Underbound length of a ternary linear code












0












$begingroup$


I have to prove the following theorem:



Let $C$ be a ternary linear $[n,2,d]$-code. Prove that $d+ d/3 leq n$.



Now I don't really see what the best approach for this would be. I was thinking maybe the generator matrix, but I didn't really get anywhere when trying this. Any tips?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $d+ d/3 leq n$ looks weird, as it would be simpler to write $ frac43 d leq n$ Are you sure you got it right?
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 8 at 20:47












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I'm sure...
    $endgroup$
    – xzeo
    Jan 9 at 11:08










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: consider the possible columns of $G$ and how many linear combinatios produce a zero in each position....
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 9 at 13:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a special case of the Griesmer bound. The 2-dimensional case can, indeed, be proven the way leonbloy indicated. But the general result isn't very difficult either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 9 at 15:25
















0












$begingroup$


I have to prove the following theorem:



Let $C$ be a ternary linear $[n,2,d]$-code. Prove that $d+ d/3 leq n$.



Now I don't really see what the best approach for this would be. I was thinking maybe the generator matrix, but I didn't really get anywhere when trying this. Any tips?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $d+ d/3 leq n$ looks weird, as it would be simpler to write $ frac43 d leq n$ Are you sure you got it right?
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 8 at 20:47












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I'm sure...
    $endgroup$
    – xzeo
    Jan 9 at 11:08










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: consider the possible columns of $G$ and how many linear combinatios produce a zero in each position....
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 9 at 13:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a special case of the Griesmer bound. The 2-dimensional case can, indeed, be proven the way leonbloy indicated. But the general result isn't very difficult either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 9 at 15:25














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have to prove the following theorem:



Let $C$ be a ternary linear $[n,2,d]$-code. Prove that $d+ d/3 leq n$.



Now I don't really see what the best approach for this would be. I was thinking maybe the generator matrix, but I didn't really get anywhere when trying this. Any tips?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have to prove the following theorem:



Let $C$ be a ternary linear $[n,2,d]$-code. Prove that $d+ d/3 leq n$.



Now I don't really see what the best approach for this would be. I was thinking maybe the generator matrix, but I didn't really get anywhere when trying this. Any tips?







coding-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 8 at 18:41









xzeoxzeo

388111




388111












  • $begingroup$
    $d+ d/3 leq n$ looks weird, as it would be simpler to write $ frac43 d leq n$ Are you sure you got it right?
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 8 at 20:47












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I'm sure...
    $endgroup$
    – xzeo
    Jan 9 at 11:08










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: consider the possible columns of $G$ and how many linear combinatios produce a zero in each position....
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 9 at 13:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a special case of the Griesmer bound. The 2-dimensional case can, indeed, be proven the way leonbloy indicated. But the general result isn't very difficult either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 9 at 15:25


















  • $begingroup$
    $d+ d/3 leq n$ looks weird, as it would be simpler to write $ frac43 d leq n$ Are you sure you got it right?
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 8 at 20:47












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I'm sure...
    $endgroup$
    – xzeo
    Jan 9 at 11:08










  • $begingroup$
    Hint: consider the possible columns of $G$ and how many linear combinatios produce a zero in each position....
    $endgroup$
    – leonbloy
    Jan 9 at 13:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a special case of the Griesmer bound. The 2-dimensional case can, indeed, be proven the way leonbloy indicated. But the general result isn't very difficult either.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 9 at 15:25
















$begingroup$
$d+ d/3 leq n$ looks weird, as it would be simpler to write $ frac43 d leq n$ Are you sure you got it right?
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Jan 8 at 20:47






$begingroup$
$d+ d/3 leq n$ looks weird, as it would be simpler to write $ frac43 d leq n$ Are you sure you got it right?
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Jan 8 at 20:47














$begingroup$
Yes I'm sure...
$endgroup$
– xzeo
Jan 9 at 11:08




$begingroup$
Yes I'm sure...
$endgroup$
– xzeo
Jan 9 at 11:08












$begingroup$
Hint: consider the possible columns of $G$ and how many linear combinatios produce a zero in each position....
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Jan 9 at 13:43




$begingroup$
Hint: consider the possible columns of $G$ and how many linear combinatios produce a zero in each position....
$endgroup$
– leonbloy
Jan 9 at 13:43




2




2




$begingroup$
This is a special case of the Griesmer bound. The 2-dimensional case can, indeed, be proven the way leonbloy indicated. But the general result isn't very difficult either.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 9 at 15:25




$begingroup$
This is a special case of the Griesmer bound. The 2-dimensional case can, indeed, be proven the way leonbloy indicated. But the general result isn't very difficult either.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 9 at 15:25










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066564%2funderbound-length-of-a-ternary-linear-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066564%2funderbound-length-of-a-ternary-linear-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis