Given $ I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx $, prove that $ I_n=frac{1}{(n+1)!}+I_{n+1} $












4












$begingroup$


$$
I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx
$$




Prove that
$$
I_n=frac{1}{(n+1)!}+I_{n+1}
$$




I tried integration by parts and still can't prove it, I appreciate any hint/answer.






integration analysis reduction-formula







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Disagree with close vote. OP told us what he tried and asked for a hint.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    Alae: you will get a lot more positive attention to your question if you convert it from a picture to MathJax. See the tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    What do you get after integrating by parts?
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would do this using integration by parts. Show us your work, and maybe we can see where you went astray.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Feb 8 at 22:28










  • $begingroup$
    For what it is worth: "Montrons que" (with an 'r') means "Let's show that" (indicating that the proof should follow right after). "Prove that" would be "Prouve que" or "Prouvez que".
    $endgroup$
    – Taladris
    Feb 9 at 1:09
















4












$begingroup$


$$
I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx
$$




Prove that
$$
I_n=frac{1}{(n+1)!}+I_{n+1}
$$




I tried integration by parts and still can't prove it, I appreciate any hint/answer.






integration analysis reduction-formula







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Disagree with close vote. OP told us what he tried and asked for a hint.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    Alae: you will get a lot more positive attention to your question if you convert it from a picture to MathJax. See the tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    What do you get after integrating by parts?
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would do this using integration by parts. Show us your work, and maybe we can see where you went astray.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Feb 8 at 22:28










  • $begingroup$
    For what it is worth: "Montrons que" (with an 'r') means "Let's show that" (indicating that the proof should follow right after). "Prove that" would be "Prouve que" or "Prouvez que".
    $endgroup$
    – Taladris
    Feb 9 at 1:09














4












4








4


2



$begingroup$


$$
I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx
$$




Prove that
$$
I_n=frac{1}{(n+1)!}+I_{n+1}
$$




I tried integration by parts and still can't prove it, I appreciate any hint/answer.






integration analysis reduction-formula







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$$
I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx
$$




Prove that
$$
I_n=frac{1}{(n+1)!}+I_{n+1}
$$




I tried integration by parts and still can't prove it, I appreciate any hint/answer.






integration analysis reduction-formula




integration analysis reduction-formula






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 9 at 8:45









Asaf Karagila♦

306k33437768




306k33437768










asked Feb 8 at 22:08









Alae CherkaouiAlae Cherkaoui

394




394








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Disagree with close vote. OP told us what he tried and asked for a hint.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    Alae: you will get a lot more positive attention to your question if you convert it from a picture to MathJax. See the tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    What do you get after integrating by parts?
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would do this using integration by parts. Show us your work, and maybe we can see where you went astray.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Feb 8 at 22:28










  • $begingroup$
    For what it is worth: "Montrons que" (with an 'r') means "Let's show that" (indicating that the proof should follow right after). "Prove that" would be "Prouve que" or "Prouvez que".
    $endgroup$
    – Taladris
    Feb 9 at 1:09














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Disagree with close vote. OP told us what he tried and asked for a hint.
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    Alae: you will get a lot more positive attention to your question if you convert it from a picture to MathJax. See the tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Feb 8 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    What do you get after integrating by parts?
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would do this using integration by parts. Show us your work, and maybe we can see where you went astray.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Feb 8 at 22:28










  • $begingroup$
    For what it is worth: "Montrons que" (with an 'r') means "Let's show that" (indicating that the proof should follow right after). "Prove that" would be "Prouve que" or "Prouvez que".
    $endgroup$
    – Taladris
    Feb 9 at 1:09








2




2




$begingroup$
Disagree with close vote. OP told us what he tried and asked for a hint.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Feb 8 at 22:13




$begingroup$
Disagree with close vote. OP told us what he tried and asked for a hint.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Feb 8 at 22:13












$begingroup$
Alae: you will get a lot more positive attention to your question if you convert it from a picture to MathJax. See the tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Feb 8 at 22:14




$begingroup$
Alae: you will get a lot more positive attention to your question if you convert it from a picture to MathJax. See the tutorial here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Feb 8 at 22:14












$begingroup$
What do you get after integrating by parts?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 8 at 22:15




$begingroup$
What do you get after integrating by parts?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Feb 8 at 22:15




1




1




$begingroup$
I would do this using integration by parts. Show us your work, and maybe we can see where you went astray.
$endgroup$
– Doug M
Feb 8 at 22:28




$begingroup$
I would do this using integration by parts. Show us your work, and maybe we can see where you went astray.
$endgroup$
– Doug M
Feb 8 at 22:28












$begingroup$
For what it is worth: "Montrons que" (with an 'r') means "Let's show that" (indicating that the proof should follow right after). "Prove that" would be "Prouve que" or "Prouvez que".
$endgroup$
– Taladris
Feb 9 at 1:09




$begingroup$
For what it is worth: "Montrons que" (with an 'r') means "Let's show that" (indicating that the proof should follow right after). "Prove that" would be "Prouve que" or "Prouvez que".
$endgroup$
– Taladris
Feb 9 at 1:09










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

I used $n!$ as in the original image.$$I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx=frac{1}{n!}int_0^1 left(-frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1}right)'e^x,dx$$
$$=underbrace{-frac{1}{n!}frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1} e^xbigg|_0^1}_{=0-left(-largefrac{1}{(n+1)!}right)} +int_0^1 frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}e^xdx $$
$$Rightarrow I_n=frac{1}{color{}{(n+1)!}} +I_{n+1}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The OP already found this result...
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    Feb 8 at 22:33










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:34












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    Feb 8 at 22:35










  • $begingroup$
    I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Feb 8 at 23:59





















5












$begingroup$

Following the proof of the recurrence relation by Zacky, we have
$$I_{n+1}=I_n-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
$$=I_{n-1}-frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
$$=I_0 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
We can calculate $I_0$ as follows
$$I_0 = int_0^1 e^x dx=[e^x]_0^1=e-1$$
Therefore the final solution is:
$$I_{n+1}=e-1 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
$$=e-sum_{k=0}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
or equivalently;
$$I_n=e-sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{1}{k!}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105664%2fgiven-i-n-int-01-frac1-xnnex-dx-prove-that-i-n-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    I used $n!$ as in the original image.$$I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx=frac{1}{n!}int_0^1 left(-frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1}right)'e^x,dx$$
    $$=underbrace{-frac{1}{n!}frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1} e^xbigg|_0^1}_{=0-left(-largefrac{1}{(n+1)!}right)} +int_0^1 frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}e^xdx $$
    $$Rightarrow I_n=frac{1}{color{}{(n+1)!}} +I_{n+1}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The OP already found this result...
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:33










    • $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:34












    • $begingroup$
      Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:35










    • $begingroup$
      I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:36






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
      $endgroup$
      – clathratus
      Feb 8 at 23:59


















    8












    $begingroup$

    I used $n!$ as in the original image.$$I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx=frac{1}{n!}int_0^1 left(-frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1}right)'e^x,dx$$
    $$=underbrace{-frac{1}{n!}frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1} e^xbigg|_0^1}_{=0-left(-largefrac{1}{(n+1)!}right)} +int_0^1 frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}e^xdx $$
    $$Rightarrow I_n=frac{1}{color{}{(n+1)!}} +I_{n+1}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The OP already found this result...
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:33










    • $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:34












    • $begingroup$
      Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:35










    • $begingroup$
      I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:36






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
      $endgroup$
      – clathratus
      Feb 8 at 23:59
















    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    I used $n!$ as in the original image.$$I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx=frac{1}{n!}int_0^1 left(-frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1}right)'e^x,dx$$
    $$=underbrace{-frac{1}{n!}frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1} e^xbigg|_0^1}_{=0-left(-largefrac{1}{(n+1)!}right)} +int_0^1 frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}e^xdx $$
    $$Rightarrow I_n=frac{1}{color{}{(n+1)!}} +I_{n+1}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I used $n!$ as in the original image.$$I_n=int_{0}^{1}frac{(1-x)^n}{n!}e^x,dx=frac{1}{n!}int_0^1 left(-frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1}right)'e^x,dx$$
    $$=underbrace{-frac{1}{n!}frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{n+1} e^xbigg|_0^1}_{=0-left(-largefrac{1}{(n+1)!}right)} +int_0^1 frac{(1-x)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}e^xdx $$
    $$Rightarrow I_n=frac{1}{color{}{(n+1)!}} +I_{n+1}$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Feb 9 at 10:52

























    answered Feb 8 at 22:27









    ZackyZacky

    7,62011061




    7,62011061












    • $begingroup$
      The OP already found this result...
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:33










    • $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:34












    • $begingroup$
      Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:35










    • $begingroup$
      I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:36






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
      $endgroup$
      – clathratus
      Feb 8 at 23:59




















    • $begingroup$
      The OP already found this result...
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:33










    • $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:34












    • $begingroup$
      Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      Feb 8 at 22:35










    • $begingroup$
      I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
      $endgroup$
      – Zacky
      Feb 8 at 22:36






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
      $endgroup$
      – clathratus
      Feb 8 at 23:59


















    $begingroup$
    The OP already found this result...
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    Feb 8 at 22:33




    $begingroup$
    The OP already found this result...
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    Feb 8 at 22:33












    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:34






    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman he wants to prove this from my understanding as he failed by integrating by parts.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:34














    $begingroup$
    Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    Feb 8 at 22:35




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I thought he wanted the solution to the integral, by combing answers we have both though.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Foreman
    Feb 8 at 22:35












    $begingroup$
    I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:36




    $begingroup$
    I took a little bit of french some years ago. Montres means to prove I think.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Feb 8 at 22:36




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Feb 8 at 23:59






    $begingroup$
    @PeterForeman No, I don't think you should. It provides some valuable info for someone just getting into integration.
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Feb 8 at 23:59













    5












    $begingroup$

    Following the proof of the recurrence relation by Zacky, we have
    $$I_{n+1}=I_n-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
    $$=I_{n-1}-frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
    $$=I_0 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
    We can calculate $I_0$ as follows
    $$I_0 = int_0^1 e^x dx=[e^x]_0^1=e-1$$
    Therefore the final solution is:
    $$I_{n+1}=e-1 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
    $$=e-sum_{k=0}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
    or equivalently;
    $$I_n=e-sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{1}{k!}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      Following the proof of the recurrence relation by Zacky, we have
      $$I_{n+1}=I_n-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
      $$=I_{n-1}-frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
      $$=I_0 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
      We can calculate $I_0$ as follows
      $$I_0 = int_0^1 e^x dx=[e^x]_0^1=e-1$$
      Therefore the final solution is:
      $$I_{n+1}=e-1 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
      $$=e-sum_{k=0}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
      or equivalently;
      $$I_n=e-sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{1}{k!}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        Following the proof of the recurrence relation by Zacky, we have
        $$I_{n+1}=I_n-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
        $$=I_{n-1}-frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
        $$=I_0 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
        We can calculate $I_0$ as follows
        $$I_0 = int_0^1 e^x dx=[e^x]_0^1=e-1$$
        Therefore the final solution is:
        $$I_{n+1}=e-1 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
        $$=e-sum_{k=0}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
        or equivalently;
        $$I_n=e-sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{1}{k!}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Following the proof of the recurrence relation by Zacky, we have
        $$I_{n+1}=I_n-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
        $$=I_{n-1}-frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
        $$=I_0 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
        We can calculate $I_0$ as follows
        $$I_0 = int_0^1 e^x dx=[e^x]_0^1=e-1$$
        Therefore the final solution is:
        $$I_{n+1}=e-1 - sum_{k=1}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
        $$=e-sum_{k=0}^{n+1} frac{1}{k!}$$
        or equivalently;
        $$I_n=e-sum_{k=0}^{n} frac{1}{k!}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Feb 8 at 22:40

























        answered Feb 8 at 22:26









        Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

        3,0951216




        3,0951216






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105664%2fgiven-i-n-int-01-frac1-xnnex-dx-prove-that-i-n-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

            Image
            up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 Some time ago, I set up skydrive for my wife on her mac. But now she wants to access the files online, I cannot remember what Microsoft account I setup and linked her skydive app to and nor can I see anything in the skydrive app settings to tell me either? How can I see the name of the Microsoft account the skydive app is currently linked to? I would like to know this for skydrive app for Mac and PC onedrive share | improve this question asked Feb 25 '13 at 4:52 Gary Barrett 260 2 5 12
            Read more

            When does type information flow backwards in C++?

            Image
            up vote 62 down vote favorite 19 I just watched Stephan T. Lavavej talk at CppCon 2018 on "Class Template Argument Deduction", where at some point he incidentally says: In C++ type information almost never flows backwards ... I had to say "almost" because there's one or two cases, possibly more but very few . Despite trying to figure out which cases he might be referring to, I couldn't come up with anything. Hence the question: In which cases the C++17 standard mandates that type information propagate backwards? c++ language-lawyer c++17 share | improve this question edited 7 hours ago scohe0
            Read more

            Grease: Live!

            Image
            A tradução deste artigo está abaixo da qualidade média aceitável. É possível que tenha sido feita por um tradutor automático ou por alguém que não conhece bem o português ou a língua original do texto. Caso queira colaborar com a Wikipédia, tente encontrar a página original e melhore este verbete conforme o guia de tradução. Grease: Live! Grease: Live!  (PRT/BRA)  Estados Unidos 2016 •   cor •   130 min. min   Direção Thomas Kail Alex Rudzinski Produção Marc Platt Adam Siegel Roteiro Allan Carr Robert Cary Warren Casey Jim Jacobs Jonathan Tolins Bronte Woodard Baseado em Grease (musical) Grease (filme) Elenco Julianne Hough Aaron Tveit Vanessa Hudgens Carlos Pena Jr. Keke Palmer Carly Rae Jepsen Kether Donohue Jordan Fisher David Del Rio Andrew Call Gênero Musical Música Tom Kitt Figurino William Ivey Long Companhia(s) produtora(s) Warner Bros. Studios Distribuição Fox Lançamento 31 de Janei
            Read more