Parallel hypersurfaces in a riemannian manifold and focal points












3












$begingroup$


For $M^n$ a riemannian manifold and $S$ a hypersurface, if we consider $$S_t={exp^perp(v):vin T(S)^perp,;|v|=t}$$ and $$f_t:Srightarrow S_t:pmapsto exp^perp(teta)$$ with $eta$ the unit normal vector, then what is the relation of $f_t$ and the focal points of a geodesic $gammaperp S$?



We say that $f_t$ is a diffeomorphism for small $t$. How can we determine the value of $t$ where it stops being a diffeomorphism?



Any references on this material?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    For $M^n$ a riemannian manifold and $S$ a hypersurface, if we consider $$S_t={exp^perp(v):vin T(S)^perp,;|v|=t}$$ and $$f_t:Srightarrow S_t:pmapsto exp^perp(teta)$$ with $eta$ the unit normal vector, then what is the relation of $f_t$ and the focal points of a geodesic $gammaperp S$?



    We say that $f_t$ is a diffeomorphism for small $t$. How can we determine the value of $t$ where it stops being a diffeomorphism?



    Any references on this material?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      For $M^n$ a riemannian manifold and $S$ a hypersurface, if we consider $$S_t={exp^perp(v):vin T(S)^perp,;|v|=t}$$ and $$f_t:Srightarrow S_t:pmapsto exp^perp(teta)$$ with $eta$ the unit normal vector, then what is the relation of $f_t$ and the focal points of a geodesic $gammaperp S$?



      We say that $f_t$ is a diffeomorphism for small $t$. How can we determine the value of $t$ where it stops being a diffeomorphism?



      Any references on this material?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For $M^n$ a riemannian manifold and $S$ a hypersurface, if we consider $$S_t={exp^perp(v):vin T(S)^perp,;|v|=t}$$ and $$f_t:Srightarrow S_t:pmapsto exp^perp(teta)$$ with $eta$ the unit normal vector, then what is the relation of $f_t$ and the focal points of a geodesic $gammaperp S$?



      We say that $f_t$ is a diffeomorphism for small $t$. How can we determine the value of $t$ where it stops being a diffeomorphism?



      Any references on this material?







      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 10 '15 at 5:05









      Mark Fantini

      4,88041936




      4,88041936










      asked Nov 17 '14 at 22:00









      Test123Test123

      2,792828




      2,792828






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          My uneducated view (disposable if a real answer is posted) is that I think we can continue this process right until a focal point is reached, of the apparently discrete set of such points (references therein might be helpful too). Consider the unit sphere, we start from the equator to parallel disks at each latitude up until the north pole when $ t = 1 $.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Moishe Kohan
            Jan 7 at 18:08












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1026697%2fparallel-hypersurfaces-in-a-riemannian-manifold-and-focal-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          My uneducated view (disposable if a real answer is posted) is that I think we can continue this process right until a focal point is reached, of the apparently discrete set of such points (references therein might be helpful too). Consider the unit sphere, we start from the equator to parallel disks at each latitude up until the north pole when $ t = 1 $.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Moishe Kohan
            Jan 7 at 18:08
















          0












          $begingroup$

          My uneducated view (disposable if a real answer is posted) is that I think we can continue this process right until a focal point is reached, of the apparently discrete set of such points (references therein might be helpful too). Consider the unit sphere, we start from the equator to parallel disks at each latitude up until the north pole when $ t = 1 $.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Moishe Kohan
            Jan 7 at 18:08














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          My uneducated view (disposable if a real answer is posted) is that I think we can continue this process right until a focal point is reached, of the apparently discrete set of such points (references therein might be helpful too). Consider the unit sphere, we start from the equator to parallel disks at each latitude up until the north pole when $ t = 1 $.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          My uneducated view (disposable if a real answer is posted) is that I think we can continue this process right until a focal point is reached, of the apparently discrete set of such points (references therein might be helpful too). Consider the unit sphere, we start from the equator to parallel disks at each latitude up until the north pole when $ t = 1 $.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 9 at 7:03









          El borito

          664216




          664216










          answered Jan 10 '15 at 4:48









          rychrych

          2,5161718




          2,5161718












          • $begingroup$
            Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Moishe Kohan
            Jan 7 at 18:08


















          • $begingroup$
            Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Moishe Kohan
            Jan 7 at 18:08
















          $begingroup$
          Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
          $endgroup$
          – Moishe Kohan
          Jan 7 at 18:08




          $begingroup$
          Focal points are only one part of the story, they detect failure of the normal exponential map to be an immersion. However, an immersion need not be a diffeomorphism to its image because it fails to be injective. As an example, consider $n=2$, $S$ a simple closed geodesic and $M$ compact of negative curvature. There are no focal points in this situation, but, $f_t$ will fail to be injective for large $t$.
          $endgroup$
          – Moishe Kohan
          Jan 7 at 18:08


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1026697%2fparallel-hypersurfaces-in-a-riemannian-manifold-and-focal-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix