Lipschitz continuity implies continuity
$begingroup$
Say $vert f(x)-f(y)vert le Lvert x-yvert$. How to prove the following: $forall lim_{n to infty} x_n = x_0 wedge x_0in Bbb{R}$: $lim_{n to infty}f(x_n) = f(x_0)$?
In other words: how to prove that Lipschitz-continuity implies regular continuity(without using differentiation or similar methods)?
real-analysis continuity lipschitz-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Say $vert f(x)-f(y)vert le Lvert x-yvert$. How to prove the following: $forall lim_{n to infty} x_n = x_0 wedge x_0in Bbb{R}$: $lim_{n to infty}f(x_n) = f(x_0)$?
In other words: how to prove that Lipschitz-continuity implies regular continuity(without using differentiation or similar methods)?
real-analysis continuity lipschitz-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Say $vert f(x)-f(y)vert le Lvert x-yvert$. How to prove the following: $forall lim_{n to infty} x_n = x_0 wedge x_0in Bbb{R}$: $lim_{n to infty}f(x_n) = f(x_0)$?
In other words: how to prove that Lipschitz-continuity implies regular continuity(without using differentiation or similar methods)?
real-analysis continuity lipschitz-functions
$endgroup$
Say $vert f(x)-f(y)vert le Lvert x-yvert$. How to prove the following: $forall lim_{n to infty} x_n = x_0 wedge x_0in Bbb{R}$: $lim_{n to infty}f(x_n) = f(x_0)$?
In other words: how to prove that Lipschitz-continuity implies regular continuity(without using differentiation or similar methods)?
real-analysis continuity lipschitz-functions
real-analysis continuity lipschitz-functions
asked Dec 6 '18 at 19:37
Conny DagoConny Dago
225
225
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$x_nrightarrow x Leftrightarrow forall varepsilon >0 ,exists N_0: nge N_0 Rightarrow |x-x_n|le varepsilon$
Now if $f$ is Lipshitz and $x_nrightarrow x$ this implies that
$$|f(x)-f(x_n)|le L|x-x_n|le Lvarepsilon$$
for such a sequence.
Can you finish the proof with this information?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
$$|f(x_n)-f(x_0)|le L|x_n-x_0|$$
$$implies$$
$$f(x_0)-L|x_n-x_0|le f(x_n)le f(x_0)+L|x_n-x_0|$$
now squeeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming $L>0$ (otherwise the function $f$ is constant which is trivial):
Let ${x_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence of real numbers such that $lim_{n to infty} x_n=x_0$.
Let $varepsilon>0$ be given, and define $varepsilon':=min{varepsilon, frac{varepsilon}L}$. Since $x_n to x_0$ as $n to infty$ and $varepsilon'>0$, we may find a positive integer $N$ so that $|x_n-x_0|<varepsilon'$ whenever $n geq N$. Thus we have
$$ |, f(x_n)-f(x_0)|leq L|x_n-x_0| < Lvarepsilon' leq varepsilon text{ whenever } n geq N.$$
Therefore, $f$ is sequentially continuous on $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028938%2flipschitz-continuity-implies-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$x_nrightarrow x Leftrightarrow forall varepsilon >0 ,exists N_0: nge N_0 Rightarrow |x-x_n|le varepsilon$
Now if $f$ is Lipshitz and $x_nrightarrow x$ this implies that
$$|f(x)-f(x_n)|le L|x-x_n|le Lvarepsilon$$
for such a sequence.
Can you finish the proof with this information?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$x_nrightarrow x Leftrightarrow forall varepsilon >0 ,exists N_0: nge N_0 Rightarrow |x-x_n|le varepsilon$
Now if $f$ is Lipshitz and $x_nrightarrow x$ this implies that
$$|f(x)-f(x_n)|le L|x-x_n|le Lvarepsilon$$
for such a sequence.
Can you finish the proof with this information?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$x_nrightarrow x Leftrightarrow forall varepsilon >0 ,exists N_0: nge N_0 Rightarrow |x-x_n|le varepsilon$
Now if $f$ is Lipshitz and $x_nrightarrow x$ this implies that
$$|f(x)-f(x_n)|le L|x-x_n|le Lvarepsilon$$
for such a sequence.
Can you finish the proof with this information?
$endgroup$
$x_nrightarrow x Leftrightarrow forall varepsilon >0 ,exists N_0: nge N_0 Rightarrow |x-x_n|le varepsilon$
Now if $f$ is Lipshitz and $x_nrightarrow x$ this implies that
$$|f(x)-f(x_n)|le L|x-x_n|le Lvarepsilon$$
for such a sequence.
Can you finish the proof with this information?
answered Dec 6 '18 at 19:53
ThomasThomas
16.8k21631
16.8k21631
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
No, unfortunately. I'm thinking of $lim_{n to infty} vert f(x_0)-f(x_n)vert le lim_{n to infty} vert x_0-x_n vert $ But I don't think it's gonna lead me further...
$endgroup$
– Conny Dago
Dec 6 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
$begingroup$
Note: hamam_Abdallah's answer is less formal than Thomas' which is not to disrespect what anyone has written here. Hopefully @ConnyDago is able to recognize that as a matter of formality, there are different ways to write an argument.
$endgroup$
– Matt A Pelto
Dec 7 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
$$|f(x_n)-f(x_0)|le L|x_n-x_0|$$
$$implies$$
$$f(x_0)-L|x_n-x_0|le f(x_n)le f(x_0)+L|x_n-x_0|$$
now squeeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
$$|f(x_n)-f(x_0)|le L|x_n-x_0|$$
$$implies$$
$$f(x_0)-L|x_n-x_0|le f(x_n)le f(x_0)+L|x_n-x_0|$$
now squeeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
$$|f(x_n)-f(x_0)|le L|x_n-x_0|$$
$$implies$$
$$f(x_0)-L|x_n-x_0|le f(x_n)le f(x_0)+L|x_n-x_0|$$
now squeeze.
$endgroup$
hint
$$|f(x_n)-f(x_0)|le L|x_n-x_0|$$
$$implies$$
$$f(x_0)-L|x_n-x_0|le f(x_n)le f(x_0)+L|x_n-x_0|$$
now squeeze.
answered Dec 6 '18 at 19:55
hamam_Abdallahhamam_Abdallah
38k21634
38k21634
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming $L>0$ (otherwise the function $f$ is constant which is trivial):
Let ${x_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence of real numbers such that $lim_{n to infty} x_n=x_0$.
Let $varepsilon>0$ be given, and define $varepsilon':=min{varepsilon, frac{varepsilon}L}$. Since $x_n to x_0$ as $n to infty$ and $varepsilon'>0$, we may find a positive integer $N$ so that $|x_n-x_0|<varepsilon'$ whenever $n geq N$. Thus we have
$$ |, f(x_n)-f(x_0)|leq L|x_n-x_0| < Lvarepsilon' leq varepsilon text{ whenever } n geq N.$$
Therefore, $f$ is sequentially continuous on $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming $L>0$ (otherwise the function $f$ is constant which is trivial):
Let ${x_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence of real numbers such that $lim_{n to infty} x_n=x_0$.
Let $varepsilon>0$ be given, and define $varepsilon':=min{varepsilon, frac{varepsilon}L}$. Since $x_n to x_0$ as $n to infty$ and $varepsilon'>0$, we may find a positive integer $N$ so that $|x_n-x_0|<varepsilon'$ whenever $n geq N$. Thus we have
$$ |, f(x_n)-f(x_0)|leq L|x_n-x_0| < Lvarepsilon' leq varepsilon text{ whenever } n geq N.$$
Therefore, $f$ is sequentially continuous on $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming $L>0$ (otherwise the function $f$ is constant which is trivial):
Let ${x_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence of real numbers such that $lim_{n to infty} x_n=x_0$.
Let $varepsilon>0$ be given, and define $varepsilon':=min{varepsilon, frac{varepsilon}L}$. Since $x_n to x_0$ as $n to infty$ and $varepsilon'>0$, we may find a positive integer $N$ so that $|x_n-x_0|<varepsilon'$ whenever $n geq N$. Thus we have
$$ |, f(x_n)-f(x_0)|leq L|x_n-x_0| < Lvarepsilon' leq varepsilon text{ whenever } n geq N.$$
Therefore, $f$ is sequentially continuous on $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
Assuming $L>0$ (otherwise the function $f$ is constant which is trivial):
Let ${x_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence of real numbers such that $lim_{n to infty} x_n=x_0$.
Let $varepsilon>0$ be given, and define $varepsilon':=min{varepsilon, frac{varepsilon}L}$. Since $x_n to x_0$ as $n to infty$ and $varepsilon'>0$, we may find a positive integer $N$ so that $|x_n-x_0|<varepsilon'$ whenever $n geq N$. Thus we have
$$ |, f(x_n)-f(x_0)|leq L|x_n-x_0| < Lvarepsilon' leq varepsilon text{ whenever } n geq N.$$
Therefore, $f$ is sequentially continuous on $mathbb R$.
edited Dec 7 '18 at 3:15
answered Dec 7 '18 at 0:00
Matt A PeltoMatt A Pelto
2,537620
2,537620
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028938%2flipschitz-continuity-implies-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown