Question on a proof of no existance of monochromatic triangle in any tricoloring of edges of $K_{16}$












1












$begingroup$


Here is a question on the book "Problem -Solving Strategies" by Arthur Engel, with a provided solution:
enter image description here



enter image description here



In the solution, they partitioned the abelian group into 3 sets such that none of them is sum-free. However, in $A_3$, $(a+b+d) +(a+c+d)=b+c in A_3$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    yes, sorry I just wanted to know the correct version
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:51










  • $begingroup$
    Ok! I edited it!
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:56
















1












$begingroup$


Here is a question on the book "Problem -Solving Strategies" by Arthur Engel, with a provided solution:
enter image description here



enter image description here



In the solution, they partitioned the abelian group into 3 sets such that none of them is sum-free. However, in $A_3$, $(a+b+d) +(a+c+d)=b+c in A_3$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    yes, sorry I just wanted to know the correct version
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:51










  • $begingroup$
    Ok! I edited it!
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:56














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Here is a question on the book "Problem -Solving Strategies" by Arthur Engel, with a provided solution:
enter image description here



enter image description here



In the solution, they partitioned the abelian group into 3 sets such that none of them is sum-free. However, in $A_3$, $(a+b+d) +(a+c+d)=b+c in A_3$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Here is a question on the book "Problem -Solving Strategies" by Arthur Engel, with a provided solution:
enter image description here



enter image description here



In the solution, they partitioned the abelian group into 3 sets such that none of them is sum-free. However, in $A_3$, $(a+b+d) +(a+c+d)=b+c in A_3$.







proof-verification graph-theory pigeonhole-principle






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 0:55







nafhgood

















asked Dec 12 '18 at 0:18









nafhgoodnafhgood

1,805422




1,805422












  • $begingroup$
    yes, sorry I just wanted to know the correct version
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:51










  • $begingroup$
    Ok! I edited it!
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:56


















  • $begingroup$
    yes, sorry I just wanted to know the correct version
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:51










  • $begingroup$
    Ok! I edited it!
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 0:56
















$begingroup$
yes, sorry I just wanted to know the correct version
$endgroup$
– nafhgood
Dec 12 '18 at 0:51




$begingroup$
yes, sorry I just wanted to know the correct version
$endgroup$
– nafhgood
Dec 12 '18 at 0:51












$begingroup$
Ok! I edited it!
$endgroup$
– nafhgood
Dec 12 '18 at 0:56




$begingroup$
Ok! I edited it!
$endgroup$
– nafhgood
Dec 12 '18 at 0:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

You are right. To correct the proof, move $a+c+d$ to $A_2$ and $b+c+d$ to $A_3$. Is everything all right now?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:03










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know.$ $
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:10













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036052%2fquestion-on-a-proof-of-no-existance-of-monochromatic-triangle-in-any-tricoloring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

You are right. To correct the proof, move $a+c+d$ to $A_2$ and $b+c+d$ to $A_3$. Is everything all right now?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:03










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know.$ $
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:10


















0












$begingroup$

You are right. To correct the proof, move $a+c+d$ to $A_2$ and $b+c+d$ to $A_3$. Is everything all right now?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:03










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know.$ $
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:10
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

You are right. To correct the proof, move $a+c+d$ to $A_2$ and $b+c+d$ to $A_3$. Is everything all right now?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You are right. To correct the proof, move $a+c+d$ to $A_2$ and $b+c+d$ to $A_3$. Is everything all right now?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 12 '18 at 0:48









bofbof

51.7k558120




51.7k558120












  • $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:03










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know.$ $
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:10




















  • $begingroup$
    Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:03










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know.$ $
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:10


















$begingroup$
Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
$endgroup$
– nafhgood
Dec 12 '18 at 15:03




$begingroup$
Is there an algorithm to partition a group into disjoint unions of subsets that are sum free?
$endgroup$
– nafhgood
Dec 12 '18 at 15:03












$begingroup$
I don't know.$ $
$endgroup$
– bof
Dec 12 '18 at 15:10






$begingroup$
I don't know.$ $
$endgroup$
– bof
Dec 12 '18 at 15:10




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036052%2fquestion-on-a-proof-of-no-existance-of-monochromatic-triangle-in-any-tricoloring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!