Obtaining Laplace distribution from bivariate transformation
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
So this is the problem
Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be $i.i.d.$ random variables with a common density function $chi_2^2$. Let $Y_1 = frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)$ and $Y_2 = X_2$. Show that $Y_1$ follows a Laplace distribution with density function given by
$$f(y) = frac{1}{2}e^{-|y|} $$
for $y in mathbb{R}.$
Now, here is my reasoning:
Since $X_1,X_2 sim chi_2^2$ (Chi-squared distribution) , then each of these random variables have their density function given by
$$f(x)= frac{1}{2} e^{-x/2}$$
for $x >0.$ Now,we have the transformations:
$$y_1 =g_1(x_1,x_2) = frac{1}{2}(x_1-x_2), y_2 =g_2 (x_1,x_2)= x_2$$
and their inverses
$$x_1 = g_1^{-1}(y_1,y_2) = 2y_1+y_2, x_2 = g_2^{-1} (y_1,y_2)= y_2. $$
Now we obtain the Jacobian of the transformation, which is
$$J =begin{vmatrix}
2 & 1 \ 0 & 1
end{vmatrix} = 2$$
Thus the joint density of $Y_1,Y_2$ is given by
$$f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) = f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2) cdot |J|$$
and since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent we have that
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) &= f_{X_1}(x_1) cdot f_{X_2}(x_2) cdot 2\
&= 2 cdot left(frac{e^{-(2y_1+y_2)/2}}{2} right)cdot left(frac{e^{-y_2/2}}{2} right)\
&= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}.
end{align*}
Now, we are asked to find the distribution of $Y_1$, so
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1}(y_1) &= int_{0}^{infty} f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) dy_{2}\
&= int_{0}^{infty} frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}dy_{2}\
&=frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1} cdot int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2}
end{align*}
and since $ int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2} = 1$ we can conclude that
$$f_{Y_1}(y_1)= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1}.$$
Clearly this is not entirely correct since the $y$ exponent should be in absolute value. If anyone could point out my mistake and/or provide some intuition as to how the absolute value plays a role in this problem, I would appreciate it very much!
probability probability-distributions
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
So this is the problem
Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be $i.i.d.$ random variables with a common density function $chi_2^2$. Let $Y_1 = frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)$ and $Y_2 = X_2$. Show that $Y_1$ follows a Laplace distribution with density function given by
$$f(y) = frac{1}{2}e^{-|y|} $$
for $y in mathbb{R}.$
Now, here is my reasoning:
Since $X_1,X_2 sim chi_2^2$ (Chi-squared distribution) , then each of these random variables have their density function given by
$$f(x)= frac{1}{2} e^{-x/2}$$
for $x >0.$ Now,we have the transformations:
$$y_1 =g_1(x_1,x_2) = frac{1}{2}(x_1-x_2), y_2 =g_2 (x_1,x_2)= x_2$$
and their inverses
$$x_1 = g_1^{-1}(y_1,y_2) = 2y_1+y_2, x_2 = g_2^{-1} (y_1,y_2)= y_2. $$
Now we obtain the Jacobian of the transformation, which is
$$J =begin{vmatrix}
2 & 1 \ 0 & 1
end{vmatrix} = 2$$
Thus the joint density of $Y_1,Y_2$ is given by
$$f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) = f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2) cdot |J|$$
and since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent we have that
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) &= f_{X_1}(x_1) cdot f_{X_2}(x_2) cdot 2\
&= 2 cdot left(frac{e^{-(2y_1+y_2)/2}}{2} right)cdot left(frac{e^{-y_2/2}}{2} right)\
&= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}.
end{align*}
Now, we are asked to find the distribution of $Y_1$, so
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1}(y_1) &= int_{0}^{infty} f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) dy_{2}\
&= int_{0}^{infty} frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}dy_{2}\
&=frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1} cdot int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2}
end{align*}
and since $ int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2} = 1$ we can conclude that
$$f_{Y_1}(y_1)= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1}.$$
Clearly this is not entirely correct since the $y$ exponent should be in absolute value. If anyone could point out my mistake and/or provide some intuition as to how the absolute value plays a role in this problem, I would appreciate it very much!
probability probability-distributions
2
When you plug in $f_{X_1}(x_1) = f_{X_1}(2y_1 + y_2)$, you forget to check the support of $X_1$ that requires $2y_1 + y_2 > 0$, which in turns give $y_2 > -2y_1$. Combine with $y_2 > 0$, it gives the joint support of $(Y_1, Y_2)$ to be $y_1 in mathbb{R}, y_2 > max{0, -2y_1}$. Once you replace your integration lower limit by $max{0, -2y_1}$ and you should get your desired result.
– BGM
Nov 20 at 7:30
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
So this is the problem
Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be $i.i.d.$ random variables with a common density function $chi_2^2$. Let $Y_1 = frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)$ and $Y_2 = X_2$. Show that $Y_1$ follows a Laplace distribution with density function given by
$$f(y) = frac{1}{2}e^{-|y|} $$
for $y in mathbb{R}.$
Now, here is my reasoning:
Since $X_1,X_2 sim chi_2^2$ (Chi-squared distribution) , then each of these random variables have their density function given by
$$f(x)= frac{1}{2} e^{-x/2}$$
for $x >0.$ Now,we have the transformations:
$$y_1 =g_1(x_1,x_2) = frac{1}{2}(x_1-x_2), y_2 =g_2 (x_1,x_2)= x_2$$
and their inverses
$$x_1 = g_1^{-1}(y_1,y_2) = 2y_1+y_2, x_2 = g_2^{-1} (y_1,y_2)= y_2. $$
Now we obtain the Jacobian of the transformation, which is
$$J =begin{vmatrix}
2 & 1 \ 0 & 1
end{vmatrix} = 2$$
Thus the joint density of $Y_1,Y_2$ is given by
$$f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) = f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2) cdot |J|$$
and since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent we have that
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) &= f_{X_1}(x_1) cdot f_{X_2}(x_2) cdot 2\
&= 2 cdot left(frac{e^{-(2y_1+y_2)/2}}{2} right)cdot left(frac{e^{-y_2/2}}{2} right)\
&= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}.
end{align*}
Now, we are asked to find the distribution of $Y_1$, so
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1}(y_1) &= int_{0}^{infty} f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) dy_{2}\
&= int_{0}^{infty} frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}dy_{2}\
&=frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1} cdot int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2}
end{align*}
and since $ int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2} = 1$ we can conclude that
$$f_{Y_1}(y_1)= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1}.$$
Clearly this is not entirely correct since the $y$ exponent should be in absolute value. If anyone could point out my mistake and/or provide some intuition as to how the absolute value plays a role in this problem, I would appreciate it very much!
probability probability-distributions
So this is the problem
Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be $i.i.d.$ random variables with a common density function $chi_2^2$. Let $Y_1 = frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)$ and $Y_2 = X_2$. Show that $Y_1$ follows a Laplace distribution with density function given by
$$f(y) = frac{1}{2}e^{-|y|} $$
for $y in mathbb{R}.$
Now, here is my reasoning:
Since $X_1,X_2 sim chi_2^2$ (Chi-squared distribution) , then each of these random variables have their density function given by
$$f(x)= frac{1}{2} e^{-x/2}$$
for $x >0.$ Now,we have the transformations:
$$y_1 =g_1(x_1,x_2) = frac{1}{2}(x_1-x_2), y_2 =g_2 (x_1,x_2)= x_2$$
and their inverses
$$x_1 = g_1^{-1}(y_1,y_2) = 2y_1+y_2, x_2 = g_2^{-1} (y_1,y_2)= y_2. $$
Now we obtain the Jacobian of the transformation, which is
$$J =begin{vmatrix}
2 & 1 \ 0 & 1
end{vmatrix} = 2$$
Thus the joint density of $Y_1,Y_2$ is given by
$$f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) = f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2) cdot |J|$$
and since $X_1$ and $X_2$ are independent we have that
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) &= f_{X_1}(x_1) cdot f_{X_2}(x_2) cdot 2\
&= 2 cdot left(frac{e^{-(2y_1+y_2)/2}}{2} right)cdot left(frac{e^{-y_2/2}}{2} right)\
&= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}.
end{align*}
Now, we are asked to find the distribution of $Y_1$, so
begin{align*}
f_{Y_1}(y_1) &= int_{0}^{infty} f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2) dy_{2}\
&= int_{0}^{infty} frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-(y_1+y_2)}dy_{2}\
&=frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1} cdot int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2}
end{align*}
and since $ int_{0}^{infty}e^{-y_2}dy_{2} = 1$ we can conclude that
$$f_{Y_1}(y_1)= frac{1}{2}cdot e^{-y_1}.$$
Clearly this is not entirely correct since the $y$ exponent should be in absolute value. If anyone could point out my mistake and/or provide some intuition as to how the absolute value plays a role in this problem, I would appreciate it very much!
probability probability-distributions
probability probability-distributions
asked Nov 20 at 5:23
Thomas Bladt
1,170214
1,170214
2
When you plug in $f_{X_1}(x_1) = f_{X_1}(2y_1 + y_2)$, you forget to check the support of $X_1$ that requires $2y_1 + y_2 > 0$, which in turns give $y_2 > -2y_1$. Combine with $y_2 > 0$, it gives the joint support of $(Y_1, Y_2)$ to be $y_1 in mathbb{R}, y_2 > max{0, -2y_1}$. Once you replace your integration lower limit by $max{0, -2y_1}$ and you should get your desired result.
– BGM
Nov 20 at 7:30
add a comment |
2
When you plug in $f_{X_1}(x_1) = f_{X_1}(2y_1 + y_2)$, you forget to check the support of $X_1$ that requires $2y_1 + y_2 > 0$, which in turns give $y_2 > -2y_1$. Combine with $y_2 > 0$, it gives the joint support of $(Y_1, Y_2)$ to be $y_1 in mathbb{R}, y_2 > max{0, -2y_1}$. Once you replace your integration lower limit by $max{0, -2y_1}$ and you should get your desired result.
– BGM
Nov 20 at 7:30
2
2
When you plug in $f_{X_1}(x_1) = f_{X_1}(2y_1 + y_2)$, you forget to check the support of $X_1$ that requires $2y_1 + y_2 > 0$, which in turns give $y_2 > -2y_1$. Combine with $y_2 > 0$, it gives the joint support of $(Y_1, Y_2)$ to be $y_1 in mathbb{R}, y_2 > max{0, -2y_1}$. Once you replace your integration lower limit by $max{0, -2y_1}$ and you should get your desired result.
– BGM
Nov 20 at 7:30
When you plug in $f_{X_1}(x_1) = f_{X_1}(2y_1 + y_2)$, you forget to check the support of $X_1$ that requires $2y_1 + y_2 > 0$, which in turns give $y_2 > -2y_1$. Combine with $y_2 > 0$, it gives the joint support of $(Y_1, Y_2)$ to be $y_1 in mathbb{R}, y_2 > max{0, -2y_1}$. Once you replace your integration lower limit by $max{0, -2y_1}$ and you should get your desired result.
– BGM
Nov 20 at 7:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Do not forget to include the proper supports of the distributions. Use indicator functions for brevity.
Joint density of $(X_1,X_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2)&=frac{1}{2}e^{-x_1/2}mathbf1_{x_1>0},frac{1}{2}e^{-x_2/2}mathbf1_{x_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{4}e^{-(x_1+x_2)/2}mathbf1_{x_1,x_2>0}
end{align}
For the transformation $(X_1,X_2,)to (Y_1,Y_2)$ such that $$Y_1=frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)quad,quad Y_2=X_2,,$$
we have $$x_1=2y_1+y_2quad,quad x_2=y_2$$
So, $$x_1,x_2>0implies 2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0$$
In other words, $$y_2>max(0,-2y_1)quadtext{ where }quad y_1inmathbb R$$
Absolute value of the jacobian as you say is $$|J|=2$$
So the joint density of $(Y_1,Y_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2)&=f_{X_1,X_2}left(2y_1+y_2,y_2right)|J|,mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{2}e^{-(y_1+y_2)}mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
end{align}
Hence the marginal density of $Y_1$ for $y_1inmathbb R$ is given by
begin{align}
f_{Y_1}(y_1)&=int_{max(0,-2y_1)}^infty f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2),mathrm{d}y_2
\\&=frac{e^{-y_1}}{2}lim_{Atoinfty}left[-e^{-y_2}right]_{max(0,-2y_1)}^A
\\&=frac{e^{-(y_1+max(0,-2y_1))}}{2}
\\&=begin{cases}frac{1}{2}e^{-y_1}&,text{ if }y_1ge 0\\frac{1}{2}e^{y_1}&,text{ if }y_1<0end{cases}
end{align}
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Do not forget to include the proper supports of the distributions. Use indicator functions for brevity.
Joint density of $(X_1,X_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2)&=frac{1}{2}e^{-x_1/2}mathbf1_{x_1>0},frac{1}{2}e^{-x_2/2}mathbf1_{x_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{4}e^{-(x_1+x_2)/2}mathbf1_{x_1,x_2>0}
end{align}
For the transformation $(X_1,X_2,)to (Y_1,Y_2)$ such that $$Y_1=frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)quad,quad Y_2=X_2,,$$
we have $$x_1=2y_1+y_2quad,quad x_2=y_2$$
So, $$x_1,x_2>0implies 2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0$$
In other words, $$y_2>max(0,-2y_1)quadtext{ where }quad y_1inmathbb R$$
Absolute value of the jacobian as you say is $$|J|=2$$
So the joint density of $(Y_1,Y_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2)&=f_{X_1,X_2}left(2y_1+y_2,y_2right)|J|,mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{2}e^{-(y_1+y_2)}mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
end{align}
Hence the marginal density of $Y_1$ for $y_1inmathbb R$ is given by
begin{align}
f_{Y_1}(y_1)&=int_{max(0,-2y_1)}^infty f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2),mathrm{d}y_2
\\&=frac{e^{-y_1}}{2}lim_{Atoinfty}left[-e^{-y_2}right]_{max(0,-2y_1)}^A
\\&=frac{e^{-(y_1+max(0,-2y_1))}}{2}
\\&=begin{cases}frac{1}{2}e^{-y_1}&,text{ if }y_1ge 0\\frac{1}{2}e^{y_1}&,text{ if }y_1<0end{cases}
end{align}
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Do not forget to include the proper supports of the distributions. Use indicator functions for brevity.
Joint density of $(X_1,X_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2)&=frac{1}{2}e^{-x_1/2}mathbf1_{x_1>0},frac{1}{2}e^{-x_2/2}mathbf1_{x_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{4}e^{-(x_1+x_2)/2}mathbf1_{x_1,x_2>0}
end{align}
For the transformation $(X_1,X_2,)to (Y_1,Y_2)$ such that $$Y_1=frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)quad,quad Y_2=X_2,,$$
we have $$x_1=2y_1+y_2quad,quad x_2=y_2$$
So, $$x_1,x_2>0implies 2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0$$
In other words, $$y_2>max(0,-2y_1)quadtext{ where }quad y_1inmathbb R$$
Absolute value of the jacobian as you say is $$|J|=2$$
So the joint density of $(Y_1,Y_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2)&=f_{X_1,X_2}left(2y_1+y_2,y_2right)|J|,mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{2}e^{-(y_1+y_2)}mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
end{align}
Hence the marginal density of $Y_1$ for $y_1inmathbb R$ is given by
begin{align}
f_{Y_1}(y_1)&=int_{max(0,-2y_1)}^infty f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2),mathrm{d}y_2
\\&=frac{e^{-y_1}}{2}lim_{Atoinfty}left[-e^{-y_2}right]_{max(0,-2y_1)}^A
\\&=frac{e^{-(y_1+max(0,-2y_1))}}{2}
\\&=begin{cases}frac{1}{2}e^{-y_1}&,text{ if }y_1ge 0\\frac{1}{2}e^{y_1}&,text{ if }y_1<0end{cases}
end{align}
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Do not forget to include the proper supports of the distributions. Use indicator functions for brevity.
Joint density of $(X_1,X_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2)&=frac{1}{2}e^{-x_1/2}mathbf1_{x_1>0},frac{1}{2}e^{-x_2/2}mathbf1_{x_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{4}e^{-(x_1+x_2)/2}mathbf1_{x_1,x_2>0}
end{align}
For the transformation $(X_1,X_2,)to (Y_1,Y_2)$ such that $$Y_1=frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)quad,quad Y_2=X_2,,$$
we have $$x_1=2y_1+y_2quad,quad x_2=y_2$$
So, $$x_1,x_2>0implies 2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0$$
In other words, $$y_2>max(0,-2y_1)quadtext{ where }quad y_1inmathbb R$$
Absolute value of the jacobian as you say is $$|J|=2$$
So the joint density of $(Y_1,Y_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2)&=f_{X_1,X_2}left(2y_1+y_2,y_2right)|J|,mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{2}e^{-(y_1+y_2)}mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
end{align}
Hence the marginal density of $Y_1$ for $y_1inmathbb R$ is given by
begin{align}
f_{Y_1}(y_1)&=int_{max(0,-2y_1)}^infty f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2),mathrm{d}y_2
\\&=frac{e^{-y_1}}{2}lim_{Atoinfty}left[-e^{-y_2}right]_{max(0,-2y_1)}^A
\\&=frac{e^{-(y_1+max(0,-2y_1))}}{2}
\\&=begin{cases}frac{1}{2}e^{-y_1}&,text{ if }y_1ge 0\\frac{1}{2}e^{y_1}&,text{ if }y_1<0end{cases}
end{align}
Do not forget to include the proper supports of the distributions. Use indicator functions for brevity.
Joint density of $(X_1,X_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{X_1,X_2}(x_1,x_2)&=frac{1}{2}e^{-x_1/2}mathbf1_{x_1>0},frac{1}{2}e^{-x_2/2}mathbf1_{x_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{4}e^{-(x_1+x_2)/2}mathbf1_{x_1,x_2>0}
end{align}
For the transformation $(X_1,X_2,)to (Y_1,Y_2)$ such that $$Y_1=frac{1}{2}(X_1-X_2)quad,quad Y_2=X_2,,$$
we have $$x_1=2y_1+y_2quad,quad x_2=y_2$$
So, $$x_1,x_2>0implies 2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0$$
In other words, $$y_2>max(0,-2y_1)quadtext{ where }quad y_1inmathbb R$$
Absolute value of the jacobian as you say is $$|J|=2$$
So the joint density of $(Y_1,Y_2)$ is
begin{align}
f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2)&=f_{X_1,X_2}left(2y_1+y_2,y_2right)|J|,mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
\&=frac{1}{2}e^{-(y_1+y_2)}mathbf1_{2y_1+y_2>0,y_2>0}
end{align}
Hence the marginal density of $Y_1$ for $y_1inmathbb R$ is given by
begin{align}
f_{Y_1}(y_1)&=int_{max(0,-2y_1)}^infty f_{Y_1,Y_2}(y_1,y_2),mathrm{d}y_2
\\&=frac{e^{-y_1}}{2}lim_{Atoinfty}left[-e^{-y_2}right]_{max(0,-2y_1)}^A
\\&=frac{e^{-(y_1+max(0,-2y_1))}}{2}
\\&=begin{cases}frac{1}{2}e^{-y_1}&,text{ if }y_1ge 0\\frac{1}{2}e^{y_1}&,text{ if }y_1<0end{cases}
end{align}
answered Nov 20 at 7:46
StubbornAtom
4,93411137
4,93411137
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
add a comment |
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
Ahh I forgot to check the supports, now it makes sense. Thank you very much!
– Thomas Bladt
Nov 20 at 21:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005973%2fobtaining-laplace-distribution-from-bivariate-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
When you plug in $f_{X_1}(x_1) = f_{X_1}(2y_1 + y_2)$, you forget to check the support of $X_1$ that requires $2y_1 + y_2 > 0$, which in turns give $y_2 > -2y_1$. Combine with $y_2 > 0$, it gives the joint support of $(Y_1, Y_2)$ to be $y_1 in mathbb{R}, y_2 > max{0, -2y_1}$. Once you replace your integration lower limit by $max{0, -2y_1}$ and you should get your desired result.
– BGM
Nov 20 at 7:30