checking that there is a functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$












1












$begingroup$


I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.



I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.



With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.



I have seen:



(1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)



(2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)



It should hold also:



(3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)



(4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)



I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?



Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?



If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.



    I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.



    With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.



    I have seen:



    (1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)



    (2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)



    It should hold also:



    (3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)



    (4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)



    I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?



    Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?



    If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?



    Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.



      I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.



      With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.



      I have seen:



      (1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)



      (2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)



      It should hold also:



      (3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)



      (4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)



      I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?



      Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?



      If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?



      Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to show that $forall n geq 1$, there is a covariant functor $texttt{Nil}_n: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to the set ${xin R | x^n = 0}$.



      I have being thinking that the functor sends ring homomorphisms $f:Xlongrightarrow Y$ to $texttt{Nil}_n(f):texttt{Nil}_n(X) longrightarrow texttt{Nil}_n(Y)$ with $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)= f(x)$ if $f(x) in Y$ and $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x)=0$ if $f(x) notin Y$.



      With that, I should verify if all the conditions in functor's definition are satisfied.



      I have seen:



      (1) $forall A in Ring$, it specifies a unique object $F(A)$ in $Set$ (Checked)



      (2) $forall f in Hom_C (A, B)$, it specifies a morphism $F(f) in Hom_D(F(A), F(B))$. (Checked)



      It should hold also:



      (3) $forall A in Ring$, $F(Id_A)= Id_{F(A)}$ (Problem)



      (4) $forall f: A longrightarrow B$, $g:B longrightarrow C$ then $F(gcirc f) = F(g) circ F(f)$. (Problem)



      I have some problems verifying the last two conditions. Any help?



      Is that suficient to show what I wrote in the first sentence?



      If I want to do the same with the functor $texttt{Nil}: Ring longrightarrow Set$ that sends a ring $R$ to its nilradical. What should the functor do to the ring homomorphisms $f:X longrightarrow Y$?



      Thank you.







      abstract-algebra commutative-algebra category-theory functors






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 22 '18 at 17:22







      idriskameni

















      asked Dec 22 '18 at 17:15









      idriskameniidriskameni

      757321




      757321






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.



          Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
          $$

          for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$



          One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.



          Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
          $$

          so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
          begin{align*}
          texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
          &= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
          &= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
          end{align*}



          Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
            $endgroup$
            – Stahl
            Dec 22 '18 at 19:37













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049654%2fchecking-that-there-is-a-functor-textttnil-n-ring-longrightarrow-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.



          Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
          $$

          for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$



          One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.



          Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
          $$

          so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
          begin{align*}
          texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
          &= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
          &= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
          end{align*}



          Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
            $endgroup$
            – Stahl
            Dec 22 '18 at 19:37


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.



          Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
          $$

          for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$



          One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.



          Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
          $$

          so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
          begin{align*}
          texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
          &= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
          &= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
          end{align*}



          Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
            $endgroup$
            – Stahl
            Dec 22 '18 at 19:37
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.



          Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
          $$

          for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$



          One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.



          Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
          $$

          so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
          begin{align*}
          texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
          &= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
          &= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
          end{align*}



          Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $f : Rto S$ be a ring homomorphism.



          Let's first examine $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ You've written that $texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x)in S$ and $0$ if $f(x)notin S.$ But $f(x)$ is always in $S,$ by definition - $f$ is a ring morphism with codomain $S$! So, the condition is unnecessary; you simply have
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(f)(x) = f(x)
          $$

          for all $xin texttt{Nil}_n(R).$



          One should check that this is well-defined. Well, if $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R),$ then by definition $x^n = 0$ in $R.$ Hence, $f(x)^n = f(x^n) = f(0) = 0,$ so that $f(x)intexttt{Nil}_n(S),$ and we actually have a well-defined map of sets.



          Let's check the identity condition. Let $S = R$ and $f = operatorname{id}_R,$ and let $xintexttt{Nil}_n(R).$ Then
          $$
          texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)(x) := operatorname{id}_R(x) = x,
          $$

          so that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R)$ is the identity of $R$ restricted to the set $texttt{Nil}_n(R).$ This means exactly that $texttt{Nil}_n(operatorname{id}_R) = operatorname{id}_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Notice that the above holds essentially because all the functor $texttt{Nil}_n$ does to morphisms is restrict them to the subset $texttt{Nil}_n(R)subseteq R.$ That is, if we have a ring homomorphism $f : Rto S,$ we may also say $texttt{Nil}_n(f) = left. fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}.$



          Now, you could check element-wise that the assignment $fmapsto texttt{Nil}_n(f)$ behaves nicely with respect to composition, but you can also see this immediately via our new description of $texttt{Nil}_n(f).$ Let $f : Rto S$ and $g : Sto T$ be ring homomorphisms. Then
          begin{align*}
          texttt{Nil}_n(gcirc f) &= left. left(gcirc fright)right|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}\
          &= left. gright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(S)}circ left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}quadtextrm{(because }left.fright|_{texttt{Nil}_n(R)}(texttt{Nil}_n(R))subseteq texttt{Nil}_n(S).)\
          &= texttt{Nil}_n(g)circ texttt{Nil}_n(f).
          end{align*}



          Your functor $texttt{Nil}$ which assigns to $R$ the nilradical of $R$ should do essentially the same thing - simply restrict a morphism $f : Rto S$ to the nilradical. Notice also that your work with the $texttt{Nil}_n$ immediately implies this is well-defined, because $texttt{Nil}(R) = bigcup_{ngeq 1}texttt{Nil}_n(R).$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 22 '18 at 19:08

























          answered Dec 22 '18 at 18:14









          StahlStahl

          16.7k43455




          16.7k43455












          • $begingroup$
            As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
            $endgroup$
            – Stahl
            Dec 22 '18 at 19:37




















          • $begingroup$
            As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
            $endgroup$
            – Stahl
            Dec 22 '18 at 19:37


















          $begingroup$
          As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
          $endgroup$
          – Stahl
          Dec 22 '18 at 19:37






          $begingroup$
          As a remark, if you ever have a functor $F$ which assigns to some algebraic object a subset of the object thought of as a set, and which assigns to morphisms their restrictions, you only need to check that the restriction maps are well defined (that $f(F(R))subseteq F(S)$ for $f:Rto S$); the functor axioms are then immediately satisfied for the same reasons they are here.
          $endgroup$
          – Stahl
          Dec 22 '18 at 19:37




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049654%2fchecking-that-there-is-a-functor-textttnil-n-ring-longrightarrow-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix