Possible characterization of compact metric spaces via real-valued uniformly continuous functions?












2












$begingroup$


1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?



(Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



    2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



    If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?



    (Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



      2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



      If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?



      (Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



      2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?



      If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?



      (Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )







      metric-spaces compactness uniform-continuity complete-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 29 '18 at 2:28







      user521337

















      asked Dec 29 '18 at 2:21









      user521337user521337

      1,1981417




      1,1981417






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.



          Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.



          Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.



          Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.



          By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.



          Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            why is the image of $f$ compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:49










          • $begingroup$
            I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:54










          • $begingroup$
            why is it even bounded ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055475%2fpossible-characterization-of-compact-metric-spaces-via-real-valued-uniformly-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.



          Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.



          Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.



          Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.



          By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.



          Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            why is the image of $f$ compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:49










          • $begingroup$
            I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:54










          • $begingroup$
            why is it even bounded ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
















          1












          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.



          Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.



          Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.



          Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.



          By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.



          Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            why is the image of $f$ compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:49










          • $begingroup$
            I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:54










          • $begingroup$
            why is it even bounded ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.



          Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.



          Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.



          Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.



          By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.



          Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.



          Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.



          Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.



          Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.



          By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.



          Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 29 '18 at 12:45

























          answered Dec 29 '18 at 2:39









          SmileyCraftSmileyCraft

          3,749519




          3,749519












          • $begingroup$
            why is the image of $f$ compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:49










          • $begingroup$
            I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:54










          • $begingroup$
            why is it even bounded ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08


















          • $begingroup$
            why is the image of $f$ compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:49










          • $begingroup$
            I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            Dec 29 '18 at 2:54










          • $begingroup$
            why is it even bounded ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
















          $begingroup$
          why is the image of $f$ compact ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:47




          $begingroup$
          why is the image of $f$ compact ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:47




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:49




          $begingroup$
          I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:49












          $begingroup$
          I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:50




          $begingroup$
          I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:50












          $begingroup$
          Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:54




          $begingroup$
          Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          Dec 29 '18 at 2:54












          $begingroup$
          why is it even bounded ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Dec 29 '18 at 3:08




          $begingroup$
          why is it even bounded ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Dec 29 '18 at 3:08


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055475%2fpossible-characterization-of-compact-metric-spaces-via-real-valued-uniformly-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

          When does type information flow backwards in C++?

          Grease: Live!