Custom shape shows unwanted extra line
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) -- (-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This is supposed to be a closed custom shape WITHOUT the straight line!

How can I get rid of this unwanted line?
Putting '-- cycle' at the end makes no difference.
tikz-pgf shapes
add a comment |
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) -- (-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This is supposed to be a closed custom shape WITHOUT the straight line!

How can I get rid of this unwanted line?
Putting '-- cycle' at the end makes no difference.
tikz-pgf shapes
2
You have an extra-- (-4.261,2.617)which draws a straight line to the start point of the path. Remove that and swap the start and end angles of the arc:draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) arc (321.42:148.44:5);.
– Phelype Oleinik
Feb 25 at 20:44
@PhelypeOleinik Yes, that's the probably best solution here. You should write an answer.
– marmot
Feb 25 at 21:46
add a comment |
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) -- (-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This is supposed to be a closed custom shape WITHOUT the straight line!

How can I get rid of this unwanted line?
Putting '-- cycle' at the end makes no difference.
tikz-pgf shapes
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) -- (-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This is supposed to be a closed custom shape WITHOUT the straight line!

How can I get rid of this unwanted line?
Putting '-- cycle' at the end makes no difference.
tikz-pgf shapes
tikz-pgf shapes
edited Feb 25 at 20:35
Petoetje59
asked Feb 25 at 20:28
Petoetje59Petoetje59
4841616
4841616
2
You have an extra-- (-4.261,2.617)which draws a straight line to the start point of the path. Remove that and swap the start and end angles of the arc:draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) arc (321.42:148.44:5);.
– Phelype Oleinik
Feb 25 at 20:44
@PhelypeOleinik Yes, that's the probably best solution here. You should write an answer.
– marmot
Feb 25 at 21:46
add a comment |
2
You have an extra-- (-4.261,2.617)which draws a straight line to the start point of the path. Remove that and swap the start and end angles of the arc:draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) arc (321.42:148.44:5);.
– Phelype Oleinik
Feb 25 at 20:44
@PhelypeOleinik Yes, that's the probably best solution here. You should write an answer.
– marmot
Feb 25 at 21:46
2
2
You have an extra
-- (-4.261,2.617) which draws a straight line to the start point of the path. Remove that and swap the start and end angles of the arc: draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) arc (321.42:148.44:5);.– Phelype Oleinik
Feb 25 at 20:44
You have an extra
-- (-4.261,2.617) which draws a straight line to the start point of the path. Remove that and swap the start and end angles of the arc: draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) arc (321.42:148.44:5);.– Phelype Oleinik
Feb 25 at 20:44
@PhelypeOleinik Yes, that's the probably best solution here. You should write an answer.
– marmot
Feb 25 at 21:46
@PhelypeOleinik Yes, that's the probably best solution here. You should write an answer.
– marmot
Feb 25 at 21:46
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I saw Phelype's comment and deleted the post. Now I am undeleting it per request. But I will be happy to delete it again. In any case, full credits go to Phelype Oleinik, who was the first to propose a solution.
In fact, I like Phelype's proposal better than "just removing the line". Here is why:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
Reversing the arc:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=blue] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5);
end{tikzpicture}
Just removing the line:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=red] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

The blue corresponds to what I would suggest, namely reversing the arc, and the red one "removing the line", which works at the level of the contour but does not yield a continuous path.
And here is a second reason why I like Phelype's method better.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5) -- cycle;
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
draw[red] (-4.261,2.617) circle[radius=3mm]
(3.908,-3.118) circle[radius=3mm];
end{tikzpicture}
%
end{document}

add a comment |
I didn't know that the path has to be filled. So I update my answer as follows:
- remove
--from the path and - pass the option
even odd ruleif the filling is needed.
Answer updated to add a hole in the fill
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5) (-2,-2)circle[radius=1];
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476653%2fcustom-shape-shows-unwanted-extra-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I saw Phelype's comment and deleted the post. Now I am undeleting it per request. But I will be happy to delete it again. In any case, full credits go to Phelype Oleinik, who was the first to propose a solution.
In fact, I like Phelype's proposal better than "just removing the line". Here is why:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
Reversing the arc:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=blue] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5);
end{tikzpicture}
Just removing the line:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=red] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

The blue corresponds to what I would suggest, namely reversing the arc, and the red one "removing the line", which works at the level of the contour but does not yield a continuous path.
And here is a second reason why I like Phelype's method better.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5) -- cycle;
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
draw[red] (-4.261,2.617) circle[radius=3mm]
(3.908,-3.118) circle[radius=3mm];
end{tikzpicture}
%
end{document}

add a comment |
I saw Phelype's comment and deleted the post. Now I am undeleting it per request. But I will be happy to delete it again. In any case, full credits go to Phelype Oleinik, who was the first to propose a solution.
In fact, I like Phelype's proposal better than "just removing the line". Here is why:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
Reversing the arc:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=blue] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5);
end{tikzpicture}
Just removing the line:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=red] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

The blue corresponds to what I would suggest, namely reversing the arc, and the red one "removing the line", which works at the level of the contour but does not yield a continuous path.
And here is a second reason why I like Phelype's method better.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5) -- cycle;
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
draw[red] (-4.261,2.617) circle[radius=3mm]
(3.908,-3.118) circle[radius=3mm];
end{tikzpicture}
%
end{document}

add a comment |
I saw Phelype's comment and deleted the post. Now I am undeleting it per request. But I will be happy to delete it again. In any case, full credits go to Phelype Oleinik, who was the first to propose a solution.
In fact, I like Phelype's proposal better than "just removing the line". Here is why:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
Reversing the arc:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=blue] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5);
end{tikzpicture}
Just removing the line:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=red] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

The blue corresponds to what I would suggest, namely reversing the arc, and the red one "removing the line", which works at the level of the contour but does not yield a continuous path.
And here is a second reason why I like Phelype's method better.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5) -- cycle;
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
draw[red] (-4.261,2.617) circle[radius=3mm]
(3.908,-3.118) circle[radius=3mm];
end{tikzpicture}
%
end{document}

I saw Phelype's comment and deleted the post. Now I am undeleting it per request. But I will be happy to delete it again. In any case, full credits go to Phelype Oleinik, who was the first to propose a solution.
In fact, I like Phelype's proposal better than "just removing the line". Here is why:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
Reversing the arc:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=blue] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5);
end{tikzpicture}
Just removing the line:
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[fill=red] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

The blue corresponds to what I would suggest, namely reversing the arc, and the red one "removing the line", which works at the level of the contour but does not yield a continuous path.
And here is a second reason why I like Phelype's method better.
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
arc (321.42:148.44:5) -- cycle;
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw [line width=1mm,line join=round]
(-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
draw[red] (-4.261,2.617) circle[radius=3mm]
(3.908,-3.118) circle[radius=3mm];
end{tikzpicture}
%
end{document}

edited Feb 26 at 16:07
answered Feb 25 at 21:23
marmotmarmot
113k5145274
113k5145274
add a comment |
add a comment |
I didn't know that the path has to be filled. So I update my answer as follows:
- remove
--from the path and - pass the option
even odd ruleif the filling is needed.
Answer updated to add a hole in the fill
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5) (-2,-2)circle[radius=1];
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

add a comment |
I didn't know that the path has to be filled. So I update my answer as follows:
- remove
--from the path and - pass the option
even odd ruleif the filling is needed.
Answer updated to add a hole in the fill
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5) (-2,-2)circle[radius=1];
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

add a comment |
I didn't know that the path has to be filled. So I update my answer as follows:
- remove
--from the path and - pass the option
even odd ruleif the filling is needed.
Answer updated to add a hole in the fill
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5) (-2,-2)circle[radius=1];
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

I didn't know that the path has to be filled. So I update my answer as follows:
- remove
--from the path and - pass the option
even odd ruleif the filling is needed.
Answer updated to add a hole in the fill
documentclass[border=1cm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5) (-2,-2)circle[radius=1];
end{tikzpicture}
%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[red,fill,even odd rule] (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118)
(-4.261,2.617) arc (148.44:321.42:5);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

edited Feb 26 at 15:40
answered Feb 25 at 20:51
Hafid BoukhouldaHafid Boukhoulda
4,6341625
4,6341625
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476653%2fcustom-shape-shows-unwanted-extra-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
You have an extra
-- (-4.261,2.617)which draws a straight line to the start point of the path. Remove that and swap the start and end angles of the arc:draw (-4.261,2.617)..controls (2.5,1.5) and (-4.5,-3)..(3.908,-3.118) arc (321.42:148.44:5);.– Phelype Oleinik
Feb 25 at 20:44
@PhelypeOleinik Yes, that's the probably best solution here. You should write an answer.
– marmot
Feb 25 at 21:46