Word 2010 cross-reference number with chapter without label












9















I have the following problem. First I had images and other elements labeled just by number, so from 1 to ∞. When I cross referenced I changed to number only using the following:



{ REF _Ref334952863 # 0 h }


And it worked fine, I got only the image number. Then I found new instructions, saying I have to change captions to paragraph.number, like so:



enter image description here



But my referencing now is completely broken, all I get is number 4. What I need is 2.2, so number without the label. If I leave label it works, I can get Slika 2.2, but I can't use the label.



The reason is, unlike English, my language uses declination, and I cannot use "slika" everywhere, sometimes it's "slike" or "sliki" and sometimes I just want to use number in brackets only [2.2].










share|improve this question



























    9















    I have the following problem. First I had images and other elements labeled just by number, so from 1 to ∞. When I cross referenced I changed to number only using the following:



    { REF _Ref334952863 # 0 h }


    And it worked fine, I got only the image number. Then I found new instructions, saying I have to change captions to paragraph.number, like so:



    enter image description here



    But my referencing now is completely broken, all I get is number 4. What I need is 2.2, so number without the label. If I leave label it works, I can get Slika 2.2, but I can't use the label.



    The reason is, unlike English, my language uses declination, and I cannot use "slika" everywhere, sometimes it's "slike" or "sliki" and sometimes I just want to use number in brackets only [2.2].










    share|improve this question

























      9












      9








      9


      4






      I have the following problem. First I had images and other elements labeled just by number, so from 1 to ∞. When I cross referenced I changed to number only using the following:



      { REF _Ref334952863 # 0 h }


      And it worked fine, I got only the image number. Then I found new instructions, saying I have to change captions to paragraph.number, like so:



      enter image description here



      But my referencing now is completely broken, all I get is number 4. What I need is 2.2, so number without the label. If I leave label it works, I can get Slika 2.2, but I can't use the label.



      The reason is, unlike English, my language uses declination, and I cannot use "slika" everywhere, sometimes it's "slike" or "sliki" and sometimes I just want to use number in brackets only [2.2].










      share|improve this question














      I have the following problem. First I had images and other elements labeled just by number, so from 1 to ∞. When I cross referenced I changed to number only using the following:



      { REF _Ref334952863 # 0 h }


      And it worked fine, I got only the image number. Then I found new instructions, saying I have to change captions to paragraph.number, like so:



      enter image description here



      But my referencing now is completely broken, all I get is number 4. What I need is 2.2, so number without the label. If I leave label it works, I can get Slika 2.2, but I can't use the label.



      The reason is, unlike English, my language uses declination, and I cannot use "slika" everywhere, sometimes it's "slike" or "sliki" and sometimes I just want to use number in brackets only [2.2].







      microsoft-word-2010 cross-reference






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Sep 15 '12 at 11:57









      Bojan KogojBojan Kogoj

      2371412




      2371412






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          The workaround with # 0.0 or # 0 in the answer above work only for one-digit numberings. (according to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2007-word/how-to-disply-figure-number-only-in-cross/02ae3cd0-6c3c-401d-990c-5220d7f0be1e).



          But you can use the "kludgy workaround": http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm



          In short, 10 simple steps:




          1. Use classic "Add cross reference" to Slika 2.2

          2. Press Shift+F9 to show field code. You shoud see something like { REF _Ref107244825 } instead of Slika 2.2.

          3. Select and copy the _Ref107244825 part.

          4. Press Shift+F9 again.

          5. Go to the caption of Slika 2.2 (e.g. by Ctrl+click on the inserted reference)

          6. Select the 2.2 part of the caption

          7. Open the "Insert bookmark" dialog

          8. In the dialog, check the "Show hidden bookmarks" checkbox

          9. Find the _Ref107244825 (you can e.g. paste the copied text from step 3)

          10. Click "Add" and then close the dialog


          Now, when you actualize the fields (e.g. press F9), the reference becomes 2.2 and you can add declined "Na slike".






          share|improve this answer


























          • "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

            – Pedro77
            May 2 '18 at 3:41





















          1














          Instead of # 0, try adding # 0.0. That way, you would only get the paragraph.number format (so, the actuall hyperlink would only include the "2.2" part, and you would add the "slika" part as plain text in front).



          If you would like to add some text inside the hyperlink (so a wider area than 3-4 characters is clickable), I suggest adding it as custom text, enclosed in single-quotes:



          { REF _Ref334952863 # "'na slici' 0.0" h }


          So, the example you mentioned would look like this:



          { REF _Ref334952863 # "'['0.0']'" h }


          P.S. Don't forget that if you want to add multiple things to the # declaration, you have to enclose them in double-quotes.





          Sources:




          • http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/combinexrefs.htm

          • http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/insert-and-format-field-codes-in-word-2007-HA010338798.aspx






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

            – Bojan Kogoj
            Feb 28 '13 at 19:55











          • Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

            – Mandark
            Mar 1 '13 at 18:54








          • 1





            It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

            – Bojan Kogoj
            Mar 2 '13 at 0:52











          • Have you found the solution yet?

            – Michal Kováč
            Oct 14 '13 at 9:14











          • I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

            – Florian Jenn
            Oct 14 '14 at 16:48



















          0














          I came up with a little workaround for this problem. It's not the neatest solution but it works if you need this feature desperately. It works with figures, tables, whatever. What i do is:



          Suppose i have a figure followed by the figure title which is something like:
          Figure 5.23 Effect of temperature on parameter Z



          I create a 2-columned, single row table where i
          - type "Figure" on the leftmost cell
          - insert the caption (in this case 5.23) followed by the title text in the right cell



          Then i just put the table really close to my figure so that i don't end up with an ugly gap between the figure and the figure title.



          Essentially, this separates the word "Figure" from the caption so you can type whatever you want before your cross-references. The only downside is that if you create a Table of Figures, you will have to type the word "Figure" to the left of the figure reference number by hand for every single figure but that's not a deal breaker in my opinion. Cheers.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f474503%2fword-2010-cross-reference-number-with-chapter-without-label%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            The workaround with # 0.0 or # 0 in the answer above work only for one-digit numberings. (according to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2007-word/how-to-disply-figure-number-only-in-cross/02ae3cd0-6c3c-401d-990c-5220d7f0be1e).



            But you can use the "kludgy workaround": http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm



            In short, 10 simple steps:




            1. Use classic "Add cross reference" to Slika 2.2

            2. Press Shift+F9 to show field code. You shoud see something like { REF _Ref107244825 } instead of Slika 2.2.

            3. Select and copy the _Ref107244825 part.

            4. Press Shift+F9 again.

            5. Go to the caption of Slika 2.2 (e.g. by Ctrl+click on the inserted reference)

            6. Select the 2.2 part of the caption

            7. Open the "Insert bookmark" dialog

            8. In the dialog, check the "Show hidden bookmarks" checkbox

            9. Find the _Ref107244825 (you can e.g. paste the copied text from step 3)

            10. Click "Add" and then close the dialog


            Now, when you actualize the fields (e.g. press F9), the reference becomes 2.2 and you can add declined "Na slike".






            share|improve this answer


























            • "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

              – Pedro77
              May 2 '18 at 3:41


















            4














            The workaround with # 0.0 or # 0 in the answer above work only for one-digit numberings. (according to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2007-word/how-to-disply-figure-number-only-in-cross/02ae3cd0-6c3c-401d-990c-5220d7f0be1e).



            But you can use the "kludgy workaround": http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm



            In short, 10 simple steps:




            1. Use classic "Add cross reference" to Slika 2.2

            2. Press Shift+F9 to show field code. You shoud see something like { REF _Ref107244825 } instead of Slika 2.2.

            3. Select and copy the _Ref107244825 part.

            4. Press Shift+F9 again.

            5. Go to the caption of Slika 2.2 (e.g. by Ctrl+click on the inserted reference)

            6. Select the 2.2 part of the caption

            7. Open the "Insert bookmark" dialog

            8. In the dialog, check the "Show hidden bookmarks" checkbox

            9. Find the _Ref107244825 (you can e.g. paste the copied text from step 3)

            10. Click "Add" and then close the dialog


            Now, when you actualize the fields (e.g. press F9), the reference becomes 2.2 and you can add declined "Na slike".






            share|improve this answer


























            • "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

              – Pedro77
              May 2 '18 at 3:41
















            4












            4








            4







            The workaround with # 0.0 or # 0 in the answer above work only for one-digit numberings. (according to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2007-word/how-to-disply-figure-number-only-in-cross/02ae3cd0-6c3c-401d-990c-5220d7f0be1e).



            But you can use the "kludgy workaround": http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm



            In short, 10 simple steps:




            1. Use classic "Add cross reference" to Slika 2.2

            2. Press Shift+F9 to show field code. You shoud see something like { REF _Ref107244825 } instead of Slika 2.2.

            3. Select and copy the _Ref107244825 part.

            4. Press Shift+F9 again.

            5. Go to the caption of Slika 2.2 (e.g. by Ctrl+click on the inserted reference)

            6. Select the 2.2 part of the caption

            7. Open the "Insert bookmark" dialog

            8. In the dialog, check the "Show hidden bookmarks" checkbox

            9. Find the _Ref107244825 (you can e.g. paste the copied text from step 3)

            10. Click "Add" and then close the dialog


            Now, when you actualize the fields (e.g. press F9), the reference becomes 2.2 and you can add declined "Na slike".






            share|improve this answer















            The workaround with # 0.0 or # 0 in the answer above work only for one-digit numberings. (according to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2007-word/how-to-disply-figure-number-only-in-cross/02ae3cd0-6c3c-401d-990c-5220d7f0be1e).



            But you can use the "kludgy workaround": http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm



            In short, 10 simple steps:




            1. Use classic "Add cross reference" to Slika 2.2

            2. Press Shift+F9 to show field code. You shoud see something like { REF _Ref107244825 } instead of Slika 2.2.

            3. Select and copy the _Ref107244825 part.

            4. Press Shift+F9 again.

            5. Go to the caption of Slika 2.2 (e.g. by Ctrl+click on the inserted reference)

            6. Select the 2.2 part of the caption

            7. Open the "Insert bookmark" dialog

            8. In the dialog, check the "Show hidden bookmarks" checkbox

            9. Find the _Ref107244825 (you can e.g. paste the copied text from step 3)

            10. Click "Add" and then close the dialog


            Now, when you actualize the fields (e.g. press F9), the reference becomes 2.2 and you can add declined "Na slike".







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Oct 15 '13 at 11:09

























            answered Oct 15 '13 at 9:33









            Michal KováčMichal Kováč

            1414




            1414













            • "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

              – Pedro77
              May 2 '18 at 3:41





















            • "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

              – Pedro77
              May 2 '18 at 3:41



















            "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

            – Pedro77
            May 2 '18 at 3:41







            "# 0" works for multiple digits. You can also use "* arabic". But I don't know about chapter numbers.

            – Pedro77
            May 2 '18 at 3:41















            1














            Instead of # 0, try adding # 0.0. That way, you would only get the paragraph.number format (so, the actuall hyperlink would only include the "2.2" part, and you would add the "slika" part as plain text in front).



            If you would like to add some text inside the hyperlink (so a wider area than 3-4 characters is clickable), I suggest adding it as custom text, enclosed in single-quotes:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'na slici' 0.0" h }


            So, the example you mentioned would look like this:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'['0.0']'" h }


            P.S. Don't forget that if you want to add multiple things to the # declaration, you have to enclose them in double-quotes.





            Sources:




            • http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/combinexrefs.htm

            • http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/insert-and-format-field-codes-in-word-2007-HA010338798.aspx






            share|improve this answer



















            • 2





              I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Feb 28 '13 at 19:55











            • Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

              – Mandark
              Mar 1 '13 at 18:54








            • 1





              It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Mar 2 '13 at 0:52











            • Have you found the solution yet?

              – Michal Kováč
              Oct 14 '13 at 9:14











            • I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

              – Florian Jenn
              Oct 14 '14 at 16:48
















            1














            Instead of # 0, try adding # 0.0. That way, you would only get the paragraph.number format (so, the actuall hyperlink would only include the "2.2" part, and you would add the "slika" part as plain text in front).



            If you would like to add some text inside the hyperlink (so a wider area than 3-4 characters is clickable), I suggest adding it as custom text, enclosed in single-quotes:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'na slici' 0.0" h }


            So, the example you mentioned would look like this:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'['0.0']'" h }


            P.S. Don't forget that if you want to add multiple things to the # declaration, you have to enclose them in double-quotes.





            Sources:




            • http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/combinexrefs.htm

            • http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/insert-and-format-field-codes-in-word-2007-HA010338798.aspx






            share|improve this answer



















            • 2





              I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Feb 28 '13 at 19:55











            • Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

              – Mandark
              Mar 1 '13 at 18:54








            • 1





              It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Mar 2 '13 at 0:52











            • Have you found the solution yet?

              – Michal Kováč
              Oct 14 '13 at 9:14











            • I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

              – Florian Jenn
              Oct 14 '14 at 16:48














            1












            1








            1







            Instead of # 0, try adding # 0.0. That way, you would only get the paragraph.number format (so, the actuall hyperlink would only include the "2.2" part, and you would add the "slika" part as plain text in front).



            If you would like to add some text inside the hyperlink (so a wider area than 3-4 characters is clickable), I suggest adding it as custom text, enclosed in single-quotes:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'na slici' 0.0" h }


            So, the example you mentioned would look like this:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'['0.0']'" h }


            P.S. Don't forget that if you want to add multiple things to the # declaration, you have to enclose them in double-quotes.





            Sources:




            • http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/combinexrefs.htm

            • http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/insert-and-format-field-codes-in-word-2007-HA010338798.aspx






            share|improve this answer













            Instead of # 0, try adding # 0.0. That way, you would only get the paragraph.number format (so, the actuall hyperlink would only include the "2.2" part, and you would add the "slika" part as plain text in front).



            If you would like to add some text inside the hyperlink (so a wider area than 3-4 characters is clickable), I suggest adding it as custom text, enclosed in single-quotes:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'na slici' 0.0" h }


            So, the example you mentioned would look like this:



            { REF _Ref334952863 # "'['0.0']'" h }


            P.S. Don't forget that if you want to add multiple things to the # declaration, you have to enclose them in double-quotes.





            Sources:




            • http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/combinexrefs.htm

            • http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/insert-and-format-field-codes-in-word-2007-HA010338798.aspx







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Feb 28 '13 at 13:25









            MandarkMandark

            1192




            1192








            • 2





              I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Feb 28 '13 at 19:55











            • Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

              – Mandark
              Mar 1 '13 at 18:54








            • 1





              It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Mar 2 '13 at 0:52











            • Have you found the solution yet?

              – Michal Kováč
              Oct 14 '13 at 9:14











            • I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

              – Florian Jenn
              Oct 14 '14 at 16:48














            • 2





              I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Feb 28 '13 at 19:55











            • Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

              – Mandark
              Mar 1 '13 at 18:54








            • 1





              It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

              – Bojan Kogoj
              Mar 2 '13 at 0:52











            • Have you found the solution yet?

              – Michal Kováč
              Oct 14 '13 at 9:14











            • I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

              – Florian Jenn
              Oct 14 '14 at 16:48








            2




            2





            I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

            – Bojan Kogoj
            Feb 28 '13 at 19:55





            I only get 01, 02, the first number is always 0

            – Bojan Kogoj
            Feb 28 '13 at 19:55













            Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

            – Mandark
            Mar 1 '13 at 18:54







            Well, are you sure you "told" word that you've started a new chapter by using the apropriate style? By default, this is "Heading 1". All figures inserted before the begining of the first chapter would be labeled with a leading zero.

            – Mandark
            Mar 1 '13 at 18:54






            1




            1





            It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

            – Bojan Kogoj
            Mar 2 '13 at 0:52





            It just doesn't work. All i get is [01],[02]. I can get the dot by putting it into single quote. I used heading 1 and there was no effect

            – Bojan Kogoj
            Mar 2 '13 at 0:52













            Have you found the solution yet?

            – Michal Kováč
            Oct 14 '13 at 9:14





            Have you found the solution yet?

            – Michal Kováč
            Oct 14 '13 at 9:14













            I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

            – Florian Jenn
            Oct 14 '14 at 16:48





            I’ve seen this solution in several places on the web. Either it does not work at all and everybody copies it without checking, or it only works in English. (There’s a decimal point involved, so I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft to mess this up.)

            – Florian Jenn
            Oct 14 '14 at 16:48











            0














            I came up with a little workaround for this problem. It's not the neatest solution but it works if you need this feature desperately. It works with figures, tables, whatever. What i do is:



            Suppose i have a figure followed by the figure title which is something like:
            Figure 5.23 Effect of temperature on parameter Z



            I create a 2-columned, single row table where i
            - type "Figure" on the leftmost cell
            - insert the caption (in this case 5.23) followed by the title text in the right cell



            Then i just put the table really close to my figure so that i don't end up with an ugly gap between the figure and the figure title.



            Essentially, this separates the word "Figure" from the caption so you can type whatever you want before your cross-references. The only downside is that if you create a Table of Figures, you will have to type the word "Figure" to the left of the figure reference number by hand for every single figure but that's not a deal breaker in my opinion. Cheers.






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              I came up with a little workaround for this problem. It's not the neatest solution but it works if you need this feature desperately. It works with figures, tables, whatever. What i do is:



              Suppose i have a figure followed by the figure title which is something like:
              Figure 5.23 Effect of temperature on parameter Z



              I create a 2-columned, single row table where i
              - type "Figure" on the leftmost cell
              - insert the caption (in this case 5.23) followed by the title text in the right cell



              Then i just put the table really close to my figure so that i don't end up with an ugly gap between the figure and the figure title.



              Essentially, this separates the word "Figure" from the caption so you can type whatever you want before your cross-references. The only downside is that if you create a Table of Figures, you will have to type the word "Figure" to the left of the figure reference number by hand for every single figure but that's not a deal breaker in my opinion. Cheers.






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                I came up with a little workaround for this problem. It's not the neatest solution but it works if you need this feature desperately. It works with figures, tables, whatever. What i do is:



                Suppose i have a figure followed by the figure title which is something like:
                Figure 5.23 Effect of temperature on parameter Z



                I create a 2-columned, single row table where i
                - type "Figure" on the leftmost cell
                - insert the caption (in this case 5.23) followed by the title text in the right cell



                Then i just put the table really close to my figure so that i don't end up with an ugly gap between the figure and the figure title.



                Essentially, this separates the word "Figure" from the caption so you can type whatever you want before your cross-references. The only downside is that if you create a Table of Figures, you will have to type the word "Figure" to the left of the figure reference number by hand for every single figure but that's not a deal breaker in my opinion. Cheers.






                share|improve this answer













                I came up with a little workaround for this problem. It's not the neatest solution but it works if you need this feature desperately. It works with figures, tables, whatever. What i do is:



                Suppose i have a figure followed by the figure title which is something like:
                Figure 5.23 Effect of temperature on parameter Z



                I create a 2-columned, single row table where i
                - type "Figure" on the leftmost cell
                - insert the caption (in this case 5.23) followed by the title text in the right cell



                Then i just put the table really close to my figure so that i don't end up with an ugly gap between the figure and the figure title.



                Essentially, this separates the word "Figure" from the caption so you can type whatever you want before your cross-references. The only downside is that if you create a Table of Figures, you will have to type the word "Figure" to the left of the figure reference number by hand for every single figure but that's not a deal breaker in my opinion. Cheers.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 26 '13 at 2:39









                panoskolpanoskol

                1




                1






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f474503%2fword-2010-cross-reference-number-with-chapter-without-label%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix

                    “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis