Meaning of $x^2+y^2=0$ (imaginary can have real property?!)












0












$begingroup$



While working for some homework problems for circle to select the radius for circles, I encountered with radius 0 and centre at origin i.e., $$x^2+y^2=0$$. When I asked about it to the teacher, he said that it is the equation for point circle and also it denotes the pair of imaginary lines with real intersection point.




My doubt



How come two imaginary lines have real intersection? I mean it's imaginary (pff), it can't be on the paper. How will it have a real intersection point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:18












  • $begingroup$
    @Mason But if the imaginary lines can't be plotted in real world, how can they have intersection point that we can plot or see?
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Who told you this lie?
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:23










  • $begingroup$
    @Mason What do you mean? Imaginary shapes can be plotted?!
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:24


















0












$begingroup$



While working for some homework problems for circle to select the radius for circles, I encountered with radius 0 and centre at origin i.e., $$x^2+y^2=0$$. When I asked about it to the teacher, he said that it is the equation for point circle and also it denotes the pair of imaginary lines with real intersection point.




My doubt



How come two imaginary lines have real intersection? I mean it's imaginary (pff), it can't be on the paper. How will it have a real intersection point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:18












  • $begingroup$
    @Mason But if the imaginary lines can't be plotted in real world, how can they have intersection point that we can plot or see?
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Who told you this lie?
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:23










  • $begingroup$
    @Mason What do you mean? Imaginary shapes can be plotted?!
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:24
















0












0








0


1



$begingroup$



While working for some homework problems for circle to select the radius for circles, I encountered with radius 0 and centre at origin i.e., $$x^2+y^2=0$$. When I asked about it to the teacher, he said that it is the equation for point circle and also it denotes the pair of imaginary lines with real intersection point.




My doubt



How come two imaginary lines have real intersection? I mean it's imaginary (pff), it can't be on the paper. How will it have a real intersection point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





While working for some homework problems for circle to select the radius for circles, I encountered with radius 0 and centre at origin i.e., $$x^2+y^2=0$$. When I asked about it to the teacher, he said that it is the equation for point circle and also it denotes the pair of imaginary lines with real intersection point.




My doubt



How come two imaginary lines have real intersection? I mean it's imaginary (pff), it can't be on the paper. How will it have a real intersection point?







geometry analytic-geometry circle






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 8:44







jayant98

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 21:16









jayant98jayant98

552116




552116








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:18












  • $begingroup$
    @Mason But if the imaginary lines can't be plotted in real world, how can they have intersection point that we can plot or see?
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Who told you this lie?
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:23










  • $begingroup$
    @Mason What do you mean? Imaginary shapes can be plotted?!
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:24
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:18












  • $begingroup$
    @Mason But if the imaginary lines can't be plotted in real world, how can they have intersection point that we can plot or see?
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Who told you this lie?
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:23










  • $begingroup$
    @Mason What do you mean? Imaginary shapes can be plotted?!
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:24










2




2




$begingroup$
$0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 6 '18 at 21:18






$begingroup$
$0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 6 '18 at 21:18














$begingroup$
@Mason But if the imaginary lines can't be plotted in real world, how can they have intersection point that we can plot or see?
$endgroup$
– jayant98
Dec 6 '18 at 21:22






$begingroup$
@Mason But if the imaginary lines can't be plotted in real world, how can they have intersection point that we can plot or see?
$endgroup$
– jayant98
Dec 6 '18 at 21:22






1




1




$begingroup$
Who told you this lie?
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 6 '18 at 21:23




$begingroup$
Who told you this lie?
$endgroup$
– Mason
Dec 6 '18 at 21:23












$begingroup$
@Mason What do you mean? Imaginary shapes can be plotted?!
$endgroup$
– jayant98
Dec 6 '18 at 21:24






$begingroup$
@Mason What do you mean? Imaginary shapes can be plotted?!
$endgroup$
– jayant98
Dec 6 '18 at 21:24












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.



Really the expression "imaginary" is a kind of PR problem for mathematicians. There is nothing so imaginary about imaginary numbers. Moreover... there is nothing so real about real numbers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:30










  • $begingroup$
    Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – jayant98
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    Dec 6 '18 at 21:33



















2












$begingroup$

Your teacher's answer is perhaps slightly misleading, but not entirely mistaken.



If we restrict our focus to the real numbers, then the graph of $x^2+y^2=0$ is the subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ given by the point at the origin ${ (0,0) }$.



We can also factorise $x^2+y^2$ as $(x-yi)(x+yi)=0$, which is equal to zero if and only if $x-yi=0$ or $x+yi=0$. If the variables $x$ and $y$ are both real, this means that we must have $x=y=0$, since $x = pm yi$ and $0$ is the only complex number that is both real and imaginary.



However, if $x$ and $y$ are allowed to range over $mathbb{C}$, then $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ are both 'complex lines'. The word line here is slightly misleading because their dimension is $1$ over $mathbb{C}$, not over $mathbb{R}$.



The reason this seems counterintuitive is because we often view $mathbb{C}$ as a plane—and indeed $mathbb{C}$ is $2$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$. But then $mathbb{C}^2$ is $4$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$, and then the equations $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ describe $2$-dimensional subspaces of a $4$-dimensional space. This is understandably difficult to intuit!



It is worth pointing out, also, that $x^2+y^2=0$ is the union of the complex lines $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$, not their intersection.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Maybe your teacher was referring to the factorization



    $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)=0 iff x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
      $endgroup$
      – jayant98
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:29






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:33





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The conic $x^2+y^2=0$ in $mathbf C^2$ splits into two lines since
    $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)$$
    so it's the union of the *isotropic lines $y=ix$ and $y=-ix$. The point $(0,0)$ belongs to both lines.



    Note: In complex projective geometry, the points at infinity on those lines, $(1:i:0)$ and $(1:-i:0)$ are called the cyclic points.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029061%2fmeaning-of-x2y2-0-imaginary-can-have-real-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.



      Really the expression "imaginary" is a kind of PR problem for mathematicians. There is nothing so imaginary about imaginary numbers. Moreover... there is nothing so real about real numbers.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:26






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:30










      • $begingroup$
        Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:33
















      1












      $begingroup$

      $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.



      Really the expression "imaginary" is a kind of PR problem for mathematicians. There is nothing so imaginary about imaginary numbers. Moreover... there is nothing so real about real numbers.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:26






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:30










      • $begingroup$
        Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:33














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$

      $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.



      Really the expression "imaginary" is a kind of PR problem for mathematicians. There is nothing so imaginary about imaginary numbers. Moreover... there is nothing so real about real numbers.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      $0$ is both an imaginary number and a real number. A complex number is a number of the form $a+bi$ for real $a,b$. A real number is any complex number where $b=0$. An imaginary number is any complex number where $a=0$. Zero fits the criteria for both of these categories.



      Really the expression "imaginary" is a kind of PR problem for mathematicians. There is nothing so imaginary about imaginary numbers. Moreover... there is nothing so real about real numbers.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 6 '18 at 21:24









      MasonMason

      1,9551530




      1,9551530












      • $begingroup$
        please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:26






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:30










      • $begingroup$
        Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:33


















      • $begingroup$
        please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:26






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:30










      • $begingroup$
        Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
        $endgroup$
        – jayant98
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        Dec 6 '18 at 21:33
















      $begingroup$
      please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
      $endgroup$
      – jayant98
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:26




      $begingroup$
      please explain the last two lines of your answer. If possible please give some examples. Thanks for helping me!
      $endgroup$
      – jayant98
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:26




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
      $endgroup$
      – Mason
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:30




      $begingroup$
      The point $a+bi$ is really a lot like the point $(a,b)$. You are clearly familiar with plotting in the cartesian plane. But now we have the added power that $i^2=-1$. So whenever we take a number in the complex plane and multiply it by $i$ we rotate it's position 90 degrees. I don't think that anyone would claim that "rotation by 90 degrees" is an imaginary concept.
      $endgroup$
      – Mason
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:30












      $begingroup$
      Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
      $endgroup$
      – jayant98
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:32




      $begingroup$
      Okay. Understood that point. Phew, it was like clearing up the mess in my mind. Thanks again!
      $endgroup$
      – jayant98
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:32




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
      $endgroup$
      – Mason
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:33




      $begingroup$
      As for why real numbers are not "real" well... there is some leaps in thinking that we have to overcome to think of real numbers as meaningful things... You know you have never stepped into $1$ river. Every moment that you see the river it moves. And changes. When we talk in math about numbers we are somehow counting or measuring something which is not subject to the real world of space and time. The objects we are discussing do not move or change in time. They are somehow not of the real world.
      $endgroup$
      – Mason
      Dec 6 '18 at 21:33











      2












      $begingroup$

      Your teacher's answer is perhaps slightly misleading, but not entirely mistaken.



      If we restrict our focus to the real numbers, then the graph of $x^2+y^2=0$ is the subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ given by the point at the origin ${ (0,0) }$.



      We can also factorise $x^2+y^2$ as $(x-yi)(x+yi)=0$, which is equal to zero if and only if $x-yi=0$ or $x+yi=0$. If the variables $x$ and $y$ are both real, this means that we must have $x=y=0$, since $x = pm yi$ and $0$ is the only complex number that is both real and imaginary.



      However, if $x$ and $y$ are allowed to range over $mathbb{C}$, then $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ are both 'complex lines'. The word line here is slightly misleading because their dimension is $1$ over $mathbb{C}$, not over $mathbb{R}$.



      The reason this seems counterintuitive is because we often view $mathbb{C}$ as a plane—and indeed $mathbb{C}$ is $2$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$. But then $mathbb{C}^2$ is $4$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$, and then the equations $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ describe $2$-dimensional subspaces of a $4$-dimensional space. This is understandably difficult to intuit!



      It is worth pointing out, also, that $x^2+y^2=0$ is the union of the complex lines $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$, not their intersection.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        Your teacher's answer is perhaps slightly misleading, but not entirely mistaken.



        If we restrict our focus to the real numbers, then the graph of $x^2+y^2=0$ is the subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ given by the point at the origin ${ (0,0) }$.



        We can also factorise $x^2+y^2$ as $(x-yi)(x+yi)=0$, which is equal to zero if and only if $x-yi=0$ or $x+yi=0$. If the variables $x$ and $y$ are both real, this means that we must have $x=y=0$, since $x = pm yi$ and $0$ is the only complex number that is both real and imaginary.



        However, if $x$ and $y$ are allowed to range over $mathbb{C}$, then $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ are both 'complex lines'. The word line here is slightly misleading because their dimension is $1$ over $mathbb{C}$, not over $mathbb{R}$.



        The reason this seems counterintuitive is because we often view $mathbb{C}$ as a plane—and indeed $mathbb{C}$ is $2$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$. But then $mathbb{C}^2$ is $4$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$, and then the equations $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ describe $2$-dimensional subspaces of a $4$-dimensional space. This is understandably difficult to intuit!



        It is worth pointing out, also, that $x^2+y^2=0$ is the union of the complex lines $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$, not their intersection.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Your teacher's answer is perhaps slightly misleading, but not entirely mistaken.



          If we restrict our focus to the real numbers, then the graph of $x^2+y^2=0$ is the subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ given by the point at the origin ${ (0,0) }$.



          We can also factorise $x^2+y^2$ as $(x-yi)(x+yi)=0$, which is equal to zero if and only if $x-yi=0$ or $x+yi=0$. If the variables $x$ and $y$ are both real, this means that we must have $x=y=0$, since $x = pm yi$ and $0$ is the only complex number that is both real and imaginary.



          However, if $x$ and $y$ are allowed to range over $mathbb{C}$, then $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ are both 'complex lines'. The word line here is slightly misleading because their dimension is $1$ over $mathbb{C}$, not over $mathbb{R}$.



          The reason this seems counterintuitive is because we often view $mathbb{C}$ as a plane—and indeed $mathbb{C}$ is $2$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$. But then $mathbb{C}^2$ is $4$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$, and then the equations $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ describe $2$-dimensional subspaces of a $4$-dimensional space. This is understandably difficult to intuit!



          It is worth pointing out, also, that $x^2+y^2=0$ is the union of the complex lines $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$, not their intersection.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Your teacher's answer is perhaps slightly misleading, but not entirely mistaken.



          If we restrict our focus to the real numbers, then the graph of $x^2+y^2=0$ is the subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ given by the point at the origin ${ (0,0) }$.



          We can also factorise $x^2+y^2$ as $(x-yi)(x+yi)=0$, which is equal to zero if and only if $x-yi=0$ or $x+yi=0$. If the variables $x$ and $y$ are both real, this means that we must have $x=y=0$, since $x = pm yi$ and $0$ is the only complex number that is both real and imaginary.



          However, if $x$ and $y$ are allowed to range over $mathbb{C}$, then $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ are both 'complex lines'. The word line here is slightly misleading because their dimension is $1$ over $mathbb{C}$, not over $mathbb{R}$.



          The reason this seems counterintuitive is because we often view $mathbb{C}$ as a plane—and indeed $mathbb{C}$ is $2$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$. But then $mathbb{C}^2$ is $4$-dimensional over $mathbb{R}$, and then the equations $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$ describe $2$-dimensional subspaces of a $4$-dimensional space. This is understandably difficult to intuit!



          It is worth pointing out, also, that $x^2+y^2=0$ is the union of the complex lines $x-yi=0$ and $x+yi=0$, not their intersection.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 6 '18 at 21:29









          Clive NewsteadClive Newstead

          51.3k474135




          51.3k474135























              0












              $begingroup$

              Maybe your teacher was referring to the factorization



              $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)=0 iff x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
                $endgroup$
                – jayant98
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:29






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
                $endgroup$
                – gimusi
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:33


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Maybe your teacher was referring to the factorization



              $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)=0 iff x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
                $endgroup$
                – jayant98
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:29






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
                $endgroup$
                – gimusi
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:33
















              0












              0








              0





              $begingroup$

              Maybe your teacher was referring to the factorization



              $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)=0 iff x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Maybe your teacher was referring to the factorization



              $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)=0 iff x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy$$







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 6 '18 at 21:27









              gimusigimusi

              92.8k84494




              92.8k84494












              • $begingroup$
                So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
                $endgroup$
                – jayant98
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:29






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
                $endgroup$
                – gimusi
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:33




















              • $begingroup$
                So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
                $endgroup$
                – jayant98
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:29






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
                $endgroup$
                – gimusi
                Dec 6 '18 at 21:33


















              $begingroup$
              So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
              $endgroup$
              – jayant98
              Dec 6 '18 at 21:29




              $begingroup$
              So the two brackets of RHS denote the imaginary line. But how do we plot them to show intersection?
              $endgroup$
              – jayant98
              Dec 6 '18 at 21:29




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 6 '18 at 21:33






              $begingroup$
              @jayant98 If we assume $x$ and $y$ real then if $x=iy$ we obtain $iy=-iy implies y=0$ and then $x=0$. In that sense we can say that $x=iy quad lor quad x=-iy implies x=0 quad land quad y=0$ and then we can view that as the intersection of the two lines.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 6 '18 at 21:33













              0












              $begingroup$

              The conic $x^2+y^2=0$ in $mathbf C^2$ splits into two lines since
              $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)$$
              so it's the union of the *isotropic lines $y=ix$ and $y=-ix$. The point $(0,0)$ belongs to both lines.



              Note: In complex projective geometry, the points at infinity on those lines, $(1:i:0)$ and $(1:-i:0)$ are called the cyclic points.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                The conic $x^2+y^2=0$ in $mathbf C^2$ splits into two lines since
                $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)$$
                so it's the union of the *isotropic lines $y=ix$ and $y=-ix$. The point $(0,0)$ belongs to both lines.



                Note: In complex projective geometry, the points at infinity on those lines, $(1:i:0)$ and $(1:-i:0)$ are called the cyclic points.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The conic $x^2+y^2=0$ in $mathbf C^2$ splits into two lines since
                  $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)$$
                  so it's the union of the *isotropic lines $y=ix$ and $y=-ix$. The point $(0,0)$ belongs to both lines.



                  Note: In complex projective geometry, the points at infinity on those lines, $(1:i:0)$ and $(1:-i:0)$ are called the cyclic points.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  The conic $x^2+y^2=0$ in $mathbf C^2$ splits into two lines since
                  $$x^2+y^2=(x+iy)(x-iy)$$
                  so it's the union of the *isotropic lines $y=ix$ and $y=-ix$. The point $(0,0)$ belongs to both lines.



                  Note: In complex projective geometry, the points at infinity on those lines, $(1:i:0)$ and $(1:-i:0)$ are called the cyclic points.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 6 '18 at 21:54









                  Botond

                  5,6822732




                  5,6822732










                  answered Dec 6 '18 at 21:28









                  BernardBernard

                  119k740113




                  119k740113






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029061%2fmeaning-of-x2y2-0-imaginary-can-have-real-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix