Desrcibing all the equivalent martingale measures (EMM)











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Exercise :




Consider the finite sample space $Omega = {omega_1, omega_2, omega_3}$ and the probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbb P)$ with $mathcal F:= 2^Omega$ and let $mathbb P$ be a probability measure such that $mathbb P[{omega_1}] > 0$ for all $i=1,2,3$ .



Let :
$$bar{S}_0 = begin{pmatrix} 1\2\7 end{pmatrix}, quadbar{S}_1(omega_1) = begin{pmatrix} 1\3\9end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_2) = begin{pmatrix} 1\1\5end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_3) = begin{pmatrix} 1\13\10 end{pmatrix}$$
Describe all the equivalent martingale measures.




Definitions and request for help/elaboration :




Theorem : Let $mathbb P, mathbb Q$ be two probability measures over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$. Then, it is $mathbb P sim mathbb Q$ if and only if there exists a random variable $X>0, ; X in L^1(mathbb P)$ such that :
$$mathbb E_mathbb Q[mathbf{1}_A] = mathbb Q(A) = int_AXmathrm{d}mathbb P=mathbb E_mathbb P[Xmathbf{1}_A], quad forall A in mathcal F$$



Definition : A probability measure $mathbb Q$ over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$ is called a martingale measure (MM) if it is :
$$S_1 in L^1(mathbb Q) quad text{and} quad S_0 = mathbb{E}_mathbb Qbigg[frac{S_1}{1+r}bigg]$$



Definition : If $mathbb Q$ is a martingale measure and it also is $mathbb Q sim mathbb P$, then $mathbb Q$ is called an equivalent martingale measure (EMM).



Definition : We define $mathcal{P}$ to be the set of all the equivalent martingale measures :
$$mathcal{P} = {mathbb Q|mathbb Q sim mathbb P, mathbb Q ; text{is an equivalent martingale measure}}$$




Question : Now, given these definitions, what is needed for me to carry out so I can answer properly to the exercise given ? What am I expected to do and how ? I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration as I haven't been properly introduced to martingales and measure theory yet (there are just tools needed for a higher-level class).










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Exercise :




    Consider the finite sample space $Omega = {omega_1, omega_2, omega_3}$ and the probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbb P)$ with $mathcal F:= 2^Omega$ and let $mathbb P$ be a probability measure such that $mathbb P[{omega_1}] > 0$ for all $i=1,2,3$ .



    Let :
    $$bar{S}_0 = begin{pmatrix} 1\2\7 end{pmatrix}, quadbar{S}_1(omega_1) = begin{pmatrix} 1\3\9end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_2) = begin{pmatrix} 1\1\5end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_3) = begin{pmatrix} 1\13\10 end{pmatrix}$$
    Describe all the equivalent martingale measures.




    Definitions and request for help/elaboration :




    Theorem : Let $mathbb P, mathbb Q$ be two probability measures over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$. Then, it is $mathbb P sim mathbb Q$ if and only if there exists a random variable $X>0, ; X in L^1(mathbb P)$ such that :
    $$mathbb E_mathbb Q[mathbf{1}_A] = mathbb Q(A) = int_AXmathrm{d}mathbb P=mathbb E_mathbb P[Xmathbf{1}_A], quad forall A in mathcal F$$



    Definition : A probability measure $mathbb Q$ over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$ is called a martingale measure (MM) if it is :
    $$S_1 in L^1(mathbb Q) quad text{and} quad S_0 = mathbb{E}_mathbb Qbigg[frac{S_1}{1+r}bigg]$$



    Definition : If $mathbb Q$ is a martingale measure and it also is $mathbb Q sim mathbb P$, then $mathbb Q$ is called an equivalent martingale measure (EMM).



    Definition : We define $mathcal{P}$ to be the set of all the equivalent martingale measures :
    $$mathcal{P} = {mathbb Q|mathbb Q sim mathbb P, mathbb Q ; text{is an equivalent martingale measure}}$$




    Question : Now, given these definitions, what is needed for me to carry out so I can answer properly to the exercise given ? What am I expected to do and how ? I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration as I haven't been properly introduced to martingales and measure theory yet (there are just tools needed for a higher-level class).










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Exercise :




      Consider the finite sample space $Omega = {omega_1, omega_2, omega_3}$ and the probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbb P)$ with $mathcal F:= 2^Omega$ and let $mathbb P$ be a probability measure such that $mathbb P[{omega_1}] > 0$ for all $i=1,2,3$ .



      Let :
      $$bar{S}_0 = begin{pmatrix} 1\2\7 end{pmatrix}, quadbar{S}_1(omega_1) = begin{pmatrix} 1\3\9end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_2) = begin{pmatrix} 1\1\5end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_3) = begin{pmatrix} 1\13\10 end{pmatrix}$$
      Describe all the equivalent martingale measures.




      Definitions and request for help/elaboration :




      Theorem : Let $mathbb P, mathbb Q$ be two probability measures over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$. Then, it is $mathbb P sim mathbb Q$ if and only if there exists a random variable $X>0, ; X in L^1(mathbb P)$ such that :
      $$mathbb E_mathbb Q[mathbf{1}_A] = mathbb Q(A) = int_AXmathrm{d}mathbb P=mathbb E_mathbb P[Xmathbf{1}_A], quad forall A in mathcal F$$



      Definition : A probability measure $mathbb Q$ over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$ is called a martingale measure (MM) if it is :
      $$S_1 in L^1(mathbb Q) quad text{and} quad S_0 = mathbb{E}_mathbb Qbigg[frac{S_1}{1+r}bigg]$$



      Definition : If $mathbb Q$ is a martingale measure and it also is $mathbb Q sim mathbb P$, then $mathbb Q$ is called an equivalent martingale measure (EMM).



      Definition : We define $mathcal{P}$ to be the set of all the equivalent martingale measures :
      $$mathcal{P} = {mathbb Q|mathbb Q sim mathbb P, mathbb Q ; text{is an equivalent martingale measure}}$$




      Question : Now, given these definitions, what is needed for me to carry out so I can answer properly to the exercise given ? What am I expected to do and how ? I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration as I haven't been properly introduced to martingales and measure theory yet (there are just tools needed for a higher-level class).










      share|cite|improve this question













      Exercise :




      Consider the finite sample space $Omega = {omega_1, omega_2, omega_3}$ and the probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbb P)$ with $mathcal F:= 2^Omega$ and let $mathbb P$ be a probability measure such that $mathbb P[{omega_1}] > 0$ for all $i=1,2,3$ .



      Let :
      $$bar{S}_0 = begin{pmatrix} 1\2\7 end{pmatrix}, quadbar{S}_1(omega_1) = begin{pmatrix} 1\3\9end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_2) = begin{pmatrix} 1\1\5end{pmatrix}, quad bar{S}_1(omega_3) = begin{pmatrix} 1\13\10 end{pmatrix}$$
      Describe all the equivalent martingale measures.




      Definitions and request for help/elaboration :




      Theorem : Let $mathbb P, mathbb Q$ be two probability measures over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$. Then, it is $mathbb P sim mathbb Q$ if and only if there exists a random variable $X>0, ; X in L^1(mathbb P)$ such that :
      $$mathbb E_mathbb Q[mathbf{1}_A] = mathbb Q(A) = int_AXmathrm{d}mathbb P=mathbb E_mathbb P[Xmathbf{1}_A], quad forall A in mathcal F$$



      Definition : A probability measure $mathbb Q$ over the space $(Omega, mathcal{F})$ is called a martingale measure (MM) if it is :
      $$S_1 in L^1(mathbb Q) quad text{and} quad S_0 = mathbb{E}_mathbb Qbigg[frac{S_1}{1+r}bigg]$$



      Definition : If $mathbb Q$ is a martingale measure and it also is $mathbb Q sim mathbb P$, then $mathbb Q$ is called an equivalent martingale measure (EMM).



      Definition : We define $mathcal{P}$ to be the set of all the equivalent martingale measures :
      $$mathcal{P} = {mathbb Q|mathbb Q sim mathbb P, mathbb Q ; text{is an equivalent martingale measure}}$$




      Question : Now, given these definitions, what is needed for me to carry out so I can answer properly to the exercise given ? What am I expected to do and how ? I would really appreciate a thorough elaboration as I haven't been properly introduced to martingales and measure theory yet (there are just tools needed for a higher-level class).







      probability-theory measure-theory stochastic-processes martingales finance






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 13 at 21:04









      Rebellos

      11.5k21040




      11.5k21040






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          From the fact that the first asset does not change value, we can infer that the interest rate is zero. The problem is to find all probability measures $Q$ such that $$ S_0 = S_1Q(omega_1) + S_2Q(omega_2) +S_3Q(omega_3),$$ and all of the three probabilities are greater than zero (and add up to one, of course). The equation expresses the fact that it is a martingale measure (the RHS is the expected discounted value). It needs all probabilities greater than zero in order to be equivalent to $P.$



          As far as I can tell, there aren’t any (I find one probability measure that has the right expected value but it doesn’t have all probabilities nonzero.)



          Edit



          Going to expand on equivalence a bit. Two measures are equivalent if they have the same null events. I notice the part on equivalence is marked as a theorem, not a definition, so I suspect perhaps you were given this definition at at some point. Since the physical measure $P$ you've been given has $P(omega)>0$ for all $omegainOmega,$ the only null event is the empty set. Thus for $Q$ to be equivalent, it must also have the only null event be the emptyset, i.e. $Q(omega)>0$ for all $omegain Omega.$



          To see this is equivalent to the theorem that there exists a random variable $X>0$ such that for any event $A$ $$ E_Q(1_A) = E_P(X1_A),$$ as I mentioned in the comments, just take $X(omega) = frac{Q(omega)}{P(omega)},$ for all $omega$ such that $P(omega) >0,$ and let it be defined as any positive number elsewhere. We see that the fact that P and Q are equivalent implies $X>0$. And we have (specializing to the sample space in the problem for clarity) $$ E_Q(1_A) = 1_A(omega_1)Q(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)Q(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)Q(omega_3) \=1_A(omega_1)X(omega_1)P(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)X(omega_2)P(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)X(omega_3)P(omega_3)\=E_P(1_A X) $$ where we used equivalence again to deal with the possibility that $P(omega_i) = 0$ for some $i$.



          In the reverse direction, for any $X>0$, if there is an $A$ such that $Q(A) =0$ but $P(A)ne 0,$ or vice versa then it's clear that $E_Q(1_A) ne E_P(X 1_A)$ since one side is zero and the other isn't $(E_Q(1_A) = Q(A)$ and $E_P(X1_A) = 0$ if and only if $P(A) = 0$ since $X>0.$)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 22:28










          • It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 13 at 22:58










          • Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 23:07






          • 1




            Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:11






          • 1




            The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:18













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997333%2fdesrcibing-all-the-equivalent-martingale-measures-emm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          From the fact that the first asset does not change value, we can infer that the interest rate is zero. The problem is to find all probability measures $Q$ such that $$ S_0 = S_1Q(omega_1) + S_2Q(omega_2) +S_3Q(omega_3),$$ and all of the three probabilities are greater than zero (and add up to one, of course). The equation expresses the fact that it is a martingale measure (the RHS is the expected discounted value). It needs all probabilities greater than zero in order to be equivalent to $P.$



          As far as I can tell, there aren’t any (I find one probability measure that has the right expected value but it doesn’t have all probabilities nonzero.)



          Edit



          Going to expand on equivalence a bit. Two measures are equivalent if they have the same null events. I notice the part on equivalence is marked as a theorem, not a definition, so I suspect perhaps you were given this definition at at some point. Since the physical measure $P$ you've been given has $P(omega)>0$ for all $omegainOmega,$ the only null event is the empty set. Thus for $Q$ to be equivalent, it must also have the only null event be the emptyset, i.e. $Q(omega)>0$ for all $omegain Omega.$



          To see this is equivalent to the theorem that there exists a random variable $X>0$ such that for any event $A$ $$ E_Q(1_A) = E_P(X1_A),$$ as I mentioned in the comments, just take $X(omega) = frac{Q(omega)}{P(omega)},$ for all $omega$ such that $P(omega) >0,$ and let it be defined as any positive number elsewhere. We see that the fact that P and Q are equivalent implies $X>0$. And we have (specializing to the sample space in the problem for clarity) $$ E_Q(1_A) = 1_A(omega_1)Q(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)Q(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)Q(omega_3) \=1_A(omega_1)X(omega_1)P(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)X(omega_2)P(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)X(omega_3)P(omega_3)\=E_P(1_A X) $$ where we used equivalence again to deal with the possibility that $P(omega_i) = 0$ for some $i$.



          In the reverse direction, for any $X>0$, if there is an $A$ such that $Q(A) =0$ but $P(A)ne 0,$ or vice versa then it's clear that $E_Q(1_A) ne E_P(X 1_A)$ since one side is zero and the other isn't $(E_Q(1_A) = Q(A)$ and $E_P(X1_A) = 0$ if and only if $P(A) = 0$ since $X>0.$)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 22:28










          • It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 13 at 22:58










          • Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 23:07






          • 1




            Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:11






          • 1




            The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:18

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          From the fact that the first asset does not change value, we can infer that the interest rate is zero. The problem is to find all probability measures $Q$ such that $$ S_0 = S_1Q(omega_1) + S_2Q(omega_2) +S_3Q(omega_3),$$ and all of the three probabilities are greater than zero (and add up to one, of course). The equation expresses the fact that it is a martingale measure (the RHS is the expected discounted value). It needs all probabilities greater than zero in order to be equivalent to $P.$



          As far as I can tell, there aren’t any (I find one probability measure that has the right expected value but it doesn’t have all probabilities nonzero.)



          Edit



          Going to expand on equivalence a bit. Two measures are equivalent if they have the same null events. I notice the part on equivalence is marked as a theorem, not a definition, so I suspect perhaps you were given this definition at at some point. Since the physical measure $P$ you've been given has $P(omega)>0$ for all $omegainOmega,$ the only null event is the empty set. Thus for $Q$ to be equivalent, it must also have the only null event be the emptyset, i.e. $Q(omega)>0$ for all $omegain Omega.$



          To see this is equivalent to the theorem that there exists a random variable $X>0$ such that for any event $A$ $$ E_Q(1_A) = E_P(X1_A),$$ as I mentioned in the comments, just take $X(omega) = frac{Q(omega)}{P(omega)},$ for all $omega$ such that $P(omega) >0,$ and let it be defined as any positive number elsewhere. We see that the fact that P and Q are equivalent implies $X>0$. And we have (specializing to the sample space in the problem for clarity) $$ E_Q(1_A) = 1_A(omega_1)Q(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)Q(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)Q(omega_3) \=1_A(omega_1)X(omega_1)P(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)X(omega_2)P(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)X(omega_3)P(omega_3)\=E_P(1_A X) $$ where we used equivalence again to deal with the possibility that $P(omega_i) = 0$ for some $i$.



          In the reverse direction, for any $X>0$, if there is an $A$ such that $Q(A) =0$ but $P(A)ne 0,$ or vice versa then it's clear that $E_Q(1_A) ne E_P(X 1_A)$ since one side is zero and the other isn't $(E_Q(1_A) = Q(A)$ and $E_P(X1_A) = 0$ if and only if $P(A) = 0$ since $X>0.$)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 22:28










          • It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 13 at 22:58










          • Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 23:07






          • 1




            Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:11






          • 1




            The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:18















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          From the fact that the first asset does not change value, we can infer that the interest rate is zero. The problem is to find all probability measures $Q$ such that $$ S_0 = S_1Q(omega_1) + S_2Q(omega_2) +S_3Q(omega_3),$$ and all of the three probabilities are greater than zero (and add up to one, of course). The equation expresses the fact that it is a martingale measure (the RHS is the expected discounted value). It needs all probabilities greater than zero in order to be equivalent to $P.$



          As far as I can tell, there aren’t any (I find one probability measure that has the right expected value but it doesn’t have all probabilities nonzero.)



          Edit



          Going to expand on equivalence a bit. Two measures are equivalent if they have the same null events. I notice the part on equivalence is marked as a theorem, not a definition, so I suspect perhaps you were given this definition at at some point. Since the physical measure $P$ you've been given has $P(omega)>0$ for all $omegainOmega,$ the only null event is the empty set. Thus for $Q$ to be equivalent, it must also have the only null event be the emptyset, i.e. $Q(omega)>0$ for all $omegain Omega.$



          To see this is equivalent to the theorem that there exists a random variable $X>0$ such that for any event $A$ $$ E_Q(1_A) = E_P(X1_A),$$ as I mentioned in the comments, just take $X(omega) = frac{Q(omega)}{P(omega)},$ for all $omega$ such that $P(omega) >0,$ and let it be defined as any positive number elsewhere. We see that the fact that P and Q are equivalent implies $X>0$. And we have (specializing to the sample space in the problem for clarity) $$ E_Q(1_A) = 1_A(omega_1)Q(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)Q(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)Q(omega_3) \=1_A(omega_1)X(omega_1)P(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)X(omega_2)P(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)X(omega_3)P(omega_3)\=E_P(1_A X) $$ where we used equivalence again to deal with the possibility that $P(omega_i) = 0$ for some $i$.



          In the reverse direction, for any $X>0$, if there is an $A$ such that $Q(A) =0$ but $P(A)ne 0,$ or vice versa then it's clear that $E_Q(1_A) ne E_P(X 1_A)$ since one side is zero and the other isn't $(E_Q(1_A) = Q(A)$ and $E_P(X1_A) = 0$ if and only if $P(A) = 0$ since $X>0.$)






          share|cite|improve this answer














          From the fact that the first asset does not change value, we can infer that the interest rate is zero. The problem is to find all probability measures $Q$ such that $$ S_0 = S_1Q(omega_1) + S_2Q(omega_2) +S_3Q(omega_3),$$ and all of the three probabilities are greater than zero (and add up to one, of course). The equation expresses the fact that it is a martingale measure (the RHS is the expected discounted value). It needs all probabilities greater than zero in order to be equivalent to $P.$



          As far as I can tell, there aren’t any (I find one probability measure that has the right expected value but it doesn’t have all probabilities nonzero.)



          Edit



          Going to expand on equivalence a bit. Two measures are equivalent if they have the same null events. I notice the part on equivalence is marked as a theorem, not a definition, so I suspect perhaps you were given this definition at at some point. Since the physical measure $P$ you've been given has $P(omega)>0$ for all $omegainOmega,$ the only null event is the empty set. Thus for $Q$ to be equivalent, it must also have the only null event be the emptyset, i.e. $Q(omega)>0$ for all $omegain Omega.$



          To see this is equivalent to the theorem that there exists a random variable $X>0$ such that for any event $A$ $$ E_Q(1_A) = E_P(X1_A),$$ as I mentioned in the comments, just take $X(omega) = frac{Q(omega)}{P(omega)},$ for all $omega$ such that $P(omega) >0,$ and let it be defined as any positive number elsewhere. We see that the fact that P and Q are equivalent implies $X>0$. And we have (specializing to the sample space in the problem for clarity) $$ E_Q(1_A) = 1_A(omega_1)Q(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)Q(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)Q(omega_3) \=1_A(omega_1)X(omega_1)P(omega_1) + 1_A(omega_2)X(omega_2)P(omega_2) + 1_A(omega_3)X(omega_3)P(omega_3)\=E_P(1_A X) $$ where we used equivalence again to deal with the possibility that $P(omega_i) = 0$ for some $i$.



          In the reverse direction, for any $X>0$, if there is an $A$ such that $Q(A) =0$ but $P(A)ne 0,$ or vice versa then it's clear that $E_Q(1_A) ne E_P(X 1_A)$ since one side is zero and the other isn't $(E_Q(1_A) = Q(A)$ and $E_P(X1_A) = 0$ if and only if $P(A) = 0$ since $X>0.$)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 14 at 1:01

























          answered Nov 13 at 22:16









          spaceisdarkgreen

          31.4k21552




          31.4k21552












          • Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 22:28










          • It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 13 at 22:58










          • Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 23:07






          • 1




            Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:11






          • 1




            The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:18




















          • Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 22:28










          • It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 13 at 22:58










          • Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
            – Rebellos
            Nov 13 at 23:07






          • 1




            Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:11






          • 1




            The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 14 at 0:18


















          Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
          – Rebellos
          Nov 13 at 22:28




          Hi and thanks a lot for your answer ! How did you yield that the problem described comes down to finding all the probability measures $mathbb Q$ such that : $$S_0 = S_1mathbb{Q}(omega_1) + S_2mathbb{Q}(omega_2) +S_3mathbb{Q}(omega_3)$$ After that, I didn't really understand what you meant about the equivalence to $P$ ? Given on your hints, how would I derive a complete solution to the problem ? It's the first time I'm handling such a task, that's why I am mind boggled.
          – Rebellos
          Nov 13 at 22:28












          It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 13 at 22:58




          It is just the expression that the expected value is the same as the starting value for all three assets (which is what martingale means). They say all three probabilities are greater than zero in measure P, so by the definition of equivalence they must be greater than zero in Q as well.
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 13 at 22:58












          Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
          – Rebellos
          Nov 13 at 23:07




          Nicely explained ! One last question, from the definition of equivalence posted above, how does one derive that the probabilities must follow the same order of $geq 0$ from $mathbb P$ to $mathbb Q$ ?
          – Rebellos
          Nov 13 at 23:07




          1




          1




          Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 14 at 0:11




          Equivalence means the two measures agree which events have measure zero and one. Will edit my answer to square that up with the definition when I have more time later.
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 14 at 0:11




          1




          1




          The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 14 at 0:18






          The short answer is you take $X(omega)=Q(omega)/P(omega).$
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 14 at 0:18




















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997333%2fdesrcibing-all-the-equivalent-martingale-measures-emm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Index of /

          Tribalistas

          Listed building