Confusion with this inverse Laplace Transform
$begingroup$
I have earlier posted this question in Physics StackExchange but I feel that it is more relevant here. The question is about a contour integral and I have written most of the equations needed. Please feel free to ask for any clarification.
I have the thermal partition function and the density of states for the 3D simple harmonic oscillator, which is given below
$$
Z(beta) = frac { 1 } { left( 2 sinh left( frac { beta omega } { 2 } right) right) ^ { 3 } }
$$
and
$$
rho ( E ) = frac { left( frac { E } { omega } - frac { 1 } { 2 } right) left( frac { E } { omega } + frac { 1 } { 2 } right) } { 2 omega }
$$
where, $beta$ is the inverse temperature and $omega$ is the natural frequency of the SHO.
Now, the partition function can also be written as the following integral
$$
Z(beta) = int_{0}^{infty} dE : rho(E) e^{-beta E}
$$
which is a Laplace transform, hence we can calculate the asymptotic of the density of states by inverting this Laplace transform. The inverse Laplace transform can be done using the Bromwich contour integral which is
$$
rho(E) = frac{1}{2pi i} int_{gamma - i infty}^{gamma + i infty} dbeta : Z(beta) e^{beta E}
$$
where $gamma$ is greater can the real part of all the singularities of $Z(beta)$. Now, I tried doing this integral using the residue theorem by closing the contour on the left half of the complex plane. But somehow I am getting the correct density of states using the residue of just one pole, whereas there are infinite number of poles on the imaginary axis due to the periodicity of the hyperbolic sine function (on the imaginary axis).
Can someone explain where I am wrong in this process.
P.S. We also know that $n = frac{E}{omega} - frac{3}{2}$ is a positive integer.
complex-analysis laplace-transform contour-integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have earlier posted this question in Physics StackExchange but I feel that it is more relevant here. The question is about a contour integral and I have written most of the equations needed. Please feel free to ask for any clarification.
I have the thermal partition function and the density of states for the 3D simple harmonic oscillator, which is given below
$$
Z(beta) = frac { 1 } { left( 2 sinh left( frac { beta omega } { 2 } right) right) ^ { 3 } }
$$
and
$$
rho ( E ) = frac { left( frac { E } { omega } - frac { 1 } { 2 } right) left( frac { E } { omega } + frac { 1 } { 2 } right) } { 2 omega }
$$
where, $beta$ is the inverse temperature and $omega$ is the natural frequency of the SHO.
Now, the partition function can also be written as the following integral
$$
Z(beta) = int_{0}^{infty} dE : rho(E) e^{-beta E}
$$
which is a Laplace transform, hence we can calculate the asymptotic of the density of states by inverting this Laplace transform. The inverse Laplace transform can be done using the Bromwich contour integral which is
$$
rho(E) = frac{1}{2pi i} int_{gamma - i infty}^{gamma + i infty} dbeta : Z(beta) e^{beta E}
$$
where $gamma$ is greater can the real part of all the singularities of $Z(beta)$. Now, I tried doing this integral using the residue theorem by closing the contour on the left half of the complex plane. But somehow I am getting the correct density of states using the residue of just one pole, whereas there are infinite number of poles on the imaginary axis due to the periodicity of the hyperbolic sine function (on the imaginary axis).
Can someone explain where I am wrong in this process.
P.S. We also know that $n = frac{E}{omega} - frac{3}{2}$ is a positive integer.
complex-analysis laplace-transform contour-integration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
could you please outline your calculations a bit along with the answer you expect? Would help speed up the checking of your work. You are correct that this is the right site for a question like this, and I am more than happy to take a look at it if you show proper effort :)
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jan 3 at 18:03
1
$begingroup$
If $E$ is just an independent variable, then $mathcal L_{E to beta}[E^2/(2 omega^3) - 1/(8 omega)]$ is $1/(omega beta)^3 - 1/(8 omega beta)$. $mathcal L[rho]$ just happens to coincide with the principal part of the Laurent series of $Z(beta)$ at zero.
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 19:43
$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen The partition function $Z(beta)$ has poles at $beta = (2 pi i) n$ (where $n$ is all integers). Now, I am getting the residue of all these poles to be the same equal to $rho(E)$ given above. Hence, if we sum up these residues we get the answer to be infinity. I expect the answer of the inverse Laplace transform to be $rho(E)$.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@Maxim Can you explain what you are implying from your statement?
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 5:59
$begingroup$
See also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/451541/… and the links in my answer to this question.
$endgroup$
– LonelyProf
Jan 4 at 8:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have earlier posted this question in Physics StackExchange but I feel that it is more relevant here. The question is about a contour integral and I have written most of the equations needed. Please feel free to ask for any clarification.
I have the thermal partition function and the density of states for the 3D simple harmonic oscillator, which is given below
$$
Z(beta) = frac { 1 } { left( 2 sinh left( frac { beta omega } { 2 } right) right) ^ { 3 } }
$$
and
$$
rho ( E ) = frac { left( frac { E } { omega } - frac { 1 } { 2 } right) left( frac { E } { omega } + frac { 1 } { 2 } right) } { 2 omega }
$$
where, $beta$ is the inverse temperature and $omega$ is the natural frequency of the SHO.
Now, the partition function can also be written as the following integral
$$
Z(beta) = int_{0}^{infty} dE : rho(E) e^{-beta E}
$$
which is a Laplace transform, hence we can calculate the asymptotic of the density of states by inverting this Laplace transform. The inverse Laplace transform can be done using the Bromwich contour integral which is
$$
rho(E) = frac{1}{2pi i} int_{gamma - i infty}^{gamma + i infty} dbeta : Z(beta) e^{beta E}
$$
where $gamma$ is greater can the real part of all the singularities of $Z(beta)$. Now, I tried doing this integral using the residue theorem by closing the contour on the left half of the complex plane. But somehow I am getting the correct density of states using the residue of just one pole, whereas there are infinite number of poles on the imaginary axis due to the periodicity of the hyperbolic sine function (on the imaginary axis).
Can someone explain where I am wrong in this process.
P.S. We also know that $n = frac{E}{omega} - frac{3}{2}$ is a positive integer.
complex-analysis laplace-transform contour-integration
$endgroup$
I have earlier posted this question in Physics StackExchange but I feel that it is more relevant here. The question is about a contour integral and I have written most of the equations needed. Please feel free to ask for any clarification.
I have the thermal partition function and the density of states for the 3D simple harmonic oscillator, which is given below
$$
Z(beta) = frac { 1 } { left( 2 sinh left( frac { beta omega } { 2 } right) right) ^ { 3 } }
$$
and
$$
rho ( E ) = frac { left( frac { E } { omega } - frac { 1 } { 2 } right) left( frac { E } { omega } + frac { 1 } { 2 } right) } { 2 omega }
$$
where, $beta$ is the inverse temperature and $omega$ is the natural frequency of the SHO.
Now, the partition function can also be written as the following integral
$$
Z(beta) = int_{0}^{infty} dE : rho(E) e^{-beta E}
$$
which is a Laplace transform, hence we can calculate the asymptotic of the density of states by inverting this Laplace transform. The inverse Laplace transform can be done using the Bromwich contour integral which is
$$
rho(E) = frac{1}{2pi i} int_{gamma - i infty}^{gamma + i infty} dbeta : Z(beta) e^{beta E}
$$
where $gamma$ is greater can the real part of all the singularities of $Z(beta)$. Now, I tried doing this integral using the residue theorem by closing the contour on the left half of the complex plane. But somehow I am getting the correct density of states using the residue of just one pole, whereas there are infinite number of poles on the imaginary axis due to the periodicity of the hyperbolic sine function (on the imaginary axis).
Can someone explain where I am wrong in this process.
P.S. We also know that $n = frac{E}{omega} - frac{3}{2}$ is a positive integer.
complex-analysis laplace-transform contour-integration
complex-analysis laplace-transform contour-integration
edited Jan 4 at 6:33
rahuldan
asked Jan 3 at 10:40
rahuldanrahuldan
84
84
$begingroup$
could you please outline your calculations a bit along with the answer you expect? Would help speed up the checking of your work. You are correct that this is the right site for a question like this, and I am more than happy to take a look at it if you show proper effort :)
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jan 3 at 18:03
1
$begingroup$
If $E$ is just an independent variable, then $mathcal L_{E to beta}[E^2/(2 omega^3) - 1/(8 omega)]$ is $1/(omega beta)^3 - 1/(8 omega beta)$. $mathcal L[rho]$ just happens to coincide with the principal part of the Laurent series of $Z(beta)$ at zero.
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 19:43
$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen The partition function $Z(beta)$ has poles at $beta = (2 pi i) n$ (where $n$ is all integers). Now, I am getting the residue of all these poles to be the same equal to $rho(E)$ given above. Hence, if we sum up these residues we get the answer to be infinity. I expect the answer of the inverse Laplace transform to be $rho(E)$.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@Maxim Can you explain what you are implying from your statement?
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 5:59
$begingroup$
See also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/451541/… and the links in my answer to this question.
$endgroup$
– LonelyProf
Jan 4 at 8:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
could you please outline your calculations a bit along with the answer you expect? Would help speed up the checking of your work. You are correct that this is the right site for a question like this, and I am more than happy to take a look at it if you show proper effort :)
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jan 3 at 18:03
1
$begingroup$
If $E$ is just an independent variable, then $mathcal L_{E to beta}[E^2/(2 omega^3) - 1/(8 omega)]$ is $1/(omega beta)^3 - 1/(8 omega beta)$. $mathcal L[rho]$ just happens to coincide with the principal part of the Laurent series of $Z(beta)$ at zero.
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 19:43
$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen The partition function $Z(beta)$ has poles at $beta = (2 pi i) n$ (where $n$ is all integers). Now, I am getting the residue of all these poles to be the same equal to $rho(E)$ given above. Hence, if we sum up these residues we get the answer to be infinity. I expect the answer of the inverse Laplace transform to be $rho(E)$.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@Maxim Can you explain what you are implying from your statement?
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 5:59
$begingroup$
See also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/451541/… and the links in my answer to this question.
$endgroup$
– LonelyProf
Jan 4 at 8:00
$begingroup$
could you please outline your calculations a bit along with the answer you expect? Would help speed up the checking of your work. You are correct that this is the right site for a question like this, and I am more than happy to take a look at it if you show proper effort :)
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jan 3 at 18:03
$begingroup$
could you please outline your calculations a bit along with the answer you expect? Would help speed up the checking of your work. You are correct that this is the right site for a question like this, and I am more than happy to take a look at it if you show proper effort :)
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jan 3 at 18:03
1
1
$begingroup$
If $E$ is just an independent variable, then $mathcal L_{E to beta}[E^2/(2 omega^3) - 1/(8 omega)]$ is $1/(omega beta)^3 - 1/(8 omega beta)$. $mathcal L[rho]$ just happens to coincide with the principal part of the Laurent series of $Z(beta)$ at zero.
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 19:43
$begingroup$
If $E$ is just an independent variable, then $mathcal L_{E to beta}[E^2/(2 omega^3) - 1/(8 omega)]$ is $1/(omega beta)^3 - 1/(8 omega beta)$. $mathcal L[rho]$ just happens to coincide with the principal part of the Laurent series of $Z(beta)$ at zero.
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 19:43
$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen The partition function $Z(beta)$ has poles at $beta = (2 pi i) n$ (where $n$ is all integers). Now, I am getting the residue of all these poles to be the same equal to $rho(E)$ given above. Hence, if we sum up these residues we get the answer to be infinity. I expect the answer of the inverse Laplace transform to be $rho(E)$.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen The partition function $Z(beta)$ has poles at $beta = (2 pi i) n$ (where $n$ is all integers). Now, I am getting the residue of all these poles to be the same equal to $rho(E)$ given above. Hence, if we sum up these residues we get the answer to be infinity. I expect the answer of the inverse Laplace transform to be $rho(E)$.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@Maxim Can you explain what you are implying from your statement?
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 5:59
$begingroup$
@Maxim Can you explain what you are implying from your statement?
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 5:59
$begingroup$
See also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/451541/… and the links in my answer to this question.
$endgroup$
– LonelyProf
Jan 4 at 8:00
$begingroup$
See also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/451541/… and the links in my answer to this question.
$endgroup$
– LonelyProf
Jan 4 at 8:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The way it's written, $rho(E)$ is just a polynomial, the Laplace transform of which is just a sum of negative powers of $beta$. What is meant here is
$$rho(E) = frac 1 {2 omega}
left( frac E omega - frac 1 2 right)
left( frac E omega + frac 1 2 right)
sum_{n geq 0}
delta {left( frac E omega - left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)} = \
sum_{n geq 0} frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2
,delta {left( E - omega left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)}, \
mathcal L[rho] = sum_{n geq 0}
frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2 e^{-omega (n + 3/2) beta} =
frac {operatorname{csch}^3 frac {omega beta} 2} 8.$$
It's related to compositions of integers because when we convolve a Dirac comb with itself twice, we get a sum of the form $sum_{i, j, k} delta(t - i - j - k)$, and $(n - 1) (n - 2)/2$ is the number of ways to write $n$ as the sum of an ordered triple of positive integers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060442%2fconfusion-with-this-inverse-laplace-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The way it's written, $rho(E)$ is just a polynomial, the Laplace transform of which is just a sum of negative powers of $beta$. What is meant here is
$$rho(E) = frac 1 {2 omega}
left( frac E omega - frac 1 2 right)
left( frac E omega + frac 1 2 right)
sum_{n geq 0}
delta {left( frac E omega - left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)} = \
sum_{n geq 0} frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2
,delta {left( E - omega left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)}, \
mathcal L[rho] = sum_{n geq 0}
frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2 e^{-omega (n + 3/2) beta} =
frac {operatorname{csch}^3 frac {omega beta} 2} 8.$$
It's related to compositions of integers because when we convolve a Dirac comb with itself twice, we get a sum of the form $sum_{i, j, k} delta(t - i - j - k)$, and $(n - 1) (n - 2)/2$ is the number of ways to write $n$ as the sum of an ordered triple of positive integers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The way it's written, $rho(E)$ is just a polynomial, the Laplace transform of which is just a sum of negative powers of $beta$. What is meant here is
$$rho(E) = frac 1 {2 omega}
left( frac E omega - frac 1 2 right)
left( frac E omega + frac 1 2 right)
sum_{n geq 0}
delta {left( frac E omega - left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)} = \
sum_{n geq 0} frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2
,delta {left( E - omega left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)}, \
mathcal L[rho] = sum_{n geq 0}
frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2 e^{-omega (n + 3/2) beta} =
frac {operatorname{csch}^3 frac {omega beta} 2} 8.$$
It's related to compositions of integers because when we convolve a Dirac comb with itself twice, we get a sum of the form $sum_{i, j, k} delta(t - i - j - k)$, and $(n - 1) (n - 2)/2$ is the number of ways to write $n$ as the sum of an ordered triple of positive integers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The way it's written, $rho(E)$ is just a polynomial, the Laplace transform of which is just a sum of negative powers of $beta$. What is meant here is
$$rho(E) = frac 1 {2 omega}
left( frac E omega - frac 1 2 right)
left( frac E omega + frac 1 2 right)
sum_{n geq 0}
delta {left( frac E omega - left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)} = \
sum_{n geq 0} frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2
,delta {left( E - omega left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)}, \
mathcal L[rho] = sum_{n geq 0}
frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2 e^{-omega (n + 3/2) beta} =
frac {operatorname{csch}^3 frac {omega beta} 2} 8.$$
It's related to compositions of integers because when we convolve a Dirac comb with itself twice, we get a sum of the form $sum_{i, j, k} delta(t - i - j - k)$, and $(n - 1) (n - 2)/2$ is the number of ways to write $n$ as the sum of an ordered triple of positive integers.
$endgroup$
The way it's written, $rho(E)$ is just a polynomial, the Laplace transform of which is just a sum of negative powers of $beta$. What is meant here is
$$rho(E) = frac 1 {2 omega}
left( frac E omega - frac 1 2 right)
left( frac E omega + frac 1 2 right)
sum_{n geq 0}
delta {left( frac E omega - left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)} = \
sum_{n geq 0} frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2
,delta {left( E - omega left( n + frac 3 2 right) right)}, \
mathcal L[rho] = sum_{n geq 0}
frac {(n + 1) (n + 2)} 2 e^{-omega (n + 3/2) beta} =
frac {operatorname{csch}^3 frac {omega beta} 2} 8.$$
It's related to compositions of integers because when we convolve a Dirac comb with itself twice, we get a sum of the form $sum_{i, j, k} delta(t - i - j - k)$, and $(n - 1) (n - 2)/2$ is the number of ways to write $n$ as the sum of an ordered triple of positive integers.
edited Jan 4 at 19:24
answered Jan 4 at 14:30
MaximMaxim
6,1181221
6,1181221
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. This clarified my doubt.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060442%2fconfusion-with-this-inverse-laplace-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
could you please outline your calculations a bit along with the answer you expect? Would help speed up the checking of your work. You are correct that this is the right site for a question like this, and I am more than happy to take a look at it if you show proper effort :)
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Jan 3 at 18:03
1
$begingroup$
If $E$ is just an independent variable, then $mathcal L_{E to beta}[E^2/(2 omega^3) - 1/(8 omega)]$ is $1/(omega beta)^3 - 1/(8 omega beta)$. $mathcal L[rho]$ just happens to coincide with the principal part of the Laurent series of $Z(beta)$ at zero.
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 19:43
$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen The partition function $Z(beta)$ has poles at $beta = (2 pi i) n$ (where $n$ is all integers). Now, I am getting the residue of all these poles to be the same equal to $rho(E)$ given above. Hence, if we sum up these residues we get the answer to be infinity. I expect the answer of the inverse Laplace transform to be $rho(E)$.
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@Maxim Can you explain what you are implying from your statement?
$endgroup$
– rahuldan
Jan 4 at 5:59
$begingroup$
See also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/451541/… and the links in my answer to this question.
$endgroup$
– LonelyProf
Jan 4 at 8:00