Is that armistice wagon photograph authentic?











up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1












The armistice on November 11th, 1918, was signed between 5:00 AM and 5:30 AM, french time (which was at this time UTC+0, one hour earlier than today). Wikipedia has a photo of the event, presumably taken at 5:30 AM (*)



However, it seems hard to imagine this photo could have been taken by night. According to this website the sunrise time in Compièges on November 11th is 7:52 AM (UTC+1), which makes it on 1918 rising at 6:52 AM (UTC).



So this armistice photograph would have been taken in the dark, 1h22 before sunrise. This makes me wonder, is this fotograph really authentic ?



(Note: At the time of asking this question, Wikipedia stated that the photo was taken at 5:30 AM, this was edited since by Evarlago)










share|improve this question
























  • It is not a" wagon photograph" the vehicle is the famous railroad car. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compi%C3%A8gne_Wagon
    – MAGolding
    Nov 14 at 16:47






  • 2




    Nice spot and good question. I have updated the fr.wikipedia page according to the source given by Langlang in his answer.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:21















up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1












The armistice on November 11th, 1918, was signed between 5:00 AM and 5:30 AM, french time (which was at this time UTC+0, one hour earlier than today). Wikipedia has a photo of the event, presumably taken at 5:30 AM (*)



However, it seems hard to imagine this photo could have been taken by night. According to this website the sunrise time in Compièges on November 11th is 7:52 AM (UTC+1), which makes it on 1918 rising at 6:52 AM (UTC).



So this armistice photograph would have been taken in the dark, 1h22 before sunrise. This makes me wonder, is this fotograph really authentic ?



(Note: At the time of asking this question, Wikipedia stated that the photo was taken at 5:30 AM, this was edited since by Evarlago)










share|improve this question
























  • It is not a" wagon photograph" the vehicle is the famous railroad car. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compi%C3%A8gne_Wagon
    – MAGolding
    Nov 14 at 16:47






  • 2




    Nice spot and good question. I have updated the fr.wikipedia page according to the source given by Langlang in his answer.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:21













up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1






1





The armistice on November 11th, 1918, was signed between 5:00 AM and 5:30 AM, french time (which was at this time UTC+0, one hour earlier than today). Wikipedia has a photo of the event, presumably taken at 5:30 AM (*)



However, it seems hard to imagine this photo could have been taken by night. According to this website the sunrise time in Compièges on November 11th is 7:52 AM (UTC+1), which makes it on 1918 rising at 6:52 AM (UTC).



So this armistice photograph would have been taken in the dark, 1h22 before sunrise. This makes me wonder, is this fotograph really authentic ?



(Note: At the time of asking this question, Wikipedia stated that the photo was taken at 5:30 AM, this was edited since by Evarlago)










share|improve this question















The armistice on November 11th, 1918, was signed between 5:00 AM and 5:30 AM, french time (which was at this time UTC+0, one hour earlier than today). Wikipedia has a photo of the event, presumably taken at 5:30 AM (*)



However, it seems hard to imagine this photo could have been taken by night. According to this website the sunrise time in Compièges on November 11th is 7:52 AM (UTC+1), which makes it on 1918 rising at 6:52 AM (UTC).



So this armistice photograph would have been taken in the dark, 1h22 before sunrise. This makes me wonder, is this fotograph really authentic ?



(Note: At the time of asking this question, Wikipedia stated that the photo was taken at 5:30 AM, this was edited since by Evarlago)







world-war-one france photography






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 8:26

























asked Nov 14 at 7:40









Bregalad

2,30421555




2,30421555












  • It is not a" wagon photograph" the vehicle is the famous railroad car. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compi%C3%A8gne_Wagon
    – MAGolding
    Nov 14 at 16:47






  • 2




    Nice spot and good question. I have updated the fr.wikipedia page according to the source given by Langlang in his answer.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:21


















  • It is not a" wagon photograph" the vehicle is the famous railroad car. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compi%C3%A8gne_Wagon
    – MAGolding
    Nov 14 at 16:47






  • 2




    Nice spot and good question. I have updated the fr.wikipedia page according to the source given by Langlang in his answer.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:21
















It is not a" wagon photograph" the vehicle is the famous railroad car. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compi%C3%A8gne_Wagon
– MAGolding
Nov 14 at 16:47




It is not a" wagon photograph" the vehicle is the famous railroad car. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compi%C3%A8gne_Wagon
– MAGolding
Nov 14 at 16:47




2




2




Nice spot and good question. I have updated the fr.wikipedia page according to the source given by Langlang in his answer.
– Evargalo
Nov 14 at 17:21




Nice spot and good question. I have updated the fr.wikipedia page according to the source given by Langlang in his answer.
– Evargalo
Nov 14 at 17:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










The photo is authentic. It is in numerous reliable archives. The exact time given in one wikipedia is just overly precise. That is: wrong. No other Wikipedia page gives that time.




French Wikipedia: On November 11, 1918, around 5:30 a.m., just after the signing of the treaty, at the exit of the "Armistice wagon": in the foreground with a cane and a kepi, Marshal Foch, surrounded by the British admirals Hope (right) and Wemyss (left).




Looking at the picture more closely reveals things Evargalo noticed in a comment:




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.




Then there are the natural soft shadows from diffuse illumination indicating a certain early time of day. The absence of harsh contrasts points into that direction as well.



Earlier, when Foch signed the document, this photo was taken:




enter image description here (src)




More importantly, other sources give another time:




enter image description here
The only known photo of the Copiègne armistice on 11 November 1918 at 7:30 a.m. shows the "winners": front from left: Naval officer George Hope, General Maxime Weygand, Naval officer Rosslyn Wemyss, Marshal Ferdinand Foch, Captain Marriott, Naval officer Jack Marriott. At the top of the stairs Commander Riedinger and the translator Laperche, in front General Desticker and Captain of the Mierry. (Source) (Alternative src, same time given, PDF)




And directly asking google gives this




06:52, Monday, 11. November 1918 (GMT)
sunrise in Compiègne, France




Whether it's a typo or not, for me that is still shortly after the signing, as soon as lighting allowed.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:24










  • Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
    – Bregalad
    Nov 14 at 21:36






  • 2




    @Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
    – Ross Ridge
    Nov 15 at 0:17


















up vote
15
down vote













French Wikipedia may be in error here. The English version shows the same photo but no specific time or date for it is mentioned.



Given the timing involved, the 05:30 time may of course well be accurate for the moment the gentlemen left the carriage, but doesn't have to be when the photo was taken.



For such a momentous moment, it's quite feasible that they staged a photo opportunity some time later for example, as it would take time for photographers to be called to the scene.



Another reason to think the actual time of the photo is later than 05:30 in the morning is that Foch wasn't around for the negotiations, arrived only for the signing ceremony (the timing of which isn't mentioned by Wikipedia, but if we assume WW1 era technology they'd likely have a runner sent to Foch's residence and have him return by car to the site, leaving probably up to several hours in between, enough time as well to call in photographers.



Wikipedia states that news of the signing was spread around 09:00, so we can assume the actual signatures were placed (and the photo taken) somewhere between the 05:20 moment it states as the armistice having been agreed upon and 09:00 when it was officially announced to the world.



That gives enough time for the sun to come up (which happens between 7 and 8 in the morning as you say in the area this time of the year).



One caveat: where the Wikipedia article on the armistice states that Foch wasn't there for the negotiations and only arrived for the signing, the article on Foch himself states he was there at 05:00 that morning.



If that's true the signing can indeed have happened at 05:30, in which case the photo can have been taken at any time after that, again leaving time for runners to alert staff photographers and possibly have artificial light brought in to light up the scene (which may have been there already to facilitate the negotiations themselves).



In the end, I guess we can only speculate about the exact timing as sources seem contradictory and we can't really know whether photographers were even present or nearby, let alone how long it would have taken them to arrive on being called.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 13:26






  • 5




    @Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
    – David Richerby
    Nov 14 at 13:51











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49383%2fis-that-armistice-wagon-photograph-authentic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
10
down vote



accepted










The photo is authentic. It is in numerous reliable archives. The exact time given in one wikipedia is just overly precise. That is: wrong. No other Wikipedia page gives that time.




French Wikipedia: On November 11, 1918, around 5:30 a.m., just after the signing of the treaty, at the exit of the "Armistice wagon": in the foreground with a cane and a kepi, Marshal Foch, surrounded by the British admirals Hope (right) and Wemyss (left).




Looking at the picture more closely reveals things Evargalo noticed in a comment:




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.




Then there are the natural soft shadows from diffuse illumination indicating a certain early time of day. The absence of harsh contrasts points into that direction as well.



Earlier, when Foch signed the document, this photo was taken:




enter image description here (src)




More importantly, other sources give another time:




enter image description here
The only known photo of the Copiègne armistice on 11 November 1918 at 7:30 a.m. shows the "winners": front from left: Naval officer George Hope, General Maxime Weygand, Naval officer Rosslyn Wemyss, Marshal Ferdinand Foch, Captain Marriott, Naval officer Jack Marriott. At the top of the stairs Commander Riedinger and the translator Laperche, in front General Desticker and Captain of the Mierry. (Source) (Alternative src, same time given, PDF)




And directly asking google gives this




06:52, Monday, 11. November 1918 (GMT)
sunrise in Compiègne, France




Whether it's a typo or not, for me that is still shortly after the signing, as soon as lighting allowed.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:24










  • Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
    – Bregalad
    Nov 14 at 21:36






  • 2




    @Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
    – Ross Ridge
    Nov 15 at 0:17















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










The photo is authentic. It is in numerous reliable archives. The exact time given in one wikipedia is just overly precise. That is: wrong. No other Wikipedia page gives that time.




French Wikipedia: On November 11, 1918, around 5:30 a.m., just after the signing of the treaty, at the exit of the "Armistice wagon": in the foreground with a cane and a kepi, Marshal Foch, surrounded by the British admirals Hope (right) and Wemyss (left).




Looking at the picture more closely reveals things Evargalo noticed in a comment:




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.




Then there are the natural soft shadows from diffuse illumination indicating a certain early time of day. The absence of harsh contrasts points into that direction as well.



Earlier, when Foch signed the document, this photo was taken:




enter image description here (src)




More importantly, other sources give another time:




enter image description here
The only known photo of the Copiègne armistice on 11 November 1918 at 7:30 a.m. shows the "winners": front from left: Naval officer George Hope, General Maxime Weygand, Naval officer Rosslyn Wemyss, Marshal Ferdinand Foch, Captain Marriott, Naval officer Jack Marriott. At the top of the stairs Commander Riedinger and the translator Laperche, in front General Desticker and Captain of the Mierry. (Source) (Alternative src, same time given, PDF)




And directly asking google gives this




06:52, Monday, 11. November 1918 (GMT)
sunrise in Compiègne, France




Whether it's a typo or not, for me that is still shortly after the signing, as soon as lighting allowed.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:24










  • Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
    – Bregalad
    Nov 14 at 21:36






  • 2




    @Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
    – Ross Ridge
    Nov 15 at 0:17













up vote
10
down vote



accepted







up vote
10
down vote



accepted






The photo is authentic. It is in numerous reliable archives. The exact time given in one wikipedia is just overly precise. That is: wrong. No other Wikipedia page gives that time.




French Wikipedia: On November 11, 1918, around 5:30 a.m., just after the signing of the treaty, at the exit of the "Armistice wagon": in the foreground with a cane and a kepi, Marshal Foch, surrounded by the British admirals Hope (right) and Wemyss (left).




Looking at the picture more closely reveals things Evargalo noticed in a comment:




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.




Then there are the natural soft shadows from diffuse illumination indicating a certain early time of day. The absence of harsh contrasts points into that direction as well.



Earlier, when Foch signed the document, this photo was taken:




enter image description here (src)




More importantly, other sources give another time:




enter image description here
The only known photo of the Copiègne armistice on 11 November 1918 at 7:30 a.m. shows the "winners": front from left: Naval officer George Hope, General Maxime Weygand, Naval officer Rosslyn Wemyss, Marshal Ferdinand Foch, Captain Marriott, Naval officer Jack Marriott. At the top of the stairs Commander Riedinger and the translator Laperche, in front General Desticker and Captain of the Mierry. (Source) (Alternative src, same time given, PDF)




And directly asking google gives this




06:52, Monday, 11. November 1918 (GMT)
sunrise in Compiègne, France




Whether it's a typo or not, for me that is still shortly after the signing, as soon as lighting allowed.






share|improve this answer












The photo is authentic. It is in numerous reliable archives. The exact time given in one wikipedia is just overly precise. That is: wrong. No other Wikipedia page gives that time.




French Wikipedia: On November 11, 1918, around 5:30 a.m., just after the signing of the treaty, at the exit of the "Armistice wagon": in the foreground with a cane and a kepi, Marshal Foch, surrounded by the British admirals Hope (right) and Wemyss (left).




Looking at the picture more closely reveals things Evargalo noticed in a comment:




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.




Then there are the natural soft shadows from diffuse illumination indicating a certain early time of day. The absence of harsh contrasts points into that direction as well.



Earlier, when Foch signed the document, this photo was taken:




enter image description here (src)




More importantly, other sources give another time:




enter image description here
The only known photo of the Copiègne armistice on 11 November 1918 at 7:30 a.m. shows the "winners": front from left: Naval officer George Hope, General Maxime Weygand, Naval officer Rosslyn Wemyss, Marshal Ferdinand Foch, Captain Marriott, Naval officer Jack Marriott. At the top of the stairs Commander Riedinger and the translator Laperche, in front General Desticker and Captain of the Mierry. (Source) (Alternative src, same time given, PDF)




And directly asking google gives this




06:52, Monday, 11. November 1918 (GMT)
sunrise in Compiègne, France




Whether it's a typo or not, for me that is still shortly after the signing, as soon as lighting allowed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 at 14:03









LangLangC

18.6k360102




18.6k360102








  • 1




    Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:24










  • Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
    – Bregalad
    Nov 14 at 21:36






  • 2




    @Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
    – Ross Ridge
    Nov 15 at 0:17














  • 1




    Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 17:24










  • Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
    – Bregalad
    Nov 14 at 21:36






  • 2




    @Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
    – Ross Ridge
    Nov 15 at 0:17








1




1




Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
– Evargalo
Nov 14 at 17:24




Nice answer ! Your source also disagree with fr.wikipedia about the position of the British admirals in the front row.
– Evargalo
Nov 14 at 17:24












Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
– Bregalad
Nov 14 at 21:36




Your request to google gives the same result as my request to lesheuresdusoleil.com so nothing new here. However, while I could understand they waited more than 1 hour for the forograph in front of the wagon, I still cannot understand how that other fotograph of Foch signing, presumably during the night, could be authentic.
– Bregalad
Nov 14 at 21:36




2




2




@Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
– Ross Ridge
Nov 15 at 0:17




@Bregalad The picture of Foch signing the document appears to have been taken using some sort of flash. Probably a flash-lamp held up to the left side of the camera.
– Ross Ridge
Nov 15 at 0:17










up vote
15
down vote













French Wikipedia may be in error here. The English version shows the same photo but no specific time or date for it is mentioned.



Given the timing involved, the 05:30 time may of course well be accurate for the moment the gentlemen left the carriage, but doesn't have to be when the photo was taken.



For such a momentous moment, it's quite feasible that they staged a photo opportunity some time later for example, as it would take time for photographers to be called to the scene.



Another reason to think the actual time of the photo is later than 05:30 in the morning is that Foch wasn't around for the negotiations, arrived only for the signing ceremony (the timing of which isn't mentioned by Wikipedia, but if we assume WW1 era technology they'd likely have a runner sent to Foch's residence and have him return by car to the site, leaving probably up to several hours in between, enough time as well to call in photographers.



Wikipedia states that news of the signing was spread around 09:00, so we can assume the actual signatures were placed (and the photo taken) somewhere between the 05:20 moment it states as the armistice having been agreed upon and 09:00 when it was officially announced to the world.



That gives enough time for the sun to come up (which happens between 7 and 8 in the morning as you say in the area this time of the year).



One caveat: where the Wikipedia article on the armistice states that Foch wasn't there for the negotiations and only arrived for the signing, the article on Foch himself states he was there at 05:00 that morning.



If that's true the signing can indeed have happened at 05:30, in which case the photo can have been taken at any time after that, again leaving time for runners to alert staff photographers and possibly have artificial light brought in to light up the scene (which may have been there already to facilitate the negotiations themselves).



In the end, I guess we can only speculate about the exact timing as sources seem contradictory and we can't really know whether photographers were even present or nearby, let alone how long it would have taken them to arrive on being called.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 13:26






  • 5




    @Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
    – David Richerby
    Nov 14 at 13:51















up vote
15
down vote













French Wikipedia may be in error here. The English version shows the same photo but no specific time or date for it is mentioned.



Given the timing involved, the 05:30 time may of course well be accurate for the moment the gentlemen left the carriage, but doesn't have to be when the photo was taken.



For such a momentous moment, it's quite feasible that they staged a photo opportunity some time later for example, as it would take time for photographers to be called to the scene.



Another reason to think the actual time of the photo is later than 05:30 in the morning is that Foch wasn't around for the negotiations, arrived only for the signing ceremony (the timing of which isn't mentioned by Wikipedia, but if we assume WW1 era technology they'd likely have a runner sent to Foch's residence and have him return by car to the site, leaving probably up to several hours in between, enough time as well to call in photographers.



Wikipedia states that news of the signing was spread around 09:00, so we can assume the actual signatures were placed (and the photo taken) somewhere between the 05:20 moment it states as the armistice having been agreed upon and 09:00 when it was officially announced to the world.



That gives enough time for the sun to come up (which happens between 7 and 8 in the morning as you say in the area this time of the year).



One caveat: where the Wikipedia article on the armistice states that Foch wasn't there for the negotiations and only arrived for the signing, the article on Foch himself states he was there at 05:00 that morning.



If that's true the signing can indeed have happened at 05:30, in which case the photo can have been taken at any time after that, again leaving time for runners to alert staff photographers and possibly have artificial light brought in to light up the scene (which may have been there already to facilitate the negotiations themselves).



In the end, I guess we can only speculate about the exact timing as sources seem contradictory and we can't really know whether photographers were even present or nearby, let alone how long it would have taken them to arrive on being called.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 13:26






  • 5




    @Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
    – David Richerby
    Nov 14 at 13:51













up vote
15
down vote










up vote
15
down vote









French Wikipedia may be in error here. The English version shows the same photo but no specific time or date for it is mentioned.



Given the timing involved, the 05:30 time may of course well be accurate for the moment the gentlemen left the carriage, but doesn't have to be when the photo was taken.



For such a momentous moment, it's quite feasible that they staged a photo opportunity some time later for example, as it would take time for photographers to be called to the scene.



Another reason to think the actual time of the photo is later than 05:30 in the morning is that Foch wasn't around for the negotiations, arrived only for the signing ceremony (the timing of which isn't mentioned by Wikipedia, but if we assume WW1 era technology they'd likely have a runner sent to Foch's residence and have him return by car to the site, leaving probably up to several hours in between, enough time as well to call in photographers.



Wikipedia states that news of the signing was spread around 09:00, so we can assume the actual signatures were placed (and the photo taken) somewhere between the 05:20 moment it states as the armistice having been agreed upon and 09:00 when it was officially announced to the world.



That gives enough time for the sun to come up (which happens between 7 and 8 in the morning as you say in the area this time of the year).



One caveat: where the Wikipedia article on the armistice states that Foch wasn't there for the negotiations and only arrived for the signing, the article on Foch himself states he was there at 05:00 that morning.



If that's true the signing can indeed have happened at 05:30, in which case the photo can have been taken at any time after that, again leaving time for runners to alert staff photographers and possibly have artificial light brought in to light up the scene (which may have been there already to facilitate the negotiations themselves).



In the end, I guess we can only speculate about the exact timing as sources seem contradictory and we can't really know whether photographers were even present or nearby, let alone how long it would have taken them to arrive on being called.






share|improve this answer












French Wikipedia may be in error here. The English version shows the same photo but no specific time or date for it is mentioned.



Given the timing involved, the 05:30 time may of course well be accurate for the moment the gentlemen left the carriage, but doesn't have to be when the photo was taken.



For such a momentous moment, it's quite feasible that they staged a photo opportunity some time later for example, as it would take time for photographers to be called to the scene.



Another reason to think the actual time of the photo is later than 05:30 in the morning is that Foch wasn't around for the negotiations, arrived only for the signing ceremony (the timing of which isn't mentioned by Wikipedia, but if we assume WW1 era technology they'd likely have a runner sent to Foch's residence and have him return by car to the site, leaving probably up to several hours in between, enough time as well to call in photographers.



Wikipedia states that news of the signing was spread around 09:00, so we can assume the actual signatures were placed (and the photo taken) somewhere between the 05:20 moment it states as the armistice having been agreed upon and 09:00 when it was officially announced to the world.



That gives enough time for the sun to come up (which happens between 7 and 8 in the morning as you say in the area this time of the year).



One caveat: where the Wikipedia article on the armistice states that Foch wasn't there for the negotiations and only arrived for the signing, the article on Foch himself states he was there at 05:00 that morning.



If that's true the signing can indeed have happened at 05:30, in which case the photo can have been taken at any time after that, again leaving time for runners to alert staff photographers and possibly have artificial light brought in to light up the scene (which may have been there already to facilitate the negotiations themselves).



In the end, I guess we can only speculate about the exact timing as sources seem contradictory and we can't really know whether photographers were even present or nearby, let alone how long it would have taken them to arrive on being called.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 at 9:56









jwenting

7,7752339




7,7752339








  • 5




    I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 13:26






  • 5




    @Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
    – David Richerby
    Nov 14 at 13:51














  • 5




    I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
    – Evargalo
    Nov 14 at 13:26






  • 5




    @Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
    – David Richerby
    Nov 14 at 13:51








5




5




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
– Evargalo
Nov 14 at 13:26




I don't believe artificial lights could help taking such a picture by night. It might enlighten the front scene (the characters and the wagon), but not the trees in the background. The clear sky in between the trees on top of the picture can only be explained by daylight or (very unlikely) later photo-editing.
– Evargalo
Nov 14 at 13:26




5




5




@Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
– David Richerby
Nov 14 at 13:51




@Evargalo Indeed -- regardless of what was used to light the scene, the sky would be dark if the photograph had been taken in the dark.
– David Richerby
Nov 14 at 13:51


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49383%2fis-that-armistice-wagon-photograph-authentic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix