Are the Complex Numbers Isomorphic to the Polynomials, mod $x^2+1$?












1












$begingroup$


My friend told me that the Complex Numbers are Isomorphic to the Polynomials mod $x^2+1$, is this so? And how can this be proved?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The graph isomorphism tag refers (I think) to a certain problem in Graph Theory.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    Intuitively: since we are modding out by a quadratic, all our elements are linear, that is $a + bx$. Next, since $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in this ring, $x^2 = -1$, so $x$ behaves like the $i$ from $mathbb{C}$. For a proof, see the answer by @N.S. .
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Swanson
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    @HenrySwanson:that means 3+2i is equivalent to 3+2x
    $endgroup$
    – P.Styles
    Jun 9 '16 at 19:15
















1












$begingroup$


My friend told me that the Complex Numbers are Isomorphic to the Polynomials mod $x^2+1$, is this so? And how can this be proved?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The graph isomorphism tag refers (I think) to a certain problem in Graph Theory.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    Intuitively: since we are modding out by a quadratic, all our elements are linear, that is $a + bx$. Next, since $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in this ring, $x^2 = -1$, so $x$ behaves like the $i$ from $mathbb{C}$. For a proof, see the answer by @N.S. .
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Swanson
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    @HenrySwanson:that means 3+2i is equivalent to 3+2x
    $endgroup$
    – P.Styles
    Jun 9 '16 at 19:15














1












1








1


2



$begingroup$


My friend told me that the Complex Numbers are Isomorphic to the Polynomials mod $x^2+1$, is this so? And how can this be proved?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My friend told me that the Complex Numbers are Isomorphic to the Polynomials mod $x^2+1$, is this so? And how can this be proved?







polynomials complex-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 30 '18 at 15:36









Namaste

1




1










asked Sep 17 '13 at 21:11







user82004



















  • $begingroup$
    The graph isomorphism tag refers (I think) to a certain problem in Graph Theory.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    Intuitively: since we are modding out by a quadratic, all our elements are linear, that is $a + bx$. Next, since $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in this ring, $x^2 = -1$, so $x$ behaves like the $i$ from $mathbb{C}$. For a proof, see the answer by @N.S. .
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Swanson
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    @HenrySwanson:that means 3+2i is equivalent to 3+2x
    $endgroup$
    – P.Styles
    Jun 9 '16 at 19:15


















  • $begingroup$
    The graph isomorphism tag refers (I think) to a certain problem in Graph Theory.
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    Intuitively: since we are modding out by a quadratic, all our elements are linear, that is $a + bx$. Next, since $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in this ring, $x^2 = -1$, so $x$ behaves like the $i$ from $mathbb{C}$. For a proof, see the answer by @N.S. .
    $endgroup$
    – Henry Swanson
    Sep 17 '13 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    @HenrySwanson:that means 3+2i is equivalent to 3+2x
    $endgroup$
    – P.Styles
    Jun 9 '16 at 19:15
















$begingroup$
The graph isomorphism tag refers (I think) to a certain problem in Graph Theory.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Sep 17 '13 at 21:16




$begingroup$
The graph isomorphism tag refers (I think) to a certain problem in Graph Theory.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Sep 17 '13 at 21:16












$begingroup$
Intuitively: since we are modding out by a quadratic, all our elements are linear, that is $a + bx$. Next, since $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in this ring, $x^2 = -1$, so $x$ behaves like the $i$ from $mathbb{C}$. For a proof, see the answer by @N.S. .
$endgroup$
– Henry Swanson
Sep 17 '13 at 21:22




$begingroup$
Intuitively: since we are modding out by a quadratic, all our elements are linear, that is $a + bx$. Next, since $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in this ring, $x^2 = -1$, so $x$ behaves like the $i$ from $mathbb{C}$. For a proof, see the answer by @N.S. .
$endgroup$
– Henry Swanson
Sep 17 '13 at 21:22












$begingroup$
@HenrySwanson:that means 3+2i is equivalent to 3+2x
$endgroup$
– P.Styles
Jun 9 '16 at 19:15




$begingroup$
@HenrySwanson:that means 3+2i is equivalent to 3+2x
$endgroup$
– P.Styles
Jun 9 '16 at 19:15










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Let $phi : mathbb R[x] to mathbb C$ be defined by $phi(P)=P(i)$.



This can be proven to be ring/group morphism, which is onto and $ker(phi)=langle x^2+1 rangle$. Apply the first isomorphism theorem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    $Bbb R[x]$ is a PID so every prime ideal is maximal. $x^2+1$ is irreducible over $Bbb R[x]$, and therefore $(x^2+1)$ is a maximal ideal, so $Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field.



    Now, consider the evaluation homomorphism $phi: Bbb R[x]rightarrowBbb C$, such that $phi(f)=f(i)$.



    It is clear that $(x^2+1)subseteqker(phi)$, and equality follows since $(x^2+1)$ is maximal. From the 1st isomorphism theorem, we have $$Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)congBbb C$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496781%2fare-the-complex-numbers-isomorphic-to-the-polynomials-mod-x21%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown
























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      Let $phi : mathbb R[x] to mathbb C$ be defined by $phi(P)=P(i)$.



      This can be proven to be ring/group morphism, which is onto and $ker(phi)=langle x^2+1 rangle$. Apply the first isomorphism theorem.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        5












        $begingroup$

        Let $phi : mathbb R[x] to mathbb C$ be defined by $phi(P)=P(i)$.



        This can be proven to be ring/group morphism, which is onto and $ker(phi)=langle x^2+1 rangle$. Apply the first isomorphism theorem.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Let $phi : mathbb R[x] to mathbb C$ be defined by $phi(P)=P(i)$.



          This can be proven to be ring/group morphism, which is onto and $ker(phi)=langle x^2+1 rangle$. Apply the first isomorphism theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $phi : mathbb R[x] to mathbb C$ be defined by $phi(P)=P(i)$.



          This can be proven to be ring/group morphism, which is onto and $ker(phi)=langle x^2+1 rangle$. Apply the first isomorphism theorem.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 17 '13 at 21:25









          mrf

          37.6k64786




          37.6k64786










          answered Sep 17 '13 at 21:15









          N. S.N. S.

          104k7114209




          104k7114209























              0












              $begingroup$

              $Bbb R[x]$ is a PID so every prime ideal is maximal. $x^2+1$ is irreducible over $Bbb R[x]$, and therefore $(x^2+1)$ is a maximal ideal, so $Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field.



              Now, consider the evaluation homomorphism $phi: Bbb R[x]rightarrowBbb C$, such that $phi(f)=f(i)$.



              It is clear that $(x^2+1)subseteqker(phi)$, and equality follows since $(x^2+1)$ is maximal. From the 1st isomorphism theorem, we have $$Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)congBbb C$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                $Bbb R[x]$ is a PID so every prime ideal is maximal. $x^2+1$ is irreducible over $Bbb R[x]$, and therefore $(x^2+1)$ is a maximal ideal, so $Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field.



                Now, consider the evaluation homomorphism $phi: Bbb R[x]rightarrowBbb C$, such that $phi(f)=f(i)$.



                It is clear that $(x^2+1)subseteqker(phi)$, and equality follows since $(x^2+1)$ is maximal. From the 1st isomorphism theorem, we have $$Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)congBbb C$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  $Bbb R[x]$ is a PID so every prime ideal is maximal. $x^2+1$ is irreducible over $Bbb R[x]$, and therefore $(x^2+1)$ is a maximal ideal, so $Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field.



                  Now, consider the evaluation homomorphism $phi: Bbb R[x]rightarrowBbb C$, such that $phi(f)=f(i)$.



                  It is clear that $(x^2+1)subseteqker(phi)$, and equality follows since $(x^2+1)$ is maximal. From the 1st isomorphism theorem, we have $$Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)congBbb C$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $Bbb R[x]$ is a PID so every prime ideal is maximal. $x^2+1$ is irreducible over $Bbb R[x]$, and therefore $(x^2+1)$ is a maximal ideal, so $Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field.



                  Now, consider the evaluation homomorphism $phi: Bbb R[x]rightarrowBbb C$, such that $phi(f)=f(i)$.



                  It is clear that $(x^2+1)subseteqker(phi)$, and equality follows since $(x^2+1)$ is maximal. From the 1st isomorphism theorem, we have $$Bbb R[x]/(x^2+1)congBbb C$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 6 '18 at 16:42









                  cansomeonehelpmeoutcansomeonehelpmeout

                  7,1273935




                  7,1273935






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496781%2fare-the-complex-numbers-isomorphic-to-the-polynomials-mod-x21%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix

                      “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis