Regular connected graph with at least one bridge.












3












$begingroup$



We have a connected $k$-regular graph with at least one bridge. For which $k$ does such a graph exsist?




Clearly if $k$ is even, then this graph is Eulerian so it does not have a bridge. So $k$ must be odd.



Also if we delte this bride, then we have components $A$ and $B$ with $a$ and $b$ elements, so we have for component $A$ by handshake lemma $$(a-1)cdot k+1cdot (k-1) = 2alpha$$
where $alpha $ is the number of edges in $A$. So $a$ must be odd. The same is true for $B$.



Now, I don't know how to prove that $k$ is odd is also a sufficient condition. Any idea?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$



    We have a connected $k$-regular graph with at least one bridge. For which $k$ does such a graph exsist?




    Clearly if $k$ is even, then this graph is Eulerian so it does not have a bridge. So $k$ must be odd.



    Also if we delte this bride, then we have components $A$ and $B$ with $a$ and $b$ elements, so we have for component $A$ by handshake lemma $$(a-1)cdot k+1cdot (k-1) = 2alpha$$
    where $alpha $ is the number of edges in $A$. So $a$ must be odd. The same is true for $B$.



    Now, I don't know how to prove that $k$ is odd is also a sufficient condition. Any idea?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$



      We have a connected $k$-regular graph with at least one bridge. For which $k$ does such a graph exsist?




      Clearly if $k$ is even, then this graph is Eulerian so it does not have a bridge. So $k$ must be odd.



      Also if we delte this bride, then we have components $A$ and $B$ with $a$ and $b$ elements, so we have for component $A$ by handshake lemma $$(a-1)cdot k+1cdot (k-1) = 2alpha$$
      where $alpha $ is the number of edges in $A$. So $a$ must be odd. The same is true for $B$.



      Now, I don't know how to prove that $k$ is odd is also a sufficient condition. Any idea?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      We have a connected $k$-regular graph with at least one bridge. For which $k$ does such a graph exsist?




      Clearly if $k$ is even, then this graph is Eulerian so it does not have a bridge. So $k$ must be odd.



      Also if we delte this bride, then we have components $A$ and $B$ with $a$ and $b$ elements, so we have for component $A$ by handshake lemma $$(a-1)cdot k+1cdot (k-1) = 2alpha$$
      where $alpha $ is the number of edges in $A$. So $a$ must be odd. The same is true for $B$.



      Now, I don't know how to prove that $k$ is odd is also a sufficient condition. Any idea?







      combinatorics graph-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 8 at 20:11







      Maria Mazur

















      asked Jan 8 at 18:57









      Maria MazurMaria Mazur

      50k1361125




      50k1361125






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The special case $k=1$ is uninteresting and easy. So assume $kge 3$.



          Take a complete graph on $k+1$ vertices. Select and remove a perfect matching between $k-1$ of them (which is an even number). Each of those $k-1$ vertices now have degree $k-1$; connect them all to a fresh vertex to get their degree back up to $k$. The fresh vertex has exactly one valence left over, which will be your bridge when you connect the graph so far with a second copy of itself.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Great, how did you come up with this solution?
            $endgroup$
            – Maria Mazur
            Jan 8 at 20:02



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your observation involving the handshake lemma can be strengthened a bit: $A$ must have degree sequence $(k, k, ldots, k, k-1)$, where there are $a-1$ copies of $k$. A similar statement can be made for $B$. Given two graphs $A$ and $B$ with degree sequences like this, can you construct the desired $k$-regular graph? Do you know some technique for showing that such graphs exist?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066580%2fregular-connected-graph-with-at-least-one-bridge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The special case $k=1$ is uninteresting and easy. So assume $kge 3$.



            Take a complete graph on $k+1$ vertices. Select and remove a perfect matching between $k-1$ of them (which is an even number). Each of those $k-1$ vertices now have degree $k-1$; connect them all to a fresh vertex to get their degree back up to $k$. The fresh vertex has exactly one valence left over, which will be your bridge when you connect the graph so far with a second copy of itself.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Great, how did you come up with this solution?
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              Jan 8 at 20:02
















            3












            $begingroup$

            The special case $k=1$ is uninteresting and easy. So assume $kge 3$.



            Take a complete graph on $k+1$ vertices. Select and remove a perfect matching between $k-1$ of them (which is an even number). Each of those $k-1$ vertices now have degree $k-1$; connect them all to a fresh vertex to get their degree back up to $k$. The fresh vertex has exactly one valence left over, which will be your bridge when you connect the graph so far with a second copy of itself.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Great, how did you come up with this solution?
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              Jan 8 at 20:02














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            The special case $k=1$ is uninteresting and easy. So assume $kge 3$.



            Take a complete graph on $k+1$ vertices. Select and remove a perfect matching between $k-1$ of them (which is an even number). Each of those $k-1$ vertices now have degree $k-1$; connect them all to a fresh vertex to get their degree back up to $k$. The fresh vertex has exactly one valence left over, which will be your bridge when you connect the graph so far with a second copy of itself.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The special case $k=1$ is uninteresting and easy. So assume $kge 3$.



            Take a complete graph on $k+1$ vertices. Select and remove a perfect matching between $k-1$ of them (which is an even number). Each of those $k-1$ vertices now have degree $k-1$; connect them all to a fresh vertex to get their degree back up to $k$. The fresh vertex has exactly one valence left over, which will be your bridge when you connect the graph so far with a second copy of itself.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 8 at 19:54









            Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

            243k17312556




            243k17312556












            • $begingroup$
              Great, how did you come up with this solution?
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              Jan 8 at 20:02


















            • $begingroup$
              Great, how did you come up with this solution?
              $endgroup$
              – Maria Mazur
              Jan 8 at 20:02
















            $begingroup$
            Great, how did you come up with this solution?
            $endgroup$
            – Maria Mazur
            Jan 8 at 20:02




            $begingroup$
            Great, how did you come up with this solution?
            $endgroup$
            – Maria Mazur
            Jan 8 at 20:02











            1












            $begingroup$

            Your observation involving the handshake lemma can be strengthened a bit: $A$ must have degree sequence $(k, k, ldots, k, k-1)$, where there are $a-1$ copies of $k$. A similar statement can be made for $B$. Given two graphs $A$ and $B$ with degree sequences like this, can you construct the desired $k$-regular graph? Do you know some technique for showing that such graphs exist?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Your observation involving the handshake lemma can be strengthened a bit: $A$ must have degree sequence $(k, k, ldots, k, k-1)$, where there are $a-1$ copies of $k$. A similar statement can be made for $B$. Given two graphs $A$ and $B$ with degree sequences like this, can you construct the desired $k$-regular graph? Do you know some technique for showing that such graphs exist?






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Your observation involving the handshake lemma can be strengthened a bit: $A$ must have degree sequence $(k, k, ldots, k, k-1)$, where there are $a-1$ copies of $k$. A similar statement can be made for $B$. Given two graphs $A$ and $B$ with degree sequences like this, can you construct the desired $k$-regular graph? Do you know some technique for showing that such graphs exist?






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your observation involving the handshake lemma can be strengthened a bit: $A$ must have degree sequence $(k, k, ldots, k, k-1)$, where there are $a-1$ copies of $k$. A similar statement can be made for $B$. Given two graphs $A$ and $B$ with degree sequences like this, can you construct the desired $k$-regular graph? Do you know some technique for showing that such graphs exist?







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 8 at 19:02









                Gregory J. PuleoGregory J. Puleo

                4,65631520




                4,65631520






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066580%2fregular-connected-graph-with-at-least-one-bridge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix