Set theory problem about sets that contain at most one element












-2












$begingroup$


It is problem 9 in A.Shen' book



Consider an equality whose left-hand side and right- hand side contain set variables and operations ∩, ∪, . Prove that if this equality is false for some sets, then it is false for some sets that contain at most one element.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. What were your attempts in solving this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 3 at 10:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just encounter it when reading the book. I guess it is an easy problem but cannot figure out the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 3 at 12:19
















-2












$begingroup$


It is problem 9 in A.Shen' book



Consider an equality whose left-hand side and right- hand side contain set variables and operations ∩, ∪, . Prove that if this equality is false for some sets, then it is false for some sets that contain at most one element.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. What were your attempts in solving this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 3 at 10:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just encounter it when reading the book. I guess it is an easy problem but cannot figure out the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 3 at 12:19














-2












-2








-2


0



$begingroup$


It is problem 9 in A.Shen' book



Consider an equality whose left-hand side and right- hand side contain set variables and operations ∩, ∪, . Prove that if this equality is false for some sets, then it is false for some sets that contain at most one element.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




It is problem 9 in A.Shen' book



Consider an equality whose left-hand side and right- hand side contain set variables and operations ∩, ∪, . Prove that if this equality is false for some sets, then it is false for some sets that contain at most one element.



enter image description here







discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 3 at 12:22







Unstandard Candle

















asked Jan 3 at 10:37









Unstandard CandleUnstandard Candle

11




11












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. What were your attempts in solving this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 3 at 10:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just encounter it when reading the book. I guess it is an easy problem but cannot figure out the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 3 at 12:19


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. What were your attempts in solving this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jan 3 at 10:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just encounter it when reading the book. I guess it is an easy problem but cannot figure out the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 3 at 12:19
















$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. What were your attempts in solving this problem?
$endgroup$
– James
Jan 3 at 10:56




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. What were your attempts in solving this problem?
$endgroup$
– James
Jan 3 at 10:56












$begingroup$
Just encounter it when reading the book. I guess it is an easy problem but cannot figure out the proof.
$endgroup$
– Unstandard Candle
Jan 3 at 12:19




$begingroup$
Just encounter it when reading the book. I guess it is an easy problem but cannot figure out the proof.
$endgroup$
– Unstandard Candle
Jan 3 at 12:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

That's interesting - seems like it sys something about $Bbb Z_2$-valued homomorphisms of Boolean algebras, sort of. Anyway, I bet the following works. First show this:





Lemma Fix $x$, and define $f(A)=Acap{x}$ for all $A$. Then $f(Acup B)=f(A)cup f(B)$, $f(Acap B)=f(A)cap f(B)$ and $f(Asetminus B)=f(A)setminus f(B)$ for all $A,B$.





Now say the two expressions are $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $psi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Suppose $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)nepsi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Then there exists $x$ with $xinphi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $xnotinpsi(A_1,dots,,A_n)$ (or vice versa). Hence $$phi((f(A_j))=f(phi((A_j)))ne f(psi((A_j)))=psi((f(A_j)).$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for this nice proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 4 at 2:22












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060437%2fset-theory-problem-about-sets-that-contain-at-most-one-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

That's interesting - seems like it sys something about $Bbb Z_2$-valued homomorphisms of Boolean algebras, sort of. Anyway, I bet the following works. First show this:





Lemma Fix $x$, and define $f(A)=Acap{x}$ for all $A$. Then $f(Acup B)=f(A)cup f(B)$, $f(Acap B)=f(A)cap f(B)$ and $f(Asetminus B)=f(A)setminus f(B)$ for all $A,B$.





Now say the two expressions are $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $psi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Suppose $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)nepsi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Then there exists $x$ with $xinphi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $xnotinpsi(A_1,dots,,A_n)$ (or vice versa). Hence $$phi((f(A_j))=f(phi((A_j)))ne f(psi((A_j)))=psi((f(A_j)).$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for this nice proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 4 at 2:22
















1












$begingroup$

That's interesting - seems like it sys something about $Bbb Z_2$-valued homomorphisms of Boolean algebras, sort of. Anyway, I bet the following works. First show this:





Lemma Fix $x$, and define $f(A)=Acap{x}$ for all $A$. Then $f(Acup B)=f(A)cup f(B)$, $f(Acap B)=f(A)cap f(B)$ and $f(Asetminus B)=f(A)setminus f(B)$ for all $A,B$.





Now say the two expressions are $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $psi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Suppose $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)nepsi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Then there exists $x$ with $xinphi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $xnotinpsi(A_1,dots,,A_n)$ (or vice versa). Hence $$phi((f(A_j))=f(phi((A_j)))ne f(psi((A_j)))=psi((f(A_j)).$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for this nice proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 4 at 2:22














1












1








1





$begingroup$

That's interesting - seems like it sys something about $Bbb Z_2$-valued homomorphisms of Boolean algebras, sort of. Anyway, I bet the following works. First show this:





Lemma Fix $x$, and define $f(A)=Acap{x}$ for all $A$. Then $f(Acup B)=f(A)cup f(B)$, $f(Acap B)=f(A)cap f(B)$ and $f(Asetminus B)=f(A)setminus f(B)$ for all $A,B$.





Now say the two expressions are $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $psi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Suppose $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)nepsi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Then there exists $x$ with $xinphi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $xnotinpsi(A_1,dots,,A_n)$ (or vice versa). Hence $$phi((f(A_j))=f(phi((A_j)))ne f(psi((A_j)))=psi((f(A_j)).$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



That's interesting - seems like it sys something about $Bbb Z_2$-valued homomorphisms of Boolean algebras, sort of. Anyway, I bet the following works. First show this:





Lemma Fix $x$, and define $f(A)=Acap{x}$ for all $A$. Then $f(Acup B)=f(A)cup f(B)$, $f(Acap B)=f(A)cap f(B)$ and $f(Asetminus B)=f(A)setminus f(B)$ for all $A,B$.





Now say the two expressions are $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $psi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Suppose $phi(A_1,dots,A_n)nepsi(A_1,dots,A_n)$. Then there exists $x$ with $xinphi(A_1,dots,A_n)$ and $xnotinpsi(A_1,dots,,A_n)$ (or vice versa). Hence $$phi((f(A_j))=f(phi((A_j)))ne f(psi((A_j)))=psi((f(A_j)).$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 3 at 20:10

























answered Jan 3 at 14:52









David C. UllrichDavid C. Ullrich

61.6k43995




61.6k43995












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for this nice proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 4 at 2:22


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for this nice proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Unstandard Candle
    Jan 4 at 2:22
















$begingroup$
Thank you for this nice proof.
$endgroup$
– Unstandard Candle
Jan 4 at 2:22




$begingroup$
Thank you for this nice proof.
$endgroup$
– Unstandard Candle
Jan 4 at 2:22


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060437%2fset-theory-problem-about-sets-that-contain-at-most-one-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix