

– marmot
Mar 11 at 4:29





Welcome to TeX-SE! According to tex.stackexchange.com/a/89424/121799 you could do documentclass[fleqn]{article} begin{document} noindent hrule width hsize kern 0.5mm hrule width hsize height 0.4pt end{document}

– marmot
Mar 11 at 4:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














The rule macro has an optional first parameter which specifies the height above the baseline. So you can use that to bring two rules closer together:



begin{document}
This is some text.
parnoindentrule{textwidth}{.5pt}
rule[.8baselineskip]{textwidth}{.5pt}
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code



The disadvantage of this approach is that the rule behaves like a single character and must be in its own paragraph. If you want to avoid that, then the hrule approach is better, and you can get very exact spacing. Of course in this case you would probably want to add vertical space around the rules themselves. The following example doesn't do that in order to show the difference between the two methods.



documentclass[11pt]{article}

begin{document}

This is some text.
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
vspace{2pt}
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code






share|improve this answer


























  • I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 7:25











  • @Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

    – Alan Munn
    Mar 11 at 12:47











  • Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 15:30












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478830%2fdrawing-close-together-horizontal-lines-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














The rule macro has an optional first parameter which specifies the height above the baseline. So you can use that to bring two rules closer together:



begin{document}
This is some text.
parnoindentrule{textwidth}{.5pt}
rule[.8baselineskip]{textwidth}{.5pt}
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code



The disadvantage of this approach is that the rule behaves like a single character and must be in its own paragraph. If you want to avoid that, then the hrule approach is better, and you can get very exact spacing. Of course in this case you would probably want to add vertical space around the rules themselves. The following example doesn't do that in order to show the difference between the two methods.



documentclass[11pt]{article}

begin{document}

This is some text.
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
vspace{2pt}
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code






share|improve this answer


























  • I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 7:25











  • @Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

    – Alan Munn
    Mar 11 at 12:47











  • Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 15:30
















8














The rule macro has an optional first parameter which specifies the height above the baseline. So you can use that to bring two rules closer together:



begin{document}
This is some text.
parnoindentrule{textwidth}{.5pt}
rule[.8baselineskip]{textwidth}{.5pt}
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code



The disadvantage of this approach is that the rule behaves like a single character and must be in its own paragraph. If you want to avoid that, then the hrule approach is better, and you can get very exact spacing. Of course in this case you would probably want to add vertical space around the rules themselves. The following example doesn't do that in order to show the difference between the two methods.



documentclass[11pt]{article}

begin{document}

This is some text.
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
vspace{2pt}
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code






share|improve this answer


























  • I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 7:25











  • @Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

    – Alan Munn
    Mar 11 at 12:47











  • Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 15:30














8












8








8







The rule macro has an optional first parameter which specifies the height above the baseline. So you can use that to bring two rules closer together:



begin{document}
This is some text.
parnoindentrule{textwidth}{.5pt}
rule[.8baselineskip]{textwidth}{.5pt}
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code



The disadvantage of this approach is that the rule behaves like a single character and must be in its own paragraph. If you want to avoid that, then the hrule approach is better, and you can get very exact spacing. Of course in this case you would probably want to add vertical space around the rules themselves. The following example doesn't do that in order to show the difference between the two methods.



documentclass[11pt]{article}

begin{document}

This is some text.
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
vspace{2pt}
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code






share|improve this answer















The rule macro has an optional first parameter which specifies the height above the baseline. So you can use that to bring two rules closer together:



begin{document}
This is some text.
parnoindentrule{textwidth}{.5pt}
rule[.8baselineskip]{textwidth}{.5pt}
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code



The disadvantage of this approach is that the rule behaves like a single character and must be in its own paragraph. If you want to avoid that, then the hrule approach is better, and you can get very exact spacing. Of course in this case you would probably want to add vertical space around the rules themselves. The following example doesn't do that in order to show the difference between the two methods.



documentclass[11pt]{article}

begin{document}

This is some text.
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
vspace{2pt}
hrule height 0.5pt depth 0pt width textwidth
This is some text.
end{document}


output of code







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 11 at 12:47

























answered Mar 11 at 4:53









Alan MunnAlan Munn

163k28433714




163k28433714













  • I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 7:25











  • @Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

    – Alan Munn
    Mar 11 at 12:47











  • Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 15:30



















  • I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 7:25











  • @Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

    – Alan Munn
    Mar 11 at 12:47











  • Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

    – Arsenal
    Mar 11 at 15:30

















I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

– Arsenal
Mar 11 at 7:25





I don't really see the difference between the two approaches as the first example contains no text.

– Arsenal
Mar 11 at 7:25













@Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

– Alan Munn
Mar 11 at 12:47





@Arsenal I've made the two examples parallel to show the difference more clearly.

– Alan Munn
Mar 11 at 12:47













Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

– Arsenal
Mar 11 at 15:30





Yes, that shows the difference very clearly. Thank you.

– Arsenal
Mar 11 at 15:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478830%2fdrawing-close-together-horizontal-lines-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Index of /

Tribalistas

Listed building