Question on proving the inverse of the distribution function of the random variable












0












$begingroup$


We can approximate the conditional distribution by a random variable with density
$$
\pdelta_0(x)+(1-p)beta e^{-beta{x}}1_{x>0}dx
$$



that is to say a weighted mean between a Dirac mass at 0 and an exponential random variable with parameter $beta$. The constants $p in (0,1)$ and $beta >0$ must once again be determined so that the first two moments of the approximation match with the true ones.



Prove that the inverse of the distribution function of the random variable is given by
$$
F^{-1}(u) = 1_{{p<u<=1}} :beta^{-1} log(frac{1-p}{1-u})
$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    We can approximate the conditional distribution by a random variable with density
    $$
    \pdelta_0(x)+(1-p)beta e^{-beta{x}}1_{x>0}dx
    $$



    that is to say a weighted mean between a Dirac mass at 0 and an exponential random variable with parameter $beta$. The constants $p in (0,1)$ and $beta >0$ must once again be determined so that the first two moments of the approximation match with the true ones.



    Prove that the inverse of the distribution function of the random variable is given by
    $$
    F^{-1}(u) = 1_{{p<u<=1}} :beta^{-1} log(frac{1-p}{1-u})
    $$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      We can approximate the conditional distribution by a random variable with density
      $$
      \pdelta_0(x)+(1-p)beta e^{-beta{x}}1_{x>0}dx
      $$



      that is to say a weighted mean between a Dirac mass at 0 and an exponential random variable with parameter $beta$. The constants $p in (0,1)$ and $beta >0$ must once again be determined so that the first two moments of the approximation match with the true ones.



      Prove that the inverse of the distribution function of the random variable is given by
      $$
      F^{-1}(u) = 1_{{p<u<=1}} :beta^{-1} log(frac{1-p}{1-u})
      $$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      We can approximate the conditional distribution by a random variable with density
      $$
      \pdelta_0(x)+(1-p)beta e^{-beta{x}}1_{x>0}dx
      $$



      that is to say a weighted mean between a Dirac mass at 0 and an exponential random variable with parameter $beta$. The constants $p in (0,1)$ and $beta >0$ must once again be determined so that the first two moments of the approximation match with the true ones.



      Prove that the inverse of the distribution function of the random variable is given by
      $$
      F^{-1}(u) = 1_{{p<u<=1}} :beta^{-1} log(frac{1-p}{1-u})
      $$







      dirac-delta inverse-function exponential-distribution






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 22 '18 at 18:04









      stedmoaoastedmoaoa

      5310




      5310






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049701%2fquestion-on-proving-the-inverse-of-the-distribution-function-of-the-random-varia%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049701%2fquestion-on-proving-the-inverse-of-the-distribution-function-of-the-random-varia%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix