Is there an equal sign with wider gap?
I am trying to make a large unary operator from an equal sign =
, namely, mathlarger{boldsymbol{=}}
, but the bars are too close together to distinguish from the general binary case. Is there some package with =
having a wider gap that I can use?
symbols
add a comment |
I am trying to make a large unary operator from an equal sign =
, namely, mathlarger{boldsymbol{=}}
, but the bars are too close together to distinguish from the general binary case. Is there some package with =
having a wider gap that I can use?
symbols
I go with @campa 's answer because it seems most simple
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:20
3
I'm not sure what unary equality is supposed to denote but, if you're having trouble distinguishing your symbol for it from ordinary equality, that suggests you might want to look at a completely different symbol.
– David Richerby
Mar 12 at 11:49
@DavidRicherby thanks for the suggestion, I use unary equal to refer to the set that is the isovalue contour of point p, so it can be intuitive.
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:41
add a comment |
I am trying to make a large unary operator from an equal sign =
, namely, mathlarger{boldsymbol{=}}
, but the bars are too close together to distinguish from the general binary case. Is there some package with =
having a wider gap that I can use?
symbols
I am trying to make a large unary operator from an equal sign =
, namely, mathlarger{boldsymbol{=}}
, but the bars are too close together to distinguish from the general binary case. Is there some package with =
having a wider gap that I can use?
symbols
symbols
asked Mar 12 at 9:03
updraftupdraft
455
455
I go with @campa 's answer because it seems most simple
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:20
3
I'm not sure what unary equality is supposed to denote but, if you're having trouble distinguishing your symbol for it from ordinary equality, that suggests you might want to look at a completely different symbol.
– David Richerby
Mar 12 at 11:49
@DavidRicherby thanks for the suggestion, I use unary equal to refer to the set that is the isovalue contour of point p, so it can be intuitive.
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:41
add a comment |
I go with @campa 's answer because it seems most simple
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:20
3
I'm not sure what unary equality is supposed to denote but, if you're having trouble distinguishing your symbol for it from ordinary equality, that suggests you might want to look at a completely different symbol.
– David Richerby
Mar 12 at 11:49
@DavidRicherby thanks for the suggestion, I use unary equal to refer to the set that is the isovalue contour of point p, so it can be intuitive.
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:41
I go with @campa 's answer because it seems most simple
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:20
I go with @campa 's answer because it seems most simple
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:20
3
3
I'm not sure what unary equality is supposed to denote but, if you're having trouble distinguishing your symbol for it from ordinary equality, that suggests you might want to look at a completely different symbol.
– David Richerby
Mar 12 at 11:49
I'm not sure what unary equality is supposed to denote but, if you're having trouble distinguishing your symbol for it from ordinary equality, that suggests you might want to look at a completely different symbol.
– David Richerby
Mar 12 at 11:49
@DavidRicherby thanks for the suggestion, I use unary equal to refer to the set that is the isovalue contour of point p, so it can be intuitive.
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:41
@DavidRicherby thanks for the suggestion, I use unary equal to refer to the set that is the isovalue contour of point p, so it can be intuitive.
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:41
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Here's a proposal:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{uneq}{}
{
mathbin{mathpaletteupdraft_uneq:nn {}}
}
dim_new:N l__updraft_width_dim
dim_new:N l__updraft_height_dim
cs_new_protected:Nn updraft_uneq:nn
{
vcenter
{
mathsurround=0pt
hbox:n
{
% measure the width of the equals sign in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1{=}$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_width_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% measure the width of 1mu in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1mkern1mu$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_height_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% start drawing
driver_draw_begin:
% round caps on lines
driver_draw_cap_round:
% set the line width (change 1.2 to your liking)
driver_draw_linewidth:n { 1.2l__updraft_height_dim }
% 1. cm fonts use width/10 of side bearings
% 2. the gap between lines is 5 times the line width
% bottom line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
% top line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
driver_draw_end:
% occupy the space
hspace{ l__updraft_width_dim }
}
}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$mathbin{=}A$
$uneq A$ $scriptstyleuneq A$ $scriptscriptstyleuneq A$
$A=B$
end{document}
There is no “unary operator” class, one has to use mathbin
and TeX will act according to the context. You could also decide to simply use mathord
.
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
add a comment |
The gap can be tweaked by changing the 4LMpt
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel,stackengine,bm}
newcommandbineq{mathbin{ThisStyle{ensurestackMath{vcenter{hbox{stackengine{%
4LMpt}{SavedStylebm{-}}{SavedStylebm{-}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{L}}}}}}}
begin{document}
${bm{=}} Aquadscriptstyle{bm{=}} Aquadscriptscriptstyle{bm{=}} A$ bold =
$bineq Aquadscriptstylebineq Aquadscriptscriptstylebineq A$ verb|bineq|
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479037%2fis-there-an-equal-sign-with-wider-gap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here's a proposal:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{uneq}{}
{
mathbin{mathpaletteupdraft_uneq:nn {}}
}
dim_new:N l__updraft_width_dim
dim_new:N l__updraft_height_dim
cs_new_protected:Nn updraft_uneq:nn
{
vcenter
{
mathsurround=0pt
hbox:n
{
% measure the width of the equals sign in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1{=}$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_width_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% measure the width of 1mu in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1mkern1mu$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_height_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% start drawing
driver_draw_begin:
% round caps on lines
driver_draw_cap_round:
% set the line width (change 1.2 to your liking)
driver_draw_linewidth:n { 1.2l__updraft_height_dim }
% 1. cm fonts use width/10 of side bearings
% 2. the gap between lines is 5 times the line width
% bottom line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
% top line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
driver_draw_end:
% occupy the space
hspace{ l__updraft_width_dim }
}
}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$mathbin{=}A$
$uneq A$ $scriptstyleuneq A$ $scriptscriptstyleuneq A$
$A=B$
end{document}
There is no “unary operator” class, one has to use mathbin
and TeX will act according to the context. You could also decide to simply use mathord
.
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
add a comment |
Here's a proposal:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{uneq}{}
{
mathbin{mathpaletteupdraft_uneq:nn {}}
}
dim_new:N l__updraft_width_dim
dim_new:N l__updraft_height_dim
cs_new_protected:Nn updraft_uneq:nn
{
vcenter
{
mathsurround=0pt
hbox:n
{
% measure the width of the equals sign in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1{=}$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_width_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% measure the width of 1mu in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1mkern1mu$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_height_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% start drawing
driver_draw_begin:
% round caps on lines
driver_draw_cap_round:
% set the line width (change 1.2 to your liking)
driver_draw_linewidth:n { 1.2l__updraft_height_dim }
% 1. cm fonts use width/10 of side bearings
% 2. the gap between lines is 5 times the line width
% bottom line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
% top line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
driver_draw_end:
% occupy the space
hspace{ l__updraft_width_dim }
}
}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$mathbin{=}A$
$uneq A$ $scriptstyleuneq A$ $scriptscriptstyleuneq A$
$A=B$
end{document}
There is no “unary operator” class, one has to use mathbin
and TeX will act according to the context. You could also decide to simply use mathord
.
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
add a comment |
Here's a proposal:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{uneq}{}
{
mathbin{mathpaletteupdraft_uneq:nn {}}
}
dim_new:N l__updraft_width_dim
dim_new:N l__updraft_height_dim
cs_new_protected:Nn updraft_uneq:nn
{
vcenter
{
mathsurround=0pt
hbox:n
{
% measure the width of the equals sign in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1{=}$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_width_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% measure the width of 1mu in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1mkern1mu$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_height_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% start drawing
driver_draw_begin:
% round caps on lines
driver_draw_cap_round:
% set the line width (change 1.2 to your liking)
driver_draw_linewidth:n { 1.2l__updraft_height_dim }
% 1. cm fonts use width/10 of side bearings
% 2. the gap between lines is 5 times the line width
% bottom line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
% top line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
driver_draw_end:
% occupy the space
hspace{ l__updraft_width_dim }
}
}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$mathbin{=}A$
$uneq A$ $scriptstyleuneq A$ $scriptscriptstyleuneq A$
$A=B$
end{document}
There is no “unary operator” class, one has to use mathbin
and TeX will act according to the context. You could also decide to simply use mathord
.
Here's a proposal:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{uneq}{}
{
mathbin{mathpaletteupdraft_uneq:nn {}}
}
dim_new:N l__updraft_width_dim
dim_new:N l__updraft_height_dim
cs_new_protected:Nn updraft_uneq:nn
{
vcenter
{
mathsurround=0pt
hbox:n
{
% measure the width of the equals sign in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1{=}$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_width_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% measure the width of 1mu in the current style
hbox_set:Nn l_tmpa_box {$#1mkern1mu$}
dim_set:Nn l__updraft_height_dim { box_wd:N l_tmpa_box }
% start drawing
driver_draw_begin:
% round caps on lines
driver_draw_cap_round:
% set the line width (change 1.2 to your liking)
driver_draw_linewidth:n { 1.2l__updraft_height_dim }
% 1. cm fonts use width/10 of side bearings
% 2. the gap between lines is 5 times the line width
% bottom line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ -2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
% top line
driver_draw_moveto:nn
{ 0.1 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_lineto:nn
{ 0.9 l__updraft_width_dim }
{ 2.5 l__updraft_height_dim }
driver_draw_stroke:
driver_draw_end:
% occupy the space
hspace{ l__updraft_width_dim }
}
}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$mathbin{=}A$
$uneq A$ $scriptstyleuneq A$ $scriptscriptstyleuneq A$
$A=B$
end{document}
There is no “unary operator” class, one has to use mathbin
and TeX will act according to the context. You could also decide to simply use mathord
.
edited Mar 12 at 12:04
answered Mar 12 at 10:33
egregegreg
734k8919333257
734k8919333257
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
add a comment |
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
thank you:), your proposal is a little hard I don't quite understand, haha
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:02
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
@updraft I added some comments
– egreg
Mar 12 at 12:04
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
your method is actually very thorough and illuminating I go with yours instead!
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:37
add a comment |
The gap can be tweaked by changing the 4LMpt
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel,stackengine,bm}
newcommandbineq{mathbin{ThisStyle{ensurestackMath{vcenter{hbox{stackengine{%
4LMpt}{SavedStylebm{-}}{SavedStylebm{-}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{L}}}}}}}
begin{document}
${bm{=}} Aquadscriptstyle{bm{=}} Aquadscriptscriptstyle{bm{=}} A$ bold =
$bineq Aquadscriptstylebineq Aquadscriptscriptstylebineq A$ verb|bineq|
end{document}
add a comment |
The gap can be tweaked by changing the 4LMpt
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel,stackengine,bm}
newcommandbineq{mathbin{ThisStyle{ensurestackMath{vcenter{hbox{stackengine{%
4LMpt}{SavedStylebm{-}}{SavedStylebm{-}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{L}}}}}}}
begin{document}
${bm{=}} Aquadscriptstyle{bm{=}} Aquadscriptscriptstyle{bm{=}} A$ bold =
$bineq Aquadscriptstylebineq Aquadscriptscriptstylebineq A$ verb|bineq|
end{document}
add a comment |
The gap can be tweaked by changing the 4LMpt
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel,stackengine,bm}
newcommandbineq{mathbin{ThisStyle{ensurestackMath{vcenter{hbox{stackengine{%
4LMpt}{SavedStylebm{-}}{SavedStylebm{-}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{L}}}}}}}
begin{document}
${bm{=}} Aquadscriptstyle{bm{=}} Aquadscriptscriptstyle{bm{=}} A$ bold =
$bineq Aquadscriptstylebineq Aquadscriptscriptstylebineq A$ verb|bineq|
end{document}
The gap can be tweaked by changing the 4LMpt
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel,stackengine,bm}
newcommandbineq{mathbin{ThisStyle{ensurestackMath{vcenter{hbox{stackengine{%
4LMpt}{SavedStylebm{-}}{SavedStylebm{-}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{L}}}}}}}
begin{document}
${bm{=}} Aquadscriptstyle{bm{=}} Aquadscriptscriptstyle{bm{=}} A$ bold =
$bineq Aquadscriptstylebineq Aquadscriptscriptstylebineq A$ verb|bineq|
end{document}
answered Mar 12 at 11:08
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
162k9206418
162k9206418
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479037%2fis-there-an-equal-sign-with-wider-gap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I go with @campa 's answer because it seems most simple
– updraft
Mar 12 at 11:20
3
I'm not sure what unary equality is supposed to denote but, if you're having trouble distinguishing your symbol for it from ordinary equality, that suggests you might want to look at a completely different symbol.
– David Richerby
Mar 12 at 11:49
@DavidRicherby thanks for the suggestion, I use unary equal to refer to the set that is the isovalue contour of point p, so it can be intuitive.
– updraft
Mar 13 at 6:41