Networking between Subnets
i have been trying to connect a local subnet to another subnet.
Router 1: 137.226.189.1
Router 2: 192.168.1.1
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed and currently a pingrequest returns a timeout. Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and pinging from 192.168.1.228 to 137.226.189.1 works with response.
The connection has this topology:
PC <-> LAN to LAN <-> Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 <-> LAN to LAN <-> PC2
I am not sure whether i should forward any traffic using Router 1 or Router 2. Some sources say it should work out of the box. Firewall of PC1 is turned off and Router 1 uses standard firewall of dd-wrt.
networking dd-wrt subnet
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
add a comment |
i have been trying to connect a local subnet to another subnet.
Router 1: 137.226.189.1
Router 2: 192.168.1.1
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed and currently a pingrequest returns a timeout. Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and pinging from 192.168.1.228 to 137.226.189.1 works with response.
The connection has this topology:
PC <-> LAN to LAN <-> Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 <-> LAN to LAN <-> PC2
I am not sure whether i should forward any traffic using Router 1 or Router 2. Some sources say it should work out of the box. Firewall of PC1 is turned off and Router 1 uses standard firewall of dd-wrt.
networking dd-wrt subnet
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
1
Generally routers have an address for each interface (one for LAN, another for WAN, etc.) Could you update the router information with addresses and /netmasks for all interfaces?
– grawity
Dec 13 at 11:32
Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and in the same time Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 - i.e. backward. Draw scheme like:(PC - LAN=192.168.1.228) - (LAN=192.168.1.1 - Router 1 - WAN_IP) - (LAN=137.226.189.1 - Router 2 - LAN=137.226.189.1) - ( LAN=137.226.189.42 - PC2).
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:54
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed This means that both PC1 may connect to PC2 and PC2 to PC1, or you mean only PC1 calls PC2 and PC2 answers to PC1? And - if some router (Router1 on your scheme but Router2 from your description) have WAN interface, does NAT is enabled on that interface?
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:56
add a comment |
i have been trying to connect a local subnet to another subnet.
Router 1: 137.226.189.1
Router 2: 192.168.1.1
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed and currently a pingrequest returns a timeout. Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and pinging from 192.168.1.228 to 137.226.189.1 works with response.
The connection has this topology:
PC <-> LAN to LAN <-> Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 <-> LAN to LAN <-> PC2
I am not sure whether i should forward any traffic using Router 1 or Router 2. Some sources say it should work out of the box. Firewall of PC1 is turned off and Router 1 uses standard firewall of dd-wrt.
networking dd-wrt subnet
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
i have been trying to connect a local subnet to another subnet.
Router 1: 137.226.189.1
Router 2: 192.168.1.1
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed and currently a pingrequest returns a timeout. Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and pinging from 192.168.1.228 to 137.226.189.1 works with response.
The connection has this topology:
PC <-> LAN to LAN <-> Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 <-> LAN to LAN <-> PC2
I am not sure whether i should forward any traffic using Router 1 or Router 2. Some sources say it should work out of the box. Firewall of PC1 is turned off and Router 1 uses standard firewall of dd-wrt.
networking dd-wrt subnet
networking dd-wrt subnet
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
asked Dec 13 at 11:07
Tuni
1
1
1
Generally routers have an address for each interface (one for LAN, another for WAN, etc.) Could you update the router information with addresses and /netmasks for all interfaces?
– grawity
Dec 13 at 11:32
Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and in the same time Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 - i.e. backward. Draw scheme like:(PC - LAN=192.168.1.228) - (LAN=192.168.1.1 - Router 1 - WAN_IP) - (LAN=137.226.189.1 - Router 2 - LAN=137.226.189.1) - ( LAN=137.226.189.42 - PC2).
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:54
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed This means that both PC1 may connect to PC2 and PC2 to PC1, or you mean only PC1 calls PC2 and PC2 answers to PC1? And - if some router (Router1 on your scheme but Router2 from your description) have WAN interface, does NAT is enabled on that interface?
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:56
add a comment |
1
Generally routers have an address for each interface (one for LAN, another for WAN, etc.) Could you update the router information with addresses and /netmasks for all interfaces?
– grawity
Dec 13 at 11:32
Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and in the same time Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 - i.e. backward. Draw scheme like:(PC - LAN=192.168.1.228) - (LAN=192.168.1.1 - Router 1 - WAN_IP) - (LAN=137.226.189.1 - Router 2 - LAN=137.226.189.1) - ( LAN=137.226.189.42 - PC2).
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:54
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed This means that both PC1 may connect to PC2 and PC2 to PC1, or you mean only PC1 calls PC2 and PC2 answers to PC1? And - if some router (Router1 on your scheme but Router2 from your description) have WAN interface, does NAT is enabled on that interface?
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:56
1
1
Generally routers have an address for each interface (one for LAN, another for WAN, etc.) Could you update the router information with addresses and /netmasks for all interfaces?
– grawity
Dec 13 at 11:32
Generally routers have an address for each interface (one for LAN, another for WAN, etc.) Could you update the router information with addresses and /netmasks for all interfaces?
– grawity
Dec 13 at 11:32
Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and in the same time Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 - i.e. backward. Draw scheme like:
(PC - LAN=192.168.1.228) - (LAN=192.168.1.1 - Router 1 - WAN_IP) - (LAN=137.226.189.1 - Router 2 - LAN=137.226.189.1) - ( LAN=137.226.189.42 - PC2).– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:54
Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and in the same time Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 - i.e. backward. Draw scheme like:
(PC - LAN=192.168.1.228) - (LAN=192.168.1.1 - Router 1 - WAN_IP) - (LAN=137.226.189.1 - Router 2 - LAN=137.226.189.1) - ( LAN=137.226.189.42 - PC2).– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:54
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed This means that both PC1 may connect to PC2 and PC2 to PC1, or you mean only PC1 calls PC2 and PC2 answers to PC1? And - if some router (Router1 on your scheme but Router2 from your description) have WAN interface, does NAT is enabled on that interface?
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:56
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed This means that both PC1 may connect to PC2 and PC2 to PC1, or you mean only PC1 calls PC2 and PC2 answers to PC1? And - if some router (Router1 on your scheme but Router2 from your description) have WAN interface, does NAT is enabled on that interface?
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:56
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1383265%2fnetworking-between-subnets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1383265%2fnetworking-between-subnets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Generally routers have an address for each interface (one for LAN, another for WAN, etc.) Could you update the router information with addresses and /netmasks for all interfaces?
– grawity
Dec 13 at 11:32
Router 1 is connected to the WAN port of Router 2 and in the same time Router 1 <-> WAN to LAN <-> Router 2 - i.e. backward. Draw scheme like:
(PC - LAN=192.168.1.228) - (LAN=192.168.1.1 - Router 1 - WAN_IP) - (LAN=137.226.189.1 - Router 2 - LAN=137.226.189.1) - ( LAN=137.226.189.42 - PC2).– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:54
Only a connection from 192.168.1.228 (PC1) to 137.226.189.42 (PC2) and back is needed This means that both PC1 may connect to PC2 and PC2 to PC1, or you mean only PC1 calls PC2 and PC2 answers to PC1? And - if some router (Router1 on your scheme but Router2 from your description) have WAN interface, does NAT is enabled on that interface?
– Akina
Dec 13 at 12:56