Distance to cut locus and injectivity of the exponential map











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.



He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.



As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$



I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.



I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}

Does this help?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
    – Jack Lee
    Nov 15 at 2:44










  • Thanks, this helped.
    – Frieder Jäckel
    Nov 15 at 7:49















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.



He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.



As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$



I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.



I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}

Does this help?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
    – Jack Lee
    Nov 15 at 2:44










  • Thanks, this helped.
    – Frieder Jäckel
    Nov 15 at 7:49













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.



He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.



As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$



I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.



I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}

Does this help?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $M$ be a Riemannian manifold, $p in M$ and $C_m(p)$ shall denote the cut locus of $p$.
In his „Riemannian Geometry“ Do Carmo says that $exp_p$ is injective on a open ball $B_r(p)$ of radius $r$ if and only if $rleq d(p,C_m(p))$. I have however trouble proving the if direction.



He says that this is a consequence of the fact that if $q notin C_m(p)$, then there is unique minimizing geodesic from $p$ to $q$. He also proved the fact that if $gamma(t_0)$ is the cut point of $p=gamma(0)$ along $gamma$, then either $gamma(t_0)$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma$ or there exists a different geodesic of equal length connecting $p$ and $gamma(t_0)$.



As I said I have trouble proving that if $exp_p$ is injective on $B_r(p)$, then $rleq d(p,C_m(p)).$
My attempt:
Assume $r>d(p,C_m(p)).$ Choose a point $q in C_m(p)$ with $d(p,q)<r$ and let $gamma$ denote a minimizing geodesic joining $p$ and $q$. If there is a different geodesic of same length joining these two points, then $exp_p$ is not inhective on $B_r(p).$ But I can‘t come up with a contradiction when $q$ is the first conjugate point of $p$ along $gamma.$



I would appreciate a hint on how to proceed or a proof.



I was able to prove
begin{equation}
d(p,C_m(p))=sup{r>0: exp_p text{is a diffeo on} B_r(p)}.
end{equation}

Does this help?







riemannian-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 14 at 16:08









Frieder Jäckel

1,079213




1,079213








  • 1




    The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
    – Jack Lee
    Nov 15 at 2:44










  • Thanks, this helped.
    – Frieder Jäckel
    Nov 15 at 7:49














  • 1




    The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
    – Jack Lee
    Nov 15 at 2:44










  • Thanks, this helped.
    – Frieder Jäckel
    Nov 15 at 7:49








1




1




The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44




The key fact is that no geodesic is minimizing past its first conjugate point. Does do Carmo prove that?
– Jack Lee
Nov 15 at 2:44












Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49




Thanks, this helped.
– Frieder Jäckel
Nov 15 at 7:49















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998442%2fdistance-to-cut-locus-and-injectivity-of-the-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998442%2fdistance-to-cut-locus-and-injectivity-of-the-exponential-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix