Complex integral with conjugate as an exponent












7












$begingroup$



What is the integral of
$$int_{Gamma}pi e^{pibar{z}}dz$$ where $Gamma$ is the square with vertices at $0,1,1+i,i$ oriented anticlockwise?




I am badly stuck at this problem. I thought of using the Residue theorem by using $bar{z}=frac{|z|^2}{z}$, but we get an essential singularity. Using Laurent series about zero, I get $a_{-1}=pi|z|^2$. Is this correct? how do we proceed? Any hints. Thanks beforehand.






integration complex-analysis contour-integration residue-calculus







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$



    What is the integral of
    $$int_{Gamma}pi e^{pibar{z}}dz$$ where $Gamma$ is the square with vertices at $0,1,1+i,i$ oriented anticlockwise?




    I am badly stuck at this problem. I thought of using the Residue theorem by using $bar{z}=frac{|z|^2}{z}$, but we get an essential singularity. Using Laurent series about zero, I get $a_{-1}=pi|z|^2$. Is this correct? how do we proceed? Any hints. Thanks beforehand.






    integration complex-analysis contour-integration residue-calculus







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      5



      $begingroup$



      What is the integral of
      $$int_{Gamma}pi e^{pibar{z}}dz$$ where $Gamma$ is the square with vertices at $0,1,1+i,i$ oriented anticlockwise?




      I am badly stuck at this problem. I thought of using the Residue theorem by using $bar{z}=frac{|z|^2}{z}$, but we get an essential singularity. Using Laurent series about zero, I get $a_{-1}=pi|z|^2$. Is this correct? how do we proceed? Any hints. Thanks beforehand.






      integration complex-analysis contour-integration residue-calculus







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      What is the integral of
      $$int_{Gamma}pi e^{pibar{z}}dz$$ where $Gamma$ is the square with vertices at $0,1,1+i,i$ oriented anticlockwise?




      I am badly stuck at this problem. I thought of using the Residue theorem by using $bar{z}=frac{|z|^2}{z}$, but we get an essential singularity. Using Laurent series about zero, I get $a_{-1}=pi|z|^2$. Is this correct? how do we proceed? Any hints. Thanks beforehand.






      integration complex-analysis contour-integration residue-calculus




      integration complex-analysis contour-integration residue-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 2 at 15:06









      José Carlos Santos

      171k23132240




      171k23132240










      asked Sep 20 '17 at 8:14









      vidyarthividyarthi

      3,0731833




      3,0731833






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          12












          $begingroup$

          In addition to José Carlos Santos' answer, we can also utilize Green's theorem:



          begin{align*}
          int_{gamma} pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dz
          &= int_{gamma} left( pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dx + ipi e^{pi bar{z}} , dy right) \
          &= int_{[0,1]^2} left( frac{partial}{partial x} ipi e^{pi bar{z}} - frac{partial}{partial y} pi e^{pi bar{z}}right) , dxdy \
          &= 2pi^2 i int_{[0,1]^2} e^{pi x}e^{-ipi y} , dxdy \
          &= 4(e^{pi} - 1).
          end{align*}






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Beautiful answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Oria Gruber
            Sep 20 '17 at 9:03



















          7












          $begingroup$

          You can't use the residue theorem in a non-analytic function!



          Your integral can be naturally broken on four pieces. One of them is$$int_gammapi e^{pioverline z},mathrm dz,tag{1}$$with $gammacolon[0,1]longrightarrowmathbb C$ defined by $gamma(t)=t$. But then $(1)$ is equal to$$int_0^1pi e^{pioverline{gamma(t)}}gamma'(t),mathrm dt=int_0^1pi e^{pi t},mathrm dt=left[e^{pi t}right]_{t=0}^{t=1}=e^{pi}-e^0=e^{pi}-1$$Can you compute the other three integrals?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:44






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:45












          • $begingroup$
            why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:52










          • $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:56






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Sangchul Lee
            Sep 20 '17 at 9:35





















          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint. Note that if $gamma$ is a segment from $P$ to $Q$ then
          $gamma(t)=P+(Q-P)t$ for $tin [0,1]$ and
          $$int_{gamma}pi e^{pioverline{z}}dz=int_{t=0}^1pi e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-overline{P})t)}(Q-P)dt=frac{Q-P}{overline{Q}-overline{P}}[e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-bar{P})t)}]_0^1=frac{(Q-P)(e^{pi overline{Q}}-e^{pi overline{P}})}{overline{Q-P}}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2437171%2fcomplex-integral-with-conjugate-as-an-exponent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            12












            $begingroup$

            In addition to José Carlos Santos' answer, we can also utilize Green's theorem:



            begin{align*}
            int_{gamma} pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dz
            &= int_{gamma} left( pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dx + ipi e^{pi bar{z}} , dy right) \
            &= int_{[0,1]^2} left( frac{partial}{partial x} ipi e^{pi bar{z}} - frac{partial}{partial y} pi e^{pi bar{z}}right) , dxdy \
            &= 2pi^2 i int_{[0,1]^2} e^{pi x}e^{-ipi y} , dxdy \
            &= 4(e^{pi} - 1).
            end{align*}






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Beautiful answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Oria Gruber
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:03
















            12












            $begingroup$

            In addition to José Carlos Santos' answer, we can also utilize Green's theorem:



            begin{align*}
            int_{gamma} pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dz
            &= int_{gamma} left( pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dx + ipi e^{pi bar{z}} , dy right) \
            &= int_{[0,1]^2} left( frac{partial}{partial x} ipi e^{pi bar{z}} - frac{partial}{partial y} pi e^{pi bar{z}}right) , dxdy \
            &= 2pi^2 i int_{[0,1]^2} e^{pi x}e^{-ipi y} , dxdy \
            &= 4(e^{pi} - 1).
            end{align*}






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Beautiful answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Oria Gruber
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:03














            12












            12








            12





            $begingroup$

            In addition to José Carlos Santos' answer, we can also utilize Green's theorem:



            begin{align*}
            int_{gamma} pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dz
            &= int_{gamma} left( pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dx + ipi e^{pi bar{z}} , dy right) \
            &= int_{[0,1]^2} left( frac{partial}{partial x} ipi e^{pi bar{z}} - frac{partial}{partial y} pi e^{pi bar{z}}right) , dxdy \
            &= 2pi^2 i int_{[0,1]^2} e^{pi x}e^{-ipi y} , dxdy \
            &= 4(e^{pi} - 1).
            end{align*}






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            In addition to José Carlos Santos' answer, we can also utilize Green's theorem:



            begin{align*}
            int_{gamma} pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dz
            &= int_{gamma} left( pi e^{pi bar{z}} , dx + ipi e^{pi bar{z}} , dy right) \
            &= int_{[0,1]^2} left( frac{partial}{partial x} ipi e^{pi bar{z}} - frac{partial}{partial y} pi e^{pi bar{z}}right) , dxdy \
            &= 2pi^2 i int_{[0,1]^2} e^{pi x}e^{-ipi y} , dxdy \
            &= 4(e^{pi} - 1).
            end{align*}







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Sep 20 '17 at 9:01









            Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee

            96.3k12171282




            96.3k12171282












            • $begingroup$
              Beautiful answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Oria Gruber
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:03


















            • $begingroup$
              Beautiful answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Oria Gruber
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:03
















            $begingroup$
            Beautiful answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Oria Gruber
            Sep 20 '17 at 9:03




            $begingroup$
            Beautiful answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Oria Gruber
            Sep 20 '17 at 9:03











            7












            $begingroup$

            You can't use the residue theorem in a non-analytic function!



            Your integral can be naturally broken on four pieces. One of them is$$int_gammapi e^{pioverline z},mathrm dz,tag{1}$$with $gammacolon[0,1]longrightarrowmathbb C$ defined by $gamma(t)=t$. But then $(1)$ is equal to$$int_0^1pi e^{pioverline{gamma(t)}}gamma'(t),mathrm dt=int_0^1pi e^{pi t},mathrm dt=left[e^{pi t}right]_{t=0}^{t=1}=e^{pi}-e^0=e^{pi}-1$$Can you compute the other three integrals?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:44






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:45












            • $begingroup$
              why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:52










            • $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:56






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
              $endgroup$
              – Sangchul Lee
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:35


















            7












            $begingroup$

            You can't use the residue theorem in a non-analytic function!



            Your integral can be naturally broken on four pieces. One of them is$$int_gammapi e^{pioverline z},mathrm dz,tag{1}$$with $gammacolon[0,1]longrightarrowmathbb C$ defined by $gamma(t)=t$. But then $(1)$ is equal to$$int_0^1pi e^{pioverline{gamma(t)}}gamma'(t),mathrm dt=int_0^1pi e^{pi t},mathrm dt=left[e^{pi t}right]_{t=0}^{t=1}=e^{pi}-e^0=e^{pi}-1$$Can you compute the other three integrals?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:44






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:45












            • $begingroup$
              why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:52










            • $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:56






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
              $endgroup$
              – Sangchul Lee
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:35
















            7












            7








            7





            $begingroup$

            You can't use the residue theorem in a non-analytic function!



            Your integral can be naturally broken on four pieces. One of them is$$int_gammapi e^{pioverline z},mathrm dz,tag{1}$$with $gammacolon[0,1]longrightarrowmathbb C$ defined by $gamma(t)=t$. But then $(1)$ is equal to$$int_0^1pi e^{pioverline{gamma(t)}}gamma'(t),mathrm dt=int_0^1pi e^{pi t},mathrm dt=left[e^{pi t}right]_{t=0}^{t=1}=e^{pi}-e^0=e^{pi}-1$$Can you compute the other three integrals?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            You can't use the residue theorem in a non-analytic function!



            Your integral can be naturally broken on four pieces. One of them is$$int_gammapi e^{pioverline z},mathrm dz,tag{1}$$with $gammacolon[0,1]longrightarrowmathbb C$ defined by $gamma(t)=t$. But then $(1)$ is equal to$$int_0^1pi e^{pioverline{gamma(t)}}gamma'(t),mathrm dt=int_0^1pi e^{pi t},mathrm dt=left[e^{pi t}right]_{t=0}^{t=1}=e^{pi}-e^0=e^{pi}-1$$Can you compute the other three integrals?







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Sep 20 '17 at 9:04









            vidyarthi

            3,0731833




            3,0731833










            answered Sep 20 '17 at 8:37









            José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

            171k23132240




            171k23132240












            • $begingroup$
              I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:44






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:45












            • $begingroup$
              why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:52










            • $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:56






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
              $endgroup$
              – Sangchul Lee
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:35




















            • $begingroup$
              I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:44






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:45












            • $begingroup$
              why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
              $endgroup$
              – vidyarthi
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:52










            • $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Sep 20 '17 at 8:56






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
              $endgroup$
              – Sangchul Lee
              Sep 20 '17 at 9:35


















            $begingroup$
            I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:44




            $begingroup$
            I thought the function is meromorphic with an essential singularity at $0$, isnt it? Anyways, what are four parts you are breaking the integral to: the integral on the four sides of the square?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:44




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:45






            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi Your function ($e^{pioverline z}$) is differentiable nowhere! Forget about meromorphic. Yes, I was talking about the four sides of the square.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:45














            $begingroup$
            why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:52




            $begingroup$
            why do you use the path $gamma(t)=it$? and how do you determine the limits?
            $endgroup$
            – vidyarthi
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:52












            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:56




            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi Its limits are $gamma(0)=0$ and $gamma(1)=i$. Actually, I made a mistake. Since you want to go around the square counterclockwise, I should have defined $gamma(t)=t$, in order to go from $0$ to $1$. Then you should go from $1$ to $1+i$, then from $1+i$ to $i$ and finally go back to $0$, along the four sides of a square.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Sep 20 '17 at 8:56




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Sangchul Lee
            Sep 20 '17 at 9:35






            $begingroup$
            @vidyarthi, The contour integral $int_{gamma} f(z) , dz$ depends only on the value of the function $f$ along the curve $gamma$. So as long as you can identify one analytic function that matches $f$ on $gamma$, you can initiate the residue theorem. For your function $f(z) = pi e^{pi bar{z}}$ it is simply that the circular contour allows one such choice, and the square contour doesn't.
            $endgroup$
            – Sangchul Lee
            Sep 20 '17 at 9:35













            3












            $begingroup$

            Hint. Note that if $gamma$ is a segment from $P$ to $Q$ then
            $gamma(t)=P+(Q-P)t$ for $tin [0,1]$ and
            $$int_{gamma}pi e^{pioverline{z}}dz=int_{t=0}^1pi e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-overline{P})t)}(Q-P)dt=frac{Q-P}{overline{Q}-overline{P}}[e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-bar{P})t)}]_0^1=frac{(Q-P)(e^{pi overline{Q}}-e^{pi overline{P}})}{overline{Q-P}}.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Hint. Note that if $gamma$ is a segment from $P$ to $Q$ then
              $gamma(t)=P+(Q-P)t$ for $tin [0,1]$ and
              $$int_{gamma}pi e^{pioverline{z}}dz=int_{t=0}^1pi e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-overline{P})t)}(Q-P)dt=frac{Q-P}{overline{Q}-overline{P}}[e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-bar{P})t)}]_0^1=frac{(Q-P)(e^{pi overline{Q}}-e^{pi overline{P}})}{overline{Q-P}}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Hint. Note that if $gamma$ is a segment from $P$ to $Q$ then
                $gamma(t)=P+(Q-P)t$ for $tin [0,1]$ and
                $$int_{gamma}pi e^{pioverline{z}}dz=int_{t=0}^1pi e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-overline{P})t)}(Q-P)dt=frac{Q-P}{overline{Q}-overline{P}}[e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-bar{P})t)}]_0^1=frac{(Q-P)(e^{pi overline{Q}}-e^{pi overline{P}})}{overline{Q-P}}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Hint. Note that if $gamma$ is a segment from $P$ to $Q$ then
                $gamma(t)=P+(Q-P)t$ for $tin [0,1]$ and
                $$int_{gamma}pi e^{pioverline{z}}dz=int_{t=0}^1pi e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-overline{P})t)}(Q-P)dt=frac{Q-P}{overline{Q}-overline{P}}[e^{pi(overline{P}+(overline{Q}-bar{P})t)}]_0^1=frac{(Q-P)(e^{pi overline{Q}}-e^{pi overline{P}})}{overline{Q-P}}.$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 20 '17 at 9:05









                Robert ZRobert Z

                101k1070143




                101k1070143






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2437171%2fcomplex-integral-with-conjugate-as-an-exponent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                    Image
                    up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 Some time ago, I set up skydrive for my wife on her mac. But now she wants to access the files online, I cannot remember what Microsoft account I setup and linked her skydive app to and nor can I see anything in the skydrive app settings to tell me either? How can I see the name of the Microsoft account the skydive app is currently linked to? I would like to know this for skydrive app for Mac and PC onedrive share | improve this question asked Feb 25 '13 at 4:52 Gary Barrett 260 2 5 12
                    Read more

                    When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                    Image
                    up vote 62 down vote favorite 19 I just watched Stephan T. Lavavej talk at CppCon 2018 on "Class Template Argument Deduction", where at some point he incidentally says: In C++ type information almost never flows backwards ... I had to say "almost" because there's one or two cases, possibly more but very few . Despite trying to figure out which cases he might be referring to, I couldn't come up with anything. Hence the question: In which cases the C++17 standard mandates that type information propagate backwards? c++ language-lawyer c++17 share | improve this question edited 7 hours ago scohe0
                    Read more

                    Grease: Live!

                    Image
                    A tradução deste artigo está abaixo da qualidade média aceitável. É possível que tenha sido feita por um tradutor automático ou por alguém que não conhece bem o português ou a língua original do texto. Caso queira colaborar com a Wikipédia, tente encontrar a página original e melhore este verbete conforme o guia de tradução. Grease: Live! Grease: Live!  (PRT/BRA)  Estados Unidos 2016 •   cor •   130 min. min   Direção Thomas Kail Alex Rudzinski Produção Marc Platt Adam Siegel Roteiro Allan Carr Robert Cary Warren Casey Jim Jacobs Jonathan Tolins Bronte Woodard Baseado em Grease (musical) Grease (filme) Elenco Julianne Hough Aaron Tveit Vanessa Hudgens Carlos Pena Jr. Keke Palmer Carly Rae Jepsen Kether Donohue Jordan Fisher David Del Rio Andrew Call Gênero Musical Música Tom Kitt Figurino William Ivey Long Companhia(s) produtora(s) Warner Bros. Studios Distribuição Fox Lançamento 31 de Janei
                    Read more