The Poincare Plane distance
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The Poincare plane, $mathbb{H}$, is:
$$mathbb{H} = {(x,y) in mathbb{R^2} | y>0}$$
$$_{a}L = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | x=a}$$
$$_{c}L_r = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | (x-c)^2+y^2=r^2}.$$
The Poincare distance is given by the following if $x_1=x_2$:
$$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|ln(y_2/y_1)|$$
My question is, why isn't the distance just $$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|y_2-y_1|$$ instead since $x_1=x_2$? Why is the natural logarithm introduced for the distance?
geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The Poincare plane, $mathbb{H}$, is:
$$mathbb{H} = {(x,y) in mathbb{R^2} | y>0}$$
$$_{a}L = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | x=a}$$
$$_{c}L_r = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | (x-c)^2+y^2=r^2}.$$
The Poincare distance is given by the following if $x_1=x_2$:
$$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|ln(y_2/y_1)|$$
My question is, why isn't the distance just $$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|y_2-y_1|$$ instead since $x_1=x_2$? Why is the natural logarithm introduced for the distance?
geometry
The formula comes from the general definition of the line element, $ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2$. The distance function isn't arbitrary; it's chosen to make the resulting space negatively curved, and it has a very nice isometry group. If you just take the Euclidean distance on $mathbb{H}$, the resulting space is flat, and it's not even complete: consider the case $y_i to 0$.
– anomaly
Nov 13 at 5:08
@anomaly hmm I have not yet covered isometry nor calculus in the book. Is there a different approach in understanding why without introducing isometry or calculus?
– Robben
Nov 13 at 5:59
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The Poincare plane, $mathbb{H}$, is:
$$mathbb{H} = {(x,y) in mathbb{R^2} | y>0}$$
$$_{a}L = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | x=a}$$
$$_{c}L_r = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | (x-c)^2+y^2=r^2}.$$
The Poincare distance is given by the following if $x_1=x_2$:
$$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|ln(y_2/y_1)|$$
My question is, why isn't the distance just $$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|y_2-y_1|$$ instead since $x_1=x_2$? Why is the natural logarithm introduced for the distance?
geometry
The Poincare plane, $mathbb{H}$, is:
$$mathbb{H} = {(x,y) in mathbb{R^2} | y>0}$$
$$_{a}L = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | x=a}$$
$$_{c}L_r = {(x,y) in mathbb{H} | (x-c)^2+y^2=r^2}.$$
The Poincare distance is given by the following if $x_1=x_2$:
$$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|ln(y_2/y_1)|$$
My question is, why isn't the distance just $$d_mathbb{H}(P,Q)=|y_2-y_1|$$ instead since $x_1=x_2$? Why is the natural logarithm introduced for the distance?
geometry
geometry
edited Nov 13 at 17:05
asked Nov 13 at 4:57
Robben
1295
1295
The formula comes from the general definition of the line element, $ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2$. The distance function isn't arbitrary; it's chosen to make the resulting space negatively curved, and it has a very nice isometry group. If you just take the Euclidean distance on $mathbb{H}$, the resulting space is flat, and it's not even complete: consider the case $y_i to 0$.
– anomaly
Nov 13 at 5:08
@anomaly hmm I have not yet covered isometry nor calculus in the book. Is there a different approach in understanding why without introducing isometry or calculus?
– Robben
Nov 13 at 5:59
add a comment |
The formula comes from the general definition of the line element, $ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2$. The distance function isn't arbitrary; it's chosen to make the resulting space negatively curved, and it has a very nice isometry group. If you just take the Euclidean distance on $mathbb{H}$, the resulting space is flat, and it's not even complete: consider the case $y_i to 0$.
– anomaly
Nov 13 at 5:08
@anomaly hmm I have not yet covered isometry nor calculus in the book. Is there a different approach in understanding why without introducing isometry or calculus?
– Robben
Nov 13 at 5:59
The formula comes from the general definition of the line element, $ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2$. The distance function isn't arbitrary; it's chosen to make the resulting space negatively curved, and it has a very nice isometry group. If you just take the Euclidean distance on $mathbb{H}$, the resulting space is flat, and it's not even complete: consider the case $y_i to 0$.
– anomaly
Nov 13 at 5:08
The formula comes from the general definition of the line element, $ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2$. The distance function isn't arbitrary; it's chosen to make the resulting space negatively curved, and it has a very nice isometry group. If you just take the Euclidean distance on $mathbb{H}$, the resulting space is flat, and it's not even complete: consider the case $y_i to 0$.
– anomaly
Nov 13 at 5:08
@anomaly hmm I have not yet covered isometry nor calculus in the book. Is there a different approach in understanding why without introducing isometry or calculus?
– Robben
Nov 13 at 5:59
@anomaly hmm I have not yet covered isometry nor calculus in the book. Is there a different approach in understanding why without introducing isometry or calculus?
– Robben
Nov 13 at 5:59
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996312%2fthe-poincare-plane-distance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The formula comes from the general definition of the line element, $ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2$. The distance function isn't arbitrary; it's chosen to make the resulting space negatively curved, and it has a very nice isometry group. If you just take the Euclidean distance on $mathbb{H}$, the resulting space is flat, and it's not even complete: consider the case $y_i to 0$.
– anomaly
Nov 13 at 5:08
@anomaly hmm I have not yet covered isometry nor calculus in the book. Is there a different approach in understanding why without introducing isometry or calculus?
– Robben
Nov 13 at 5:59