Calcul of $lim_{xto 1^{-}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$
$begingroup$
I found that
$$lim_{xto 1^{-}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=+infty$$
My question: Can we use Taylor series method to find this limit?
limits taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found that
$$lim_{xto 1^{-}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=+infty$$
My question: Can we use Taylor series method to find this limit?
limits taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found that
$$lim_{xto 1^{-}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=+infty$$
My question: Can we use Taylor series method to find this limit?
limits taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
I found that
$$lim_{xto 1^{-}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=+infty$$
My question: Can we use Taylor series method to find this limit?
limits taylor-expansion
limits taylor-expansion
edited Dec 6 '18 at 20:25
Theory Nombre
asked Dec 6 '18 at 20:19
Theory NombreTheory Nombre
1297
1297
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that we cannot use l’Hopital since as $xto1^-$
$$frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$$
is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$, and we can directly conclude from here that the limit is $+infty$.
A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$ and in that case we can of course apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
You cannot use Taylor series here, because $arccos$ is not analytic at $1$. In fact, its not even continuous. You could try to do a kind of Taylor expansion with taking limits only from one side, but then the derivative at $1$ is still infinite.
There is a generalisation you can use though, the so called Puisseux Series.
As mentioned in the other answer, the more interesting limit is $xto -1^+$.
As the first right derivative of $arccos(x)$ is infinite, you cannot use the Taylor series here. However, l'hospital still works:
$$lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=lim_{xto -1^{+}} frac {-(1-x^2)^{-1/2}}{-x (1-x^2)^{-1/2} } = lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac 1 x =-1.$$
You could also try to use the mentioned puisseux series: However,
$$pi -arccos(x) =sqrt2 sqrt{x+1} + frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{6sqrt 2}+ dots$$
and $$ sqrt{1-x^2}= sqrt 2 sqrt{x+1} - frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{2sqrt 2}+dots$$
and there does not seem to be a vanishing term in either of those. So it is actually less helpful than I thought at first.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028993%2fcalcul-of-lim-x-to-1-frac-pi-arccosx-sqrt1-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that we cannot use l’Hopital since as $xto1^-$
$$frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$$
is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$, and we can directly conclude from here that the limit is $+infty$.
A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$ and in that case we can of course apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that we cannot use l’Hopital since as $xto1^-$
$$frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$$
is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$, and we can directly conclude from here that the limit is $+infty$.
A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$ and in that case we can of course apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that we cannot use l’Hopital since as $xto1^-$
$$frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$$
is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$, and we can directly conclude from here that the limit is $+infty$.
A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$ and in that case we can of course apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
Note that we cannot use l’Hopital since as $xto1^-$
$$frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$$
is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$, and we can directly conclude from here that the limit is $+infty$.
A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$ and in that case we can of course apply l'Hopital.
edited Dec 6 '18 at 20:48
answered Dec 6 '18 at 20:23
gimusigimusi
92.8k84494
92.8k84494
1
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
1
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
1
1
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
We can but it is completely not necessary here.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
1
1
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
$begingroup$
The proof is already there ... "We can directly..."
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 20:31
1
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre As noticed we don't need in that case, we can easily conclude from the fact that the expression is in the form $frac{pi}{0^+}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:42
1
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre We cannot apply Taylor since (arccos x)' doesn't exist at $x=1$ and neither $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
1
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@TheoryNombre A more interesting limit would be the same for $xto -1^+$. In that case we can apply l'Hopital.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
You cannot use Taylor series here, because $arccos$ is not analytic at $1$. In fact, its not even continuous. You could try to do a kind of Taylor expansion with taking limits only from one side, but then the derivative at $1$ is still infinite.
There is a generalisation you can use though, the so called Puisseux Series.
As mentioned in the other answer, the more interesting limit is $xto -1^+$.
As the first right derivative of $arccos(x)$ is infinite, you cannot use the Taylor series here. However, l'hospital still works:
$$lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=lim_{xto -1^{+}} frac {-(1-x^2)^{-1/2}}{-x (1-x^2)^{-1/2} } = lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac 1 x =-1.$$
You could also try to use the mentioned puisseux series: However,
$$pi -arccos(x) =sqrt2 sqrt{x+1} + frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{6sqrt 2}+ dots$$
and $$ sqrt{1-x^2}= sqrt 2 sqrt{x+1} - frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{2sqrt 2}+dots$$
and there does not seem to be a vanishing term in either of those. So it is actually less helpful than I thought at first.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You cannot use Taylor series here, because $arccos$ is not analytic at $1$. In fact, its not even continuous. You could try to do a kind of Taylor expansion with taking limits only from one side, but then the derivative at $1$ is still infinite.
There is a generalisation you can use though, the so called Puisseux Series.
As mentioned in the other answer, the more interesting limit is $xto -1^+$.
As the first right derivative of $arccos(x)$ is infinite, you cannot use the Taylor series here. However, l'hospital still works:
$$lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=lim_{xto -1^{+}} frac {-(1-x^2)^{-1/2}}{-x (1-x^2)^{-1/2} } = lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac 1 x =-1.$$
You could also try to use the mentioned puisseux series: However,
$$pi -arccos(x) =sqrt2 sqrt{x+1} + frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{6sqrt 2}+ dots$$
and $$ sqrt{1-x^2}= sqrt 2 sqrt{x+1} - frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{2sqrt 2}+dots$$
and there does not seem to be a vanishing term in either of those. So it is actually less helpful than I thought at first.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You cannot use Taylor series here, because $arccos$ is not analytic at $1$. In fact, its not even continuous. You could try to do a kind of Taylor expansion with taking limits only from one side, but then the derivative at $1$ is still infinite.
There is a generalisation you can use though, the so called Puisseux Series.
As mentioned in the other answer, the more interesting limit is $xto -1^+$.
As the first right derivative of $arccos(x)$ is infinite, you cannot use the Taylor series here. However, l'hospital still works:
$$lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=lim_{xto -1^{+}} frac {-(1-x^2)^{-1/2}}{-x (1-x^2)^{-1/2} } = lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac 1 x =-1.$$
You could also try to use the mentioned puisseux series: However,
$$pi -arccos(x) =sqrt2 sqrt{x+1} + frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{6sqrt 2}+ dots$$
and $$ sqrt{1-x^2}= sqrt 2 sqrt{x+1} - frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{2sqrt 2}+dots$$
and there does not seem to be a vanishing term in either of those. So it is actually less helpful than I thought at first.
$endgroup$
You cannot use Taylor series here, because $arccos$ is not analytic at $1$. In fact, its not even continuous. You could try to do a kind of Taylor expansion with taking limits only from one side, but then the derivative at $1$ is still infinite.
There is a generalisation you can use though, the so called Puisseux Series.
As mentioned in the other answer, the more interesting limit is $xto -1^+$.
As the first right derivative of $arccos(x)$ is infinite, you cannot use the Taylor series here. However, l'hospital still works:
$$lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac{pi-arccos(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}}=lim_{xto -1^{+}} frac {-(1-x^2)^{-1/2}}{-x (1-x^2)^{-1/2} } = lim_{xto -1^{+}}frac 1 x =-1.$$
You could also try to use the mentioned puisseux series: However,
$$pi -arccos(x) =sqrt2 sqrt{x+1} + frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{6sqrt 2}+ dots$$
and $$ sqrt{1-x^2}= sqrt 2 sqrt{x+1} - frac {(x+1)^{frac 3 2}}{2sqrt 2}+dots$$
and there does not seem to be a vanishing term in either of those. So it is actually less helpful than I thought at first.
edited Dec 6 '18 at 21:20
answered Dec 6 '18 at 20:40
klirkklirk
2,631530
2,631530
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028993%2fcalcul-of-lim-x-to-1-frac-pi-arccosx-sqrt1-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown