Proof that $x^{(n+4)} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$












6












$begingroup$


While solving a programming challenge in which one should efficiently compute the last digit of $a^b$, I noticed that apparently the following holds (for $n > 0$)



$x^{(n+4)} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$



How can this be proven?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    the standard notation is just $x^{n+4}equiv x^nbmod 10$. When working with the modulus we only write $bmod 10$ at the end of each line of identities, you dont need to repeat $bmod 10$ next to every quantity
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry for a digression to the notation issues. @Masacroso I'd say that both notations are quite common: mod is sometimes used to denote a binary operation - in which case bmod is used: $x^n bmod 10$ $x^n bmod 10$. But if we user congruences, the command pmod is used to get something like $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$ $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:59


















6












$begingroup$


While solving a programming challenge in which one should efficiently compute the last digit of $a^b$, I noticed that apparently the following holds (for $n > 0$)



$x^{(n+4)} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$



How can this be proven?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    the standard notation is just $x^{n+4}equiv x^nbmod 10$. When working with the modulus we only write $bmod 10$ at the end of each line of identities, you dont need to repeat $bmod 10$ next to every quantity
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry for a digression to the notation issues. @Masacroso I'd say that both notations are quite common: mod is sometimes used to denote a binary operation - in which case bmod is used: $x^n bmod 10$ $x^n bmod 10$. But if we user congruences, the command pmod is used to get something like $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$ $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:59
















6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


While solving a programming challenge in which one should efficiently compute the last digit of $a^b$, I noticed that apparently the following holds (for $n > 0$)



$x^{(n+4)} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$



How can this be proven?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




While solving a programming challenge in which one should efficiently compute the last digit of $a^b$, I noticed that apparently the following holds (for $n > 0$)



$x^{(n+4)} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$



How can this be proven?







elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic exponentiation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 9:01









Martin Sleziak

44.8k10119273




44.8k10119273










asked Dec 24 '18 at 5:36









Andreas FinklerAndreas Finkler

1334




1334








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    the standard notation is just $x^{n+4}equiv x^nbmod 10$. When working with the modulus we only write $bmod 10$ at the end of each line of identities, you dont need to repeat $bmod 10$ next to every quantity
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry for a digression to the notation issues. @Masacroso I'd say that both notations are quite common: mod is sometimes used to denote a binary operation - in which case bmod is used: $x^n bmod 10$ $x^n bmod 10$. But if we user congruences, the command pmod is used to get something like $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$ $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:59
















  • 4




    $begingroup$
    the standard notation is just $x^{n+4}equiv x^nbmod 10$. When working with the modulus we only write $bmod 10$ at the end of each line of identities, you dont need to repeat $bmod 10$ next to every quantity
    $endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry for a digression to the notation issues. @Masacroso I'd say that both notations are quite common: mod is sometimes used to denote a binary operation - in which case bmod is used: $x^n bmod 10$ $x^n bmod 10$. But if we user congruences, the command pmod is used to get something like $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$ $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:59










4




4




$begingroup$
the standard notation is just $x^{n+4}equiv x^nbmod 10$. When working with the modulus we only write $bmod 10$ at the end of each line of identities, you dont need to repeat $bmod 10$ next to every quantity
$endgroup$
– Masacroso
Dec 24 '18 at 5:59




$begingroup$
the standard notation is just $x^{n+4}equiv x^nbmod 10$. When working with the modulus we only write $bmod 10$ at the end of each line of identities, you dont need to repeat $bmod 10$ next to every quantity
$endgroup$
– Masacroso
Dec 24 '18 at 5:59




1




1




$begingroup$
Sorry for a digression to the notation issues. @Masacroso I'd say that both notations are quite common: mod is sometimes used to denote a binary operation - in which case bmod is used: $x^n bmod 10$ $x^n bmod 10$. But if we user congruences, the command pmod is used to get something like $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$ $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 24 '18 at 8:59






$begingroup$
Sorry for a digression to the notation issues. @Masacroso I'd say that both notations are quite common: mod is sometimes used to denote a binary operation - in which case bmod is used: $x^n bmod 10$ $x^n bmod 10$. But if we user congruences, the command pmod is used to get something like $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$ $x^{n+4}equiv x^n pmod{10}$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 24 '18 at 8:59












7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Consider how the difference, i.e.,
$$x^{n + 4} - x^{n} = x^{n} left( x^4 - 1 right) = x^{n} left( x^2 - 1 right) left( x^2 + 1 right)$$
behaves for all cases of $x mod 10$ from $0$ to $9$, inclusive. For $x$ being $0$, the result is $0$. For $x$ being an even positive value, then $x^n$ is a multiple of 2, while either $x^2 + 1$ or $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of 5, so together are a multiple of $10$. Finally, for $x$ being an odd value, consider the cases:



$1$: $x^2 - 1$ is $0$



$3$: $x^2 + 1$ is $10$, i.e., $0 mod 10$



$5$: $x^n$ is a multiple of $5$ and $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of $2$, so together shows congruent to $0$



$7$: $x^2 + 1$ is $50$



$9$: $x^2 - 1$ is $80$



This shows that the result is congruent to $0$ in all cases. The other answers here are generally shorter and simpler, so they're better if you're able to use them. However, this is a fairly general way to check basically any congruence operation where ever it can be relatively easily used (e.g., where the mod divisor is not a variable or too large).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 25 '18 at 19:03












  • $begingroup$
    @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Dec 25 '18 at 23:35










  • $begingroup$
    Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
    $endgroup$
    – Björn Lindqvist
    Dec 26 '18 at 2:15










  • $begingroup$
    @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 2:17





















8












$begingroup$

$x^4equiv1pmod{10}$ for $x$ and $10$ coprime, by Euler's theorem, since $varphi (10)=4$.



(The proof for $x$ not coprime to $10$ can be found in some of the other answers here.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:42












  • $begingroup$
    @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:48










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 25 '18 at 17:55





















2












$begingroup$

This is true because of the periodicity of the last digits of numbers raised to powers. if you check cor $x=2,3,4ldots n$ you will see that after every $4$th power the last digit is the same, $2^1 = 2$ and $2^5 = 32$ thus the last digit is the same. $x^n mod 10$ is essentially asking for the last digit. Thus, $$x^{n+4} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$$
Some numbers have a periodicity of $2$ when raised to powers, for example, $9$ but the unit digit is still the same as the first power as the first.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
    $endgroup$
    – Hubble
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:51










  • $begingroup$
    Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
    $endgroup$
    – Prakhar Nagpal
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:52





















2












$begingroup$

We want to show that $x^{n+4}-x^n=x^n(x^4-1)$ is a multiple of $10$.



We first notice that if $x^n$ is odd then $x^4-1$ will be even and vice versa. Consequently, the product will always be even.



If $x$ is divisible by $5$ then the product is divisible by $10$ because we have an even product which is divisible by $5$.



If $x$ is not divisible by $5$ then $x=5m+k$ for some $m$ and $k$ where $kin{1,2,3,4}$.



Now, $x^4-1=(5m)^4+4(5m)^3k+6(5m)^2k^2+4(5m)k^3+k^4-1$ and every term is divisible by $5$ with the possible exception of $k^4-1$.



But there are only four values of $k$ and if you raise each to the fourth power and subtract $1$ you get a multiple of $5$. Once again, this gives us an even number divisible by $5$ which is a multiple of $10$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    It is the special case $,p,q,k = 2,5,4,$ below.



    Lemma $,pneq q,$ primes and $, color{#c00}{p!-!1,,q!-!1mid k} $ $Rightarrow, pqmidsmash[t]{overbrace{ x^n(x^k!-!1)}^{Large a}},$ for all $,x,$ and $,n>0$



    Proof $ $ $,p,q,$ are coprime so $,pqmid aiff p,qmid a,,$ by Euclid / unique factorization.



    When $, pmid x,$ then $,pmid xmid x^nmid a,$ by $,n>0,,$ hence $,pmid a,$ by transitivity of divisibility,



    $ $ else: $, pnmid x,$ so $!bmod p!: xnotequiv 0,$ so $,x^k equiv (color{#0a0}{x^{p-1}})^{smash[t]{Largecolor{#c00}{frac{k}{p-1}}}}!!equivcolor{#0a0} 1,$ by $rmcolor{#0a0}{Fermat},,$ so $,pmid x^k!-1mid a$.



    So in every case $,pmid a,,$ so $,qmid a,$ by $,p,q,$ symmetry (i.e. same proof works for $q). $





    Remark $ $ Above is a special case of this generalization of Euler-Fermat - which often proves handy.



    Theorem $ $ Suppose that $ min mathbb N $ has the prime factorization $:m = p_1^{e_{1}}cdots:p_k^{e_k} $ and suppose that for all $,i,,$ $ ege e_i $ and $ phi(p_i^{e_{i}})mid f. $ Then $ mmid a^e(a^f-1) $ for all $: ain mathbb Z.$



    Proof $ $ Notice that if $ p_imid a $ then $:p_i^{e_{i}}mid a^e $ by $ e_i le e.: $ Else $:a:$ is coprime to $: p_i:$ so by Euler's phi theorem, $!bmod q = p_i^{e_{i}}:, a^{phi(q)}equiv 1 Rightarrow a^fequiv 1, $ by $: phi(q)mid f. $ Since all $ p_i^{e_{i}} | a^e (a^f - 1) $ so too does their lcm = product = $m$.



    Examples $ $ You can find many illuminating examples in prior questions, e.g. below



    $24mid a^3(a^2-1)$



    $40mid a^3(a^4-1)$



    $88mid a^5(a^{20}-1)$



    $6pmid a,b^p - b,a^p$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      If you can prove $x^4 equiv 1 pmod {10}$ that's enough as $x^{n+4}equiv x^ncdot x^4 equiv x^ncdot 1equiv x^npmod {10}$



      If you google Euler's theorem that will be true for all numbers relatively prime to $10$. Intuitively (but hand wavy) if $x$ and $10$ are relatively prime then $x^n$ will be relatively prime. There are only $4$ possible last digits that are relatively prime to $10$ so $x^k$ will cycle through the same four digits. (More or less.)



      If $x$ is even or divisible by $5$. Well, if it's both then $x equiv 0 mod 10$ so $x^k equiv 0 pmod {10}$ and $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 0pmod {10}$. Likewise if it's odd but divisible by $5$ then $x^k equiv 5 pmod{10}$ and so $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 5 pmod {10}$.



      Now if $x$ is even but not divisible by $5$ then. Well, $x^n$ is even and there are only $4$ even digits it could end with and it cycles through them.



      More to the point $2*j pmod 10 equiv 2*(j pmod 5)$ and there are only $4$ non-zero classes $pmod 5$ so $x^k$ just cycles through those.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        1












        $begingroup$

        Because:



        $x^{n+4} = x^{n-1}x^5$
        $x^n = x^{n-1}x$

        ($abmod 10) = (a(bmod 10) mod 10)$



        ... you only have to prove that $(x^5 mod 10)=(xmod 10)$.



        ... which means: $((x mod 10)^5mod 10) = (x mod 10)$.



        Because there are only 10 possible values for $(x mod 10)$ these 10 values can be calculated directly:




        • $0^5mod 10=0 mod 10=0$

        • $1^5mod 10=1 mod 10=1$

        • $2^5mod 10=32 mod 10=2$


        • $3^5mod 10=243 mod 10=3$

          ...

        • $9^5mod 10=59049 mod 10=9$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050972%2fproof-that-xn4-mod-10-xn-mod-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes








          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          Consider how the difference, i.e.,
          $$x^{n + 4} - x^{n} = x^{n} left( x^4 - 1 right) = x^{n} left( x^2 - 1 right) left( x^2 + 1 right)$$
          behaves for all cases of $x mod 10$ from $0$ to $9$, inclusive. For $x$ being $0$, the result is $0$. For $x$ being an even positive value, then $x^n$ is a multiple of 2, while either $x^2 + 1$ or $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of 5, so together are a multiple of $10$. Finally, for $x$ being an odd value, consider the cases:



          $1$: $x^2 - 1$ is $0$



          $3$: $x^2 + 1$ is $10$, i.e., $0 mod 10$



          $5$: $x^n$ is a multiple of $5$ and $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of $2$, so together shows congruent to $0$



          $7$: $x^2 + 1$ is $50$



          $9$: $x^2 - 1$ is $80$



          This shows that the result is congruent to $0$ in all cases. The other answers here are generally shorter and simpler, so they're better if you're able to use them. However, this is a fairly general way to check basically any congruence operation where ever it can be relatively easily used (e.g., where the mod divisor is not a variable or too large).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:03












          • $begingroup$
            @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 25 '18 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
            $endgroup$
            – Björn Lindqvist
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:15










          • $begingroup$
            @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:17


















          6












          $begingroup$

          Consider how the difference, i.e.,
          $$x^{n + 4} - x^{n} = x^{n} left( x^4 - 1 right) = x^{n} left( x^2 - 1 right) left( x^2 + 1 right)$$
          behaves for all cases of $x mod 10$ from $0$ to $9$, inclusive. For $x$ being $0$, the result is $0$. For $x$ being an even positive value, then $x^n$ is a multiple of 2, while either $x^2 + 1$ or $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of 5, so together are a multiple of $10$. Finally, for $x$ being an odd value, consider the cases:



          $1$: $x^2 - 1$ is $0$



          $3$: $x^2 + 1$ is $10$, i.e., $0 mod 10$



          $5$: $x^n$ is a multiple of $5$ and $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of $2$, so together shows congruent to $0$



          $7$: $x^2 + 1$ is $50$



          $9$: $x^2 - 1$ is $80$



          This shows that the result is congruent to $0$ in all cases. The other answers here are generally shorter and simpler, so they're better if you're able to use them. However, this is a fairly general way to check basically any congruence operation where ever it can be relatively easily used (e.g., where the mod divisor is not a variable or too large).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:03












          • $begingroup$
            @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 25 '18 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
            $endgroup$
            – Björn Lindqvist
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:15










          • $begingroup$
            @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:17
















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          Consider how the difference, i.e.,
          $$x^{n + 4} - x^{n} = x^{n} left( x^4 - 1 right) = x^{n} left( x^2 - 1 right) left( x^2 + 1 right)$$
          behaves for all cases of $x mod 10$ from $0$ to $9$, inclusive. For $x$ being $0$, the result is $0$. For $x$ being an even positive value, then $x^n$ is a multiple of 2, while either $x^2 + 1$ or $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of 5, so together are a multiple of $10$. Finally, for $x$ being an odd value, consider the cases:



          $1$: $x^2 - 1$ is $0$



          $3$: $x^2 + 1$ is $10$, i.e., $0 mod 10$



          $5$: $x^n$ is a multiple of $5$ and $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of $2$, so together shows congruent to $0$



          $7$: $x^2 + 1$ is $50$



          $9$: $x^2 - 1$ is $80$



          This shows that the result is congruent to $0$ in all cases. The other answers here are generally shorter and simpler, so they're better if you're able to use them. However, this is a fairly general way to check basically any congruence operation where ever it can be relatively easily used (e.g., where the mod divisor is not a variable or too large).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Consider how the difference, i.e.,
          $$x^{n + 4} - x^{n} = x^{n} left( x^4 - 1 right) = x^{n} left( x^2 - 1 right) left( x^2 + 1 right)$$
          behaves for all cases of $x mod 10$ from $0$ to $9$, inclusive. For $x$ being $0$, the result is $0$. For $x$ being an even positive value, then $x^n$ is a multiple of 2, while either $x^2 + 1$ or $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of 5, so together are a multiple of $10$. Finally, for $x$ being an odd value, consider the cases:



          $1$: $x^2 - 1$ is $0$



          $3$: $x^2 + 1$ is $10$, i.e., $0 mod 10$



          $5$: $x^n$ is a multiple of $5$ and $x^2 - 1$ is a multiple of $2$, so together shows congruent to $0$



          $7$: $x^2 + 1$ is $50$



          $9$: $x^2 - 1$ is $80$



          This shows that the result is congruent to $0$ in all cases. The other answers here are generally shorter and simpler, so they're better if you're able to use them. However, this is a fairly general way to check basically any congruence operation where ever it can be relatively easily used (e.g., where the mod divisor is not a variable or too large).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 26 '18 at 1:19

























          answered Dec 24 '18 at 5:57









          John OmielanJohn Omielan

          3,8551215




          3,8551215












          • $begingroup$
            Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:03












          • $begingroup$
            @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 25 '18 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
            $endgroup$
            – Björn Lindqvist
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:15










          • $begingroup$
            @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:17




















          • $begingroup$
            Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 19:03












          • $begingroup$
            @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 25 '18 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
            $endgroup$
            – Björn Lindqvist
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:15










          • $begingroup$
            @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Dec 26 '18 at 2:17


















          $begingroup$
          Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:03






          $begingroup$
          Actually, a general method requires a general result like Fermat or Euler's theorem (I show one way in my answer). The above method works only in very special cases.
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 19:03














          $begingroup$
          @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Dec 25 '18 at 23:35




          $begingroup$
          @Bill Dubuque I meant "general" in a different way, in that directly or indirectly all results boil down to ensuring all the congruence values provide desired result such as I showed. You are right that my method will not work well, or at all, in many cases such as where the modulo value is variable or a very large value.
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Dec 25 '18 at 23:35












          $begingroup$
          Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
          $endgroup$
          – Björn Lindqvist
          Dec 26 '18 at 2:15




          $begingroup$
          Why do you only consider $x$ values 0..9?
          $endgroup$
          – Björn Lindqvist
          Dec 26 '18 at 2:15












          $begingroup$
          @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Dec 26 '18 at 2:17






          $begingroup$
          @Björn Lindqvist I only consider $x$ values $0ldots9$ since those are the only residue values $mod 10$, i.e., any other integer has a remainder which is one of these values when divided by 10. Also, only the last digit of any one of the number affects the final last value last digit, which is why we are working with $mod 10$.
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Dec 26 '18 at 2:17













          8












          $begingroup$

          $x^4equiv1pmod{10}$ for $x$ and $10$ coprime, by Euler's theorem, since $varphi (10)=4$.



          (The proof for $x$ not coprime to $10$ can be found in some of the other answers here.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:42












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:45










          • $begingroup$
            If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:46












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:48










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:55


















          8












          $begingroup$

          $x^4equiv1pmod{10}$ for $x$ and $10$ coprime, by Euler's theorem, since $varphi (10)=4$.



          (The proof for $x$ not coprime to $10$ can be found in some of the other answers here.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:42












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:45










          • $begingroup$
            If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:46












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:48










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:55
















          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          $x^4equiv1pmod{10}$ for $x$ and $10$ coprime, by Euler's theorem, since $varphi (10)=4$.



          (The proof for $x$ not coprime to $10$ can be found in some of the other answers here.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $x^4equiv1pmod{10}$ for $x$ and $10$ coprime, by Euler's theorem, since $varphi (10)=4$.



          (The proof for $x$ not coprime to $10$ can be found in some of the other answers here.)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 25 '18 at 17:50

























          answered Dec 24 '18 at 5:48









          Chris CusterChris Custer

          14.2k3827




          14.2k3827












          • $begingroup$
            But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:42












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:45










          • $begingroup$
            If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:46












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:48










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:55




















          • $begingroup$
            But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:42












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:45










          • $begingroup$
            If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:46












          • $begingroup$
            @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Custer
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:48










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:55


















          $begingroup$
          But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:42






          $begingroup$
          But $x$ is not assumed coprime to $10$ so the proof is either incomplete or incorrect.
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:42














          $begingroup$
          @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:45




          $begingroup$
          @BillDubuque. It's incomplete. It is apparent from the other answers that this is actually true in general.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:45












          $begingroup$
          If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:46






          $begingroup$
          If your proof relies on other answers then you should explicitly mention that, Otherwise the answer could wrongly mislead readers into thinking that nothing more needs to be said (given the nuymber of votes I suspect this did actually occur).
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:46














          $begingroup$
          @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:48




          $begingroup$
          @BillDubuque. Ok, will do.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:48












          $begingroup$
          Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:55






          $begingroup$
          Thanks for adding the note. Btw, note that your answer was posted first so readers could not have relied on other answers for this crucial fact.
          $endgroup$
          – Bill Dubuque
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:55













          2












          $begingroup$

          This is true because of the periodicity of the last digits of numbers raised to powers. if you check cor $x=2,3,4ldots n$ you will see that after every $4$th power the last digit is the same, $2^1 = 2$ and $2^5 = 32$ thus the last digit is the same. $x^n mod 10$ is essentially asking for the last digit. Thus, $$x^{n+4} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$$
          Some numbers have a periodicity of $2$ when raised to powers, for example, $9$ but the unit digit is still the same as the first power as the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
            $endgroup$
            – Hubble
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:51










          • $begingroup$
            Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Nagpal
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:52


















          2












          $begingroup$

          This is true because of the periodicity of the last digits of numbers raised to powers. if you check cor $x=2,3,4ldots n$ you will see that after every $4$th power the last digit is the same, $2^1 = 2$ and $2^5 = 32$ thus the last digit is the same. $x^n mod 10$ is essentially asking for the last digit. Thus, $$x^{n+4} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$$
          Some numbers have a periodicity of $2$ when raised to powers, for example, $9$ but the unit digit is still the same as the first power as the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
            $endgroup$
            – Hubble
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:51










          • $begingroup$
            Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Nagpal
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:52
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          This is true because of the periodicity of the last digits of numbers raised to powers. if you check cor $x=2,3,4ldots n$ you will see that after every $4$th power the last digit is the same, $2^1 = 2$ and $2^5 = 32$ thus the last digit is the same. $x^n mod 10$ is essentially asking for the last digit. Thus, $$x^{n+4} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$$
          Some numbers have a periodicity of $2$ when raised to powers, for example, $9$ but the unit digit is still the same as the first power as the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This is true because of the periodicity of the last digits of numbers raised to powers. if you check cor $x=2,3,4ldots n$ you will see that after every $4$th power the last digit is the same, $2^1 = 2$ and $2^5 = 32$ thus the last digit is the same. $x^n mod 10$ is essentially asking for the last digit. Thus, $$x^{n+4} mod 10 = x^n mod 10$$
          Some numbers have a periodicity of $2$ when raised to powers, for example, $9$ but the unit digit is still the same as the first power as the first.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 24 '18 at 5:51

























          answered Dec 24 '18 at 5:49









          Prakhar NagpalPrakhar Nagpal

          752318




          752318








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
            $endgroup$
            – Hubble
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:51










          • $begingroup$
            Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Nagpal
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:52
















          • 1




            $begingroup$
            While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
            $endgroup$
            – Hubble
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:51










          • $begingroup$
            Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Nagpal
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:52










          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
          $endgroup$
          – Hubble
          Dec 24 '18 at 5:51




          $begingroup$
          While your argument is true, this isn't a proof per se.
          $endgroup$
          – Hubble
          Dec 24 '18 at 5:51












          $begingroup$
          Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
          $endgroup$
          – Prakhar Nagpal
          Dec 24 '18 at 5:52






          $begingroup$
          Can it be written in such a way to make it a proof, or is just a logic?
          $endgroup$
          – Prakhar Nagpal
          Dec 24 '18 at 5:52













          2












          $begingroup$

          We want to show that $x^{n+4}-x^n=x^n(x^4-1)$ is a multiple of $10$.



          We first notice that if $x^n$ is odd then $x^4-1$ will be even and vice versa. Consequently, the product will always be even.



          If $x$ is divisible by $5$ then the product is divisible by $10$ because we have an even product which is divisible by $5$.



          If $x$ is not divisible by $5$ then $x=5m+k$ for some $m$ and $k$ where $kin{1,2,3,4}$.



          Now, $x^4-1=(5m)^4+4(5m)^3k+6(5m)^2k^2+4(5m)k^3+k^4-1$ and every term is divisible by $5$ with the possible exception of $k^4-1$.



          But there are only four values of $k$ and if you raise each to the fourth power and subtract $1$ you get a multiple of $5$. Once again, this gives us an even number divisible by $5$ which is a multiple of $10$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$


















            2












            $begingroup$

            We want to show that $x^{n+4}-x^n=x^n(x^4-1)$ is a multiple of $10$.



            We first notice that if $x^n$ is odd then $x^4-1$ will be even and vice versa. Consequently, the product will always be even.



            If $x$ is divisible by $5$ then the product is divisible by $10$ because we have an even product which is divisible by $5$.



            If $x$ is not divisible by $5$ then $x=5m+k$ for some $m$ and $k$ where $kin{1,2,3,4}$.



            Now, $x^4-1=(5m)^4+4(5m)^3k+6(5m)^2k^2+4(5m)k^3+k^4-1$ and every term is divisible by $5$ with the possible exception of $k^4-1$.



            But there are only four values of $k$ and if you raise each to the fourth power and subtract $1$ you get a multiple of $5$. Once again, this gives us an even number divisible by $5$ which is a multiple of $10$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$
















              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              We want to show that $x^{n+4}-x^n=x^n(x^4-1)$ is a multiple of $10$.



              We first notice that if $x^n$ is odd then $x^4-1$ will be even and vice versa. Consequently, the product will always be even.



              If $x$ is divisible by $5$ then the product is divisible by $10$ because we have an even product which is divisible by $5$.



              If $x$ is not divisible by $5$ then $x=5m+k$ for some $m$ and $k$ where $kin{1,2,3,4}$.



              Now, $x^4-1=(5m)^4+4(5m)^3k+6(5m)^2k^2+4(5m)k^3+k^4-1$ and every term is divisible by $5$ with the possible exception of $k^4-1$.



              But there are only four values of $k$ and if you raise each to the fourth power and subtract $1$ you get a multiple of $5$. Once again, this gives us an even number divisible by $5$ which is a multiple of $10$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              We want to show that $x^{n+4}-x^n=x^n(x^4-1)$ is a multiple of $10$.



              We first notice that if $x^n$ is odd then $x^4-1$ will be even and vice versa. Consequently, the product will always be even.



              If $x$ is divisible by $5$ then the product is divisible by $10$ because we have an even product which is divisible by $5$.



              If $x$ is not divisible by $5$ then $x=5m+k$ for some $m$ and $k$ where $kin{1,2,3,4}$.



              Now, $x^4-1=(5m)^4+4(5m)^3k+6(5m)^2k^2+4(5m)k^3+k^4-1$ and every term is divisible by $5$ with the possible exception of $k^4-1$.



              But there are only four values of $k$ and if you raise each to the fourth power and subtract $1$ you get a multiple of $5$. Once again, this gives us an even number divisible by $5$ which is a multiple of $10$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 24 '18 at 7:10









              John DoumaJohn Douma

              5,59711419




              5,59711419























                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  It is the special case $,p,q,k = 2,5,4,$ below.



                  Lemma $,pneq q,$ primes and $, color{#c00}{p!-!1,,q!-!1mid k} $ $Rightarrow, pqmidsmash[t]{overbrace{ x^n(x^k!-!1)}^{Large a}},$ for all $,x,$ and $,n>0$



                  Proof $ $ $,p,q,$ are coprime so $,pqmid aiff p,qmid a,,$ by Euclid / unique factorization.



                  When $, pmid x,$ then $,pmid xmid x^nmid a,$ by $,n>0,,$ hence $,pmid a,$ by transitivity of divisibility,



                  $ $ else: $, pnmid x,$ so $!bmod p!: xnotequiv 0,$ so $,x^k equiv (color{#0a0}{x^{p-1}})^{smash[t]{Largecolor{#c00}{frac{k}{p-1}}}}!!equivcolor{#0a0} 1,$ by $rmcolor{#0a0}{Fermat},,$ so $,pmid x^k!-1mid a$.



                  So in every case $,pmid a,,$ so $,qmid a,$ by $,p,q,$ symmetry (i.e. same proof works for $q). $





                  Remark $ $ Above is a special case of this generalization of Euler-Fermat - which often proves handy.



                  Theorem $ $ Suppose that $ min mathbb N $ has the prime factorization $:m = p_1^{e_{1}}cdots:p_k^{e_k} $ and suppose that for all $,i,,$ $ ege e_i $ and $ phi(p_i^{e_{i}})mid f. $ Then $ mmid a^e(a^f-1) $ for all $: ain mathbb Z.$



                  Proof $ $ Notice that if $ p_imid a $ then $:p_i^{e_{i}}mid a^e $ by $ e_i le e.: $ Else $:a:$ is coprime to $: p_i:$ so by Euler's phi theorem, $!bmod q = p_i^{e_{i}}:, a^{phi(q)}equiv 1 Rightarrow a^fequiv 1, $ by $: phi(q)mid f. $ Since all $ p_i^{e_{i}} | a^e (a^f - 1) $ so too does their lcm = product = $m$.



                  Examples $ $ You can find many illuminating examples in prior questions, e.g. below



                  $24mid a^3(a^2-1)$



                  $40mid a^3(a^4-1)$



                  $88mid a^5(a^{20}-1)$



                  $6pmid a,b^p - b,a^p$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It is the special case $,p,q,k = 2,5,4,$ below.



                    Lemma $,pneq q,$ primes and $, color{#c00}{p!-!1,,q!-!1mid k} $ $Rightarrow, pqmidsmash[t]{overbrace{ x^n(x^k!-!1)}^{Large a}},$ for all $,x,$ and $,n>0$



                    Proof $ $ $,p,q,$ are coprime so $,pqmid aiff p,qmid a,,$ by Euclid / unique factorization.



                    When $, pmid x,$ then $,pmid xmid x^nmid a,$ by $,n>0,,$ hence $,pmid a,$ by transitivity of divisibility,



                    $ $ else: $, pnmid x,$ so $!bmod p!: xnotequiv 0,$ so $,x^k equiv (color{#0a0}{x^{p-1}})^{smash[t]{Largecolor{#c00}{frac{k}{p-1}}}}!!equivcolor{#0a0} 1,$ by $rmcolor{#0a0}{Fermat},,$ so $,pmid x^k!-1mid a$.



                    So in every case $,pmid a,,$ so $,qmid a,$ by $,p,q,$ symmetry (i.e. same proof works for $q). $





                    Remark $ $ Above is a special case of this generalization of Euler-Fermat - which often proves handy.



                    Theorem $ $ Suppose that $ min mathbb N $ has the prime factorization $:m = p_1^{e_{1}}cdots:p_k^{e_k} $ and suppose that for all $,i,,$ $ ege e_i $ and $ phi(p_i^{e_{i}})mid f. $ Then $ mmid a^e(a^f-1) $ for all $: ain mathbb Z.$



                    Proof $ $ Notice that if $ p_imid a $ then $:p_i^{e_{i}}mid a^e $ by $ e_i le e.: $ Else $:a:$ is coprime to $: p_i:$ so by Euler's phi theorem, $!bmod q = p_i^{e_{i}}:, a^{phi(q)}equiv 1 Rightarrow a^fequiv 1, $ by $: phi(q)mid f. $ Since all $ p_i^{e_{i}} | a^e (a^f - 1) $ so too does their lcm = product = $m$.



                    Examples $ $ You can find many illuminating examples in prior questions, e.g. below



                    $24mid a^3(a^2-1)$



                    $40mid a^3(a^4-1)$



                    $88mid a^5(a^{20}-1)$



                    $6pmid a,b^p - b,a^p$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$
















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      It is the special case $,p,q,k = 2,5,4,$ below.



                      Lemma $,pneq q,$ primes and $, color{#c00}{p!-!1,,q!-!1mid k} $ $Rightarrow, pqmidsmash[t]{overbrace{ x^n(x^k!-!1)}^{Large a}},$ for all $,x,$ and $,n>0$



                      Proof $ $ $,p,q,$ are coprime so $,pqmid aiff p,qmid a,,$ by Euclid / unique factorization.



                      When $, pmid x,$ then $,pmid xmid x^nmid a,$ by $,n>0,,$ hence $,pmid a,$ by transitivity of divisibility,



                      $ $ else: $, pnmid x,$ so $!bmod p!: xnotequiv 0,$ so $,x^k equiv (color{#0a0}{x^{p-1}})^{smash[t]{Largecolor{#c00}{frac{k}{p-1}}}}!!equivcolor{#0a0} 1,$ by $rmcolor{#0a0}{Fermat},,$ so $,pmid x^k!-1mid a$.



                      So in every case $,pmid a,,$ so $,qmid a,$ by $,p,q,$ symmetry (i.e. same proof works for $q). $





                      Remark $ $ Above is a special case of this generalization of Euler-Fermat - which often proves handy.



                      Theorem $ $ Suppose that $ min mathbb N $ has the prime factorization $:m = p_1^{e_{1}}cdots:p_k^{e_k} $ and suppose that for all $,i,,$ $ ege e_i $ and $ phi(p_i^{e_{i}})mid f. $ Then $ mmid a^e(a^f-1) $ for all $: ain mathbb Z.$



                      Proof $ $ Notice that if $ p_imid a $ then $:p_i^{e_{i}}mid a^e $ by $ e_i le e.: $ Else $:a:$ is coprime to $: p_i:$ so by Euler's phi theorem, $!bmod q = p_i^{e_{i}}:, a^{phi(q)}equiv 1 Rightarrow a^fequiv 1, $ by $: phi(q)mid f. $ Since all $ p_i^{e_{i}} | a^e (a^f - 1) $ so too does their lcm = product = $m$.



                      Examples $ $ You can find many illuminating examples in prior questions, e.g. below



                      $24mid a^3(a^2-1)$



                      $40mid a^3(a^4-1)$



                      $88mid a^5(a^{20}-1)$



                      $6pmid a,b^p - b,a^p$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      It is the special case $,p,q,k = 2,5,4,$ below.



                      Lemma $,pneq q,$ primes and $, color{#c00}{p!-!1,,q!-!1mid k} $ $Rightarrow, pqmidsmash[t]{overbrace{ x^n(x^k!-!1)}^{Large a}},$ for all $,x,$ and $,n>0$



                      Proof $ $ $,p,q,$ are coprime so $,pqmid aiff p,qmid a,,$ by Euclid / unique factorization.



                      When $, pmid x,$ then $,pmid xmid x^nmid a,$ by $,n>0,,$ hence $,pmid a,$ by transitivity of divisibility,



                      $ $ else: $, pnmid x,$ so $!bmod p!: xnotequiv 0,$ so $,x^k equiv (color{#0a0}{x^{p-1}})^{smash[t]{Largecolor{#c00}{frac{k}{p-1}}}}!!equivcolor{#0a0} 1,$ by $rmcolor{#0a0}{Fermat},,$ so $,pmid x^k!-1mid a$.



                      So in every case $,pmid a,,$ so $,qmid a,$ by $,p,q,$ symmetry (i.e. same proof works for $q). $





                      Remark $ $ Above is a special case of this generalization of Euler-Fermat - which often proves handy.



                      Theorem $ $ Suppose that $ min mathbb N $ has the prime factorization $:m = p_1^{e_{1}}cdots:p_k^{e_k} $ and suppose that for all $,i,,$ $ ege e_i $ and $ phi(p_i^{e_{i}})mid f. $ Then $ mmid a^e(a^f-1) $ for all $: ain mathbb Z.$



                      Proof $ $ Notice that if $ p_imid a $ then $:p_i^{e_{i}}mid a^e $ by $ e_i le e.: $ Else $:a:$ is coprime to $: p_i:$ so by Euler's phi theorem, $!bmod q = p_i^{e_{i}}:, a^{phi(q)}equiv 1 Rightarrow a^fequiv 1, $ by $: phi(q)mid f. $ Since all $ p_i^{e_{i}} | a^e (a^f - 1) $ so too does their lcm = product = $m$.



                      Examples $ $ You can find many illuminating examples in prior questions, e.g. below



                      $24mid a^3(a^2-1)$



                      $40mid a^3(a^4-1)$



                      $88mid a^5(a^{20}-1)$



                      $6pmid a,b^p - b,a^p$







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 9 at 4:57

























                      answered Dec 25 '18 at 18:41









                      Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

                      212k29195651




                      212k29195651























                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          If you can prove $x^4 equiv 1 pmod {10}$ that's enough as $x^{n+4}equiv x^ncdot x^4 equiv x^ncdot 1equiv x^npmod {10}$



                          If you google Euler's theorem that will be true for all numbers relatively prime to $10$. Intuitively (but hand wavy) if $x$ and $10$ are relatively prime then $x^n$ will be relatively prime. There are only $4$ possible last digits that are relatively prime to $10$ so $x^k$ will cycle through the same four digits. (More or less.)



                          If $x$ is even or divisible by $5$. Well, if it's both then $x equiv 0 mod 10$ so $x^k equiv 0 pmod {10}$ and $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 0pmod {10}$. Likewise if it's odd but divisible by $5$ then $x^k equiv 5 pmod{10}$ and so $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 5 pmod {10}$.



                          Now if $x$ is even but not divisible by $5$ then. Well, $x^n$ is even and there are only $4$ even digits it could end with and it cycles through them.



                          More to the point $2*j pmod 10 equiv 2*(j pmod 5)$ and there are only $4$ non-zero classes $pmod 5$ so $x^k$ just cycles through those.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            If you can prove $x^4 equiv 1 pmod {10}$ that's enough as $x^{n+4}equiv x^ncdot x^4 equiv x^ncdot 1equiv x^npmod {10}$



                            If you google Euler's theorem that will be true for all numbers relatively prime to $10$. Intuitively (but hand wavy) if $x$ and $10$ are relatively prime then $x^n$ will be relatively prime. There are only $4$ possible last digits that are relatively prime to $10$ so $x^k$ will cycle through the same four digits. (More or less.)



                            If $x$ is even or divisible by $5$. Well, if it's both then $x equiv 0 mod 10$ so $x^k equiv 0 pmod {10}$ and $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 0pmod {10}$. Likewise if it's odd but divisible by $5$ then $x^k equiv 5 pmod{10}$ and so $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 5 pmod {10}$.



                            Now if $x$ is even but not divisible by $5$ then. Well, $x^n$ is even and there are only $4$ even digits it could end with and it cycles through them.



                            More to the point $2*j pmod 10 equiv 2*(j pmod 5)$ and there are only $4$ non-zero classes $pmod 5$ so $x^k$ just cycles through those.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              If you can prove $x^4 equiv 1 pmod {10}$ that's enough as $x^{n+4}equiv x^ncdot x^4 equiv x^ncdot 1equiv x^npmod {10}$



                              If you google Euler's theorem that will be true for all numbers relatively prime to $10$. Intuitively (but hand wavy) if $x$ and $10$ are relatively prime then $x^n$ will be relatively prime. There are only $4$ possible last digits that are relatively prime to $10$ so $x^k$ will cycle through the same four digits. (More or less.)



                              If $x$ is even or divisible by $5$. Well, if it's both then $x equiv 0 mod 10$ so $x^k equiv 0 pmod {10}$ and $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 0pmod {10}$. Likewise if it's odd but divisible by $5$ then $x^k equiv 5 pmod{10}$ and so $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 5 pmod {10}$.



                              Now if $x$ is even but not divisible by $5$ then. Well, $x^n$ is even and there are only $4$ even digits it could end with and it cycles through them.



                              More to the point $2*j pmod 10 equiv 2*(j pmod 5)$ and there are only $4$ non-zero classes $pmod 5$ so $x^k$ just cycles through those.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              If you can prove $x^4 equiv 1 pmod {10}$ that's enough as $x^{n+4}equiv x^ncdot x^4 equiv x^ncdot 1equiv x^npmod {10}$



                              If you google Euler's theorem that will be true for all numbers relatively prime to $10$. Intuitively (but hand wavy) if $x$ and $10$ are relatively prime then $x^n$ will be relatively prime. There are only $4$ possible last digits that are relatively prime to $10$ so $x^k$ will cycle through the same four digits. (More or less.)



                              If $x$ is even or divisible by $5$. Well, if it's both then $x equiv 0 mod 10$ so $x^k equiv 0 pmod {10}$ and $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 0pmod {10}$. Likewise if it's odd but divisible by $5$ then $x^k equiv 5 pmod{10}$ and so $x^{n+4} equiv x^n equiv 5 pmod {10}$.



                              Now if $x$ is even but not divisible by $5$ then. Well, $x^n$ is even and there are only $4$ even digits it could end with and it cycles through them.



                              More to the point $2*j pmod 10 equiv 2*(j pmod 5)$ and there are only $4$ non-zero classes $pmod 5$ so $x^k$ just cycles through those.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 24 '18 at 6:27









                              fleabloodfleablood

                              72.1k22687




                              72.1k22687























                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Because:



                                  $x^{n+4} = x^{n-1}x^5$
                                  $x^n = x^{n-1}x$

                                  ($abmod 10) = (a(bmod 10) mod 10)$



                                  ... you only have to prove that $(x^5 mod 10)=(xmod 10)$.



                                  ... which means: $((x mod 10)^5mod 10) = (x mod 10)$.



                                  Because there are only 10 possible values for $(x mod 10)$ these 10 values can be calculated directly:




                                  • $0^5mod 10=0 mod 10=0$

                                  • $1^5mod 10=1 mod 10=1$

                                  • $2^5mod 10=32 mod 10=2$


                                  • $3^5mod 10=243 mod 10=3$

                                    ...

                                  • $9^5mod 10=59049 mod 10=9$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Because:



                                    $x^{n+4} = x^{n-1}x^5$
                                    $x^n = x^{n-1}x$

                                    ($abmod 10) = (a(bmod 10) mod 10)$



                                    ... you only have to prove that $(x^5 mod 10)=(xmod 10)$.



                                    ... which means: $((x mod 10)^5mod 10) = (x mod 10)$.



                                    Because there are only 10 possible values for $(x mod 10)$ these 10 values can be calculated directly:




                                    • $0^5mod 10=0 mod 10=0$

                                    • $1^5mod 10=1 mod 10=1$

                                    • $2^5mod 10=32 mod 10=2$


                                    • $3^5mod 10=243 mod 10=3$

                                      ...

                                    • $9^5mod 10=59049 mod 10=9$






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Because:



                                      $x^{n+4} = x^{n-1}x^5$
                                      $x^n = x^{n-1}x$

                                      ($abmod 10) = (a(bmod 10) mod 10)$



                                      ... you only have to prove that $(x^5 mod 10)=(xmod 10)$.



                                      ... which means: $((x mod 10)^5mod 10) = (x mod 10)$.



                                      Because there are only 10 possible values for $(x mod 10)$ these 10 values can be calculated directly:




                                      • $0^5mod 10=0 mod 10=0$

                                      • $1^5mod 10=1 mod 10=1$

                                      • $2^5mod 10=32 mod 10=2$


                                      • $3^5mod 10=243 mod 10=3$

                                        ...

                                      • $9^5mod 10=59049 mod 10=9$






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      Because:



                                      $x^{n+4} = x^{n-1}x^5$
                                      $x^n = x^{n-1}x$

                                      ($abmod 10) = (a(bmod 10) mod 10)$



                                      ... you only have to prove that $(x^5 mod 10)=(xmod 10)$.



                                      ... which means: $((x mod 10)^5mod 10) = (x mod 10)$.



                                      Because there are only 10 possible values for $(x mod 10)$ these 10 values can be calculated directly:




                                      • $0^5mod 10=0 mod 10=0$

                                      • $1^5mod 10=1 mod 10=1$

                                      • $2^5mod 10=32 mod 10=2$


                                      • $3^5mod 10=243 mod 10=3$

                                        ...

                                      • $9^5mod 10=59049 mod 10=9$







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 24 '18 at 7:06









                                      Martin RosenauMartin Rosenau

                                      1,1661410




                                      1,1661410






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050972%2fproof-that-xn4-mod-10-xn-mod-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Aardman Animations

                                          Are they similar matrix

                                          “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis