$mathbb{E}X^2 = mathbb{E}Y^2$ and $mathbb{E}(Y|mathcal{A}) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P.-a.s.
$begingroup$
I have a question and hope you can help me. The problem is about stochastic variables $X,Y$, which are square integrable, independent and identically distributed on $(Omega, mathcal{S}, P)$. Furthermore $mathcal{A} subsetmathcal{S}$ is a sub-sigma-algebra.
Now I have to show three statements:
a) $mathbb{V}(X) = mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A}) + mathbb{E}[X-mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})]^2 Rightarrow mathbb{V}(mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})) leq mathbb{V}(X)$
b) $mathbb{E}X^2 = mathbb{E}Y^2$ and $mathbb{E}(Y|mathcal{A}) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P.-a.s.
c) $mathbb{E}(X|Y) = Y$ P-a.s. and $mathbb{E}(Y|X) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P-a.s.
I already managed to proof a) by using variance-decomposition-theorem and a little bit of calculation.
Furthermore I think I have an idea how to solve c):
$mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X] = X X = X^2$ P.-almost sure, where the second equal-sign uses the assumption. Similarly there one can conclude $mathbb{E}[XY|Y] = Y^2$ P-a.s.
Applying $mathbb{E}$ on both sides gives me:
$mathbb{E}[X^2]=mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|X]] = mathbb{E}[XY] = mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|Y]] = mathbb{E}[Y^2]$ P-a.s. Now, by using this result, I can conclude $mathbb{E}[(X-Y)^2] = 0$ to get the required result.
Sadly I don't have a clue how to prove b) to finish this task.
I would be very glad if anyone could help me solving b) too!
Thanks in advance for your help!
measure-theory conditional-expectation conditional-probability variance
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have a question and hope you can help me. The problem is about stochastic variables $X,Y$, which are square integrable, independent and identically distributed on $(Omega, mathcal{S}, P)$. Furthermore $mathcal{A} subsetmathcal{S}$ is a sub-sigma-algebra.
Now I have to show three statements:
a) $mathbb{V}(X) = mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A}) + mathbb{E}[X-mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})]^2 Rightarrow mathbb{V}(mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})) leq mathbb{V}(X)$
b) $mathbb{E}X^2 = mathbb{E}Y^2$ and $mathbb{E}(Y|mathcal{A}) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P.-a.s.
c) $mathbb{E}(X|Y) = Y$ P-a.s. and $mathbb{E}(Y|X) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P-a.s.
I already managed to proof a) by using variance-decomposition-theorem and a little bit of calculation.
Furthermore I think I have an idea how to solve c):
$mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X] = X X = X^2$ P.-almost sure, where the second equal-sign uses the assumption. Similarly there one can conclude $mathbb{E}[XY|Y] = Y^2$ P-a.s.
Applying $mathbb{E}$ on both sides gives me:
$mathbb{E}[X^2]=mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|X]] = mathbb{E}[XY] = mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|Y]] = mathbb{E}[Y^2]$ P-a.s. Now, by using this result, I can conclude $mathbb{E}[(X-Y)^2] = 0$ to get the required result.
Sadly I don't have a clue how to prove b) to finish this task.
I would be very glad if anyone could help me solving b) too!
Thanks in advance for your help!
measure-theory conditional-expectation conditional-probability variance
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Implication c) holds for integrable random variables X and Y not necessarily square integrable, as shown in answers to several questions on this site.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 17 '18 at 22:19
$begingroup$
@Did I believe c) it to be true in general, but I failed to provide a proof. Do you have any of this links or a proof-sketch?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 17 '18 at 22:37
$begingroup$
I thought, that my proof for c) (given above) is valid. Is there anything wrong with it? The only step I need square integrability is (at least I think so) $mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X]$. With Hölder's inequality I can conclude, that if X,Y are square-integrable then XY is integrable: $int XY dP leq int |XY| dp stackrel{Hölder}{=} left( int |X|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} left( int |Y|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} < infty$. Or am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:42
$begingroup$
It is true that if $X$ and $Y$ are square integrable, then $XY$ is integrable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:36
$begingroup$
@WillM. math.stackexchange.com/a/1520480/6179
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 18 '18 at 7:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have a question and hope you can help me. The problem is about stochastic variables $X,Y$, which are square integrable, independent and identically distributed on $(Omega, mathcal{S}, P)$. Furthermore $mathcal{A} subsetmathcal{S}$ is a sub-sigma-algebra.
Now I have to show three statements:
a) $mathbb{V}(X) = mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A}) + mathbb{E}[X-mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})]^2 Rightarrow mathbb{V}(mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})) leq mathbb{V}(X)$
b) $mathbb{E}X^2 = mathbb{E}Y^2$ and $mathbb{E}(Y|mathcal{A}) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P.-a.s.
c) $mathbb{E}(X|Y) = Y$ P-a.s. and $mathbb{E}(Y|X) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P-a.s.
I already managed to proof a) by using variance-decomposition-theorem and a little bit of calculation.
Furthermore I think I have an idea how to solve c):
$mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X] = X X = X^2$ P.-almost sure, where the second equal-sign uses the assumption. Similarly there one can conclude $mathbb{E}[XY|Y] = Y^2$ P-a.s.
Applying $mathbb{E}$ on both sides gives me:
$mathbb{E}[X^2]=mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|X]] = mathbb{E}[XY] = mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|Y]] = mathbb{E}[Y^2]$ P-a.s. Now, by using this result, I can conclude $mathbb{E}[(X-Y)^2] = 0$ to get the required result.
Sadly I don't have a clue how to prove b) to finish this task.
I would be very glad if anyone could help me solving b) too!
Thanks in advance for your help!
measure-theory conditional-expectation conditional-probability variance
$endgroup$
I have a question and hope you can help me. The problem is about stochastic variables $X,Y$, which are square integrable, independent and identically distributed on $(Omega, mathcal{S}, P)$. Furthermore $mathcal{A} subsetmathcal{S}$ is a sub-sigma-algebra.
Now I have to show three statements:
a) $mathbb{V}(X) = mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A}) + mathbb{E}[X-mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})]^2 Rightarrow mathbb{V}(mathbb{E}(X|mathcal{A})) leq mathbb{V}(X)$
b) $mathbb{E}X^2 = mathbb{E}Y^2$ and $mathbb{E}(Y|mathcal{A}) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P.-a.s.
c) $mathbb{E}(X|Y) = Y$ P-a.s. and $mathbb{E}(Y|X) = X$ P-a.s. $Rightarrow X=Y$ P-a.s.
I already managed to proof a) by using variance-decomposition-theorem and a little bit of calculation.
Furthermore I think I have an idea how to solve c):
$mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X] = X X = X^2$ P.-almost sure, where the second equal-sign uses the assumption. Similarly there one can conclude $mathbb{E}[XY|Y] = Y^2$ P-a.s.
Applying $mathbb{E}$ on both sides gives me:
$mathbb{E}[X^2]=mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|X]] = mathbb{E}[XY] = mathbb{E}[mathbb{E}[XY|Y]] = mathbb{E}[Y^2]$ P-a.s. Now, by using this result, I can conclude $mathbb{E}[(X-Y)^2] = 0$ to get the required result.
Sadly I don't have a clue how to prove b) to finish this task.
I would be very glad if anyone could help me solving b) too!
Thanks in advance for your help!
measure-theory conditional-expectation conditional-probability variance
measure-theory conditional-expectation conditional-probability variance
edited Dec 17 '18 at 22:48
TNicky
asked Dec 17 '18 at 20:57
TNickyTNicky
85
85
$begingroup$
Implication c) holds for integrable random variables X and Y not necessarily square integrable, as shown in answers to several questions on this site.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 17 '18 at 22:19
$begingroup$
@Did I believe c) it to be true in general, but I failed to provide a proof. Do you have any of this links or a proof-sketch?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 17 '18 at 22:37
$begingroup$
I thought, that my proof for c) (given above) is valid. Is there anything wrong with it? The only step I need square integrability is (at least I think so) $mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X]$. With Hölder's inequality I can conclude, that if X,Y are square-integrable then XY is integrable: $int XY dP leq int |XY| dp stackrel{Hölder}{=} left( int |X|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} left( int |Y|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} < infty$. Or am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:42
$begingroup$
It is true that if $X$ and $Y$ are square integrable, then $XY$ is integrable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:36
$begingroup$
@WillM. math.stackexchange.com/a/1520480/6179
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 18 '18 at 7:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Implication c) holds for integrable random variables X and Y not necessarily square integrable, as shown in answers to several questions on this site.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 17 '18 at 22:19
$begingroup$
@Did I believe c) it to be true in general, but I failed to provide a proof. Do you have any of this links or a proof-sketch?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 17 '18 at 22:37
$begingroup$
I thought, that my proof for c) (given above) is valid. Is there anything wrong with it? The only step I need square integrability is (at least I think so) $mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X]$. With Hölder's inequality I can conclude, that if X,Y are square-integrable then XY is integrable: $int XY dP leq int |XY| dp stackrel{Hölder}{=} left( int |X|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} left( int |Y|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} < infty$. Or am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:42
$begingroup$
It is true that if $X$ and $Y$ are square integrable, then $XY$ is integrable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:36
$begingroup$
@WillM. math.stackexchange.com/a/1520480/6179
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 18 '18 at 7:20
$begingroup$
Implication c) holds for integrable random variables X and Y not necessarily square integrable, as shown in answers to several questions on this site.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 17 '18 at 22:19
$begingroup$
Implication c) holds for integrable random variables X and Y not necessarily square integrable, as shown in answers to several questions on this site.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 17 '18 at 22:19
$begingroup$
@Did I believe c) it to be true in general, but I failed to provide a proof. Do you have any of this links or a proof-sketch?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 17 '18 at 22:37
$begingroup$
@Did I believe c) it to be true in general, but I failed to provide a proof. Do you have any of this links or a proof-sketch?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 17 '18 at 22:37
$begingroup$
I thought, that my proof for c) (given above) is valid. Is there anything wrong with it? The only step I need square integrability is (at least I think so) $mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X]$. With Hölder's inequality I can conclude, that if X,Y are square-integrable then XY is integrable: $int XY dP leq int |XY| dp stackrel{Hölder}{=} left( int |X|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} left( int |Y|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} < infty$. Or am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:42
$begingroup$
I thought, that my proof for c) (given above) is valid. Is there anything wrong with it? The only step I need square integrability is (at least I think so) $mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X]$. With Hölder's inequality I can conclude, that if X,Y are square-integrable then XY is integrable: $int XY dP leq int |XY| dp stackrel{Hölder}{=} left( int |X|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} left( int |Y|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} < infty$. Or am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:42
$begingroup$
It is true that if $X$ and $Y$ are square integrable, then $XY$ is integrable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:36
$begingroup$
It is true that if $X$ and $Y$ are square integrable, then $XY$ is integrable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:36
$begingroup$
@WillM. math.stackexchange.com/a/1520480/6179
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 18 '18 at 7:20
$begingroup$
@WillM. math.stackexchange.com/a/1520480/6179
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 18 '18 at 7:20
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Since you have a), I give a proof of b). Observe the hypothesis $mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) = X$ implies $X$ to be measurable with respect to $mathscr{A}.$ Bearing this in mind,
$$begin{align*}
mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2) &= mathbf{E}big( mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2 mid mathscr{A}) big) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - 2mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) X+ X^2) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - X^2) = 0.
end{align*}$$
As for c), if $X$ and $Y$ were square integrable, you have $mathbf{E}(XY) = E(X^2) = E(Y^2),$ so b) finishes the proof upon applying it with $mathscr{A} = sigma(X).$ For the general case, I am not sure how to tackle it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044434%2fmathbbex2-mathbbey2-and-mathbbey-mathcala-x-p-a-s-rig%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Since you have a), I give a proof of b). Observe the hypothesis $mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) = X$ implies $X$ to be measurable with respect to $mathscr{A}.$ Bearing this in mind,
$$begin{align*}
mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2) &= mathbf{E}big( mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2 mid mathscr{A}) big) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - 2mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) X+ X^2) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - X^2) = 0.
end{align*}$$
As for c), if $X$ and $Y$ were square integrable, you have $mathbf{E}(XY) = E(X^2) = E(Y^2),$ so b) finishes the proof upon applying it with $mathscr{A} = sigma(X).$ For the general case, I am not sure how to tackle it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Since you have a), I give a proof of b). Observe the hypothesis $mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) = X$ implies $X$ to be measurable with respect to $mathscr{A}.$ Bearing this in mind,
$$begin{align*}
mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2) &= mathbf{E}big( mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2 mid mathscr{A}) big) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - 2mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) X+ X^2) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - X^2) = 0.
end{align*}$$
As for c), if $X$ and $Y$ were square integrable, you have $mathbf{E}(XY) = E(X^2) = E(Y^2),$ so b) finishes the proof upon applying it with $mathscr{A} = sigma(X).$ For the general case, I am not sure how to tackle it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Partial solution.
Since you have a), I give a proof of b). Observe the hypothesis $mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) = X$ implies $X$ to be measurable with respect to $mathscr{A}.$ Bearing this in mind,
$$begin{align*}
mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2) &= mathbf{E}big( mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2 mid mathscr{A}) big) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - 2mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) X+ X^2) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - X^2) = 0.
end{align*}$$
As for c), if $X$ and $Y$ were square integrable, you have $mathbf{E}(XY) = E(X^2) = E(Y^2),$ so b) finishes the proof upon applying it with $mathscr{A} = sigma(X).$ For the general case, I am not sure how to tackle it.
$endgroup$
Partial solution.
Since you have a), I give a proof of b). Observe the hypothesis $mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) = X$ implies $X$ to be measurable with respect to $mathscr{A}.$ Bearing this in mind,
$$begin{align*}
mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2) &= mathbf{E}big( mathbf{E}((Y-X)^2 mid mathscr{A}) big) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - 2mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A}) X+ X^2) \
&= mathbf{E}(mathbf{E}(Y^2 mid mathscr{A}) - X^2) = 0.
end{align*}$$
As for c), if $X$ and $Y$ were square integrable, you have $mathbf{E}(XY) = E(X^2) = E(Y^2),$ so b) finishes the proof upon applying it with $mathscr{A} = sigma(X).$ For the general case, I am not sure how to tackle it.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 22:11
Will M.Will M.
2,725315
2,725315
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
Hi and thanks for your quick respond! I have a question about the second equal-sign. Why is it $X^2$ and not $mathbb{E}[X|mathcal{A}]$? I think it doesn't make much difference in the result, due to if i write it this way I get zero as well, but maybe I missed something so my way might be faulty (?)
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
You would need $mathbf{E}(X^2 mid mathscr{A}) = X^2$ since $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Ok! But I don't see, why $X$ is $mathcal{A}$-measurable. We also need this for the step with the term $mathbb{E}[XY|mathcal{A}]$.
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
If $X = mathbf{E}(Y mid mathscr{A})$ then $X$ is $mathscr{A}$-measurable. If this is not clear, you need to read again the definition of conditional expectation.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:53
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
$begingroup$
AAh sure it is clear! Stupid me! Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 18 '18 at 7:55
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044434%2fmathbbex2-mathbbey2-and-mathbbey-mathcala-x-p-a-s-rig%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Implication c) holds for integrable random variables X and Y not necessarily square integrable, as shown in answers to several questions on this site.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 17 '18 at 22:19
$begingroup$
@Did I believe c) it to be true in general, but I failed to provide a proof. Do you have any of this links or a proof-sketch?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 17 '18 at 22:37
$begingroup$
I thought, that my proof for c) (given above) is valid. Is there anything wrong with it? The only step I need square integrability is (at least I think so) $mathbb{E}[XY|X] = X mathbb{E}[Y|X]$. With Hölder's inequality I can conclude, that if X,Y are square-integrable then XY is integrable: $int XY dP leq int |XY| dp stackrel{Hölder}{=} left( int |X|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} left( int |Y|^2 dP right)^{frac{1}{2}} < infty$. Or am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– TNicky
Dec 17 '18 at 22:42
$begingroup$
It is true that if $X$ and $Y$ are square integrable, then $XY$ is integrable.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 1:36
$begingroup$
@WillM. math.stackexchange.com/a/1520480/6179
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 18 '18 at 7:20