3TB Western Digital Hard drive is showing only 2TB





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I do not believe this to be an issue with formatting. Both Linux and Windows (64bit) see it as 2TB drive. However it is supposed to be a 3TB drive. It is in an enclosure, and I am wondering if perhaps the enclosure's controller is unable to support larger than 2TB drives? It is a WD MyBook and is not meant to be taken apart to plug in the drive directly into a PC... so before I rip it apart I thought id ask for advice here. It is a USB3.0 enclosure, I believe by the time USB3.0 came about we have resolved 32bit issues?



sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda1
Disk /dev/sda1: 1.8 TiB, 2000362143744 bytes, 3906957312 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1p1 1920221984 3736432267 1816210284 866G 72 unknown
/dev/sda1p2 1936028192 3889681299 1953653108 931.6G 6c unknown
/dev/sda1p3 0 0 0 0B 0 Empty
/dev/sda1p4 27722122 27722568 447 223.5K 0 Empty


Under what circumstances will sda1p3 show up like that with all 0's ?



Drive's internal info states its a 3TB drive:



sudo hdparm -I /dev/sda1

/dev/sda1:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD30EZRX-00D8PB0
Firmware Revision: 80.00A80
Transport: Serial, SATA 1.0a, SATA II Extensions, SATA Rev 2.5, SATA Rev 2.6, SATA Rev 3.0
Standards:
Supported: 9 8 7 6 5
Likely used: 9
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 5860533168
Logical Sector size: 512 bytes
Physical Sector size: 4096 bytes
device size with M = 1024*1024: 2861588 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 3000592 MBytes (3000 GB)


df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 59G 6.7G 50G 12% /
devtmpfs 484M 0 484M 0% /dev
tmpfs 489M 8.0K 489M 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 489M 6.5M 482M 2% /run
tmpfs 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 489M 0 489M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mmcblk0p1 44M 22M 22M 51% /boot
/dev/sda1 1.9T 435G 1.4T 24% /media/ExternalHD
tmpfs 98M 0 98M 0% /run/user/1000


Any ideas?










share|improve this question























  • You say it’s a MyBook enclosure. Did you install this hard drive manually or did it come in the enclosure?

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 6:16











  • I do not remember at this point. Ive had this hard drive for at least 5 years... I might have installed it in there or it might have come with it. This drive has been sitting in the closet for almost entirety of that time and I want to actually start using it, but before I load it up all the way with data I want to see if I can actually utilize the full 3TB. Have you seen sda1p3 report all 0's like that before?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 6:51








  • 1





    There's sure to be an exact model number on the enclosure somewhere. Please add it to your question.

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 7:13











  • You are onto something. wdbwlg0020hbk-04, which according to this (and the obvious 20 in P/N) points to 2TB drive support.wdc.com/product.aspx?ID=307&lang=en Now I wonder if there is a way to make a 3TB work with it (maybe a firmware flash to the controller or param change or something) ?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 7:20











  • Possible duplicate of 3TB SATA hard drives into an old Linux system

    – Ramhound
    Mar 11 at 11:07


















1















I do not believe this to be an issue with formatting. Both Linux and Windows (64bit) see it as 2TB drive. However it is supposed to be a 3TB drive. It is in an enclosure, and I am wondering if perhaps the enclosure's controller is unable to support larger than 2TB drives? It is a WD MyBook and is not meant to be taken apart to plug in the drive directly into a PC... so before I rip it apart I thought id ask for advice here. It is a USB3.0 enclosure, I believe by the time USB3.0 came about we have resolved 32bit issues?



sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda1
Disk /dev/sda1: 1.8 TiB, 2000362143744 bytes, 3906957312 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1p1 1920221984 3736432267 1816210284 866G 72 unknown
/dev/sda1p2 1936028192 3889681299 1953653108 931.6G 6c unknown
/dev/sda1p3 0 0 0 0B 0 Empty
/dev/sda1p4 27722122 27722568 447 223.5K 0 Empty


Under what circumstances will sda1p3 show up like that with all 0's ?



Drive's internal info states its a 3TB drive:



sudo hdparm -I /dev/sda1

/dev/sda1:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD30EZRX-00D8PB0
Firmware Revision: 80.00A80
Transport: Serial, SATA 1.0a, SATA II Extensions, SATA Rev 2.5, SATA Rev 2.6, SATA Rev 3.0
Standards:
Supported: 9 8 7 6 5
Likely used: 9
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 5860533168
Logical Sector size: 512 bytes
Physical Sector size: 4096 bytes
device size with M = 1024*1024: 2861588 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 3000592 MBytes (3000 GB)


df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 59G 6.7G 50G 12% /
devtmpfs 484M 0 484M 0% /dev
tmpfs 489M 8.0K 489M 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 489M 6.5M 482M 2% /run
tmpfs 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 489M 0 489M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mmcblk0p1 44M 22M 22M 51% /boot
/dev/sda1 1.9T 435G 1.4T 24% /media/ExternalHD
tmpfs 98M 0 98M 0% /run/user/1000


Any ideas?










share|improve this question























  • You say it’s a MyBook enclosure. Did you install this hard drive manually or did it come in the enclosure?

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 6:16











  • I do not remember at this point. Ive had this hard drive for at least 5 years... I might have installed it in there or it might have come with it. This drive has been sitting in the closet for almost entirety of that time and I want to actually start using it, but before I load it up all the way with data I want to see if I can actually utilize the full 3TB. Have you seen sda1p3 report all 0's like that before?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 6:51








  • 1





    There's sure to be an exact model number on the enclosure somewhere. Please add it to your question.

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 7:13











  • You are onto something. wdbwlg0020hbk-04, which according to this (and the obvious 20 in P/N) points to 2TB drive support.wdc.com/product.aspx?ID=307&lang=en Now I wonder if there is a way to make a 3TB work with it (maybe a firmware flash to the controller or param change or something) ?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 7:20











  • Possible duplicate of 3TB SATA hard drives into an old Linux system

    – Ramhound
    Mar 11 at 11:07














1












1








1








I do not believe this to be an issue with formatting. Both Linux and Windows (64bit) see it as 2TB drive. However it is supposed to be a 3TB drive. It is in an enclosure, and I am wondering if perhaps the enclosure's controller is unable to support larger than 2TB drives? It is a WD MyBook and is not meant to be taken apart to plug in the drive directly into a PC... so before I rip it apart I thought id ask for advice here. It is a USB3.0 enclosure, I believe by the time USB3.0 came about we have resolved 32bit issues?



sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda1
Disk /dev/sda1: 1.8 TiB, 2000362143744 bytes, 3906957312 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1p1 1920221984 3736432267 1816210284 866G 72 unknown
/dev/sda1p2 1936028192 3889681299 1953653108 931.6G 6c unknown
/dev/sda1p3 0 0 0 0B 0 Empty
/dev/sda1p4 27722122 27722568 447 223.5K 0 Empty


Under what circumstances will sda1p3 show up like that with all 0's ?



Drive's internal info states its a 3TB drive:



sudo hdparm -I /dev/sda1

/dev/sda1:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD30EZRX-00D8PB0
Firmware Revision: 80.00A80
Transport: Serial, SATA 1.0a, SATA II Extensions, SATA Rev 2.5, SATA Rev 2.6, SATA Rev 3.0
Standards:
Supported: 9 8 7 6 5
Likely used: 9
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 5860533168
Logical Sector size: 512 bytes
Physical Sector size: 4096 bytes
device size with M = 1024*1024: 2861588 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 3000592 MBytes (3000 GB)


df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 59G 6.7G 50G 12% /
devtmpfs 484M 0 484M 0% /dev
tmpfs 489M 8.0K 489M 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 489M 6.5M 482M 2% /run
tmpfs 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 489M 0 489M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mmcblk0p1 44M 22M 22M 51% /boot
/dev/sda1 1.9T 435G 1.4T 24% /media/ExternalHD
tmpfs 98M 0 98M 0% /run/user/1000


Any ideas?










share|improve this question














I do not believe this to be an issue with formatting. Both Linux and Windows (64bit) see it as 2TB drive. However it is supposed to be a 3TB drive. It is in an enclosure, and I am wondering if perhaps the enclosure's controller is unable to support larger than 2TB drives? It is a WD MyBook and is not meant to be taken apart to plug in the drive directly into a PC... so before I rip it apart I thought id ask for advice here. It is a USB3.0 enclosure, I believe by the time USB3.0 came about we have resolved 32bit issues?



sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda1
Disk /dev/sda1: 1.8 TiB, 2000362143744 bytes, 3906957312 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1p1 1920221984 3736432267 1816210284 866G 72 unknown
/dev/sda1p2 1936028192 3889681299 1953653108 931.6G 6c unknown
/dev/sda1p3 0 0 0 0B 0 Empty
/dev/sda1p4 27722122 27722568 447 223.5K 0 Empty


Under what circumstances will sda1p3 show up like that with all 0's ?



Drive's internal info states its a 3TB drive:



sudo hdparm -I /dev/sda1

/dev/sda1:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD30EZRX-00D8PB0
Firmware Revision: 80.00A80
Transport: Serial, SATA 1.0a, SATA II Extensions, SATA Rev 2.5, SATA Rev 2.6, SATA Rev 3.0
Standards:
Supported: 9 8 7 6 5
Likely used: 9
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 5860533168
Logical Sector size: 512 bytes
Physical Sector size: 4096 bytes
device size with M = 1024*1024: 2861588 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 3000592 MBytes (3000 GB)


df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 59G 6.7G 50G 12% /
devtmpfs 484M 0 484M 0% /dev
tmpfs 489M 8.0K 489M 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 489M 6.5M 482M 2% /run
tmpfs 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 489M 0 489M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mmcblk0p1 44M 22M 22M 51% /boot
/dev/sda1 1.9T 435G 1.4T 24% /media/ExternalHD
tmpfs 98M 0 98M 0% /run/user/1000


Any ideas?







hard-drive partitioning fdisk hdparm






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 11 at 5:58









DuxaDuxa

1134




1134













  • You say it’s a MyBook enclosure. Did you install this hard drive manually or did it come in the enclosure?

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 6:16











  • I do not remember at this point. Ive had this hard drive for at least 5 years... I might have installed it in there or it might have come with it. This drive has been sitting in the closet for almost entirety of that time and I want to actually start using it, but before I load it up all the way with data I want to see if I can actually utilize the full 3TB. Have you seen sda1p3 report all 0's like that before?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 6:51








  • 1





    There's sure to be an exact model number on the enclosure somewhere. Please add it to your question.

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 7:13











  • You are onto something. wdbwlg0020hbk-04, which according to this (and the obvious 20 in P/N) points to 2TB drive support.wdc.com/product.aspx?ID=307&lang=en Now I wonder if there is a way to make a 3TB work with it (maybe a firmware flash to the controller or param change or something) ?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 7:20











  • Possible duplicate of 3TB SATA hard drives into an old Linux system

    – Ramhound
    Mar 11 at 11:07



















  • You say it’s a MyBook enclosure. Did you install this hard drive manually or did it come in the enclosure?

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 6:16











  • I do not remember at this point. Ive had this hard drive for at least 5 years... I might have installed it in there or it might have come with it. This drive has been sitting in the closet for almost entirety of that time and I want to actually start using it, but before I load it up all the way with data I want to see if I can actually utilize the full 3TB. Have you seen sda1p3 report all 0's like that before?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 6:51








  • 1





    There's sure to be an exact model number on the enclosure somewhere. Please add it to your question.

    – Daniel B
    Mar 11 at 7:13











  • You are onto something. wdbwlg0020hbk-04, which according to this (and the obvious 20 in P/N) points to 2TB drive support.wdc.com/product.aspx?ID=307&lang=en Now I wonder if there is a way to make a 3TB work with it (maybe a firmware flash to the controller or param change or something) ?

    – Duxa
    Mar 11 at 7:20











  • Possible duplicate of 3TB SATA hard drives into an old Linux system

    – Ramhound
    Mar 11 at 11:07

















You say it’s a MyBook enclosure. Did you install this hard drive manually or did it come in the enclosure?

– Daniel B
Mar 11 at 6:16





You say it’s a MyBook enclosure. Did you install this hard drive manually or did it come in the enclosure?

– Daniel B
Mar 11 at 6:16













I do not remember at this point. Ive had this hard drive for at least 5 years... I might have installed it in there or it might have come with it. This drive has been sitting in the closet for almost entirety of that time and I want to actually start using it, but before I load it up all the way with data I want to see if I can actually utilize the full 3TB. Have you seen sda1p3 report all 0's like that before?

– Duxa
Mar 11 at 6:51







I do not remember at this point. Ive had this hard drive for at least 5 years... I might have installed it in there or it might have come with it. This drive has been sitting in the closet for almost entirety of that time and I want to actually start using it, but before I load it up all the way with data I want to see if I can actually utilize the full 3TB. Have you seen sda1p3 report all 0's like that before?

– Duxa
Mar 11 at 6:51






1




1





There's sure to be an exact model number on the enclosure somewhere. Please add it to your question.

– Daniel B
Mar 11 at 7:13





There's sure to be an exact model number on the enclosure somewhere. Please add it to your question.

– Daniel B
Mar 11 at 7:13













You are onto something. wdbwlg0020hbk-04, which according to this (and the obvious 20 in P/N) points to 2TB drive support.wdc.com/product.aspx?ID=307&lang=en Now I wonder if there is a way to make a 3TB work with it (maybe a firmware flash to the controller or param change or something) ?

– Duxa
Mar 11 at 7:20





You are onto something. wdbwlg0020hbk-04, which according to this (and the obvious 20 in P/N) points to 2TB drive support.wdc.com/product.aspx?ID=307&lang=en Now I wonder if there is a way to make a 3TB work with it (maybe a firmware flash to the controller or param change or something) ?

– Duxa
Mar 11 at 7:20













Possible duplicate of 3TB SATA hard drives into an old Linux system

– Ramhound
Mar 11 at 11:07





Possible duplicate of 3TB SATA hard drives into an old Linux system

– Ramhound
Mar 11 at 11:07










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














As you indicated in your comment, you have a Western Digital Elements Desktop 2 TB (WDBWLG0020HBK) enclosure. That means it may not be compatible with hard drives larger than the one it shipped with.



When looking at the reported vs actual sector count, we can see that it is not a trivial problem with data structures:



3,906,957,312 =   1110 1000 1101 1111 0111 0000 0000 0000
5,860,533,168 = 1 0101 1101 0101 0000 1010 0011 1011 0000


The real value is not simply cut off.



It’s unclear whether the controller is ready for 33 bit addresses. As such, we can’t know whether a firmware update would suffice. Not that you’d get that firmware update.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Use gdisk, it is the command needed for disks using GPT partition tables, which yours probably should be using.
    Your fdisk command should give an error output.



    You should be able to either make a second partition on that 3TB disk to use the space that is now "missing", ie unallocated, or if you insist on a single 3TB partition you will have to make a new GPT partition table.






    share|improve this answer































      -1














      The disklabel type indicates that your disk is having a MBR partition table instead of GPT. GPT partition type is needed for large disks like yours.
      See: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2308964






      share|improve this answer


























      • While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

        – Daniel B
        Mar 11 at 6:17












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "3"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1412983%2f3tb-western-digital-hard-drive-is-showing-only-2tb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      As you indicated in your comment, you have a Western Digital Elements Desktop 2 TB (WDBWLG0020HBK) enclosure. That means it may not be compatible with hard drives larger than the one it shipped with.



      When looking at the reported vs actual sector count, we can see that it is not a trivial problem with data structures:



      3,906,957,312 =   1110 1000 1101 1111 0111 0000 0000 0000
      5,860,533,168 = 1 0101 1101 0101 0000 1010 0011 1011 0000


      The real value is not simply cut off.



      It’s unclear whether the controller is ready for 33 bit addresses. As such, we can’t know whether a firmware update would suffice. Not that you’d get that firmware update.






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        As you indicated in your comment, you have a Western Digital Elements Desktop 2 TB (WDBWLG0020HBK) enclosure. That means it may not be compatible with hard drives larger than the one it shipped with.



        When looking at the reported vs actual sector count, we can see that it is not a trivial problem with data structures:



        3,906,957,312 =   1110 1000 1101 1111 0111 0000 0000 0000
        5,860,533,168 = 1 0101 1101 0101 0000 1010 0011 1011 0000


        The real value is not simply cut off.



        It’s unclear whether the controller is ready for 33 bit addresses. As such, we can’t know whether a firmware update would suffice. Not that you’d get that firmware update.






        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          As you indicated in your comment, you have a Western Digital Elements Desktop 2 TB (WDBWLG0020HBK) enclosure. That means it may not be compatible with hard drives larger than the one it shipped with.



          When looking at the reported vs actual sector count, we can see that it is not a trivial problem with data structures:



          3,906,957,312 =   1110 1000 1101 1111 0111 0000 0000 0000
          5,860,533,168 = 1 0101 1101 0101 0000 1010 0011 1011 0000


          The real value is not simply cut off.



          It’s unclear whether the controller is ready for 33 bit addresses. As such, we can’t know whether a firmware update would suffice. Not that you’d get that firmware update.






          share|improve this answer













          As you indicated in your comment, you have a Western Digital Elements Desktop 2 TB (WDBWLG0020HBK) enclosure. That means it may not be compatible with hard drives larger than the one it shipped with.



          When looking at the reported vs actual sector count, we can see that it is not a trivial problem with data structures:



          3,906,957,312 =   1110 1000 1101 1111 0111 0000 0000 0000
          5,860,533,168 = 1 0101 1101 0101 0000 1010 0011 1011 0000


          The real value is not simply cut off.



          It’s unclear whether the controller is ready for 33 bit addresses. As such, we can’t know whether a firmware update would suffice. Not that you’d get that firmware update.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 14 at 10:22









          Daniel BDaniel B

          34.6k76587




          34.6k76587

























              0














              Use gdisk, it is the command needed for disks using GPT partition tables, which yours probably should be using.
              Your fdisk command should give an error output.



              You should be able to either make a second partition on that 3TB disk to use the space that is now "missing", ie unallocated, or if you insist on a single 3TB partition you will have to make a new GPT partition table.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Use gdisk, it is the command needed for disks using GPT partition tables, which yours probably should be using.
                Your fdisk command should give an error output.



                You should be able to either make a second partition on that 3TB disk to use the space that is now "missing", ie unallocated, or if you insist on a single 3TB partition you will have to make a new GPT partition table.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Use gdisk, it is the command needed for disks using GPT partition tables, which yours probably should be using.
                  Your fdisk command should give an error output.



                  You should be able to either make a second partition on that 3TB disk to use the space that is now "missing", ie unallocated, or if you insist on a single 3TB partition you will have to make a new GPT partition table.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Use gdisk, it is the command needed for disks using GPT partition tables, which yours probably should be using.
                  Your fdisk command should give an error output.



                  You should be able to either make a second partition on that 3TB disk to use the space that is now "missing", ie unallocated, or if you insist on a single 3TB partition you will have to make a new GPT partition table.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 11 at 7:36









                  Sohaib JamilSohaib Jamil

                  11




                  11























                      -1














                      The disklabel type indicates that your disk is having a MBR partition table instead of GPT. GPT partition type is needed for large disks like yours.
                      See: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2308964






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

                        – Daniel B
                        Mar 11 at 6:17
















                      -1














                      The disklabel type indicates that your disk is having a MBR partition table instead of GPT. GPT partition type is needed for large disks like yours.
                      See: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2308964






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

                        – Daniel B
                        Mar 11 at 6:17














                      -1












                      -1








                      -1







                      The disklabel type indicates that your disk is having a MBR partition table instead of GPT. GPT partition type is needed for large disks like yours.
                      See: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2308964






                      share|improve this answer















                      The disklabel type indicates that your disk is having a MBR partition table instead of GPT. GPT partition type is needed for large disks like yours.
                      See: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2308964







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Mar 11 at 6:48

























                      answered Mar 11 at 6:13









                      John Damm SørensenJohn Damm Sørensen

                      12




                      12













                      • While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

                        – Daniel B
                        Mar 11 at 6:17



















                      • While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

                        – Daniel B
                        Mar 11 at 6:17

















                      While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

                      – Daniel B
                      Mar 11 at 6:17





                      While also a reason, in this case we can see in the second line of the fdisk output that it’s not the reason.

                      – Daniel B
                      Mar 11 at 6:17


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1412983%2f3tb-western-digital-hard-drive-is-showing-only-2tb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Index of /

                      Tribalistas

                      Listed building