Is this true that the sequences evenly sampled from functions in $L^p$ are in $l_p$?












0












$begingroup$


Is the following statement true ?




Given a function $f(x)$ in $L^p(mathbb{R})$, $1le p<infty$, the sequence ${f(x+kT)}_{kinmathbb{Z}}$ is in $l_p$ for any $x$ and $T$ if every number in the sequence is finite.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $L_p$ consists of equivalence classes of a.e. equal functions...
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, "taking a sample" is unbounded operator in $L_p$.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:41












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 True but what does this imply ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    @A.G. Maybe I can add some mild conditions, e.g., continuous function in $L_p$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Hua It does not help. You may need $L_p$ bound on the derivative too.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:12
















0












$begingroup$


Is the following statement true ?




Given a function $f(x)$ in $L^p(mathbb{R})$, $1le p<infty$, the sequence ${f(x+kT)}_{kinmathbb{Z}}$ is in $l_p$ for any $x$ and $T$ if every number in the sequence is finite.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $L_p$ consists of equivalence classes of a.e. equal functions...
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, "taking a sample" is unbounded operator in $L_p$.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:41












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 True but what does this imply ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    @A.G. Maybe I can add some mild conditions, e.g., continuous function in $L_p$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Hua It does not help. You may need $L_p$ bound on the derivative too.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:12














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Is the following statement true ?




Given a function $f(x)$ in $L^p(mathbb{R})$, $1le p<infty$, the sequence ${f(x+kT)}_{kinmathbb{Z}}$ is in $l_p$ for any $x$ and $T$ if every number in the sequence is finite.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is the following statement true ?




Given a function $f(x)$ in $L^p(mathbb{R})$, $1le p<infty$, the sequence ${f(x+kT)}_{kinmathbb{Z}}$ is in $l_p$ for any $x$ and $T$ if every number in the sequence is finite.








real-analysis sequences-and-series functional-analysis lp-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 11 '18 at 20:37









Davide Giraudo

126k16150261




126k16150261










asked Oct 13 '16 at 10:33









bridgerbridger

503315




503315












  • $begingroup$
    $L_p$ consists of equivalence classes of a.e. equal functions...
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, "taking a sample" is unbounded operator in $L_p$.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:41












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 True but what does this imply ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    @A.G. Maybe I can add some mild conditions, e.g., continuous function in $L_p$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Hua It does not help. You may need $L_p$ bound on the derivative too.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:12


















  • $begingroup$
    $L_p$ consists of equivalence classes of a.e. equal functions...
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, "taking a sample" is unbounded operator in $L_p$.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 10:41












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 True but what does this imply ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    @A.G. Maybe I can add some mild conditions, e.g., continuous function in $L_p$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Hua It does not help. You may need $L_p$ bound on the derivative too.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Oct 13 '16 at 11:12
















$begingroup$
$L_p$ consists of equivalence classes of a.e. equal functions...
$endgroup$
– user251257
Oct 13 '16 at 10:40




$begingroup$
$L_p$ consists of equivalence classes of a.e. equal functions...
$endgroup$
– user251257
Oct 13 '16 at 10:40




2




2




$begingroup$
No, "taking a sample" is unbounded operator in $L_p$.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Oct 13 '16 at 10:41






$begingroup$
No, "taking a sample" is unbounded operator in $L_p$.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Oct 13 '16 at 10:41














$begingroup$
@user251257 True but what does this imply ?
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 11:04




$begingroup$
@user251257 True but what does this imply ?
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 11:04












$begingroup$
@A.G. Maybe I can add some mild conditions, e.g., continuous function in $L_p$ ?
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 11:06




$begingroup$
@A.G. Maybe I can add some mild conditions, e.g., continuous function in $L_p$ ?
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 11:06




2




2




$begingroup$
@Hua It does not help. You may need $L_p$ bound on the derivative too.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Oct 13 '16 at 11:12




$begingroup$
@Hua It does not help. You may need $L_p$ bound on the derivative too.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Oct 13 '16 at 11:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This statement is not true for every $xinmathbb{R}$, however it is true for almost every $xinmathbb{R}$:



Suppose that there is a measurable $Esubsetmathbb{R}$ with $mathrm{Leb}(E)>0$ such that $(f(x+kT))_{k}notinell^p$ for all $xin E$. W.l.o.g. assume that $Ecap (T+E)=emptyset$. Then
$$
int_{mathbb R}|f(x)|^p,dxgeq sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_{kT+E}|f(x)|^p,dx=sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_E|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=int_Esum_{kinmathbb Z}|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=infty
$$
contradiciting the assumption $fin L^p$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:30











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1966625%2fis-this-true-that-the-sequences-evenly-sampled-from-functions-in-lp-are-in-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

This statement is not true for every $xinmathbb{R}$, however it is true for almost every $xinmathbb{R}$:



Suppose that there is a measurable $Esubsetmathbb{R}$ with $mathrm{Leb}(E)>0$ such that $(f(x+kT))_{k}notinell^p$ for all $xin E$. W.l.o.g. assume that $Ecap (T+E)=emptyset$. Then
$$
int_{mathbb R}|f(x)|^p,dxgeq sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_{kT+E}|f(x)|^p,dx=sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_E|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=int_Esum_{kinmathbb Z}|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=infty
$$
contradiciting the assumption $fin L^p$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:30
















1












$begingroup$

This statement is not true for every $xinmathbb{R}$, however it is true for almost every $xinmathbb{R}$:



Suppose that there is a measurable $Esubsetmathbb{R}$ with $mathrm{Leb}(E)>0$ such that $(f(x+kT))_{k}notinell^p$ for all $xin E$. W.l.o.g. assume that $Ecap (T+E)=emptyset$. Then
$$
int_{mathbb R}|f(x)|^p,dxgeq sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_{kT+E}|f(x)|^p,dx=sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_E|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=int_Esum_{kinmathbb Z}|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=infty
$$
contradiciting the assumption $fin L^p$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:30














1












1








1





$begingroup$

This statement is not true for every $xinmathbb{R}$, however it is true for almost every $xinmathbb{R}$:



Suppose that there is a measurable $Esubsetmathbb{R}$ with $mathrm{Leb}(E)>0$ such that $(f(x+kT))_{k}notinell^p$ for all $xin E$. W.l.o.g. assume that $Ecap (T+E)=emptyset$. Then
$$
int_{mathbb R}|f(x)|^p,dxgeq sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_{kT+E}|f(x)|^p,dx=sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_E|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=int_Esum_{kinmathbb Z}|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=infty
$$
contradiciting the assumption $fin L^p$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



This statement is not true for every $xinmathbb{R}$, however it is true for almost every $xinmathbb{R}$:



Suppose that there is a measurable $Esubsetmathbb{R}$ with $mathrm{Leb}(E)>0$ such that $(f(x+kT))_{k}notinell^p$ for all $xin E$. W.l.o.g. assume that $Ecap (T+E)=emptyset$. Then
$$
int_{mathbb R}|f(x)|^p,dxgeq sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_{kT+E}|f(x)|^p,dx=sum_{kinmathbb Z}int_E|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=int_Esum_{kinmathbb Z}|f(x-kT)|^p,dx=infty
$$
contradiciting the assumption $fin L^p$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Oct 13 '16 at 13:30









MaoWaoMaoWao

3,153617




3,153617












  • $begingroup$
    Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:30


















  • $begingroup$
    Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 14:08










  • $begingroup$
    That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
    $endgroup$
    – bridger
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Oct 13 '16 at 16:30
















$begingroup$
Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 14:08




$begingroup$
Why could you exchange the sum and integral in the second equality ?
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 14:08












$begingroup$
That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Oct 13 '16 at 16:19




$begingroup$
That's an application of Fubini's theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Oct 13 '16 at 16:19












$begingroup$
Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 16:24




$begingroup$
Er, as far as I know, Fubini theorem applies when the two iterated integrals are bounded. But here you are suggesting they are not bounded. I don't think the theorem can apply here.
$endgroup$
– bridger
Oct 13 '16 at 16:24




1




1




$begingroup$
There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Oct 13 '16 at 16:30




$begingroup$
There's also a version of Fubini's theorem for non-negative integrands (wikipedia calls it "Tonelli's theorem": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Oct 13 '16 at 16:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1966625%2fis-this-true-that-the-sequences-evenly-sampled-from-functions-in-lp-are-in-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix