Algebraic proof involving Independent Set Problem & Maximum Degree











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I was wondering if somebody could help me with a graph-related proof!



Let:





  • $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected graph;


  • $S subseteq V$ a maximal independent set;


  • $Delta$ the maximum degree of the graph ( = the maximum number of edges any vertex has).


I strongly suspect that $Delta geq frac{|S|}{|V setminus S|}$ for a certain category of graphs, like non-trivial connected graphs perhaps; however I'm struggling to prove it and yielded poor results so far.



What do you guys think, can this be (dis)proved?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I was wondering if somebody could help me with a graph-related proof!



    Let:





    • $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected graph;


    • $S subseteq V$ a maximal independent set;


    • $Delta$ the maximum degree of the graph ( = the maximum number of edges any vertex has).


    I strongly suspect that $Delta geq frac{|S|}{|V setminus S|}$ for a certain category of graphs, like non-trivial connected graphs perhaps; however I'm struggling to prove it and yielded poor results so far.



    What do you guys think, can this be (dis)proved?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I was wondering if somebody could help me with a graph-related proof!



      Let:





      • $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected graph;


      • $S subseteq V$ a maximal independent set;


      • $Delta$ the maximum degree of the graph ( = the maximum number of edges any vertex has).


      I strongly suspect that $Delta geq frac{|S|}{|V setminus S|}$ for a certain category of graphs, like non-trivial connected graphs perhaps; however I'm struggling to prove it and yielded poor results so far.



      What do you guys think, can this be (dis)proved?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I was wondering if somebody could help me with a graph-related proof!



      Let:





      • $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected graph;


      • $S subseteq V$ a maximal independent set;


      • $Delta$ the maximum degree of the graph ( = the maximum number of edges any vertex has).


      I strongly suspect that $Delta geq frac{|S|}{|V setminus S|}$ for a certain category of graphs, like non-trivial connected graphs perhaps; however I'm struggling to prove it and yielded poor results so far.



      What do you guys think, can this be (dis)proved?







      proof-verification graph-theory algorithms






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 14 at 15:02

























      asked Nov 14 at 14:44









      J. Brown

      84




      84






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, this is true for all connected graphs on more than $1$ vertex. (Or, for an even weaker assumption, all graphs with no isolated vertices.)



          Let $S$ be a maximal independent set. Each vertex of $S$ must be adjacent to some vertex of $V setminus S$, since otherwise it wouldn't be connected to anything.



          This gives us at least $|S|$ edges incident to $|Vsetminus S|$ vertices, so one of the vertices must be incident to at least $frac{|S|}{|Vsetminus S|}$ of them.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:20










          • That's the idea, yes.
            – Misha Lavrov
            Nov 14 at 15:39










          • Thanks very much Misha!
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:46











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998338%2falgebraic-proof-involving-independent-set-problem-maximum-degree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, this is true for all connected graphs on more than $1$ vertex. (Or, for an even weaker assumption, all graphs with no isolated vertices.)



          Let $S$ be a maximal independent set. Each vertex of $S$ must be adjacent to some vertex of $V setminus S$, since otherwise it wouldn't be connected to anything.



          This gives us at least $|S|$ edges incident to $|Vsetminus S|$ vertices, so one of the vertices must be incident to at least $frac{|S|}{|Vsetminus S|}$ of them.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:20










          • That's the idea, yes.
            – Misha Lavrov
            Nov 14 at 15:39










          • Thanks very much Misha!
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:46















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, this is true for all connected graphs on more than $1$ vertex. (Or, for an even weaker assumption, all graphs with no isolated vertices.)



          Let $S$ be a maximal independent set. Each vertex of $S$ must be adjacent to some vertex of $V setminus S$, since otherwise it wouldn't be connected to anything.



          This gives us at least $|S|$ edges incident to $|Vsetminus S|$ vertices, so one of the vertices must be incident to at least $frac{|S|}{|Vsetminus S|}$ of them.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:20










          • That's the idea, yes.
            – Misha Lavrov
            Nov 14 at 15:39










          • Thanks very much Misha!
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:46













          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Yes, this is true for all connected graphs on more than $1$ vertex. (Or, for an even weaker assumption, all graphs with no isolated vertices.)



          Let $S$ be a maximal independent set. Each vertex of $S$ must be adjacent to some vertex of $V setminus S$, since otherwise it wouldn't be connected to anything.



          This gives us at least $|S|$ edges incident to $|Vsetminus S|$ vertices, so one of the vertices must be incident to at least $frac{|S|}{|Vsetminus S|}$ of them.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Yes, this is true for all connected graphs on more than $1$ vertex. (Or, for an even weaker assumption, all graphs with no isolated vertices.)



          Let $S$ be a maximal independent set. Each vertex of $S$ must be adjacent to some vertex of $V setminus S$, since otherwise it wouldn't be connected to anything.



          This gives us at least $|S|$ edges incident to $|Vsetminus S|$ vertices, so one of the vertices must be incident to at least $frac{|S|}{|Vsetminus S|}$ of them.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 14 at 15:06









          Misha Lavrov

          41.5k555101




          41.5k555101












          • It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:20










          • That's the idea, yes.
            – Misha Lavrov
            Nov 14 at 15:39










          • Thanks very much Misha!
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:46


















          • It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:20










          • That's the idea, yes.
            – Misha Lavrov
            Nov 14 at 15:39










          • Thanks very much Misha!
            – J. Brown
            Nov 14 at 15:46
















          It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
          – J. Brown
          Nov 14 at 15:20




          It took me a bit to visualize the last statement but I think I got it: would it be rightfully justified with the pigeonhole principle?
          – J. Brown
          Nov 14 at 15:20












          That's the idea, yes.
          – Misha Lavrov
          Nov 14 at 15:39




          That's the idea, yes.
          – Misha Lavrov
          Nov 14 at 15:39












          Thanks very much Misha!
          – J. Brown
          Nov 14 at 15:46




          Thanks very much Misha!
          – J. Brown
          Nov 14 at 15:46


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998338%2falgebraic-proof-involving-independent-set-problem-maximum-degree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix