What is the difference between the summations?
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
What is the difference between the summation $$sum_{1 leq i<j leq n} f(i,j)$$ and $$sum_{1leq i} sum_{<j leq n} f(i,j)?$$
algebra-precalculus summation notation
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
What is the difference between the summation $$sum_{1 leq i<j leq n} f(i,j)$$ and $$sum_{1leq i} sum_{<j leq n} f(i,j)?$$
algebra-precalculus summation notation
1
Notation, I suppose. It's still the same sum.
– Sean Roberson
Nov 13 at 17:27
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
What is the difference between the summation $$sum_{1 leq i<j leq n} f(i,j)$$ and $$sum_{1leq i} sum_{<j leq n} f(i,j)?$$
algebra-precalculus summation notation
What is the difference between the summation $$sum_{1 leq i<j leq n} f(i,j)$$ and $$sum_{1leq i} sum_{<j leq n} f(i,j)?$$
algebra-precalculus summation notation
algebra-precalculus summation notation
edited Nov 13 at 17:16
asked Nov 13 at 16:43
Of course it's not me
34414
34414
1
Notation, I suppose. It's still the same sum.
– Sean Roberson
Nov 13 at 17:27
add a comment |
1
Notation, I suppose. It's still the same sum.
– Sean Roberson
Nov 13 at 17:27
1
1
Notation, I suppose. It's still the same sum.
– Sean Roberson
Nov 13 at 17:27
Notation, I suppose. It's still the same sum.
– Sean Roberson
Nov 13 at 17:27
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The second is ambiguous. $sum$ usually means you will iterate over some index individually. A double sum implies summing over two indices individually.
The first version you give implies summing with respect to $i,j$ in a single intration, whereas the second vaguely implies two.
So I'd say the first is the better of the two, the second having ambiguous meaning.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The second one is nonsense; the condition in the sum, $<jleq n$, doesn't mean anything.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The second is ambiguous. $sum$ usually means you will iterate over some index individually. A double sum implies summing over two indices individually.
The first version you give implies summing with respect to $i,j$ in a single intration, whereas the second vaguely implies two.
So I'd say the first is the better of the two, the second having ambiguous meaning.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The second is ambiguous. $sum$ usually means you will iterate over some index individually. A double sum implies summing over two indices individually.
The first version you give implies summing with respect to $i,j$ in a single intration, whereas the second vaguely implies two.
So I'd say the first is the better of the two, the second having ambiguous meaning.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The second is ambiguous. $sum$ usually means you will iterate over some index individually. A double sum implies summing over two indices individually.
The first version you give implies summing with respect to $i,j$ in a single intration, whereas the second vaguely implies two.
So I'd say the first is the better of the two, the second having ambiguous meaning.
The second is ambiguous. $sum$ usually means you will iterate over some index individually. A double sum implies summing over two indices individually.
The first version you give implies summing with respect to $i,j$ in a single intration, whereas the second vaguely implies two.
So I'd say the first is the better of the two, the second having ambiguous meaning.
answered Nov 13 at 18:24
TurlocTheRed
59319
59319
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The second one is nonsense; the condition in the sum, $<jleq n$, doesn't mean anything.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The second one is nonsense; the condition in the sum, $<jleq n$, doesn't mean anything.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The second one is nonsense; the condition in the sum, $<jleq n$, doesn't mean anything.
The second one is nonsense; the condition in the sum, $<jleq n$, doesn't mean anything.
answered Nov 13 at 20:06
Deusovi
2,1261920
2,1261920
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996968%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-the-summations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Notation, I suppose. It's still the same sum.
– Sean Roberson
Nov 13 at 17:27