Convergence in Distribution implies Convergence in Expectation uniformly for an equicontinuous family











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












If $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, then for any equicontinuous family ${f_theta:thetain Theta}$, satisfying sup${|f_theta(x)|:xin mathbf{R},thetain Theta}}<infty$, prove that $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]$ uniformly in $thetain Theta$.



Now I know if $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]hspace{1ex}forall thetainTheta$. And I sense I have to use Arzela-Ascoli Theorem, but I don't have compact set as domain. Any help?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    If $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, then for any equicontinuous family ${f_theta:thetain Theta}$, satisfying sup${|f_theta(x)|:xin mathbf{R},thetain Theta}}<infty$, prove that $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]$ uniformly in $thetain Theta$.



    Now I know if $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]hspace{1ex}forall thetainTheta$. And I sense I have to use Arzela-Ascoli Theorem, but I don't have compact set as domain. Any help?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      If $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, then for any equicontinuous family ${f_theta:thetain Theta}$, satisfying sup${|f_theta(x)|:xin mathbf{R},thetain Theta}}<infty$, prove that $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]$ uniformly in $thetain Theta$.



      Now I know if $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]hspace{1ex}forall thetainTheta$. And I sense I have to use Arzela-Ascoli Theorem, but I don't have compact set as domain. Any help?










      share|cite|improve this question















      If $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, then for any equicontinuous family ${f_theta:thetain Theta}$, satisfying sup${|f_theta(x)|:xin mathbf{R},thetain Theta}}<infty$, prove that $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]$ uniformly in $thetain Theta$.



      Now I know if $X_n xrightarrow{text{d}} X$, $E[f_theta(X_n)]rightarrow E[f_theta(X)]hspace{1ex}forall thetainTheta$. And I sense I have to use Arzela-Ascoli Theorem, but I don't have compact set as domain. Any help?







      functional-analysis probability-theory measure-theory convergence equicontinuity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 12 at 6:29









      saz

      76.3k755117




      76.3k755117










      asked Nov 11 at 14:09









      PSG

      1999




      1999






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Arzelà-Ascoli is a good idea; in order to apply it we need to truncate the functions $f_{theta}$ in a suitable way.



          Step 1: Find suitable level of truncation Fix $epsilon>0$. By the monotone convergence theorem, there exists $R>0$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon; tag{1}$$



          without loss of generality, we may assume that $mathbb{P}(|X|=R)=0$. Since $X_n to X$ weakly we have



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) to mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon,$$



          and therefore we can choose $N in mathbb{N}$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N$.}$$



          We can enlarge $R>0$ in such a way that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_j| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{or all $j=1,ldots,N-1$}$$



          (note that we only have finitely many $j$'s here!), and therefore we get



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq 1$.} tag{2}$$



          Step 2: Apply Arzelà-Ascoli For fixed $epsilon>0$ let $R>0$ be as in Step 1 (i.e. such that $(1)$ and $(2)$ hold). Choose a function $chi in C_b(mathbb{R})$, $0 leq chi leq 1$ such that $chi(x)=1$ for $|x| leq R$ and $chi(x)=$ for $|x| geq R+1$. The family $${chi cdot f_{theta}; theta in Theta}$$ is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. Moreover, the support of each function $g_{theta} := chi cdot f_{theta}$ is contained in the closed ball of radius $R+1$. By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, this implies that the above family is compact in $C_b(mathbb{R})$. In particular, we can choose $theta_1,ldots,theta_m in Theta$ such that $${g_{theta}; theta in Theta} subseteq bigcup_{j=1}^m B(g_{theta_j},epsilon). tag{3}$$ For each $j=1,ldots,m$ there exists $N_j$ such that $$|mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N_j$};$$ set $N := max{N_1,ldots,N_m}$.



          Step 3: Prove uniform convergence Fix $theta in Theta$. Clearly, we have



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq I_1+I_2$$



          where



          $$begin{align*} I_1 &:= |mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) chi(X_n))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) chi(X))| \ I_2 &:=|mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) (1-chi(X_n)))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) (1-chi(X)))| end{align*}$$



          We estimate the terms separately.



          Estimate of $I_1$: According to $(3)$ there exists $j in {1,ldots,m}$ such that $|g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} leq epsilon$. Hence, $$I_1 = |mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X)| leq 2 |g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} + |mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq 3 epsilon tag{4}$$ for all $n geq N$.



          Estimate of $I_2$: Since $chi(x)=0$ for all $|x| leq R$ and $0 leq chi leq 1$, we clearly have



          $$I_2 leq |f_{theta}|_{infty} left( mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) + mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) right).$$



          It follows from $(1)$ and $(2)$ that



          $$I_2 leq3 |f_{theta}|_{infty} epsilon.$$
          If we set $M:= sup_{theta in Theta} |f_{theta}|_{infty}$ (which is finite by assumption) then $$I_2 leq 3 M epsilon.$$



          Combining our estimates, we find that



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq 3 (M+1) epsilon$$



          for all $n geq N$. Since $epsilon>0$ is arbitrary and $N$ does not depend on $theta$, this proves the uniform convergence with respect to $theta in Theta$: $$sup_{theta in Theta} |mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0.$$



          Remark: Note that the result implies in particular the following statement.




          Theorem If $X_n to X$ in distribution then $$sup_{xi in K} |mathbb{E}exp(i xi X_n)-mathbb{E}exp(i xi X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0$$ for any compact set $K$, i.e. the characteristic functions converge uniformly on compact sets.







          share|cite|improve this answer























          • The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
            – p4sch
            Nov 12 at 8:43










          • @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
            – saz
            Nov 12 at 9:25











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2993928%2fconvergence-in-distribution-implies-convergence-in-expectation-uniformly-for-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Arzelà-Ascoli is a good idea; in order to apply it we need to truncate the functions $f_{theta}$ in a suitable way.



          Step 1: Find suitable level of truncation Fix $epsilon>0$. By the monotone convergence theorem, there exists $R>0$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon; tag{1}$$



          without loss of generality, we may assume that $mathbb{P}(|X|=R)=0$. Since $X_n to X$ weakly we have



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) to mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon,$$



          and therefore we can choose $N in mathbb{N}$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N$.}$$



          We can enlarge $R>0$ in such a way that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_j| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{or all $j=1,ldots,N-1$}$$



          (note that we only have finitely many $j$'s here!), and therefore we get



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq 1$.} tag{2}$$



          Step 2: Apply Arzelà-Ascoli For fixed $epsilon>0$ let $R>0$ be as in Step 1 (i.e. such that $(1)$ and $(2)$ hold). Choose a function $chi in C_b(mathbb{R})$, $0 leq chi leq 1$ such that $chi(x)=1$ for $|x| leq R$ and $chi(x)=$ for $|x| geq R+1$. The family $${chi cdot f_{theta}; theta in Theta}$$ is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. Moreover, the support of each function $g_{theta} := chi cdot f_{theta}$ is contained in the closed ball of radius $R+1$. By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, this implies that the above family is compact in $C_b(mathbb{R})$. In particular, we can choose $theta_1,ldots,theta_m in Theta$ such that $${g_{theta}; theta in Theta} subseteq bigcup_{j=1}^m B(g_{theta_j},epsilon). tag{3}$$ For each $j=1,ldots,m$ there exists $N_j$ such that $$|mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N_j$};$$ set $N := max{N_1,ldots,N_m}$.



          Step 3: Prove uniform convergence Fix $theta in Theta$. Clearly, we have



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq I_1+I_2$$



          where



          $$begin{align*} I_1 &:= |mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) chi(X_n))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) chi(X))| \ I_2 &:=|mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) (1-chi(X_n)))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) (1-chi(X)))| end{align*}$$



          We estimate the terms separately.



          Estimate of $I_1$: According to $(3)$ there exists $j in {1,ldots,m}$ such that $|g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} leq epsilon$. Hence, $$I_1 = |mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X)| leq 2 |g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} + |mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq 3 epsilon tag{4}$$ for all $n geq N$.



          Estimate of $I_2$: Since $chi(x)=0$ for all $|x| leq R$ and $0 leq chi leq 1$, we clearly have



          $$I_2 leq |f_{theta}|_{infty} left( mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) + mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) right).$$



          It follows from $(1)$ and $(2)$ that



          $$I_2 leq3 |f_{theta}|_{infty} epsilon.$$
          If we set $M:= sup_{theta in Theta} |f_{theta}|_{infty}$ (which is finite by assumption) then $$I_2 leq 3 M epsilon.$$



          Combining our estimates, we find that



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq 3 (M+1) epsilon$$



          for all $n geq N$. Since $epsilon>0$ is arbitrary and $N$ does not depend on $theta$, this proves the uniform convergence with respect to $theta in Theta$: $$sup_{theta in Theta} |mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0.$$



          Remark: Note that the result implies in particular the following statement.




          Theorem If $X_n to X$ in distribution then $$sup_{xi in K} |mathbb{E}exp(i xi X_n)-mathbb{E}exp(i xi X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0$$ for any compact set $K$, i.e. the characteristic functions converge uniformly on compact sets.







          share|cite|improve this answer























          • The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
            – p4sch
            Nov 12 at 8:43










          • @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
            – saz
            Nov 12 at 9:25















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Arzelà-Ascoli is a good idea; in order to apply it we need to truncate the functions $f_{theta}$ in a suitable way.



          Step 1: Find suitable level of truncation Fix $epsilon>0$. By the monotone convergence theorem, there exists $R>0$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon; tag{1}$$



          without loss of generality, we may assume that $mathbb{P}(|X|=R)=0$. Since $X_n to X$ weakly we have



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) to mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon,$$



          and therefore we can choose $N in mathbb{N}$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N$.}$$



          We can enlarge $R>0$ in such a way that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_j| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{or all $j=1,ldots,N-1$}$$



          (note that we only have finitely many $j$'s here!), and therefore we get



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq 1$.} tag{2}$$



          Step 2: Apply Arzelà-Ascoli For fixed $epsilon>0$ let $R>0$ be as in Step 1 (i.e. such that $(1)$ and $(2)$ hold). Choose a function $chi in C_b(mathbb{R})$, $0 leq chi leq 1$ such that $chi(x)=1$ for $|x| leq R$ and $chi(x)=$ for $|x| geq R+1$. The family $${chi cdot f_{theta}; theta in Theta}$$ is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. Moreover, the support of each function $g_{theta} := chi cdot f_{theta}$ is contained in the closed ball of radius $R+1$. By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, this implies that the above family is compact in $C_b(mathbb{R})$. In particular, we can choose $theta_1,ldots,theta_m in Theta$ such that $${g_{theta}; theta in Theta} subseteq bigcup_{j=1}^m B(g_{theta_j},epsilon). tag{3}$$ For each $j=1,ldots,m$ there exists $N_j$ such that $$|mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N_j$};$$ set $N := max{N_1,ldots,N_m}$.



          Step 3: Prove uniform convergence Fix $theta in Theta$. Clearly, we have



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq I_1+I_2$$



          where



          $$begin{align*} I_1 &:= |mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) chi(X_n))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) chi(X))| \ I_2 &:=|mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) (1-chi(X_n)))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) (1-chi(X)))| end{align*}$$



          We estimate the terms separately.



          Estimate of $I_1$: According to $(3)$ there exists $j in {1,ldots,m}$ such that $|g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} leq epsilon$. Hence, $$I_1 = |mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X)| leq 2 |g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} + |mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq 3 epsilon tag{4}$$ for all $n geq N$.



          Estimate of $I_2$: Since $chi(x)=0$ for all $|x| leq R$ and $0 leq chi leq 1$, we clearly have



          $$I_2 leq |f_{theta}|_{infty} left( mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) + mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) right).$$



          It follows from $(1)$ and $(2)$ that



          $$I_2 leq3 |f_{theta}|_{infty} epsilon.$$
          If we set $M:= sup_{theta in Theta} |f_{theta}|_{infty}$ (which is finite by assumption) then $$I_2 leq 3 M epsilon.$$



          Combining our estimates, we find that



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq 3 (M+1) epsilon$$



          for all $n geq N$. Since $epsilon>0$ is arbitrary and $N$ does not depend on $theta$, this proves the uniform convergence with respect to $theta in Theta$: $$sup_{theta in Theta} |mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0.$$



          Remark: Note that the result implies in particular the following statement.




          Theorem If $X_n to X$ in distribution then $$sup_{xi in K} |mathbb{E}exp(i xi X_n)-mathbb{E}exp(i xi X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0$$ for any compact set $K$, i.e. the characteristic functions converge uniformly on compact sets.







          share|cite|improve this answer























          • The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
            – p4sch
            Nov 12 at 8:43










          • @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
            – saz
            Nov 12 at 9:25













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Arzelà-Ascoli is a good idea; in order to apply it we need to truncate the functions $f_{theta}$ in a suitable way.



          Step 1: Find suitable level of truncation Fix $epsilon>0$. By the monotone convergence theorem, there exists $R>0$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon; tag{1}$$



          without loss of generality, we may assume that $mathbb{P}(|X|=R)=0$. Since $X_n to X$ weakly we have



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) to mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon,$$



          and therefore we can choose $N in mathbb{N}$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N$.}$$



          We can enlarge $R>0$ in such a way that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_j| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{or all $j=1,ldots,N-1$}$$



          (note that we only have finitely many $j$'s here!), and therefore we get



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq 1$.} tag{2}$$



          Step 2: Apply Arzelà-Ascoli For fixed $epsilon>0$ let $R>0$ be as in Step 1 (i.e. such that $(1)$ and $(2)$ hold). Choose a function $chi in C_b(mathbb{R})$, $0 leq chi leq 1$ such that $chi(x)=1$ for $|x| leq R$ and $chi(x)=$ for $|x| geq R+1$. The family $${chi cdot f_{theta}; theta in Theta}$$ is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. Moreover, the support of each function $g_{theta} := chi cdot f_{theta}$ is contained in the closed ball of radius $R+1$. By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, this implies that the above family is compact in $C_b(mathbb{R})$. In particular, we can choose $theta_1,ldots,theta_m in Theta$ such that $${g_{theta}; theta in Theta} subseteq bigcup_{j=1}^m B(g_{theta_j},epsilon). tag{3}$$ For each $j=1,ldots,m$ there exists $N_j$ such that $$|mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N_j$};$$ set $N := max{N_1,ldots,N_m}$.



          Step 3: Prove uniform convergence Fix $theta in Theta$. Clearly, we have



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq I_1+I_2$$



          where



          $$begin{align*} I_1 &:= |mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) chi(X_n))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) chi(X))| \ I_2 &:=|mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) (1-chi(X_n)))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) (1-chi(X)))| end{align*}$$



          We estimate the terms separately.



          Estimate of $I_1$: According to $(3)$ there exists $j in {1,ldots,m}$ such that $|g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} leq epsilon$. Hence, $$I_1 = |mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X)| leq 2 |g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} + |mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq 3 epsilon tag{4}$$ for all $n geq N$.



          Estimate of $I_2$: Since $chi(x)=0$ for all $|x| leq R$ and $0 leq chi leq 1$, we clearly have



          $$I_2 leq |f_{theta}|_{infty} left( mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) + mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) right).$$



          It follows from $(1)$ and $(2)$ that



          $$I_2 leq3 |f_{theta}|_{infty} epsilon.$$
          If we set $M:= sup_{theta in Theta} |f_{theta}|_{infty}$ (which is finite by assumption) then $$I_2 leq 3 M epsilon.$$



          Combining our estimates, we find that



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq 3 (M+1) epsilon$$



          for all $n geq N$. Since $epsilon>0$ is arbitrary and $N$ does not depend on $theta$, this proves the uniform convergence with respect to $theta in Theta$: $$sup_{theta in Theta} |mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0.$$



          Remark: Note that the result implies in particular the following statement.




          Theorem If $X_n to X$ in distribution then $$sup_{xi in K} |mathbb{E}exp(i xi X_n)-mathbb{E}exp(i xi X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0$$ for any compact set $K$, i.e. the characteristic functions converge uniformly on compact sets.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          Arzelà-Ascoli is a good idea; in order to apply it we need to truncate the functions $f_{theta}$ in a suitable way.



          Step 1: Find suitable level of truncation Fix $epsilon>0$. By the monotone convergence theorem, there exists $R>0$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon; tag{1}$$



          without loss of generality, we may assume that $mathbb{P}(|X|=R)=0$. Since $X_n to X$ weakly we have



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) to mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) leq epsilon,$$



          and therefore we can choose $N in mathbb{N}$ such that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N$.}$$



          We can enlarge $R>0$ in such a way that



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_j| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{or all $j=1,ldots,N-1$}$$



          (note that we only have finitely many $j$'s here!), and therefore we get



          $$mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) leq 2 epsilon quad text{for all $n geq 1$.} tag{2}$$



          Step 2: Apply Arzelà-Ascoli For fixed $epsilon>0$ let $R>0$ be as in Step 1 (i.e. such that $(1)$ and $(2)$ hold). Choose a function $chi in C_b(mathbb{R})$, $0 leq chi leq 1$ such that $chi(x)=1$ for $|x| leq R$ and $chi(x)=$ for $|x| geq R+1$. The family $${chi cdot f_{theta}; theta in Theta}$$ is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. Moreover, the support of each function $g_{theta} := chi cdot f_{theta}$ is contained in the closed ball of radius $R+1$. By the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, this implies that the above family is compact in $C_b(mathbb{R})$. In particular, we can choose $theta_1,ldots,theta_m in Theta$ such that $${g_{theta}; theta in Theta} subseteq bigcup_{j=1}^m B(g_{theta_j},epsilon). tag{3}$$ For each $j=1,ldots,m$ there exists $N_j$ such that $$|mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq epsilon quad text{for all $n geq N_j$};$$ set $N := max{N_1,ldots,N_m}$.



          Step 3: Prove uniform convergence Fix $theta in Theta$. Clearly, we have



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq I_1+I_2$$



          where



          $$begin{align*} I_1 &:= |mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) chi(X_n))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) chi(X))| \ I_2 &:=|mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X_n) (1-chi(X_n)))- mathbb{E}(f_{theta}(X) (1-chi(X)))| end{align*}$$



          We estimate the terms separately.



          Estimate of $I_1$: According to $(3)$ there exists $j in {1,ldots,m}$ such that $|g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} leq epsilon$. Hence, $$I_1 = |mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta}(X)| leq 2 |g_{theta}-g_{theta_j}|_{infty} + |mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X_n)-mathbb{E}g_{theta_j}(X)| leq 3 epsilon tag{4}$$ for all $n geq N$.



          Estimate of $I_2$: Since $chi(x)=0$ for all $|x| leq R$ and $0 leq chi leq 1$, we clearly have



          $$I_2 leq |f_{theta}|_{infty} left( mathbb{P}(|X_n| geq R) + mathbb{P}(|X| geq R) right).$$



          It follows from $(1)$ and $(2)$ that



          $$I_2 leq3 |f_{theta}|_{infty} epsilon.$$
          If we set $M:= sup_{theta in Theta} |f_{theta}|_{infty}$ (which is finite by assumption) then $$I_2 leq 3 M epsilon.$$



          Combining our estimates, we find that



          $$|mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| leq 3 (M+1) epsilon$$



          for all $n geq N$. Since $epsilon>0$ is arbitrary and $N$ does not depend on $theta$, this proves the uniform convergence with respect to $theta in Theta$: $$sup_{theta in Theta} |mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X_n)-mathbb{E}f_{theta}(X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0.$$



          Remark: Note that the result implies in particular the following statement.




          Theorem If $X_n to X$ in distribution then $$sup_{xi in K} |mathbb{E}exp(i xi X_n)-mathbb{E}exp(i xi X)| xrightarrow{n to infty} 0$$ for any compact set $K$, i.e. the characteristic functions converge uniformly on compact sets.








          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 14 at 16:06

























          answered Nov 11 at 18:38









          saz

          76.3k755117




          76.3k755117












          • The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
            – p4sch
            Nov 12 at 8:43










          • @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
            – saz
            Nov 12 at 9:25


















          • The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
            – p4sch
            Nov 12 at 8:43










          • @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
            – saz
            Nov 12 at 9:25
















          The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
          – p4sch
          Nov 12 at 8:43




          The family $(exp(itx theta))_{theta in mathbb{R}}$ isn't equicontinuous - only if we restrict $theta$ on compact sets. In particular, the characteristic functions only convergence on compact sets uniformly! For example $delta_{1/n} rightarrow delta_0$, but $|exp(it_n/n) -1| = 2$ for all $t_n = n pi$. Thus the convergence cannot be uniformly!
          – p4sch
          Nov 12 at 8:43












          @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
          – saz
          Nov 12 at 9:25




          @p4sch You are right of course, I corrected it; thank you.
          – saz
          Nov 12 at 9:25


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2993928%2fconvergence-in-distribution-implies-convergence-in-expectation-uniformly-for-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix