integral equation and Fourier transform of “almost” the convolution












0












$begingroup$


I am facing an integral equation where one of the terms looks like this:



$$ V(t) = int_t^{+infty} K(x-t) cdot V(x) , dx $$



where $$K(x) = N(frac{-b-asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) - d^{-2a}N(frac{-b+asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) $$ and $N(cdot)$ is the cumulative normal distribution. I am inclined to use the Convolution theorem, but the term inside of the $K$ has flipped signs. Also, looking at the formula for $K$ it is not even (nor odd) since its not defined for $x<0$ (Look at the square root term). Any suggestions as to how to make use of the Convolution theorem or any other better way?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    With $U(t)= V(-t)$ it is $U = U ast K 1_{x > 0}$ which can be Fourier transformed
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 2 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thank you! I think that is what I'm looking for. I would accept it an an answer
    $endgroup$
    – dleal
    Dec 2 '18 at 1:13
















0












$begingroup$


I am facing an integral equation where one of the terms looks like this:



$$ V(t) = int_t^{+infty} K(x-t) cdot V(x) , dx $$



where $$K(x) = N(frac{-b-asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) - d^{-2a}N(frac{-b+asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) $$ and $N(cdot)$ is the cumulative normal distribution. I am inclined to use the Convolution theorem, but the term inside of the $K$ has flipped signs. Also, looking at the formula for $K$ it is not even (nor odd) since its not defined for $x<0$ (Look at the square root term). Any suggestions as to how to make use of the Convolution theorem or any other better way?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    With $U(t)= V(-t)$ it is $U = U ast K 1_{x > 0}$ which can be Fourier transformed
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 2 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thank you! I think that is what I'm looking for. I would accept it an an answer
    $endgroup$
    – dleal
    Dec 2 '18 at 1:13














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am facing an integral equation where one of the terms looks like this:



$$ V(t) = int_t^{+infty} K(x-t) cdot V(x) , dx $$



where $$K(x) = N(frac{-b-asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) - d^{-2a}N(frac{-b+asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) $$ and $N(cdot)$ is the cumulative normal distribution. I am inclined to use the Convolution theorem, but the term inside of the $K$ has flipped signs. Also, looking at the formula for $K$ it is not even (nor odd) since its not defined for $x<0$ (Look at the square root term). Any suggestions as to how to make use of the Convolution theorem or any other better way?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am facing an integral equation where one of the terms looks like this:



$$ V(t) = int_t^{+infty} K(x-t) cdot V(x) , dx $$



where $$K(x) = N(frac{-b-asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) - d^{-2a}N(frac{-b+asigma^2}{sigma sqrt{x}}) $$ and $N(cdot)$ is the cumulative normal distribution. I am inclined to use the Convolution theorem, but the term inside of the $K$ has flipped signs. Also, looking at the formula for $K$ it is not even (nor odd) since its not defined for $x<0$ (Look at the square root term). Any suggestions as to how to make use of the Convolution theorem or any other better way?







fourier-transform integral-equations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 2 '18 at 0:36









dlealdleal

8710




8710












  • $begingroup$
    With $U(t)= V(-t)$ it is $U = U ast K 1_{x > 0}$ which can be Fourier transformed
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 2 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thank you! I think that is what I'm looking for. I would accept it an an answer
    $endgroup$
    – dleal
    Dec 2 '18 at 1:13


















  • $begingroup$
    With $U(t)= V(-t)$ it is $U = U ast K 1_{x > 0}$ which can be Fourier transformed
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 2 '18 at 0:58












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thank you! I think that is what I'm looking for. I would accept it an an answer
    $endgroup$
    – dleal
    Dec 2 '18 at 1:13
















$begingroup$
With $U(t)= V(-t)$ it is $U = U ast K 1_{x > 0}$ which can be Fourier transformed
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 2 '18 at 0:58






$begingroup$
With $U(t)= V(-t)$ it is $U = U ast K 1_{x > 0}$ which can be Fourier transformed
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 2 '18 at 0:58














$begingroup$
@reuns thank you! I think that is what I'm looking for. I would accept it an an answer
$endgroup$
– dleal
Dec 2 '18 at 1:13




$begingroup$
@reuns thank you! I think that is what I'm looking for. I would accept it an an answer
$endgroup$
– dleal
Dec 2 '18 at 1:13










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022063%2fintegral-equation-and-fourier-transform-of-almost-the-convolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022063%2fintegral-equation-and-fourier-transform-of-almost-the-convolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis