checking that there is a functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$
$begingroup$
I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.
I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.
With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.
I have seen:
(1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)
(2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)
It should hold also:
(3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)
(4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)
I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?
Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?
If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?
Thank you.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.
I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.
With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.
I have seen:
(1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)
(2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)
It should hold also:
(3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)
(4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)
I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?
Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?
If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?
Thank you.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.
I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.
With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.
I have seen:
(1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)
(2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)
It should hold also:
(3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)
(4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)
I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?
Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?
If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?
Thank you.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
$endgroup$
I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.
I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.
With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.
I have seen:
(1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)
(2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)
It should hold also:
(3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)
(4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)
I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?
Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?
If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?
Thank you.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors
edited Dec 22 '18 at 17:22
idriskameni
asked Dec 22 '18 at 17:15
idriskameniidriskameni
757321
757321
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.
Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
$$
for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.
Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
$$
so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
begin{align*}
texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
&= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
&= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
end{align*}
Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049654%2fchecking-that-there-is-a-functor-textttnil-n-ring-longrightarrow-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.
Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
$$
for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.
Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
$$
so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
begin{align*}
texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
&= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
&= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
end{align*}
Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.
Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
$$
for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.
Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
$$
so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
begin{align*}
texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
&= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
&= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
end{align*}
Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.
Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
$$
for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.
Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
$$
so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
begin{align*}
texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
&= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
&= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
end{align*}
Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
$endgroup$
Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.
Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
$$
for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.
Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
$$
texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
$$
so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$
Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
begin{align*}
texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
&= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
&= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
end{align*}
Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$
edited Dec 22 '18 at 19:08
answered Dec 22 '18 at 18:14
StahlStahl
16.7k43455
16.7k43455
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
$begingroup$
As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049654%2fchecking-that-there-is-a-functor-textttnil-n-ring-longrightarrow-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown