Two types of Grothendieck groups for rings
$begingroup$
For a Noetherian ring $R$, there seem to be two versions of zeroth K-theory one can associate to it: $K_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the exact category of projective modules and $G_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the abelian category of finitely-generated modules. There is a map $K_0(R) rightarrow G_0(R)$ and if $R$ is a regular ring, this map is an isomorphism. What is an example of a (non-regular) ring $R$ such that $K_0(R)$ and $G_0(R)$ are not isomorphic?
(I know that if $R = k[x]/(x^n)$, then $K_0(R), G_0(R)$ are both abstractly isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ but the map above is multiplication by $n$ and hence not an isomorphism. I would an example of $R$ where the two Grothendieck groups are not even abstractly isomorphic).
ring-theory homological-algebra k-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a Noetherian ring $R$, there seem to be two versions of zeroth K-theory one can associate to it: $K_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the exact category of projective modules and $G_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the abelian category of finitely-generated modules. There is a map $K_0(R) rightarrow G_0(R)$ and if $R$ is a regular ring, this map is an isomorphism. What is an example of a (non-regular) ring $R$ such that $K_0(R)$ and $G_0(R)$ are not isomorphic?
(I know that if $R = k[x]/(x^n)$, then $K_0(R), G_0(R)$ are both abstractly isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ but the map above is multiplication by $n$ and hence not an isomorphism. I would an example of $R$ where the two Grothendieck groups are not even abstractly isomorphic).
ring-theory homological-algebra k-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a Noetherian ring $R$, there seem to be two versions of zeroth K-theory one can associate to it: $K_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the exact category of projective modules and $G_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the abelian category of finitely-generated modules. There is a map $K_0(R) rightarrow G_0(R)$ and if $R$ is a regular ring, this map is an isomorphism. What is an example of a (non-regular) ring $R$ such that $K_0(R)$ and $G_0(R)$ are not isomorphic?
(I know that if $R = k[x]/(x^n)$, then $K_0(R), G_0(R)$ are both abstractly isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ but the map above is multiplication by $n$ and hence not an isomorphism. I would an example of $R$ where the two Grothendieck groups are not even abstractly isomorphic).
ring-theory homological-algebra k-theory
$endgroup$
For a Noetherian ring $R$, there seem to be two versions of zeroth K-theory one can associate to it: $K_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the exact category of projective modules and $G_0(R)$ the Grothendieck group of the abelian category of finitely-generated modules. There is a map $K_0(R) rightarrow G_0(R)$ and if $R$ is a regular ring, this map is an isomorphism. What is an example of a (non-regular) ring $R$ such that $K_0(R)$ and $G_0(R)$ are not isomorphic?
(I know that if $R = k[x]/(x^n)$, then $K_0(R), G_0(R)$ are both abstractly isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ but the map above is multiplication by $n$ and hence not an isomorphism. I would an example of $R$ where the two Grothendieck groups are not even abstractly isomorphic).
ring-theory homological-algebra k-theory
ring-theory homological-algebra k-theory
asked Jan 8 at 19:28
user39598user39598
179213
179213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field and $R=k[[x,y]]/(xy)$. Then $R$ is local, so projective modules are free and $K_0(R)congmathbb{Z}$. I claim $G_0(R)$ is not cyclic, and in particular that the modules $M=R/(x)$ and $N=R/(y)$ are $mathbb{Z}$-linearly independent in $G_0(R)$. To prove this, note that localization gives a homomorphism $G_0(R)to G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$. We have $M_x=0$ and $M_ycong R_y$, and $N_xcong R_x$ and $N_y=0$. It follows that the images of $M$ and $N$ in $G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$ are linearly independent, and hence $M$ and $N$ are linearly independent in $G_0(R)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066615%2ftwo-types-of-grothendieck-groups-for-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field and $R=k[[x,y]]/(xy)$. Then $R$ is local, so projective modules are free and $K_0(R)congmathbb{Z}$. I claim $G_0(R)$ is not cyclic, and in particular that the modules $M=R/(x)$ and $N=R/(y)$ are $mathbb{Z}$-linearly independent in $G_0(R)$. To prove this, note that localization gives a homomorphism $G_0(R)to G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$. We have $M_x=0$ and $M_ycong R_y$, and $N_xcong R_x$ and $N_y=0$. It follows that the images of $M$ and $N$ in $G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$ are linearly independent, and hence $M$ and $N$ are linearly independent in $G_0(R)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field and $R=k[[x,y]]/(xy)$. Then $R$ is local, so projective modules are free and $K_0(R)congmathbb{Z}$. I claim $G_0(R)$ is not cyclic, and in particular that the modules $M=R/(x)$ and $N=R/(y)$ are $mathbb{Z}$-linearly independent in $G_0(R)$. To prove this, note that localization gives a homomorphism $G_0(R)to G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$. We have $M_x=0$ and $M_ycong R_y$, and $N_xcong R_x$ and $N_y=0$. It follows that the images of $M$ and $N$ in $G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$ are linearly independent, and hence $M$ and $N$ are linearly independent in $G_0(R)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field and $R=k[[x,y]]/(xy)$. Then $R$ is local, so projective modules are free and $K_0(R)congmathbb{Z}$. I claim $G_0(R)$ is not cyclic, and in particular that the modules $M=R/(x)$ and $N=R/(y)$ are $mathbb{Z}$-linearly independent in $G_0(R)$. To prove this, note that localization gives a homomorphism $G_0(R)to G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$. We have $M_x=0$ and $M_ycong R_y$, and $N_xcong R_x$ and $N_y=0$. It follows that the images of $M$ and $N$ in $G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$ are linearly independent, and hence $M$ and $N$ are linearly independent in $G_0(R)$.
$endgroup$
Let $k$ be a field and $R=k[[x,y]]/(xy)$. Then $R$ is local, so projective modules are free and $K_0(R)congmathbb{Z}$. I claim $G_0(R)$ is not cyclic, and in particular that the modules $M=R/(x)$ and $N=R/(y)$ are $mathbb{Z}$-linearly independent in $G_0(R)$. To prove this, note that localization gives a homomorphism $G_0(R)to G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$. We have $M_x=0$ and $M_ycong R_y$, and $N_xcong R_x$ and $N_y=0$. It follows that the images of $M$ and $N$ in $G_0(R_x)times G_0(R_y)$ are linearly independent, and hence $M$ and $N$ are linearly independent in $G_0(R)$.
answered Jan 8 at 21:54
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
193k14221352
193k14221352
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066615%2ftwo-types-of-grothendieck-groups-for-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown