Show that a group of order $90$ is solvable
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group of order $90$. Show that $G$ is solvable.
Given that $90=2 cdot 5 cdot 3^2$ is of the type $pqr^2$, with $p, q,$ and $r$ primes, this case is not straightforward.
My attempt to find a solution: The number of Sylow 5-subgroups of $G$, $n_5$, is either $1$ or $6$.
Case 1: $n_5=1$. In the first case, the only subgroup (say $K_5$) is normal. Then, $G$ will be solvable if both $K_5$ and $G/K_5$ are solvable. $K_5$ is solvable as it has order 5. $G/K_5$ is also solvable because its order is $90/5=18=2cdot 3^2$ (of the type $pq^2$); therefore $G$ is solvable.
Case 2: $n_5=6$. There are 6 Sylow 5-subgroups which are not normal and I don't know how to continue from here.
Similar arguments with $r=3$ made me get stuck as well when $n_3=10$.
Thanks for your help.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups sylow-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group of order $90$. Show that $G$ is solvable.
Given that $90=2 cdot 5 cdot 3^2$ is of the type $pqr^2$, with $p, q,$ and $r$ primes, this case is not straightforward.
My attempt to find a solution: The number of Sylow 5-subgroups of $G$, $n_5$, is either $1$ or $6$.
Case 1: $n_5=1$. In the first case, the only subgroup (say $K_5$) is normal. Then, $G$ will be solvable if both $K_5$ and $G/K_5$ are solvable. $K_5$ is solvable as it has order 5. $G/K_5$ is also solvable because its order is $90/5=18=2cdot 3^2$ (of the type $pq^2$); therefore $G$ is solvable.
Case 2: $n_5=6$. There are 6 Sylow 5-subgroups which are not normal and I don't know how to continue from here.
Similar arguments with $r=3$ made me get stuck as well when $n_3=10$.
Thanks for your help.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups sylow-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
First of all, $90/5=18=2*3*3...$
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 7 at 0:01
$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing that out! Corrected.
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group of order $90$. Show that $G$ is solvable.
Given that $90=2 cdot 5 cdot 3^2$ is of the type $pqr^2$, with $p, q,$ and $r$ primes, this case is not straightforward.
My attempt to find a solution: The number of Sylow 5-subgroups of $G$, $n_5$, is either $1$ or $6$.
Case 1: $n_5=1$. In the first case, the only subgroup (say $K_5$) is normal. Then, $G$ will be solvable if both $K_5$ and $G/K_5$ are solvable. $K_5$ is solvable as it has order 5. $G/K_5$ is also solvable because its order is $90/5=18=2cdot 3^2$ (of the type $pq^2$); therefore $G$ is solvable.
Case 2: $n_5=6$. There are 6 Sylow 5-subgroups which are not normal and I don't know how to continue from here.
Similar arguments with $r=3$ made me get stuck as well when $n_3=10$.
Thanks for your help.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups sylow-theory
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a group of order $90$. Show that $G$ is solvable.
Given that $90=2 cdot 5 cdot 3^2$ is of the type $pqr^2$, with $p, q,$ and $r$ primes, this case is not straightforward.
My attempt to find a solution: The number of Sylow 5-subgroups of $G$, $n_5$, is either $1$ or $6$.
Case 1: $n_5=1$. In the first case, the only subgroup (say $K_5$) is normal. Then, $G$ will be solvable if both $K_5$ and $G/K_5$ are solvable. $K_5$ is solvable as it has order 5. $G/K_5$ is also solvable because its order is $90/5=18=2cdot 3^2$ (of the type $pq^2$); therefore $G$ is solvable.
Case 2: $n_5=6$. There are 6 Sylow 5-subgroups which are not normal and I don't know how to continue from here.
Similar arguments with $r=3$ made me get stuck as well when $n_3=10$.
Thanks for your help.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups sylow-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups sylow-theory
edited Jan 8 at 9:56
the_fox
2,90231538
2,90231538
asked Jan 6 at 23:50
pendermathpendermath
56612
56612
$begingroup$
First of all, $90/5=18=2*3*3...$
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 7 at 0:01
$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing that out! Corrected.
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, $90/5=18=2*3*3...$
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 7 at 0:01
$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing that out! Corrected.
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:04
$begingroup$
First of all, $90/5=18=2*3*3...$
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 7 at 0:01
$begingroup$
First of all, $90/5=18=2*3*3...$
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 7 at 0:01
$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing that out! Corrected.
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:04
$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing that out! Corrected.
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:04
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what you've done the only case to worry about is when there are 10 Sylow 3-subgroups and 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
You can conclude that the Sylow 3-subgroups not all disjoint. Otherwise you would have 8 non-identity elements from each of the 10 Sylow 3-subgroups, leaving only 10 elements which would not be compatible with having 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
Consider a nontrivial element $x$ in some non-trivial intersection of two Sylow 3-subgroups. Let $H$ denote the centralizer of $x$. Since groups of order 9 are abelian, $H$ contains multiple Sylow 3-subgroups. The possible values of $|H|$ are thus either 18, 45, or 90.
If $|H|= 45$ then the centralizer of $x$ is normal (being index 2), and we are reduced to showing that groups of order 45 are solvable.
If $|H|= 90$, then $x$ is central, so we are reduced to showing that $G/langle xrangle$, which is order 30, is solvable. This is an exercise left to the reader.
If $|H|= 18$, then $H$ might not be normal, but consider the left action of $G$ on left cosets of $H$. This yields a homomorphism $phi: G to S_5$. The kernel of this map is a normal subgroup of $G$ that is contained in $H$, since $H$ is the stabilizer of the identity coset. Moreover, the order of the kernel of $phi$ is a multiple of 3. This kernel is order either 3, 6, 9, or 18, with the quotient group order either 30, 15, 10, or 5. We are thus reduced to checking that all groups of such orders are solvable.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an injection $f$ of $G$ into $S_{90}$ via the permutation action of $G$ on itself by left multiplication. An element of order 2 maps to a disjoint product of 45 transpositions, which is an odd permutation, so the image of $f$ is not contained in $A_{90}$. Since $S_{90}/A_{90}$ has order 2, composing that quotient map on $f$ yields a surjection of $G$ on to the group of order 2. The kernel is a normal subgroup of order 45, so $G$ is not normal.
Similarly any group of order greater than 2 whose order is divisible 2 but not 4 has a nontrivial normal subgroup of index 2.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064535%2fshow-that-a-group-of-order-90-is-solvable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what you've done the only case to worry about is when there are 10 Sylow 3-subgroups and 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
You can conclude that the Sylow 3-subgroups not all disjoint. Otherwise you would have 8 non-identity elements from each of the 10 Sylow 3-subgroups, leaving only 10 elements which would not be compatible with having 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
Consider a nontrivial element $x$ in some non-trivial intersection of two Sylow 3-subgroups. Let $H$ denote the centralizer of $x$. Since groups of order 9 are abelian, $H$ contains multiple Sylow 3-subgroups. The possible values of $|H|$ are thus either 18, 45, or 90.
If $|H|= 45$ then the centralizer of $x$ is normal (being index 2), and we are reduced to showing that groups of order 45 are solvable.
If $|H|= 90$, then $x$ is central, so we are reduced to showing that $G/langle xrangle$, which is order 30, is solvable. This is an exercise left to the reader.
If $|H|= 18$, then $H$ might not be normal, but consider the left action of $G$ on left cosets of $H$. This yields a homomorphism $phi: G to S_5$. The kernel of this map is a normal subgroup of $G$ that is contained in $H$, since $H$ is the stabilizer of the identity coset. Moreover, the order of the kernel of $phi$ is a multiple of 3. This kernel is order either 3, 6, 9, or 18, with the quotient group order either 30, 15, 10, or 5. We are thus reduced to checking that all groups of such orders are solvable.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what you've done the only case to worry about is when there are 10 Sylow 3-subgroups and 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
You can conclude that the Sylow 3-subgroups not all disjoint. Otherwise you would have 8 non-identity elements from each of the 10 Sylow 3-subgroups, leaving only 10 elements which would not be compatible with having 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
Consider a nontrivial element $x$ in some non-trivial intersection of two Sylow 3-subgroups. Let $H$ denote the centralizer of $x$. Since groups of order 9 are abelian, $H$ contains multiple Sylow 3-subgroups. The possible values of $|H|$ are thus either 18, 45, or 90.
If $|H|= 45$ then the centralizer of $x$ is normal (being index 2), and we are reduced to showing that groups of order 45 are solvable.
If $|H|= 90$, then $x$ is central, so we are reduced to showing that $G/langle xrangle$, which is order 30, is solvable. This is an exercise left to the reader.
If $|H|= 18$, then $H$ might not be normal, but consider the left action of $G$ on left cosets of $H$. This yields a homomorphism $phi: G to S_5$. The kernel of this map is a normal subgroup of $G$ that is contained in $H$, since $H$ is the stabilizer of the identity coset. Moreover, the order of the kernel of $phi$ is a multiple of 3. This kernel is order either 3, 6, 9, or 18, with the quotient group order either 30, 15, 10, or 5. We are thus reduced to checking that all groups of such orders are solvable.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what you've done the only case to worry about is when there are 10 Sylow 3-subgroups and 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
You can conclude that the Sylow 3-subgroups not all disjoint. Otherwise you would have 8 non-identity elements from each of the 10 Sylow 3-subgroups, leaving only 10 elements which would not be compatible with having 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
Consider a nontrivial element $x$ in some non-trivial intersection of two Sylow 3-subgroups. Let $H$ denote the centralizer of $x$. Since groups of order 9 are abelian, $H$ contains multiple Sylow 3-subgroups. The possible values of $|H|$ are thus either 18, 45, or 90.
If $|H|= 45$ then the centralizer of $x$ is normal (being index 2), and we are reduced to showing that groups of order 45 are solvable.
If $|H|= 90$, then $x$ is central, so we are reduced to showing that $G/langle xrangle$, which is order 30, is solvable. This is an exercise left to the reader.
If $|H|= 18$, then $H$ might not be normal, but consider the left action of $G$ on left cosets of $H$. This yields a homomorphism $phi: G to S_5$. The kernel of this map is a normal subgroup of $G$ that is contained in $H$, since $H$ is the stabilizer of the identity coset. Moreover, the order of the kernel of $phi$ is a multiple of 3. This kernel is order either 3, 6, 9, or 18, with the quotient group order either 30, 15, 10, or 5. We are thus reduced to checking that all groups of such orders are solvable.
$endgroup$
From what you've done the only case to worry about is when there are 10 Sylow 3-subgroups and 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
You can conclude that the Sylow 3-subgroups not all disjoint. Otherwise you would have 8 non-identity elements from each of the 10 Sylow 3-subgroups, leaving only 10 elements which would not be compatible with having 6 Sylow 5-subgroups.
Consider a nontrivial element $x$ in some non-trivial intersection of two Sylow 3-subgroups. Let $H$ denote the centralizer of $x$. Since groups of order 9 are abelian, $H$ contains multiple Sylow 3-subgroups. The possible values of $|H|$ are thus either 18, 45, or 90.
If $|H|= 45$ then the centralizer of $x$ is normal (being index 2), and we are reduced to showing that groups of order 45 are solvable.
If $|H|= 90$, then $x$ is central, so we are reduced to showing that $G/langle xrangle$, which is order 30, is solvable. This is an exercise left to the reader.
If $|H|= 18$, then $H$ might not be normal, but consider the left action of $G$ on left cosets of $H$. This yields a homomorphism $phi: G to S_5$. The kernel of this map is a normal subgroup of $G$ that is contained in $H$, since $H$ is the stabilizer of the identity coset. Moreover, the order of the kernel of $phi$ is a multiple of 3. This kernel is order either 3, 6, 9, or 18, with the quotient group order either 30, 15, 10, or 5. We are thus reduced to checking that all groups of such orders are solvable.
edited Jan 8 at 1:34
answered Jan 7 at 0:35
Rolf HoyerRolf Hoyer
11.4k31730
11.4k31730
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for the detailed response. You lost me in the last case (|H|=18), hopefully there is another way to prove this case. Anyways, I will take my time to think about it. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:47
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Minor thing: your element in the intersection switched from being called $x$ to $g$ and back again.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
Yes, that drove me mad for a while, @user3482749
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 13:00
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
$begingroup$
thanks for the notice on the inconsistent notation, fixed
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an injection $f$ of $G$ into $S_{90}$ via the permutation action of $G$ on itself by left multiplication. An element of order 2 maps to a disjoint product of 45 transpositions, which is an odd permutation, so the image of $f$ is not contained in $A_{90}$. Since $S_{90}/A_{90}$ has order 2, composing that quotient map on $f$ yields a surjection of $G$ on to the group of order 2. The kernel is a normal subgroup of order 45, so $G$ is not normal.
Similarly any group of order greater than 2 whose order is divisible 2 but not 4 has a nontrivial normal subgroup of index 2.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an injection $f$ of $G$ into $S_{90}$ via the permutation action of $G$ on itself by left multiplication. An element of order 2 maps to a disjoint product of 45 transpositions, which is an odd permutation, so the image of $f$ is not contained in $A_{90}$. Since $S_{90}/A_{90}$ has order 2, composing that quotient map on $f$ yields a surjection of $G$ on to the group of order 2. The kernel is a normal subgroup of order 45, so $G$ is not normal.
Similarly any group of order greater than 2 whose order is divisible 2 but not 4 has a nontrivial normal subgroup of index 2.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an injection $f$ of $G$ into $S_{90}$ via the permutation action of $G$ on itself by left multiplication. An element of order 2 maps to a disjoint product of 45 transpositions, which is an odd permutation, so the image of $f$ is not contained in $A_{90}$. Since $S_{90}/A_{90}$ has order 2, composing that quotient map on $f$ yields a surjection of $G$ on to the group of order 2. The kernel is a normal subgroup of order 45, so $G$ is not normal.
Similarly any group of order greater than 2 whose order is divisible 2 but not 4 has a nontrivial normal subgroup of index 2.
$endgroup$
There is an injection $f$ of $G$ into $S_{90}$ via the permutation action of $G$ on itself by left multiplication. An element of order 2 maps to a disjoint product of 45 transpositions, which is an odd permutation, so the image of $f$ is not contained in $A_{90}$. Since $S_{90}/A_{90}$ has order 2, composing that quotient map on $f$ yields a surjection of $G$ on to the group of order 2. The kernel is a normal subgroup of order 45, so $G$ is not normal.
Similarly any group of order greater than 2 whose order is divisible 2 but not 4 has a nontrivial normal subgroup of index 2.
edited Jan 8 at 14:29
answered Jan 7 at 15:25
C MonsourC Monsour
6,3391326
6,3391326
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
$begingroup$
This is a slick argument! I had a feeling my answer wasn't the simplest.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Jan 8 at 2:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064535%2fshow-that-a-group-of-order-90-is-solvable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
First of all, $90/5=18=2*3*3...$
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 7 at 0:01
$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing that out! Corrected.
$endgroup$
– pendermath
Jan 7 at 0:04