Distance to cut locus and injectivity of the exponential map
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.
He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.
As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$
I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.
I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}
Does this help?
riemannian-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.
He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.
As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$
I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.
I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}
Does this help?
riemannian-geometry
1
The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44
Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.
He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.
As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$
I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.
I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}
Does this help?
riemannian-geometry
Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.
He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.
As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$
I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.
I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}
Does this help?
riemannian-geometry
riemannian-geometry
asked Nov 14 at 16:08
Frieder Jäckel
1,079213
1,079213
1
The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44
Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49
add a comment |
1
The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44
Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49
1
1
The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44
The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44
Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49
Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998442%2fdistance-to-cut-locus-and-injectivity-of-the-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44
Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49