Using sound waves in layer 1












9















Is it possible, in theory, to use sound waves as the physical medium to transmit data over a network?



In other words, could you implement layer 1 of the OSI networking model using sound waves or am I totally misunderstanding the physics/networking concepts?










share|improve this question


















  • 9





    Well, modems used to use acoustic couplers, which used sound waves to transfer data.

    – Ron Maupin
    Jan 21 at 5:50






  • 5





    Doesn't this happen every time you speak words?

    – grawity
    Jan 21 at 18:11






  • 6





    Well, you can use pigeons as the layer 1, so sound waves should be totally feasible.

    – dim
    Jan 21 at 18:29






  • 3





    As an aside, the original hack that jailbroke the original iPod/iPhone was playing the OS executable file as audio through the earphone and reverse modulating that to figure out/guess what the private key for the data encryption was. The system was locked down digitally and any attempt to transfer data (including mp3 files) only got encrypted data. But the audio subsystem (by virtue of needing to interface to the unencrypted human ear) was not encrypted (the bug of being able to play random files has since been fixed)

    – slebetman
    Jan 22 at 1:04











  • A lot of things can be used for Layer 1. Do you have a reason to think you couldn't?

    – Mast
    Jan 22 at 14:12
















9















Is it possible, in theory, to use sound waves as the physical medium to transmit data over a network?



In other words, could you implement layer 1 of the OSI networking model using sound waves or am I totally misunderstanding the physics/networking concepts?










share|improve this question


















  • 9





    Well, modems used to use acoustic couplers, which used sound waves to transfer data.

    – Ron Maupin
    Jan 21 at 5:50






  • 5





    Doesn't this happen every time you speak words?

    – grawity
    Jan 21 at 18:11






  • 6





    Well, you can use pigeons as the layer 1, so sound waves should be totally feasible.

    – dim
    Jan 21 at 18:29






  • 3





    As an aside, the original hack that jailbroke the original iPod/iPhone was playing the OS executable file as audio through the earphone and reverse modulating that to figure out/guess what the private key for the data encryption was. The system was locked down digitally and any attempt to transfer data (including mp3 files) only got encrypted data. But the audio subsystem (by virtue of needing to interface to the unencrypted human ear) was not encrypted (the bug of being able to play random files has since been fixed)

    – slebetman
    Jan 22 at 1:04











  • A lot of things can be used for Layer 1. Do you have a reason to think you couldn't?

    – Mast
    Jan 22 at 14:12














9












9








9


1






Is it possible, in theory, to use sound waves as the physical medium to transmit data over a network?



In other words, could you implement layer 1 of the OSI networking model using sound waves or am I totally misunderstanding the physics/networking concepts?










share|improve this question














Is it possible, in theory, to use sound waves as the physical medium to transmit data over a network?



In other words, could you implement layer 1 of the OSI networking model using sound waves or am I totally misunderstanding the physics/networking concepts?







layer1 osi






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 21 at 3:17









ggreinerggreiner

1485




1485








  • 9





    Well, modems used to use acoustic couplers, which used sound waves to transfer data.

    – Ron Maupin
    Jan 21 at 5:50






  • 5





    Doesn't this happen every time you speak words?

    – grawity
    Jan 21 at 18:11






  • 6





    Well, you can use pigeons as the layer 1, so sound waves should be totally feasible.

    – dim
    Jan 21 at 18:29






  • 3





    As an aside, the original hack that jailbroke the original iPod/iPhone was playing the OS executable file as audio through the earphone and reverse modulating that to figure out/guess what the private key for the data encryption was. The system was locked down digitally and any attempt to transfer data (including mp3 files) only got encrypted data. But the audio subsystem (by virtue of needing to interface to the unencrypted human ear) was not encrypted (the bug of being able to play random files has since been fixed)

    – slebetman
    Jan 22 at 1:04











  • A lot of things can be used for Layer 1. Do you have a reason to think you couldn't?

    – Mast
    Jan 22 at 14:12














  • 9





    Well, modems used to use acoustic couplers, which used sound waves to transfer data.

    – Ron Maupin
    Jan 21 at 5:50






  • 5





    Doesn't this happen every time you speak words?

    – grawity
    Jan 21 at 18:11






  • 6





    Well, you can use pigeons as the layer 1, so sound waves should be totally feasible.

    – dim
    Jan 21 at 18:29






  • 3





    As an aside, the original hack that jailbroke the original iPod/iPhone was playing the OS executable file as audio through the earphone and reverse modulating that to figure out/guess what the private key for the data encryption was. The system was locked down digitally and any attempt to transfer data (including mp3 files) only got encrypted data. But the audio subsystem (by virtue of needing to interface to the unencrypted human ear) was not encrypted (the bug of being able to play random files has since been fixed)

    – slebetman
    Jan 22 at 1:04











  • A lot of things can be used for Layer 1. Do you have a reason to think you couldn't?

    – Mast
    Jan 22 at 14:12








9




9





Well, modems used to use acoustic couplers, which used sound waves to transfer data.

– Ron Maupin
Jan 21 at 5:50





Well, modems used to use acoustic couplers, which used sound waves to transfer data.

– Ron Maupin
Jan 21 at 5:50




5




5





Doesn't this happen every time you speak words?

– grawity
Jan 21 at 18:11





Doesn't this happen every time you speak words?

– grawity
Jan 21 at 18:11




6




6





Well, you can use pigeons as the layer 1, so sound waves should be totally feasible.

– dim
Jan 21 at 18:29





Well, you can use pigeons as the layer 1, so sound waves should be totally feasible.

– dim
Jan 21 at 18:29




3




3





As an aside, the original hack that jailbroke the original iPod/iPhone was playing the OS executable file as audio through the earphone and reverse modulating that to figure out/guess what the private key for the data encryption was. The system was locked down digitally and any attempt to transfer data (including mp3 files) only got encrypted data. But the audio subsystem (by virtue of needing to interface to the unencrypted human ear) was not encrypted (the bug of being able to play random files has since been fixed)

– slebetman
Jan 22 at 1:04





As an aside, the original hack that jailbroke the original iPod/iPhone was playing the OS executable file as audio through the earphone and reverse modulating that to figure out/guess what the private key for the data encryption was. The system was locked down digitally and any attempt to transfer data (including mp3 files) only got encrypted data. But the audio subsystem (by virtue of needing to interface to the unencrypted human ear) was not encrypted (the bug of being able to play random files has since been fixed)

– slebetman
Jan 22 at 1:04













A lot of things can be used for Layer 1. Do you have a reason to think you couldn't?

– Mast
Jan 22 at 14:12





A lot of things can be used for Layer 1. Do you have a reason to think you couldn't?

– Mast
Jan 22 at 14:12










8 Answers
8






active

oldest

votes


















9














It's very much possible. Even excluding the old acoustically coupled modems that eventually evolved into a direct connection to a phone line, there are also programs that will let you use a sound card as a modem (I've used some before for out-of-band communications when debugging an Ethernet driver, though I used direct audio cabling instead of actual acoustic signaling), and the general concept is becoming rather popular with IoT devices for pairing with a control app on a smart phone during setup (though this is closer to an RFID tag approach).



This approach has a number of pretty significant downsides though:




  • It's very low bandwidth by modern standards. Even with ultrasonic frequencies, you're still looking at no more than a few hundred kilobits per second under good conditions. This makes it significantly less than useful except for passing very small amounts of data (such as with the IoT usage I mentioned above, where it usually just passes a 802.11 hardware address and some auth info so a Wi-Fi Direct connection can be established).

  • Outside of very limited situations, it's really slow even aside from the signal frequency. The speed of sound in air is about 340 m/s (give or take a few dozen m/s based on temperature, pressure, humidity, and air quality), which is insanely slow compared to electrical signals or electromagnetic waves (which propagate at roughly the speed of light), which means that compared to Wi-Fi or Ethernet, signal latency is rather high. This doesn't matter much for very short-range communications, but once you get past a few meters, the latency starts to get noticable (imagine if the link between your computer and your router had a longer RTT than the entire rest of the network path to this website combined). Even the best conductors of sound can only get at best 35-40 times the speed of sound in air, which is still insanely slow.

  • It's extremely sensitive to the environment. Ethernet is solid enough that it doesn't even need shielded if you have decent cabling. Wi-Fi can get bad at times, but is still at least able to reliably screen for specific frequency bands easily, and EMI is usually pretty easy to find and stop. Vibrations and sound are everywhere though. Again, this is more of an issue for longer-range communications, but it's still more of a problem than for Wi-Fi, partially because of the next point.

  • Sonic transmitters with a high transmit power are rather dangerous, both to the environment, and to people. To reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal, you need to be operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss. That much energy can also pretty easily damage delicate objects.






share|improve this answer
























  • "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

    – immibis
    Jan 21 at 21:36











  • @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

    – Mark
    Jan 21 at 22:20











  • @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

    – immibis
    Jan 21 at 22:45











  • @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

    – Austin Hemmelgarn
    Jan 22 at 2:29



















12














It's been done. I used to have a 300-baud acoustic layer 1 device.






share|improve this answer































    8














    Anything that can transport information can be used as physical layer - sound waves as well as pigeons.



    Some air-gap attacks use (ultra)sound to communicate across the air gap.



    However, since the frequencies even for ultrasound are rather low (some kHz), the data rate would be low as well (some kbit/s). Also, the reach of sound waves limits the use to a single room.






    share|improve this answer


























    • About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

      – Agnius Vasiliauskas
      Jan 22 at 13:27











    • @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

      – Zac67
      Jan 22 at 15:49











    • I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

      – Agnius Vasiliauskas
      Jan 22 at 17:10





















    4














    Yes it’s possible. In fact, Amazon Dash buttons use ultrasound as a medium.






    share|improve this answer
























    • AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

      – Zac67
      Jan 21 at 7:19






    • 2





      Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

      – Zach Lipton
      Jan 21 at 9:06



















    1














    Certainly. Some options not discussed in other answers, but closer I think to the heart of your question:




    • A shotgun mic receiver and a similar transmitter. Uses air as the
      medium.

    • A piezo sensor receiver and a similar buzzer. Uses a rod of
      (say) wood, carbon fiber or beryllium rod as the medium.


    In both cases, an electrical impulse provided to the transmitter will produce a mechanical impulse through the medium to be detected by the receiver, where it is converted back to an electrical impulse.



    In both of these examples, we have not used any electricity to represent sound, but have actually used sound waves traveling through different media.






    share|improve this answer































      0














      One of the first computers used soundwaves within a medium of mercury to store data so though it was not a networking medium it was still a method data retention and the same concept could be used for transmission and networking






      share|improve this answer































        0














        I've done this before, not because it made sense to, but because I felt like it. Ham radio has all kinds of things for this, notably AX.25. Anything you send through a non-digital radio is audio being encoded into radio waves, and back by the receiver. Take the radio out of the equation, and you get what you're looking for.



        Take a look at AX.25, as well as other digital modems, such as MT63 and PSK. fldigi is capable of many, although it's built for text, so you'd need to base64 any binary data.






        share|improve this answer
























        • AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

          – Austin Hemmelgarn
          Jan 22 at 2:18











        • @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

          – Duncan X Simpson
          Jan 22 at 2:21











        • But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

          – Austin Hemmelgarn
          Jan 22 at 2:24











        • @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

          – Duncan X Simpson
          Jan 22 at 2:26






        • 1





          AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

          – Austin Hemmelgarn
          Jan 22 at 2:29



















        0














        There was the TCP/IP over bongodrum project. But the homepage for the actual project seems dead now.



        Here is a reference to the project






        share|improve this answer























          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "496"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56269%2fusing-sound-waves-in-layer-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          8 Answers
          8






          active

          oldest

          votes








          8 Answers
          8






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9














          It's very much possible. Even excluding the old acoustically coupled modems that eventually evolved into a direct connection to a phone line, there are also programs that will let you use a sound card as a modem (I've used some before for out-of-band communications when debugging an Ethernet driver, though I used direct audio cabling instead of actual acoustic signaling), and the general concept is becoming rather popular with IoT devices for pairing with a control app on a smart phone during setup (though this is closer to an RFID tag approach).



          This approach has a number of pretty significant downsides though:




          • It's very low bandwidth by modern standards. Even with ultrasonic frequencies, you're still looking at no more than a few hundred kilobits per second under good conditions. This makes it significantly less than useful except for passing very small amounts of data (such as with the IoT usage I mentioned above, where it usually just passes a 802.11 hardware address and some auth info so a Wi-Fi Direct connection can be established).

          • Outside of very limited situations, it's really slow even aside from the signal frequency. The speed of sound in air is about 340 m/s (give or take a few dozen m/s based on temperature, pressure, humidity, and air quality), which is insanely slow compared to electrical signals or electromagnetic waves (which propagate at roughly the speed of light), which means that compared to Wi-Fi or Ethernet, signal latency is rather high. This doesn't matter much for very short-range communications, but once you get past a few meters, the latency starts to get noticable (imagine if the link between your computer and your router had a longer RTT than the entire rest of the network path to this website combined). Even the best conductors of sound can only get at best 35-40 times the speed of sound in air, which is still insanely slow.

          • It's extremely sensitive to the environment. Ethernet is solid enough that it doesn't even need shielded if you have decent cabling. Wi-Fi can get bad at times, but is still at least able to reliably screen for specific frequency bands easily, and EMI is usually pretty easy to find and stop. Vibrations and sound are everywhere though. Again, this is more of an issue for longer-range communications, but it's still more of a problem than for Wi-Fi, partially because of the next point.

          • Sonic transmitters with a high transmit power are rather dangerous, both to the environment, and to people. To reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal, you need to be operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss. That much energy can also pretty easily damage delicate objects.






          share|improve this answer
























          • "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 21:36











          • @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

            – Mark
            Jan 21 at 22:20











          • @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 22:45











          • @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

            – Austin Hemmelgarn
            Jan 22 at 2:29
















          9














          It's very much possible. Even excluding the old acoustically coupled modems that eventually evolved into a direct connection to a phone line, there are also programs that will let you use a sound card as a modem (I've used some before for out-of-band communications when debugging an Ethernet driver, though I used direct audio cabling instead of actual acoustic signaling), and the general concept is becoming rather popular with IoT devices for pairing with a control app on a smart phone during setup (though this is closer to an RFID tag approach).



          This approach has a number of pretty significant downsides though:




          • It's very low bandwidth by modern standards. Even with ultrasonic frequencies, you're still looking at no more than a few hundred kilobits per second under good conditions. This makes it significantly less than useful except for passing very small amounts of data (such as with the IoT usage I mentioned above, where it usually just passes a 802.11 hardware address and some auth info so a Wi-Fi Direct connection can be established).

          • Outside of very limited situations, it's really slow even aside from the signal frequency. The speed of sound in air is about 340 m/s (give or take a few dozen m/s based on temperature, pressure, humidity, and air quality), which is insanely slow compared to electrical signals or electromagnetic waves (which propagate at roughly the speed of light), which means that compared to Wi-Fi or Ethernet, signal latency is rather high. This doesn't matter much for very short-range communications, but once you get past a few meters, the latency starts to get noticable (imagine if the link between your computer and your router had a longer RTT than the entire rest of the network path to this website combined). Even the best conductors of sound can only get at best 35-40 times the speed of sound in air, which is still insanely slow.

          • It's extremely sensitive to the environment. Ethernet is solid enough that it doesn't even need shielded if you have decent cabling. Wi-Fi can get bad at times, but is still at least able to reliably screen for specific frequency bands easily, and EMI is usually pretty easy to find and stop. Vibrations and sound are everywhere though. Again, this is more of an issue for longer-range communications, but it's still more of a problem than for Wi-Fi, partially because of the next point.

          • Sonic transmitters with a high transmit power are rather dangerous, both to the environment, and to people. To reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal, you need to be operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss. That much energy can also pretty easily damage delicate objects.






          share|improve this answer
























          • "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 21:36











          • @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

            – Mark
            Jan 21 at 22:20











          • @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 22:45











          • @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

            – Austin Hemmelgarn
            Jan 22 at 2:29














          9












          9








          9







          It's very much possible. Even excluding the old acoustically coupled modems that eventually evolved into a direct connection to a phone line, there are also programs that will let you use a sound card as a modem (I've used some before for out-of-band communications when debugging an Ethernet driver, though I used direct audio cabling instead of actual acoustic signaling), and the general concept is becoming rather popular with IoT devices for pairing with a control app on a smart phone during setup (though this is closer to an RFID tag approach).



          This approach has a number of pretty significant downsides though:




          • It's very low bandwidth by modern standards. Even with ultrasonic frequencies, you're still looking at no more than a few hundred kilobits per second under good conditions. This makes it significantly less than useful except for passing very small amounts of data (such as with the IoT usage I mentioned above, where it usually just passes a 802.11 hardware address and some auth info so a Wi-Fi Direct connection can be established).

          • Outside of very limited situations, it's really slow even aside from the signal frequency. The speed of sound in air is about 340 m/s (give or take a few dozen m/s based on temperature, pressure, humidity, and air quality), which is insanely slow compared to electrical signals or electromagnetic waves (which propagate at roughly the speed of light), which means that compared to Wi-Fi or Ethernet, signal latency is rather high. This doesn't matter much for very short-range communications, but once you get past a few meters, the latency starts to get noticable (imagine if the link between your computer and your router had a longer RTT than the entire rest of the network path to this website combined). Even the best conductors of sound can only get at best 35-40 times the speed of sound in air, which is still insanely slow.

          • It's extremely sensitive to the environment. Ethernet is solid enough that it doesn't even need shielded if you have decent cabling. Wi-Fi can get bad at times, but is still at least able to reliably screen for specific frequency bands easily, and EMI is usually pretty easy to find and stop. Vibrations and sound are everywhere though. Again, this is more of an issue for longer-range communications, but it's still more of a problem than for Wi-Fi, partially because of the next point.

          • Sonic transmitters with a high transmit power are rather dangerous, both to the environment, and to people. To reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal, you need to be operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss. That much energy can also pretty easily damage delicate objects.






          share|improve this answer













          It's very much possible. Even excluding the old acoustically coupled modems that eventually evolved into a direct connection to a phone line, there are also programs that will let you use a sound card as a modem (I've used some before for out-of-band communications when debugging an Ethernet driver, though I used direct audio cabling instead of actual acoustic signaling), and the general concept is becoming rather popular with IoT devices for pairing with a control app on a smart phone during setup (though this is closer to an RFID tag approach).



          This approach has a number of pretty significant downsides though:




          • It's very low bandwidth by modern standards. Even with ultrasonic frequencies, you're still looking at no more than a few hundred kilobits per second under good conditions. This makes it significantly less than useful except for passing very small amounts of data (such as with the IoT usage I mentioned above, where it usually just passes a 802.11 hardware address and some auth info so a Wi-Fi Direct connection can be established).

          • Outside of very limited situations, it's really slow even aside from the signal frequency. The speed of sound in air is about 340 m/s (give or take a few dozen m/s based on temperature, pressure, humidity, and air quality), which is insanely slow compared to electrical signals or electromagnetic waves (which propagate at roughly the speed of light), which means that compared to Wi-Fi or Ethernet, signal latency is rather high. This doesn't matter much for very short-range communications, but once you get past a few meters, the latency starts to get noticable (imagine if the link between your computer and your router had a longer RTT than the entire rest of the network path to this website combined). Even the best conductors of sound can only get at best 35-40 times the speed of sound in air, which is still insanely slow.

          • It's extremely sensitive to the environment. Ethernet is solid enough that it doesn't even need shielded if you have decent cabling. Wi-Fi can get bad at times, but is still at least able to reliably screen for specific frequency bands easily, and EMI is usually pretty easy to find and stop. Vibrations and sound are everywhere though. Again, this is more of an issue for longer-range communications, but it's still more of a problem than for Wi-Fi, partially because of the next point.

          • Sonic transmitters with a high transmit power are rather dangerous, both to the environment, and to people. To reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal, you need to be operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss. That much energy can also pretty easily damage delicate objects.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 21 at 21:02









          Austin HemmelgarnAustin Hemmelgarn

          20514




          20514













          • "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 21:36











          • @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

            – Mark
            Jan 21 at 22:20











          • @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 22:45











          • @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

            – Austin Hemmelgarn
            Jan 22 at 2:29



















          • "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 21:36











          • @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

            – Mark
            Jan 21 at 22:20











          • @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

            – immibis
            Jan 21 at 22:45











          • @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

            – Austin Hemmelgarn
            Jan 22 at 2:29

















          "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

          – immibis
          Jan 21 at 21:36





          "a few meters" in the last paragraph seems like an exaggeration. I can talk to someone a few meters away without having to yell so loud that I damage my own hearing.

          – immibis
          Jan 21 at 21:36













          @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

          – Mark
          Jan 21 at 22:20





          @immibis, talking to someone a few meters away has a very low data rate and tremendous amounts of error correction.

          – Mark
          Jan 21 at 22:20













          @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

          – immibis
          Jan 21 at 22:45





          @Mark yes, but it does "reliably get any kind of range beyond about a few meters before the SNR gets so high that you have no recoverable signal" without "operating at high enough sound pressures to cause permanent hearing loss".

          – immibis
          Jan 21 at 22:45













          @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

          – Austin Hemmelgarn
          Jan 22 at 2:29





          @immibis You pretty much need to use ultrasonic frequencies for this type of thing to minimize interference from people talking, moving, and just existing in the near vicinity. Frequency affects how sound propagates, and higher ones need higher sound pressure at the source to reliably excite a pickup at a given distance. Try using the acoustic pairing on an IoT device from more than a few meters away, and you'll notice it doesn't work reliably, and that's a low bandwidth usage.

          – Austin Hemmelgarn
          Jan 22 at 2:29











          12














          It's been done. I used to have a 300-baud acoustic layer 1 device.






          share|improve this answer




























            12














            It's been done. I used to have a 300-baud acoustic layer 1 device.






            share|improve this answer


























              12












              12








              12







              It's been done. I used to have a 300-baud acoustic layer 1 device.






              share|improve this answer













              It's been done. I used to have a 300-baud acoustic layer 1 device.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Jan 21 at 8:07









              MarkMark

              22115




              22115























                  8














                  Anything that can transport information can be used as physical layer - sound waves as well as pigeons.



                  Some air-gap attacks use (ultra)sound to communicate across the air gap.



                  However, since the frequencies even for ultrasound are rather low (some kHz), the data rate would be low as well (some kbit/s). Also, the reach of sound waves limits the use to a single room.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 13:27











                  • @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 22 at 15:49











                  • I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 17:10


















                  8














                  Anything that can transport information can be used as physical layer - sound waves as well as pigeons.



                  Some air-gap attacks use (ultra)sound to communicate across the air gap.



                  However, since the frequencies even for ultrasound are rather low (some kHz), the data rate would be low as well (some kbit/s). Also, the reach of sound waves limits the use to a single room.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 13:27











                  • @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 22 at 15:49











                  • I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 17:10
















                  8












                  8








                  8







                  Anything that can transport information can be used as physical layer - sound waves as well as pigeons.



                  Some air-gap attacks use (ultra)sound to communicate across the air gap.



                  However, since the frequencies even for ultrasound are rather low (some kHz), the data rate would be low as well (some kbit/s). Also, the reach of sound waves limits the use to a single room.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Anything that can transport information can be used as physical layer - sound waves as well as pigeons.



                  Some air-gap attacks use (ultra)sound to communicate across the air gap.



                  However, since the frequencies even for ultrasound are rather low (some kHz), the data rate would be low as well (some kbit/s). Also, the reach of sound waves limits the use to a single room.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 22 at 7:22

























                  answered Jan 21 at 7:29









                  Zac67Zac67

                  29.1k21759




                  29.1k21759













                  • About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 13:27











                  • @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 22 at 15:49











                  • I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 17:10





















                  • About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 13:27











                  • @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 22 at 15:49











                  • I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

                    – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                    Jan 22 at 17:10



















                  About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

                  – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                  Jan 22 at 13:27





                  About "single room". Not necessarily true, because sound waves (like almost any other waves in principle) can be amplified - take a look at SASER

                  – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                  Jan 22 at 13:27













                  @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

                  – Zac67
                  Jan 22 at 15:49





                  @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, of course - but practically the reach is very limited as is the usable bandwidth. You can do a lot to improve the transmission quality but then again, why not just use RF, copper or fiber in the first place?

                  – Zac67
                  Jan 22 at 15:49













                  I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

                  – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                  Jan 22 at 17:10







                  I'm not saying that we must use sound waves for information transportation. Of course nothing will beat speed of light in electromagnetic radiation. However, there may be the cases when other options fits badly - for example in strong external EM fields (solar wind, etc.), so that shielding can be impractical too for EM communication to operate. Maybe in this scenario we could try to use sound-waves-based info transportation ? (Think about having pigeons in an uninhabited island, when some ship goes across)

                  – Agnius Vasiliauskas
                  Jan 22 at 17:10













                  4














                  Yes it’s possible. In fact, Amazon Dash buttons use ultrasound as a medium.






                  share|improve this answer
























                  • AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 21 at 7:19






                  • 2





                    Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

                    – Zach Lipton
                    Jan 21 at 9:06
















                  4














                  Yes it’s possible. In fact, Amazon Dash buttons use ultrasound as a medium.






                  share|improve this answer
























                  • AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 21 at 7:19






                  • 2





                    Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

                    – Zach Lipton
                    Jan 21 at 9:06














                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Yes it’s possible. In fact, Amazon Dash buttons use ultrasound as a medium.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Yes it’s possible. In fact, Amazon Dash buttons use ultrasound as a medium.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 21 at 3:44









                  Ron TrunkRon Trunk

                  36.3k33374




                  36.3k33374













                  • AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 21 at 7:19






                  • 2





                    Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

                    – Zach Lipton
                    Jan 21 at 9:06



















                  • AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

                    – Zac67
                    Jan 21 at 7:19






                  • 2





                    Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

                    – Zach Lipton
                    Jan 21 at 9:06

















                  AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

                  – Zac67
                  Jan 21 at 7:19





                  AFAIK, Dash buttons use Wi-fi.

                  – Zac67
                  Jan 21 at 7:19




                  2




                  2





                  Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

                  – Zach Lipton
                  Jan 21 at 9:06





                  Here's an explanation of how Dash buttons work. They just use audio for configuration from iOS devices; the normal operation is over wi-fi.

                  – Zach Lipton
                  Jan 21 at 9:06











                  1














                  Certainly. Some options not discussed in other answers, but closer I think to the heart of your question:




                  • A shotgun mic receiver and a similar transmitter. Uses air as the
                    medium.

                  • A piezo sensor receiver and a similar buzzer. Uses a rod of
                    (say) wood, carbon fiber or beryllium rod as the medium.


                  In both cases, an electrical impulse provided to the transmitter will produce a mechanical impulse through the medium to be detected by the receiver, where it is converted back to an electrical impulse.



                  In both of these examples, we have not used any electricity to represent sound, but have actually used sound waves traveling through different media.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    1














                    Certainly. Some options not discussed in other answers, but closer I think to the heart of your question:




                    • A shotgun mic receiver and a similar transmitter. Uses air as the
                      medium.

                    • A piezo sensor receiver and a similar buzzer. Uses a rod of
                      (say) wood, carbon fiber or beryllium rod as the medium.


                    In both cases, an electrical impulse provided to the transmitter will produce a mechanical impulse through the medium to be detected by the receiver, where it is converted back to an electrical impulse.



                    In both of these examples, we have not used any electricity to represent sound, but have actually used sound waves traveling through different media.






                    share|improve this answer


























                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Certainly. Some options not discussed in other answers, but closer I think to the heart of your question:




                      • A shotgun mic receiver and a similar transmitter. Uses air as the
                        medium.

                      • A piezo sensor receiver and a similar buzzer. Uses a rod of
                        (say) wood, carbon fiber or beryllium rod as the medium.


                      In both cases, an electrical impulse provided to the transmitter will produce a mechanical impulse through the medium to be detected by the receiver, where it is converted back to an electrical impulse.



                      In both of these examples, we have not used any electricity to represent sound, but have actually used sound waves traveling through different media.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Certainly. Some options not discussed in other answers, but closer I think to the heart of your question:




                      • A shotgun mic receiver and a similar transmitter. Uses air as the
                        medium.

                      • A piezo sensor receiver and a similar buzzer. Uses a rod of
                        (say) wood, carbon fiber or beryllium rod as the medium.


                      In both cases, an electrical impulse provided to the transmitter will produce a mechanical impulse through the medium to be detected by the receiver, where it is converted back to an electrical impulse.



                      In both of these examples, we have not used any electricity to represent sound, but have actually used sound waves traveling through different media.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Jan 22 at 7:20









                      Haakon DahlHaakon Dahl

                      1112




                      1112























                          0














                          One of the first computers used soundwaves within a medium of mercury to store data so though it was not a networking medium it was still a method data retention and the same concept could be used for transmission and networking






                          share|improve this answer




























                            0














                            One of the first computers used soundwaves within a medium of mercury to store data so though it was not a networking medium it was still a method data retention and the same concept could be used for transmission and networking






                            share|improve this answer


























                              0












                              0








                              0







                              One of the first computers used soundwaves within a medium of mercury to store data so though it was not a networking medium it was still a method data retention and the same concept could be used for transmission and networking






                              share|improve this answer













                              One of the first computers used soundwaves within a medium of mercury to store data so though it was not a networking medium it was still a method data retention and the same concept could be used for transmission and networking







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Jan 21 at 18:45









                              PhiPhi

                              101




                              101























                                  0














                                  I've done this before, not because it made sense to, but because I felt like it. Ham radio has all kinds of things for this, notably AX.25. Anything you send through a non-digital radio is audio being encoded into radio waves, and back by the receiver. Take the radio out of the equation, and you get what you're looking for.



                                  Take a look at AX.25, as well as other digital modems, such as MT63 and PSK. fldigi is capable of many, although it's built for text, so you'd need to base64 any binary data.






                                  share|improve this answer
























                                  • AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:18











                                  • @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:21











                                  • But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:24











                                  • @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:26






                                  • 1





                                    AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:29
















                                  0














                                  I've done this before, not because it made sense to, but because I felt like it. Ham radio has all kinds of things for this, notably AX.25. Anything you send through a non-digital radio is audio being encoded into radio waves, and back by the receiver. Take the radio out of the equation, and you get what you're looking for.



                                  Take a look at AX.25, as well as other digital modems, such as MT63 and PSK. fldigi is capable of many, although it's built for text, so you'd need to base64 any binary data.






                                  share|improve this answer
























                                  • AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:18











                                  • @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:21











                                  • But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:24











                                  • @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:26






                                  • 1





                                    AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:29














                                  0












                                  0








                                  0







                                  I've done this before, not because it made sense to, but because I felt like it. Ham radio has all kinds of things for this, notably AX.25. Anything you send through a non-digital radio is audio being encoded into radio waves, and back by the receiver. Take the radio out of the equation, and you get what you're looking for.



                                  Take a look at AX.25, as well as other digital modems, such as MT63 and PSK. fldigi is capable of many, although it's built for text, so you'd need to base64 any binary data.






                                  share|improve this answer













                                  I've done this before, not because it made sense to, but because I felt like it. Ham radio has all kinds of things for this, notably AX.25. Anything you send through a non-digital radio is audio being encoded into radio waves, and back by the receiver. Take the radio out of the equation, and you get what you're looking for.



                                  Take a look at AX.25, as well as other digital modems, such as MT63 and PSK. fldigi is capable of many, although it's built for text, so you'd need to base64 any binary data.







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered Jan 21 at 20:06









                                  Duncan X SimpsonDuncan X Simpson

                                  1258




                                  1258













                                  • AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:18











                                  • @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:21











                                  • But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:24











                                  • @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:26






                                  • 1





                                    AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:29



















                                  • AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:18











                                  • @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:21











                                  • But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:24











                                  • @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

                                    – Duncan X Simpson
                                    Jan 22 at 2:26






                                  • 1





                                    AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

                                    – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                    Jan 22 at 2:29

















                                  AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

                                  – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                  Jan 22 at 2:18





                                  AX.25 isn't transmitting using sound waves though, unless you're using acoustic coupling of the signal somewhere. It's still an EM transmission (more correctly, AX.25 is a protocol for encoding digital information on an analogue signal, no sound needed or involved).

                                  – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                  Jan 22 at 2:18













                                  @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

                                  – Duncan X Simpson
                                  Jan 22 at 2:21





                                  @Austin Hemmelgarn It's encoded in such a way as to be sent out an audio device. So while it often doesn't get sent out speakers, it makes sense to think of it as sound.

                                  – Duncan X Simpson
                                  Jan 22 at 2:21













                                  But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

                                  – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                  Jan 22 at 2:24





                                  But it's still not sound until it's actually played through speakers, a piezo element, a tesla coil, or some other device that converts the electronic signal to vibrations in the air.

                                  – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                  Jan 22 at 2:24













                                  @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

                                  – Duncan X Simpson
                                  Jan 22 at 2:26





                                  @Austin Yes. And that is possible. And I have done it. What's wrong with my answer?

                                  – Duncan X Simpson
                                  Jan 22 at 2:26




                                  1




                                  1





                                  AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

                                  – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                  Jan 22 at 2:29





                                  AX.25 is not a physical layer, and it's not sound waves. The signal it produces can be converted to sound waves as a physical layer, but your answer doesn't really make that clear.

                                  – Austin Hemmelgarn
                                  Jan 22 at 2:29











                                  0














                                  There was the TCP/IP over bongodrum project. But the homepage for the actual project seems dead now.



                                  Here is a reference to the project






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    0














                                    There was the TCP/IP over bongodrum project. But the homepage for the actual project seems dead now.



                                    Here is a reference to the project






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      There was the TCP/IP over bongodrum project. But the homepage for the actual project seems dead now.



                                      Here is a reference to the project






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      There was the TCP/IP over bongodrum project. But the homepage for the actual project seems dead now.



                                      Here is a reference to the project







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Jan 22 at 8:58









                                      MarqsMarqs

                                      1




                                      1






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56269%2fusing-sound-waves-in-layer-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                                          Aardman Animations

                                          Are they similar matrix