Order of poles on a function
$begingroup$
How can I determine what the order of the pole on the following function is:
$$ f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)}$$
From the Laurent series, I found that the residue would be b/a or -b/a, however, I am confused whether this is a simple pole or a pole of second order.
complex-analysis roots laurent-series
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
How can I determine what the order of the pole on the following function is:
$$ f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)}$$
From the Laurent series, I found that the residue would be b/a or -b/a, however, I am confused whether this is a simple pole or a pole of second order.
complex-analysis roots laurent-series
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can you know the residue without the order of the pole?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 6 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Is it not possible? I thought the Laurent series would give me the residue at the z^-1 term.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
Do you mean the pole at $z=0?$ Anyway, the numerator is never $0$ so the order of the pole is just the order of the zero of the denominator.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Yes I do mean the pole at z = 0.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@saulspatz does that mean that it is of order two? Since you would have a zero relating to sinh and one to z?
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
How can I determine what the order of the pole on the following function is:
$$ f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)}$$
From the Laurent series, I found that the residue would be b/a or -b/a, however, I am confused whether this is a simple pole or a pole of second order.
complex-analysis roots laurent-series
$endgroup$
How can I determine what the order of the pole on the following function is:
$$ f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)}$$
From the Laurent series, I found that the residue would be b/a or -b/a, however, I am confused whether this is a simple pole or a pole of second order.
complex-analysis roots laurent-series
complex-analysis roots laurent-series
edited Dec 6 '18 at 20:49
A.Γ.
22.7k32656
22.7k32656
asked Dec 6 '18 at 20:37
LechugaLechuga
105
105
$begingroup$
How can you know the residue without the order of the pole?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 6 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Is it not possible? I thought the Laurent series would give me the residue at the z^-1 term.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
Do you mean the pole at $z=0?$ Anyway, the numerator is never $0$ so the order of the pole is just the order of the zero of the denominator.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Yes I do mean the pole at z = 0.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@saulspatz does that mean that it is of order two? Since you would have a zero relating to sinh and one to z?
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
How can you know the residue without the order of the pole?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 6 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Is it not possible? I thought the Laurent series would give me the residue at the z^-1 term.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
Do you mean the pole at $z=0?$ Anyway, the numerator is never $0$ so the order of the pole is just the order of the zero of the denominator.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Yes I do mean the pole at z = 0.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@saulspatz does that mean that it is of order two? Since you would have a zero relating to sinh and one to z?
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
How can you know the residue without the order of the pole?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 6 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
How can you know the residue without the order of the pole?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 6 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Is it not possible? I thought the Laurent series would give me the residue at the z^-1 term.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Is it not possible? I thought the Laurent series would give me the residue at the z^-1 term.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
1
$begingroup$
Do you mean the pole at $z=0?$ Anyway, the numerator is never $0$ so the order of the pole is just the order of the zero of the denominator.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Do you mean the pole at $z=0?$ Anyway, the numerator is never $0$ so the order of the pole is just the order of the zero of the denominator.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Yes I do mean the pole at z = 0.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
Yes I do mean the pole at z = 0.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@saulspatz does that mean that it is of order two? Since you would have a zero relating to sinh and one to z?
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@saulspatz does that mean that it is of order two? Since you would have a zero relating to sinh and one to z?
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(Effectively answered in comments, post made to clear queue).
The numerator is nonzero, prove the denominator has a root of degree $2$ by your favorite method. Alternatively,
$$f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)} = frac{2e^{bz}}{z}left(e^z-e^{-z}right)^{-1} = frac{e^{bz}}{z}sum_{k = -infty}^infty frac{(-1)^kz}{(pi k)^2+z^2}$$
The sum on the right will only yield a negative power of $z$ when $k=0,$ so the order is $-2.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029018%2forder-of-poles-on-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(Effectively answered in comments, post made to clear queue).
The numerator is nonzero, prove the denominator has a root of degree $2$ by your favorite method. Alternatively,
$$f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)} = frac{2e^{bz}}{z}left(e^z-e^{-z}right)^{-1} = frac{e^{bz}}{z}sum_{k = -infty}^infty frac{(-1)^kz}{(pi k)^2+z^2}$$
The sum on the right will only yield a negative power of $z$ when $k=0,$ so the order is $-2.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(Effectively answered in comments, post made to clear queue).
The numerator is nonzero, prove the denominator has a root of degree $2$ by your favorite method. Alternatively,
$$f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)} = frac{2e^{bz}}{z}left(e^z-e^{-z}right)^{-1} = frac{e^{bz}}{z}sum_{k = -infty}^infty frac{(-1)^kz}{(pi k)^2+z^2}$$
The sum on the right will only yield a negative power of $z$ when $k=0,$ so the order is $-2.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(Effectively answered in comments, post made to clear queue).
The numerator is nonzero, prove the denominator has a root of degree $2$ by your favorite method. Alternatively,
$$f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)} = frac{2e^{bz}}{z}left(e^z-e^{-z}right)^{-1} = frac{e^{bz}}{z}sum_{k = -infty}^infty frac{(-1)^kz}{(pi k)^2+z^2}$$
The sum on the right will only yield a negative power of $z$ when $k=0,$ so the order is $-2.$
$endgroup$
(Effectively answered in comments, post made to clear queue).
The numerator is nonzero, prove the denominator has a root of degree $2$ by your favorite method. Alternatively,
$$f(z)= frac{e^{bz}}{zsinh(az)} = frac{2e^{bz}}{z}left(e^z-e^{-z}right)^{-1} = frac{e^{bz}}{z}sum_{k = -infty}^infty frac{(-1)^kz}{(pi k)^2+z^2}$$
The sum on the right will only yield a negative power of $z$ when $k=0,$ so the order is $-2.$
answered Dec 10 '18 at 12:40
Brevan EllefsenBrevan Ellefsen
11.7k31649
11.7k31649
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029018%2forder-of-poles-on-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How can you know the residue without the order of the pole?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 6 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Is it not possible? I thought the Laurent series would give me the residue at the z^-1 term.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
Do you mean the pole at $z=0?$ Anyway, the numerator is never $0$ so the order of the pole is just the order of the zero of the denominator.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 6 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
Yes I do mean the pole at z = 0.
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
@saulspatz does that mean that it is of order two? Since you would have a zero relating to sinh and one to z?
$endgroup$
– Lechuga
Dec 6 '18 at 20:45