Fundamental ismorphism theorem
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I don't understand how to apply the fundamental isomorphism theorem to polynomial quotient rings. For example is the ring $mathbb C[X,Y,Z]/langle X^2-Z,XZ-Y^3rangle$ isomorphic to $mathbb C[X,Y]/langle X^3-Y^3rangle$? Can you please elaborate a little? If yes, how is the theorem (the isomorphism theorem) applied here? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomial-rings ring-isomorphism
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I don't understand how to apply the fundamental isomorphism theorem to polynomial quotient rings. For example is the ring $mathbb C[X,Y,Z]/langle X^2-Z,XZ-Y^3rangle$ isomorphic to $mathbb C[X,Y]/langle X^3-Y^3rangle$? Can you please elaborate a little? If yes, how is the theorem (the isomorphism theorem) applied here? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomial-rings ring-isomorphism
The first ring enforces the relation that $X^2-Z=0$, yes? Can you define a map from the first ring to the second using this information?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:27
I'm thinking at $x to t, z to t^2$ but the kernel of this map is $langle X^2-Z rangle$.
– mip
Nov 20 at 6:31
Why not try sending $Zmapsto X^2$ and sending $Xmapsto X$ as well as $Ymapsto Y$?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:41
But how is this related to the fundamental theorem of isomorphism?
– mip
Nov 20 at 7:03
The first isomorphism theorem says that for $f:Ato B$ surjective, we have $Bcong A/ker f$, yes? Do you see how you should fill in the blanks with $A,B,f$? If you complete the mad-lib appropriately, you should get an answer that satisfies you.
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 7:05
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I don't understand how to apply the fundamental isomorphism theorem to polynomial quotient rings. For example is the ring $mathbb C[X,Y,Z]/langle X^2-Z,XZ-Y^3rangle$ isomorphic to $mathbb C[X,Y]/langle X^3-Y^3rangle$? Can you please elaborate a little? If yes, how is the theorem (the isomorphism theorem) applied here? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomial-rings ring-isomorphism
I don't understand how to apply the fundamental isomorphism theorem to polynomial quotient rings. For example is the ring $mathbb C[X,Y,Z]/langle X^2-Z,XZ-Y^3rangle$ isomorphic to $mathbb C[X,Y]/langle X^3-Y^3rangle$? Can you please elaborate a little? If yes, how is the theorem (the isomorphism theorem) applied here? Thank you!
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomial-rings ring-isomorphism
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomial-rings ring-isomorphism
edited Nov 20 at 6:22
KReiser
9,17211335
9,17211335
asked Nov 20 at 6:11
mip
334
334
The first ring enforces the relation that $X^2-Z=0$, yes? Can you define a map from the first ring to the second using this information?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:27
I'm thinking at $x to t, z to t^2$ but the kernel of this map is $langle X^2-Z rangle$.
– mip
Nov 20 at 6:31
Why not try sending $Zmapsto X^2$ and sending $Xmapsto X$ as well as $Ymapsto Y$?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:41
But how is this related to the fundamental theorem of isomorphism?
– mip
Nov 20 at 7:03
The first isomorphism theorem says that for $f:Ato B$ surjective, we have $Bcong A/ker f$, yes? Do you see how you should fill in the blanks with $A,B,f$? If you complete the mad-lib appropriately, you should get an answer that satisfies you.
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 7:05
|
show 7 more comments
The first ring enforces the relation that $X^2-Z=0$, yes? Can you define a map from the first ring to the second using this information?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:27
I'm thinking at $x to t, z to t^2$ but the kernel of this map is $langle X^2-Z rangle$.
– mip
Nov 20 at 6:31
Why not try sending $Zmapsto X^2$ and sending $Xmapsto X$ as well as $Ymapsto Y$?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:41
But how is this related to the fundamental theorem of isomorphism?
– mip
Nov 20 at 7:03
The first isomorphism theorem says that for $f:Ato B$ surjective, we have $Bcong A/ker f$, yes? Do you see how you should fill in the blanks with $A,B,f$? If you complete the mad-lib appropriately, you should get an answer that satisfies you.
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 7:05
The first ring enforces the relation that $X^2-Z=0$, yes? Can you define a map from the first ring to the second using this information?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:27
The first ring enforces the relation that $X^2-Z=0$, yes? Can you define a map from the first ring to the second using this information?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:27
I'm thinking at $x to t, z to t^2$ but the kernel of this map is $langle X^2-Z rangle$.
– mip
Nov 20 at 6:31
I'm thinking at $x to t, z to t^2$ but the kernel of this map is $langle X^2-Z rangle$.
– mip
Nov 20 at 6:31
Why not try sending $Zmapsto X^2$ and sending $Xmapsto X$ as well as $Ymapsto Y$?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:41
Why not try sending $Zmapsto X^2$ and sending $Xmapsto X$ as well as $Ymapsto Y$?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:41
But how is this related to the fundamental theorem of isomorphism?
– mip
Nov 20 at 7:03
But how is this related to the fundamental theorem of isomorphism?
– mip
Nov 20 at 7:03
The first isomorphism theorem says that for $f:Ato B$ surjective, we have $Bcong A/ker f$, yes? Do you see how you should fill in the blanks with $A,B,f$? If you complete the mad-lib appropriately, you should get an answer that satisfies you.
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 7:05
The first isomorphism theorem says that for $f:Ato B$ surjective, we have $Bcong A/ker f$, yes? Do you see how you should fill in the blanks with $A,B,f$? If you complete the mad-lib appropriately, you should get an answer that satisfies you.
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 7:05
|
show 7 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
FWIW a slightly different approach: It suffices to show by the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y,z]/(x^2-z,xz-y^3)$ that there exists a morphism $xi:mathbb C[x,y,z]to mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ with the property that for each ring morphism $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$ with $f(x^2-z)=f(xz-y^3)=0$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f=tilde{f}circ xi$.
In particular, let $k$ be the unique map $mathbb C[x,y,z]tomathbb C[x,y]$ that fixes $mathbb C,x,y$ and maps $zmapsto x^2$ and let $eta:mathbb C[x,y]tomathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ be the obvious quotient morphism. We claim that it is sufficient to take $xi=etacirc k$.
To that end, consider some arbitrary $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$. By the UMP of polynomial rings, there exists a unique $f':mathbb C[x,y]to R$ such that $forall zetain mathbb C, f'(zeta)=f(zeta)$, $f'(x)=f(x)$ and $f'(y)=f(y)$. Furthemore, we have that $forall pin mathbb C[x,y,z], f'circ k(z)-f(z)=f'(x)-f(x)=0$. It follows (again from the UMP of polynomial rings) that $f=f'circ k$ and furthermore that $f'$ is the unique map with this property.
Now observe that $f'(x^3-y^3)=f'circ k(x^3-y^3)=f(x)f(x^2-z)+f(xz-y^3)=0$. By the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3,y^3)$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f'=tilde{f}circ eta$. It follows that $$f=f'circ k=(tilde{f}circ eta)circ k=tilde{f}circ (etacirc k)$$ And this $tilde{f}$ can be readily seen as unique. So we're done $blacksquare$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
FWIW a slightly different approach: It suffices to show by the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y,z]/(x^2-z,xz-y^3)$ that there exists a morphism $xi:mathbb C[x,y,z]to mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ with the property that for each ring morphism $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$ with $f(x^2-z)=f(xz-y^3)=0$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f=tilde{f}circ xi$.
In particular, let $k$ be the unique map $mathbb C[x,y,z]tomathbb C[x,y]$ that fixes $mathbb C,x,y$ and maps $zmapsto x^2$ and let $eta:mathbb C[x,y]tomathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ be the obvious quotient morphism. We claim that it is sufficient to take $xi=etacirc k$.
To that end, consider some arbitrary $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$. By the UMP of polynomial rings, there exists a unique $f':mathbb C[x,y]to R$ such that $forall zetain mathbb C, f'(zeta)=f(zeta)$, $f'(x)=f(x)$ and $f'(y)=f(y)$. Furthemore, we have that $forall pin mathbb C[x,y,z], f'circ k(z)-f(z)=f'(x)-f(x)=0$. It follows (again from the UMP of polynomial rings) that $f=f'circ k$ and furthermore that $f'$ is the unique map with this property.
Now observe that $f'(x^3-y^3)=f'circ k(x^3-y^3)=f(x)f(x^2-z)+f(xz-y^3)=0$. By the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3,y^3)$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f'=tilde{f}circ eta$. It follows that $$f=f'circ k=(tilde{f}circ eta)circ k=tilde{f}circ (etacirc k)$$ And this $tilde{f}$ can be readily seen as unique. So we're done $blacksquare$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
FWIW a slightly different approach: It suffices to show by the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y,z]/(x^2-z,xz-y^3)$ that there exists a morphism $xi:mathbb C[x,y,z]to mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ with the property that for each ring morphism $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$ with $f(x^2-z)=f(xz-y^3)=0$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f=tilde{f}circ xi$.
In particular, let $k$ be the unique map $mathbb C[x,y,z]tomathbb C[x,y]$ that fixes $mathbb C,x,y$ and maps $zmapsto x^2$ and let $eta:mathbb C[x,y]tomathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ be the obvious quotient morphism. We claim that it is sufficient to take $xi=etacirc k$.
To that end, consider some arbitrary $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$. By the UMP of polynomial rings, there exists a unique $f':mathbb C[x,y]to R$ such that $forall zetain mathbb C, f'(zeta)=f(zeta)$, $f'(x)=f(x)$ and $f'(y)=f(y)$. Furthemore, we have that $forall pin mathbb C[x,y,z], f'circ k(z)-f(z)=f'(x)-f(x)=0$. It follows (again from the UMP of polynomial rings) that $f=f'circ k$ and furthermore that $f'$ is the unique map with this property.
Now observe that $f'(x^3-y^3)=f'circ k(x^3-y^3)=f(x)f(x^2-z)+f(xz-y^3)=0$. By the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3,y^3)$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f'=tilde{f}circ eta$. It follows that $$f=f'circ k=(tilde{f}circ eta)circ k=tilde{f}circ (etacirc k)$$ And this $tilde{f}$ can be readily seen as unique. So we're done $blacksquare$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
FWIW a slightly different approach: It suffices to show by the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y,z]/(x^2-z,xz-y^3)$ that there exists a morphism $xi:mathbb C[x,y,z]to mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ with the property that for each ring morphism $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$ with $f(x^2-z)=f(xz-y^3)=0$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f=tilde{f}circ xi$.
In particular, let $k$ be the unique map $mathbb C[x,y,z]tomathbb C[x,y]$ that fixes $mathbb C,x,y$ and maps $zmapsto x^2$ and let $eta:mathbb C[x,y]tomathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ be the obvious quotient morphism. We claim that it is sufficient to take $xi=etacirc k$.
To that end, consider some arbitrary $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$. By the UMP of polynomial rings, there exists a unique $f':mathbb C[x,y]to R$ such that $forall zetain mathbb C, f'(zeta)=f(zeta)$, $f'(x)=f(x)$ and $f'(y)=f(y)$. Furthemore, we have that $forall pin mathbb C[x,y,z], f'circ k(z)-f(z)=f'(x)-f(x)=0$. It follows (again from the UMP of polynomial rings) that $f=f'circ k$ and furthermore that $f'$ is the unique map with this property.
Now observe that $f'(x^3-y^3)=f'circ k(x^3-y^3)=f(x)f(x^2-z)+f(xz-y^3)=0$. By the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3,y^3)$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f'=tilde{f}circ eta$. It follows that $$f=f'circ k=(tilde{f}circ eta)circ k=tilde{f}circ (etacirc k)$$ And this $tilde{f}$ can be readily seen as unique. So we're done $blacksquare$
FWIW a slightly different approach: It suffices to show by the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y,z]/(x^2-z,xz-y^3)$ that there exists a morphism $xi:mathbb C[x,y,z]to mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ with the property that for each ring morphism $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$ with $f(x^2-z)=f(xz-y^3)=0$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f=tilde{f}circ xi$.
In particular, let $k$ be the unique map $mathbb C[x,y,z]tomathbb C[x,y]$ that fixes $mathbb C,x,y$ and maps $zmapsto x^2$ and let $eta:mathbb C[x,y]tomathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)$ be the obvious quotient morphism. We claim that it is sufficient to take $xi=etacirc k$.
To that end, consider some arbitrary $f:mathbb C[x,y,z]to R$. By the UMP of polynomial rings, there exists a unique $f':mathbb C[x,y]to R$ such that $forall zetain mathbb C, f'(zeta)=f(zeta)$, $f'(x)=f(x)$ and $f'(y)=f(y)$. Furthemore, we have that $forall pin mathbb C[x,y,z], f'circ k(z)-f(z)=f'(x)-f(x)=0$. It follows (again from the UMP of polynomial rings) that $f=f'circ k$ and furthermore that $f'$ is the unique map with this property.
Now observe that $f'(x^3-y^3)=f'circ k(x^3-y^3)=f(x)f(x^2-z)+f(xz-y^3)=0$. By the UMP of $mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3,y^3)$ there exists a unique $tilde{f}:mathbb C[x,y]/(x^3-y^3)to R$ satisfying $f'=tilde{f}circ eta$. It follows that $$f=f'circ k=(tilde{f}circ eta)circ k=tilde{f}circ (etacirc k)$$ And this $tilde{f}$ can be readily seen as unique. So we're done $blacksquare$
answered Nov 21 at 0:02
Rafay Ashary
80118
80118
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006012%2ffundamental-ismorphism-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The first ring enforces the relation that $X^2-Z=0$, yes? Can you define a map from the first ring to the second using this information?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:27
I'm thinking at $x to t, z to t^2$ but the kernel of this map is $langle X^2-Z rangle$.
– mip
Nov 20 at 6:31
Why not try sending $Zmapsto X^2$ and sending $Xmapsto X$ as well as $Ymapsto Y$?
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 6:41
But how is this related to the fundamental theorem of isomorphism?
– mip
Nov 20 at 7:03
The first isomorphism theorem says that for $f:Ato B$ surjective, we have $Bcong A/ker f$, yes? Do you see how you should fill in the blanks with $A,B,f$? If you complete the mad-lib appropriately, you should get an answer that satisfies you.
– KReiser
Nov 20 at 7:05