Maximal Ideal in a polynomial ring
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a field, $c in G$, and let $H = {(x - c)k, k in G[X]}$ be an ideal of the polynomial ring $G[X]$. How to show that $H$ is a maximal ideal?
Ideas:
I know that $H$ is maximal if and only if $H = <p(x)>$ for some irreducible polynomial $p(x)$ in $G[X]$. I also know that it suffices to show that $G[X]/H$ is a field however, I'm having trouble coming up with a coherent proof. Any help would be much appreciated.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a field, $c in G$, and let $H = {(x - c)k, k in G[X]}$ be an ideal of the polynomial ring $G[X]$. How to show that $H$ is a maximal ideal?
Ideas:
I know that $H$ is maximal if and only if $H = <p(x)>$ for some irreducible polynomial $p(x)$ in $G[X]$. I also know that it suffices to show that $G[X]/H$ is a field however, I'm having trouble coming up with a coherent proof. Any help would be much appreciated.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your $H$ is $langle x-crangle$. Can you show that $x-c$ is irreducible?
$endgroup$
– user9077
Dec 12 '18 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Is ${(x-c)k, kin G[X]}$ of the form $langle p(x)rangle$?
$endgroup$
– Ben
Dec 12 '18 at 0:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a field, $c in G$, and let $H = {(x - c)k, k in G[X]}$ be an ideal of the polynomial ring $G[X]$. How to show that $H$ is a maximal ideal?
Ideas:
I know that $H$ is maximal if and only if $H = <p(x)>$ for some irreducible polynomial $p(x)$ in $G[X]$. I also know that it suffices to show that $G[X]/H$ is a field however, I'm having trouble coming up with a coherent proof. Any help would be much appreciated.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a field, $c in G$, and let $H = {(x - c)k, k in G[X]}$ be an ideal of the polynomial ring $G[X]$. How to show that $H$ is a maximal ideal?
Ideas:
I know that $H$ is maximal if and only if $H = <p(x)>$ for some irreducible polynomial $p(x)$ in $G[X]$. I also know that it suffices to show that $G[X]/H$ is a field however, I'm having trouble coming up with a coherent proof. Any help would be much appreciated.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
asked Dec 12 '18 at 0:33
J. MolinaJ. Molina
82
82
$begingroup$
Your $H$ is $langle x-crangle$. Can you show that $x-c$ is irreducible?
$endgroup$
– user9077
Dec 12 '18 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Is ${(x-c)k, kin G[X]}$ of the form $langle p(x)rangle$?
$endgroup$
– Ben
Dec 12 '18 at 0:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your $H$ is $langle x-crangle$. Can you show that $x-c$ is irreducible?
$endgroup$
– user9077
Dec 12 '18 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Is ${(x-c)k, kin G[X]}$ of the form $langle p(x)rangle$?
$endgroup$
– Ben
Dec 12 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
Your $H$ is $langle x-crangle$. Can you show that $x-c$ is irreducible?
$endgroup$
– user9077
Dec 12 '18 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Your $H$ is $langle x-crangle$. Can you show that $x-c$ is irreducible?
$endgroup$
– user9077
Dec 12 '18 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Is ${(x-c)k, kin G[X]}$ of the form $langle p(x)rangle$?
$endgroup$
– Ben
Dec 12 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
Is ${(x-c)k, kin G[X]}$ of the form $langle p(x)rangle$?
$endgroup$
– Ben
Dec 12 '18 at 0:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Both approaches work. One way is to see that $X - c$ is irreducible: if it weren't then we would have $X-c = fg$ with $f,g$ non units and non-zero (because $X -c neq 0$). Thus both $f$ and $g$ must have degree at least $1$, which is absurd since
$$
1 = deg (X-c) = deg fg = deg f + deg g geq 2
$$
The other approach is proving that $G[X]/langle X-crangle$ is a field. Here's a hint: consider the unital ring morphism $G[X] to G$ that sends $X$ to $c$, and recall the statement of the first isomorphism theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036065%2fmaximal-ideal-in-a-polynomial-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Both approaches work. One way is to see that $X - c$ is irreducible: if it weren't then we would have $X-c = fg$ with $f,g$ non units and non-zero (because $X -c neq 0$). Thus both $f$ and $g$ must have degree at least $1$, which is absurd since
$$
1 = deg (X-c) = deg fg = deg f + deg g geq 2
$$
The other approach is proving that $G[X]/langle X-crangle$ is a field. Here's a hint: consider the unital ring morphism $G[X] to G$ that sends $X$ to $c$, and recall the statement of the first isomorphism theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both approaches work. One way is to see that $X - c$ is irreducible: if it weren't then we would have $X-c = fg$ with $f,g$ non units and non-zero (because $X -c neq 0$). Thus both $f$ and $g$ must have degree at least $1$, which is absurd since
$$
1 = deg (X-c) = deg fg = deg f + deg g geq 2
$$
The other approach is proving that $G[X]/langle X-crangle$ is a field. Here's a hint: consider the unital ring morphism $G[X] to G$ that sends $X$ to $c$, and recall the statement of the first isomorphism theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both approaches work. One way is to see that $X - c$ is irreducible: if it weren't then we would have $X-c = fg$ with $f,g$ non units and non-zero (because $X -c neq 0$). Thus both $f$ and $g$ must have degree at least $1$, which is absurd since
$$
1 = deg (X-c) = deg fg = deg f + deg g geq 2
$$
The other approach is proving that $G[X]/langle X-crangle$ is a field. Here's a hint: consider the unital ring morphism $G[X] to G$ that sends $X$ to $c$, and recall the statement of the first isomorphism theorem.
$endgroup$
Both approaches work. One way is to see that $X - c$ is irreducible: if it weren't then we would have $X-c = fg$ with $f,g$ non units and non-zero (because $X -c neq 0$). Thus both $f$ and $g$ must have degree at least $1$, which is absurd since
$$
1 = deg (X-c) = deg fg = deg f + deg g geq 2
$$
The other approach is proving that $G[X]/langle X-crangle$ is a field. Here's a hint: consider the unital ring morphism $G[X] to G$ that sends $X$ to $c$, and recall the statement of the first isomorphism theorem.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 0:43
Guido A.Guido A.
7,3601730
7,3601730
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036065%2fmaximal-ideal-in-a-polynomial-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your $H$ is $langle x-crangle$. Can you show that $x-c$ is irreducible?
$endgroup$
– user9077
Dec 12 '18 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Is ${(x-c)k, kin G[X]}$ of the form $langle p(x)rangle$?
$endgroup$
– Ben
Dec 12 '18 at 0:38