An example of infinite resistor ladder, but with infinite resistance instead of finite
$begingroup$
I know about a problem about resistance of infinite resistor ladder like this:
The solution is the equality
$$ R_l=R+R+frac{1}{frac{1}{R}+frac{1}{R_l}},$$
which is true as if we remove three leftmost resistors, we end up with exactly same ladder. We get good result because the total resistance is finite, as may be proved by representing the total resistance as a recursive sequence and proving its convergence.
I'm curious whether somebody could give me an example if a non-trivial ladder similar to this one, but such that its total resistance is infinite? I mean that if we use similar trick, we end up with something absurd.
Original question about this was asked here, but If this innapriopriate place to ask, let me know.
sequences-and-series physics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know about a problem about resistance of infinite resistor ladder like this:
The solution is the equality
$$ R_l=R+R+frac{1}{frac{1}{R}+frac{1}{R_l}},$$
which is true as if we remove three leftmost resistors, we end up with exactly same ladder. We get good result because the total resistance is finite, as may be proved by representing the total resistance as a recursive sequence and proving its convergence.
I'm curious whether somebody could give me an example if a non-trivial ladder similar to this one, but such that its total resistance is infinite? I mean that if we use similar trick, we end up with something absurd.
Original question about this was asked here, but If this innapriopriate place to ask, let me know.
sequences-and-series physics
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
you cannot have infinite resistance as long as the two end point can be connected by a path with finite resistance (this will serve as an upper bound of the resistance between that two end points).
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Sep 28 '17 at 17:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know about a problem about resistance of infinite resistor ladder like this:
The solution is the equality
$$ R_l=R+R+frac{1}{frac{1}{R}+frac{1}{R_l}},$$
which is true as if we remove three leftmost resistors, we end up with exactly same ladder. We get good result because the total resistance is finite, as may be proved by representing the total resistance as a recursive sequence and proving its convergence.
I'm curious whether somebody could give me an example if a non-trivial ladder similar to this one, but such that its total resistance is infinite? I mean that if we use similar trick, we end up with something absurd.
Original question about this was asked here, but If this innapriopriate place to ask, let me know.
sequences-and-series physics
$endgroup$
I know about a problem about resistance of infinite resistor ladder like this:
The solution is the equality
$$ R_l=R+R+frac{1}{frac{1}{R}+frac{1}{R_l}},$$
which is true as if we remove three leftmost resistors, we end up with exactly same ladder. We get good result because the total resistance is finite, as may be proved by representing the total resistance as a recursive sequence and proving its convergence.
I'm curious whether somebody could give me an example if a non-trivial ladder similar to this one, but such that its total resistance is infinite? I mean that if we use similar trick, we end up with something absurd.
Original question about this was asked here, but If this innapriopriate place to ask, let me know.
sequences-and-series physics
sequences-and-series physics
asked Sep 28 '17 at 16:42
user483582user483582
193
193
7
$begingroup$
you cannot have infinite resistance as long as the two end point can be connected by a path with finite resistance (this will serve as an upper bound of the resistance between that two end points).
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Sep 28 '17 at 17:09
add a comment |
7
$begingroup$
you cannot have infinite resistance as long as the two end point can be connected by a path with finite resistance (this will serve as an upper bound of the resistance between that two end points).
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Sep 28 '17 at 17:09
7
7
$begingroup$
you cannot have infinite resistance as long as the two end point can be connected by a path with finite resistance (this will serve as an upper bound of the resistance between that two end points).
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Sep 28 '17 at 17:09
$begingroup$
you cannot have infinite resistance as long as the two end point can be connected by a path with finite resistance (this will serve as an upper bound of the resistance between that two end points).
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Sep 28 '17 at 17:09
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well, whe we look trough it part for part:
- The first three most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{1spacetext{in}}=text{R}+text{R}+text{R}=3cdottext{R}tag1$$ - The first six most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{2spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{11}{4}cdottext{R}tag2$$ - The first nine most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{3spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{41}{15}cdottext{R}tag3$$
So, we get (in general):
$$text{R}_{spacetext{n}spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}tag4$$
So, when $text{n}toinfty$, we get:
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spacespaceinftyspacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}spaceLongleftrightarrowspace$$
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1pmsqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}spaceimpliesspacetext{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1+sqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}tag5$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not exactly what you are looking for (as achille explains in the comment, that would be impossible), but along those lines. Just imagine removing the resistors along the horizontal sections in your ladder. You are left with
$$ R_l=frac{1}{1/R+1/R_l} $$
which doesn't have any real roots for $R_l$. In a way $R_l = 0$ "works", but mathematically speaking it is absurd, as you put it. Physically, what we have are just infinitely many $R$'s in parallel, so the "ladder's" resistance is more simply calculated as $R_l = R/n rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$.
If you know how capacitors behave in DC circuits, then imagine the same example with capacitors of capacitance $C$ and the net capacitance of the ladder will be infinite (that's because capacitances, when combined, behave as would the reciprocals of resistances).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2449265%2fan-example-of-infinite-resistor-ladder-but-with-infinite-resistance-instead-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well, whe we look trough it part for part:
- The first three most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{1spacetext{in}}=text{R}+text{R}+text{R}=3cdottext{R}tag1$$ - The first six most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{2spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{11}{4}cdottext{R}tag2$$ - The first nine most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{3spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{41}{15}cdottext{R}tag3$$
So, we get (in general):
$$text{R}_{spacetext{n}spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}tag4$$
So, when $text{n}toinfty$, we get:
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spacespaceinftyspacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}spaceLongleftrightarrowspace$$
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1pmsqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}spaceimpliesspacetext{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1+sqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}tag5$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, whe we look trough it part for part:
- The first three most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{1spacetext{in}}=text{R}+text{R}+text{R}=3cdottext{R}tag1$$ - The first six most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{2spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{11}{4}cdottext{R}tag2$$ - The first nine most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{3spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{41}{15}cdottext{R}tag3$$
So, we get (in general):
$$text{R}_{spacetext{n}spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}tag4$$
So, when $text{n}toinfty$, we get:
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spacespaceinftyspacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}spaceLongleftrightarrowspace$$
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1pmsqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}spaceimpliesspacetext{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1+sqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}tag5$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, whe we look trough it part for part:
- The first three most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{1spacetext{in}}=text{R}+text{R}+text{R}=3cdottext{R}tag1$$ - The first six most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{2spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{11}{4}cdottext{R}tag2$$ - The first nine most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{3spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{41}{15}cdottext{R}tag3$$
So, we get (in general):
$$text{R}_{spacetext{n}spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}tag4$$
So, when $text{n}toinfty$, we get:
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spacespaceinftyspacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}spaceLongleftrightarrowspace$$
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1pmsqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}spaceimpliesspacetext{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1+sqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}tag5$$
$endgroup$
Well, whe we look trough it part for part:
- The first three most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{1spacetext{in}}=text{R}+text{R}+text{R}=3cdottext{R}tag1$$ - The first six most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{2spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{11}{4}cdottext{R}tag2$$ - The first nine most left resistors:
$$text{R}_{3spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdotleft(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(frac{text{R}cdotleft(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}{text{R}+left(text{R}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}right)}+text{R}+text{R}=frac{41}{15}cdottext{R}tag3$$
So, we get (in general):
$$text{R}_{spacetext{n}spacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceleft(text{n}-1right)spacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}tag4$$
So, when $text{n}toinfty$, we get:
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=frac{text{R}cdottext{R}_{spacespaceinftyspacetext{in}}}{text{R}+text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}}+text{R}+text{R}spaceLongleftrightarrowspace$$
$$text{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1pmsqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}spaceimpliesspacetext{R}_{spaceinftyspacetext{in}}=left(1+sqrt{3}right)cdottext{R}tag5$$
answered Sep 30 '17 at 16:10
JanJan
21.9k31240
21.9k31240
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not exactly what you are looking for (as achille explains in the comment, that would be impossible), but along those lines. Just imagine removing the resistors along the horizontal sections in your ladder. You are left with
$$ R_l=frac{1}{1/R+1/R_l} $$
which doesn't have any real roots for $R_l$. In a way $R_l = 0$ "works", but mathematically speaking it is absurd, as you put it. Physically, what we have are just infinitely many $R$'s in parallel, so the "ladder's" resistance is more simply calculated as $R_l = R/n rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$.
If you know how capacitors behave in DC circuits, then imagine the same example with capacitors of capacitance $C$ and the net capacitance of the ladder will be infinite (that's because capacitances, when combined, behave as would the reciprocals of resistances).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not exactly what you are looking for (as achille explains in the comment, that would be impossible), but along those lines. Just imagine removing the resistors along the horizontal sections in your ladder. You are left with
$$ R_l=frac{1}{1/R+1/R_l} $$
which doesn't have any real roots for $R_l$. In a way $R_l = 0$ "works", but mathematically speaking it is absurd, as you put it. Physically, what we have are just infinitely many $R$'s in parallel, so the "ladder's" resistance is more simply calculated as $R_l = R/n rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$.
If you know how capacitors behave in DC circuits, then imagine the same example with capacitors of capacitance $C$ and the net capacitance of the ladder will be infinite (that's because capacitances, when combined, behave as would the reciprocals of resistances).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not exactly what you are looking for (as achille explains in the comment, that would be impossible), but along those lines. Just imagine removing the resistors along the horizontal sections in your ladder. You are left with
$$ R_l=frac{1}{1/R+1/R_l} $$
which doesn't have any real roots for $R_l$. In a way $R_l = 0$ "works", but mathematically speaking it is absurd, as you put it. Physically, what we have are just infinitely many $R$'s in parallel, so the "ladder's" resistance is more simply calculated as $R_l = R/n rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$.
If you know how capacitors behave in DC circuits, then imagine the same example with capacitors of capacitance $C$ and the net capacitance of the ladder will be infinite (that's because capacitances, when combined, behave as would the reciprocals of resistances).
$endgroup$
Not exactly what you are looking for (as achille explains in the comment, that would be impossible), but along those lines. Just imagine removing the resistors along the horizontal sections in your ladder. You are left with
$$ R_l=frac{1}{1/R+1/R_l} $$
which doesn't have any real roots for $R_l$. In a way $R_l = 0$ "works", but mathematically speaking it is absurd, as you put it. Physically, what we have are just infinitely many $R$'s in parallel, so the "ladder's" resistance is more simply calculated as $R_l = R/n rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$.
If you know how capacitors behave in DC circuits, then imagine the same example with capacitors of capacitance $C$ and the net capacitance of the ladder will be infinite (that's because capacitances, when combined, behave as would the reciprocals of resistances).
answered Sep 30 '17 at 17:38
Nick PavlovNick Pavlov
1,4041415
1,4041415
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2449265%2fan-example-of-infinite-resistor-ladder-but-with-infinite-resistance-instead-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
$begingroup$
you cannot have infinite resistance as long as the two end point can be connected by a path with finite resistance (this will serve as an upper bound of the resistance between that two end points).
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Sep 28 '17 at 17:09