Frozen time equilibria are not solutions of nonautonomous system











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am reading the following textbook:



Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos by Wiggins
p.6 (top)



Suppose we have $$dot{x} = f(x,t), xin mathbb{R}^n $$



By implicit function theorem, if we can find $(bar{x},bar{t})$ such that $f(bar{x},bar{t})=0$ and $D_xf(bar{x},bar{t})neq 0$, then we can find $bar{x}(t)$, with $bar{x}(bar{t})=bar{x}$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$.




If $bar{x}(t)$ is a solution of the nonautonomous vector field, then it must be constant in time, i.e., $dot{bar{x}}(t)=0$.




Why this is the case? I am confused about it.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    The implicit function theorem guarantees the existence of a $C^1$ function $bar{x}colon(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)tomathbb{R}^n$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$ for all $tin(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$. But that $bar{x}$ being a solution means that $dot{bar{x}}(t)=f(bar{x}(t),t)$, which is equal to $0$ by the above reasoning. Consequently, $bar{x}$ must be constant, at least on $(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$.
    – user539887
    Nov 20 at 8:41












  • @user539887 Thanks! I get it.
    – sleeve chen
    Nov 20 at 8:44















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am reading the following textbook:



Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos by Wiggins
p.6 (top)



Suppose we have $$dot{x} = f(x,t), xin mathbb{R}^n $$



By implicit function theorem, if we can find $(bar{x},bar{t})$ such that $f(bar{x},bar{t})=0$ and $D_xf(bar{x},bar{t})neq 0$, then we can find $bar{x}(t)$, with $bar{x}(bar{t})=bar{x}$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$.




If $bar{x}(t)$ is a solution of the nonautonomous vector field, then it must be constant in time, i.e., $dot{bar{x}}(t)=0$.




Why this is the case? I am confused about it.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    The implicit function theorem guarantees the existence of a $C^1$ function $bar{x}colon(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)tomathbb{R}^n$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$ for all $tin(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$. But that $bar{x}$ being a solution means that $dot{bar{x}}(t)=f(bar{x}(t),t)$, which is equal to $0$ by the above reasoning. Consequently, $bar{x}$ must be constant, at least on $(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$.
    – user539887
    Nov 20 at 8:41












  • @user539887 Thanks! I get it.
    – sleeve chen
    Nov 20 at 8:44













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am reading the following textbook:



Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos by Wiggins
p.6 (top)



Suppose we have $$dot{x} = f(x,t), xin mathbb{R}^n $$



By implicit function theorem, if we can find $(bar{x},bar{t})$ such that $f(bar{x},bar{t})=0$ and $D_xf(bar{x},bar{t})neq 0$, then we can find $bar{x}(t)$, with $bar{x}(bar{t})=bar{x}$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$.




If $bar{x}(t)$ is a solution of the nonautonomous vector field, then it must be constant in time, i.e., $dot{bar{x}}(t)=0$.




Why this is the case? I am confused about it.










share|cite|improve this question













I am reading the following textbook:



Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos by Wiggins
p.6 (top)



Suppose we have $$dot{x} = f(x,t), xin mathbb{R}^n $$



By implicit function theorem, if we can find $(bar{x},bar{t})$ such that $f(bar{x},bar{t})=0$ and $D_xf(bar{x},bar{t})neq 0$, then we can find $bar{x}(t)$, with $bar{x}(bar{t})=bar{x}$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$.




If $bar{x}(t)$ is a solution of the nonautonomous vector field, then it must be constant in time, i.e., $dot{bar{x}}(t)=0$.




Why this is the case? I am confused about it.







differential-equations dynamical-systems






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 8:19









sleeve chen

2,98941851




2,98941851








  • 2




    The implicit function theorem guarantees the existence of a $C^1$ function $bar{x}colon(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)tomathbb{R}^n$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$ for all $tin(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$. But that $bar{x}$ being a solution means that $dot{bar{x}}(t)=f(bar{x}(t),t)$, which is equal to $0$ by the above reasoning. Consequently, $bar{x}$ must be constant, at least on $(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$.
    – user539887
    Nov 20 at 8:41












  • @user539887 Thanks! I get it.
    – sleeve chen
    Nov 20 at 8:44














  • 2




    The implicit function theorem guarantees the existence of a $C^1$ function $bar{x}colon(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)tomathbb{R}^n$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$ for all $tin(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$. But that $bar{x}$ being a solution means that $dot{bar{x}}(t)=f(bar{x}(t),t)$, which is equal to $0$ by the above reasoning. Consequently, $bar{x}$ must be constant, at least on $(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$.
    – user539887
    Nov 20 at 8:41












  • @user539887 Thanks! I get it.
    – sleeve chen
    Nov 20 at 8:44








2




2




The implicit function theorem guarantees the existence of a $C^1$ function $bar{x}colon(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)tomathbb{R}^n$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$ for all $tin(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$. But that $bar{x}$ being a solution means that $dot{bar{x}}(t)=f(bar{x}(t),t)$, which is equal to $0$ by the above reasoning. Consequently, $bar{x}$ must be constant, at least on $(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$.
– user539887
Nov 20 at 8:41






The implicit function theorem guarantees the existence of a $C^1$ function $bar{x}colon(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)tomathbb{R}^n$ such that $f(bar{x}(t),t)=0$ for all $tin(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$. But that $bar{x}$ being a solution means that $dot{bar{x}}(t)=f(bar{x}(t),t)$, which is equal to $0$ by the above reasoning. Consequently, $bar{x}$ must be constant, at least on $(bar{t}-epsilon,bar{t}+epsilon)$.
– user539887
Nov 20 at 8:41














@user539887 Thanks! I get it.
– sleeve chen
Nov 20 at 8:44




@user539887 Thanks! I get it.
– sleeve chen
Nov 20 at 8:44















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006076%2ffrozen-time-equilibria-are-not-solutions-of-nonautonomous-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006076%2ffrozen-time-equilibria-are-not-solutions-of-nonautonomous-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix