Confusion over the word “ratio” in the definition of $pi$












0












$begingroup$


According to Wikipedia, pi is "a mathematical constant that was originally defined as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter."



However, when I think of the word "ratio", something like $4:3$ or $7:10$ comes to mind. Why is pi said to be a ratio? Isn't it more accurate to say that pi is the circumference divided by its diameter, rather than the ratio of the circumference to the diameter (which I would think of as $pi:1$)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    divided by means ratio. In other words, $a/b$. Here $a$ is the circumference, and $b$ is the diameter. You cannot use $pi$ there already, because you want to define $pi$ this way. So, no, $pi=pi:1$ is not what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:08


















0












$begingroup$


According to Wikipedia, pi is "a mathematical constant that was originally defined as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter."



However, when I think of the word "ratio", something like $4:3$ or $7:10$ comes to mind. Why is pi said to be a ratio? Isn't it more accurate to say that pi is the circumference divided by its diameter, rather than the ratio of the circumference to the diameter (which I would think of as $pi:1$)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    divided by means ratio. In other words, $a/b$. Here $a$ is the circumference, and $b$ is the diameter. You cannot use $pi$ there already, because you want to define $pi$ this way. So, no, $pi=pi:1$ is not what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:08
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


According to Wikipedia, pi is "a mathematical constant that was originally defined as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter."



However, when I think of the word "ratio", something like $4:3$ or $7:10$ comes to mind. Why is pi said to be a ratio? Isn't it more accurate to say that pi is the circumference divided by its diameter, rather than the ratio of the circumference to the diameter (which I would think of as $pi:1$)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




According to Wikipedia, pi is "a mathematical constant that was originally defined as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter."



However, when I think of the word "ratio", something like $4:3$ or $7:10$ comes to mind. Why is pi said to be a ratio? Isn't it more accurate to say that pi is the circumference divided by its diameter, rather than the ratio of the circumference to the diameter (which I would think of as $pi:1$)?







definition circle pi






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 20:13









Blue

48k870153




48k870153










asked Dec 6 '18 at 20:05









JoeJoe

111




111








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    divided by means ratio. In other words, $a/b$. Here $a$ is the circumference, and $b$ is the diameter. You cannot use $pi$ there already, because you want to define $pi$ this way. So, no, $pi=pi:1$ is not what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:08
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    divided by means ratio. In other words, $a/b$. Here $a$ is the circumference, and $b$ is the diameter. You cannot use $pi$ there already, because you want to define $pi$ this way. So, no, $pi=pi:1$ is not what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:08










1




1




$begingroup$
divided by means ratio. In other words, $a/b$. Here $a$ is the circumference, and $b$ is the diameter. You cannot use $pi$ there already, because you want to define $pi$ this way. So, no, $pi=pi:1$ is not what you want.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 20:08






$begingroup$
divided by means ratio. In other words, $a/b$. Here $a$ is the circumference, and $b$ is the diameter. You cannot use $pi$ there already, because you want to define $pi$ this way. So, no, $pi=pi:1$ is not what you want.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 20:08












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Recall that circumference of a circle is $C = pi d$, where $d$ is the diameter. Then, $$pi={Cover d},$$ as you mentioned. If we had the exact length of the circumference of the circle, and its diameter, then we will compute $pi$ exactly. However, as you learn in any science class, our instruments of measurement are not perfect and subject to roundoff error. So maybe using a ruler, you compute that your circle's circumference is $31$ inches, and its diameter is $10$ inches. Then $pi approx 31 div10=3.1$. If we can get a more precise measuring tool, we get closer to $pi=3.141592ldots$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028978%2fconfusion-over-the-word-ratio-in-the-definition-of-pi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Recall that circumference of a circle is $C = pi d$, where $d$ is the diameter. Then, $$pi={Cover d},$$ as you mentioned. If we had the exact length of the circumference of the circle, and its diameter, then we will compute $pi$ exactly. However, as you learn in any science class, our instruments of measurement are not perfect and subject to roundoff error. So maybe using a ruler, you compute that your circle's circumference is $31$ inches, and its diameter is $10$ inches. Then $pi approx 31 div10=3.1$. If we can get a more precise measuring tool, we get closer to $pi=3.141592ldots$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Recall that circumference of a circle is $C = pi d$, where $d$ is the diameter. Then, $$pi={Cover d},$$ as you mentioned. If we had the exact length of the circumference of the circle, and its diameter, then we will compute $pi$ exactly. However, as you learn in any science class, our instruments of measurement are not perfect and subject to roundoff error. So maybe using a ruler, you compute that your circle's circumference is $31$ inches, and its diameter is $10$ inches. Then $pi approx 31 div10=3.1$. If we can get a more precise measuring tool, we get closer to $pi=3.141592ldots$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Recall that circumference of a circle is $C = pi d$, where $d$ is the diameter. Then, $$pi={Cover d},$$ as you mentioned. If we had the exact length of the circumference of the circle, and its diameter, then we will compute $pi$ exactly. However, as you learn in any science class, our instruments of measurement are not perfect and subject to roundoff error. So maybe using a ruler, you compute that your circle's circumference is $31$ inches, and its diameter is $10$ inches. Then $pi approx 31 div10=3.1$. If we can get a more precise measuring tool, we get closer to $pi=3.141592ldots$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Recall that circumference of a circle is $C = pi d$, where $d$ is the diameter. Then, $$pi={Cover d},$$ as you mentioned. If we had the exact length of the circumference of the circle, and its diameter, then we will compute $pi$ exactly. However, as you learn in any science class, our instruments of measurement are not perfect and subject to roundoff error. So maybe using a ruler, you compute that your circle's circumference is $31$ inches, and its diameter is $10$ inches. Then $pi approx 31 div10=3.1$. If we can get a more precise measuring tool, we get closer to $pi=3.141592ldots$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 6 '18 at 20:15









        Decaf-MathDecaf-Math

        3,254825




        3,254825






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028978%2fconfusion-over-the-word-ratio-in-the-definition-of-pi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix